Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Instructor’s Name
THE EDWARD SNOWDEN CASE 2
The Official Secrets Act was initiated in the United Kingdom in 1889 to establish
recourse for a violation thereof was adopted (Feur, 2015). The Espionage1 Act of 1917
was designed to protect the United States (US) government from spies and individuals
criminalizing these acts in order to protect national security. The salient and common
individuals from dissidence and potentially dangerous acts of disloyalty. Individuals who
violate the Espionage Act may be incarcerated for a period up to ten years for each
count. This particular act has been brought to the forefront of political controversy and
criminal justice by virtue of the fact that spies and traitors are subject to the same
information with full knowledge that the surveillance was authorized by all three
1The term espionage refers to acts in which information is obtained from a foreign
government by means of spying.
THE EDWARD SNOWDEN CASE 3
Snowden’s supporters assert that these leaks are in alignment with the First
Amendment rights whereby freedom of speech and the press are guaranteed.
“Although the government is granted broad power to keep secrets, the press is given
similar latitude to reveal them” (Feur, 2015, p. 95). As such, a portion of the population
does purport that the leaking of confidential government secrets provides a system of
checks and balances that, by virtue of the transparency afforded by the leaks, ascribe
trend (Sagar, 2015). In fact, this trend is deeply rooted in history given the fact that
and ships were often intercepted and subject to searches as bags were opened without
authorization and the government embargoed2 ships. By 1653, the English had
implemented a system whereby ‘spymasters’ operated from a secret office to open and
review letters that appeared suspicious. This system served as the first official form of
surveillance that targeted communications. “It was only in the early twentieth century –
when technology shrank distance and foreign entanglements grew – that the need for
The ‘Black Chamber’ was initiated after World War I to initiate communications
surveillance of diplomatic affairs, and ten years later, the Signals Intelligence Service
was adopted prior to World War II. Today, the National Security Agency (NSA) serves
2In this context, the term embargo refers to a government order that prevents commercial
ships from leaving the port of departure.
THE EDWARD SNOWDEN CASE 4
enhancements in the speed of information transfer, data storage, and the ability to
subject to evasive means by which terrorists communicate. For example, Bin Laden
and monitoring to mitigate the threat of terrorism (Sagar, 2015). Despite the potential
for increased security, opponents express concerns regarding the impact of such
civilians are compliant as a product of fear that results from an acute awareness of the
extremist groups are certainly more likely to be monitored closely. “Why must a liberal
Ethical Issues
Agency (NSA) documents due to ethical concerns regarding the NSAs surveillance of
Snowden and those who support his actions, US citizens had a right to know that their
related to spying on the Islamic State group (ISIS) and other adversaries such as China
foreign intelligence-gathering activities that help protect the nation from subversion or
attack is far less certain” (Stein, 2016, p. 18). While Snowden perceived that he was
merely obliging his duty to share pertinent information as per his Constitutional rights,
classified information.
Government officials assert that it stands to reason that authorities are at liberty
to obtain and collect data regarding telephone and email correspondence in order to
protect citizens from the threat of terrorism assuming that safeguards are in place to
protect the privacy of the innocent (No Sympathy, 2013). As such, the ethical
Scholars have contended that most effective method by which this issue may be
personal interests (Sagar, 2015). The threat of terrorism and the subsequent effects of
this violence against humanity underscores the critical need to monitor perceived
threats for the beneficence of civilians. Many officials have asserted that national
clearly weighed the ramifications of his disclosures in light of the shared interests of US
citizens. In doing so, Snowden concluded that the acts of surveillance were more
offensive than the threats to national security. In essence, one man chose to act as the
collective conscience of the US despite the potential impacts on the lives of civilians.
THE EDWARD SNOWDEN CASE 6
in privacy and protection as a result of the Snowden case (Preibusch, 2015). The
researcher found that individuals did not significantly alter their technology behaviors
despite the fact that public awareness was raised in regard to communications
surveillance with one exception. “Snowden’s revelations brought few new users to
through 2013” (Preibusch, 2015, p. 55). As such, individual reactions to the Snowden
case were largely framed by dialogue, as opposed to actions, regarding ethics and
politics.
Despite the lack of action on the part of individuals, President Barack Obama has
commissioned five security and policy experts with the task of analyzing the surveillance
the collection of telephone records, as covered in Sections 702 and 215, respectively
(Childress, 2015). While most of the efforts have not materialized into actions to the
current date, President Obama has effectively provided safeguards requiring that data
collected from US and non-US citizens must be deleted after five years of collection if
working towards actualizing the goal of balancing the right to privacy with the interest of
national security.
THE EDWARD SNOWDEN CASE 7
References
Childress, S. (2015, February 9). How the NSA Spying Programs Have Changed Since
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/article/how-the-nsa-spying-programs-have-
changed-since-snowden/
Feur, K. (2015). Protecting government secrets: A comparison of the Espionage Act and
the Official Secrets Act. Boston College International & Comparative Law
145-159. doi:10.1017/S0892679415000040
Stein, J. (2016). No country for Edward Snowden. Newsweek Global, 167(14), 18-19.