You are on page 1of 35

懶人包 Short briefing

中文版請按我

Please press this to English version


台灣的月世界家族有兩位成員:龍崎哥和馬頭弟

龍崎哥住在台南龍崎,
跟名字一樣。

龍崎哥!

馬頭弟住在龍崎哥附近,
不過不住馬頭,住在高雄內門、
旗山、田寮的…………
……………………………… 馬頭弟!
相片來源:反馬頭山事業廢棄物掩埋場自救會
交界處。
剛進入 21 世紀不久,龍崎哥不幸地被選為事業廢棄物掩

埋場場址, 2003 年即通過環評,現在距離開發只有一步

之遙,只要台南市政府核發整個計畫範圍的「水土保持

施工許可」,龍崎哥就要說掰掰……

附近的馬頭弟在多年前也遭遇同樣命運,被選為事業廢

棄物掩埋場場址。馬頭弟的計畫目前正要進入第二階段

環評……
這兩個地方適合當掩埋場嗎?
台南龍崎到高雄馬頭山一帶有多處活動和非活動斷層

通過,地質非常不穩定。

2016 年 2 月美濃大地震,龍崎掩埋場場址正是

地表變形最劇烈的地方。中央地調所調查報告指出,

這裡的泥岩特性會加劇地表變形程度。
樑柱因地層活動而變形
而且經台南社大長期觀察,龍崎一帶有食蟹獴、

白鼻心、穿山甲、大冠鷲、大彎嘴畫眉等動物穿梭,

生物多樣性十分 豐富!

馬頭山中,有大量台灣特有種陸蟹─厚圓澤蟹穿梭

在原始刺竹林裡。
食蟹獴 穿山甲

灰腳秧雞與小雞

相片由台南社大
大冠鷲 提供 白鼻心
生物多樣性 + 不穩定地質,

想必大家心中已有答案這裡

適不適合設置掩埋場 ...
您可能還想問,

「既然廢棄物不該在這裡,

那該去哪裡?」
其實這個大哉問隱含著兩個問題:

問題 1 :地點的選擇

問題 2 :我們還需要掩埋場嗎?
首先回答第 2 個問題:我們還需要掩埋場嗎?

掩埋場問題在哪裡???

1. 有不透水布就沒有污染風險?

地層活動、因填埋作業長期受力不均,都很可能造

成不透水布破裂。掩埋場選址時考量斷層帶、地質

不透水性理由在此。
我們還需要掩埋場嗎?

掩埋場問題在哪裡???(續)

2. 污水處理設施是萬能?

極端氣候越來越頻繁,強度也越強。一場暴雨滲出的

污水量可能超過污水處理廠的容量,此時溢流的滲出

水將污染下游。
那掩埋場替代方案是什麼?

掩埋場是線性經濟思維下的垃圾處理模式,其設計並

不是供未來技術和市場成熟時再利用的!

以循環經濟為前提,面對現在無法再利用的廢棄物,

要設置的是「暫存」設施,且為「室內」、「密閉」

空間,以應對極端氣候和天災造成的風險。
示意圖

處理後的事業廢棄物應在室內空間妥適存放,供未來再利用。圖為示意圖,非符
合此目的之既有設施。
相片來源: Hazardous waste temporary storage facility of Setcar S.A. Corp.
掩埋場 VS. 室內暫存設施
露天掩埋場 室內暫存設施
暴雨後滲出的污水量可

能超過污水處理設施的 勝
極端氣候 風險低
容量,溢流的滲出水將

污染下游。

不透水布長期使用有破 勝
土壤污染 裂風險
風險低

往後再利用耗費大量人
再利用效率 物力挖除、分類。
人物力效率高 勝
我們再回到第 1 個問題:地點的選擇

除了開發自然資源沒有替代方案?

台灣現在有許多高污染場址、高污染潛勢區和廢棄

物非法棄置場址,這些場址後續的用途應經過社會

謹慎的討論,作為事業廢棄物「暫存」場址也可以

是選項之一,政府不應未經周全的社會溝通就貿然

開發自然資源!
所以,來連署吧!

連署連結:反對新設掩埋場!
Two members of Moon World family in Taiwan: Longchi and Matou

Brother Longchi lives in Longchi


district, Tainan.

Brother Longchi !

Brother Matou just lives next to


Longchi, on the conjunction of
Neimen, Qishan andTainliao
districts, Kaohsiung.
Brother Matou !
Photo credit : Anti Industrial Waste Landfill
Matou mountain Self-help Association
Unfortunately, Brother Longchi had been selected as industrial

waste landfill site just at the beginning of 21st century.

Environmental Impact Assessment was passed in 2003. At the

moment, she is just a step away from being excavated. As long as

Tainan City government hands out soil and water conservation

work permit, Brother Longchi will say goodbye…...

Not far away, Brother Matou faces the same tragedy, being

selected as industrial waste landfill site. The project is now held

for second phase environmental impact assessment.…..


Are the two places suitable for landfill ?
There are several active fault lines lying around or

passing through Longchi and Matou mountain area.

The geological structure here is Unstable.

Longchi landfill site was just the area where landscape

deformed the most severe. Central Geology Survey

concluded in the report that mudstone structure here

would exacerbate deformity.


The column had been deformed due to
geological activities.
According to investigation by Tainan Community

University, Longchi area is home to many kinds of

creatures.

Climbing through the thorny bamboo are one of

Taiwan endemic species--Yuen Chak thick crabs.


Crab-eating mongoose Pangolin

Slaty-legged
crakes.

Photo credit:
Tainan
Community
University
Crested serpent-eagle Masked palm civet
Biodiversity
and
unstable geological structure,
It's very clear whether the two
places are suitable for landfill...
You may also want to ask:
"Where waste should go since it
doesn’t belong here?"
In fact, the big question implies two
aspects of problems:
problem 1: Choice of locations
Problem 2: Are landfills necessary?
problem 2: Are landfills necessary?
What are the problems of landfills?

1. impermeable plastic liners = no risk ?

Impermeable plastic liners are likely to fracture

due to geological activities and uneven pressure

in the long run.


problem 2: Are landfills necessary?
What are the problems of landfills?

2. sewage systems are impeccable ?

With increased frequency and intensity of

extreme weather, chances are volume of waste

water would exceed the sewage system's capacity

and contaminate environment.


What is the alternative to landfill?

Landfill is a waste management system under linear

economy. It is not designed to re-utilize the waste in the

future when the market and technology are both mature.

Under circular economy, in face of non-reutilizable waste,

temporary, indoor and enclosed facilities are what we really

need in order to adapt to extreme weather, not landfills.


For reference only

Disposed waste should be stored in indoor facilities properly for re-utilization in


the future. The photo is not the existing one.
Photo credit : Hazardous waste temporary storage facility of Setcar S.A. Corp.
Alternative to landfill : indoor temporary storage facility

landfill Indoor temporary


storage facility

Volume of waste water

would exceed the sewage win


Extreme weather Low risk
system's capacity and

contaminate environment.

Risk of impermeable
win
Soil contamination fabrics fracturing in Low risk
the long run

Entail lots of win


Reutilization
resources to excavate High efficiency
efficiency
and segregate
Let’s go back to problem 1: Choice of location

There is no other option other than sacrificing natural resources?

Actually, there are still many pollured sites waited for restoration

in Taiwan. How to reuse the lands need to be discussed thoroughly.

Being temporary waste storage space may be one of the options.

The government shouldn’t destroy natural resources arbitrarily

without thorough communication with society.


Come petitioning !
Petition link : petition to oppose building landfills anymore!

You might also like