Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Please be aware that there will be specialized settings, practice arenas, regulations, etc.
that may require other types or components of documentation that are not addressed in this
resource. Please check payer, state law, and specific accreditation organization (i.e.,
Joint Commission, CARF, etc) requirements for compliance.
Medicare and many third party payers have established minimal standards for
documentation. Medicare’s minimal documentation standards vary between practice
settings and benefit. Many state practice acts define what is expected of its licensees in
clinical documentation. For the clinician, it can be challenging to determine which
standards might apply to their situation. There are several resources for the clinician:
Medicare’s internet only manual system for setting specific and Part A vs Part B
guidelines (http://www.cms.hhs.gov/Manuals/IOM/list.asp)
Medicare Administrative Contractor’s Local Coverage Decisions
(http://www.cms.hhs.gov/mcd/search.asp?from2=search.asp&)
Payer specific websites (e.g. Aetna, Blue Cross-Blue Shield, Cahaba, Noridian,
Palmetto, Trailblazer, United Health, as well as others)
State practice acts
APTA Guidelines for physical Therapy Documentation
Employer policies
It is the therapist’s responsibility to be aware of any payer-specific, setting specific,
employer/organization specific, and/or state specific documentation requirements.
1
Why is Documentation Important?
While safety and quality of care is most important when working with patients and
clients, documentation throughout the episode of care is a professional responsibility and a
legal requirement. It is also a tool to help ensure safety and the provision of high-quality
care and to support payment of services. If you ask PTs or PTAs what they like least about
their clinical practice, you are likely to hear “paperwork” or “documentation” as a frequent
answer. Many therapists feel it is difficult to document effectively while providing
patient/client care. In addition, documentation time may not be included as reportable time
thus significantly impacting therapists’ productivity standards. As a result, therapists often
view documentation as an onerous, irrelevant, and unwarranted adjunct to patient/client
care. However, appropriate documentation of physical therapy services is crucial because
it:
2) Tells others about our abilities, our unique body of knowledge, and the services we
provide as PTs and PTAs.
3) May be used to demonstrate compliance with federal, state, payer, and local
regulations.
2
Current Concerns in Physical Therapy
Documentation
Physical therapists and physical therapist assistants should not underestimate the
importance of complete documentation or the implications of deficient documentation.
Today’s health care system relies on documentation to measure patient outcomes, the need
for services, and justification of the plan of care. Insufficient or absent documentation can
negatively affect reimbursement, communication among providers, risk management, and
most important, the care of the patient/client. This section will highlight some of the
current issues affecting physical therapy services, all with important documentation
implications.
RAC’s:
The Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (MMA)
directed the Secretary of the HHS to implement a demonstration project using Recovery
Audit Contractors (RACs) under the Medicare Integrity Program (Section 306). The goals
of the project were to identify underpayments and overpayments made to providers and to
recoup those moneys for the Part A and Part B programs. The demonstration project was
launched during 2005 to 2008 in the states of California, Florida and New York since those
states were identified as having the largest Medicare expenditures. However in 2007 it was
expanded to Massachusetts, South Carolina and Arizona. RACs look for incorrect payment
amounts, non-covered services that were paid for in error, incorrectly coded services, and
duplicate services that were paid for. RACs are paid a contingency for each underpayment
and overpayment they find.
During fiscal year 2007, RACs found $371 million of improper Medicare payments. Most
of these related to lack of medical necessity & incorrect coding. Section 302 of the Tax
relief and health Care Act of 2006 made the RAC program permanent and required the
Secretary of HHS to expand the program to all 50 states by the year 2010. More
information can be obtained at www.cms.hhs.gov/RAC/
CERT Program:
As part of its Improper Payments Information Act (IPIA) compliance efforts, the
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has established the Comprehensive
Error Rate Testing (CERT) program and Hospital Payment Monitoring Program (HPMP)
to randomly sample and review claims submitted to Medicare. The main objective of these
programs is to determine the degree to which CMS and its contractors are meeting the goal
of “Paying it Right,” meaning paying the right amount to the right provider for covered and
correctly coded services. The HPMP monitors Prospective Payment System (PPS) short-
term acute-care inpatient hospital admissions; the CERT program monitors all other claims.
3
The most recent reports are available on CMS’s Web site.
In a report released in November 2007, CMS summarizes error rates from randomly
sampled claims submitted in a 12-month period ending March 31, 2007, by the following
categories: no documentation errors; insufficient documentation errors; medically
unnecessary service errors; incorrect coding errors; and other errors. This report shows a
high error rate for certain services provided by physical therapists and indicates that the
error rate for physical therapy services is primarily due to problems with documentation.
1. Insufficient Documentation:
In the CERT report, therapeutic exercise (CPT code 97110) was included in the list
of the top 20 services with insufficient documentation. The paid claims error rate
for 97110 was 5.3%, and the projected improper payments for this service were
$33,972,936. Manual therapy (97140) also appeared in the most recent report; with
a paid claims error rate of 7.8% and projected improper payments in the amount of
$16,571,551.
Physical therapy was not included in the top 20 list of medically unnecessary
services.
3. Incorrect Coding:
Physical therapists in private practice (PTPP) had a paid claims error rate of 6.2%
and a projected improper payment amount of $63,633,089.
While details of the report cause great concern regarding physical therapy
documentation, there is agreement among all stakeholders that some Medicare and
Medicaid documentation and coding standards are cumbersome and at times inconsistent.
To guide clinicians to improved documentation, Medicare, with input from APTA,
developed minimal documentation guidelines for outpatient physical therapy services for
4
payment purposes. These minimal standards are available in the Medicare Benefit Policy
Manual (100-2), Chapter 15, Sections 220 and 230
As the science and technology of rehabilitation and other clinical fields progress at
an ever increasing rate, health care providers must continue to seek out and integrate the
latest evidence. This new information can come in the form of new theories of disease
pathology, better tests and measures, new equipment, or more effective and efficient
interventions.
Third-party payers, other health care providers, and consumers expect the physical
therapist to use evidence in patient/client management. In fact, therapists may be surprised
to learn that many third-party payers have research divisions or contract with private
companies to perform research reviews. These reviews are then correlated into clinical
guidelines or approved protocols for patient/client care. Likewise, many other government
and private agencies are pooling research and expert opinion to establish “best practice”
principals or other performance criteria. Because of these expectations, the content of the
physical therapy documentation becomes increasingly important.
Physical therapy documentation should reflect the thought process and decision
making of the physical therapist. As such, documentation of patient/client care needs to be
more than a litany of patient/client procedures related to a date of service. Physical therapy
documentation must include evidence of our unique body of knowledge and skill. It also
should provide verification of our professional judgment. This concept of clinical decision
making can be incorporated into clinical documentation.
Due to the limited resources in today’s health care environment, physical therapists
need to promote our unique role in improving patients’/clients’ function, independence, and
quality of life. We need to demonstrate through evidence-based practice and patient/client
outcomes measurement the importance of physical therapy services to all stakeholders
(patients/clients, families/caregivers, payers, regulators and other providers). Appropriate
5
documentation that focuses on patient/client function can better demonstrate patient/client
outcome and can facilitate this appropriate recognition of physical therapy services.
A few years ago, the American Physical Therapy Association (APTA) determined a
need to collect outcomes data to answer questions about the effectiveness of physical
therapist services. As a result, APTA CONNECT was developed in partnership with
Cedaron Medical of Davis, California. APTA CONNECT is an electronic patient record
system designed for physical therapy and built upon a database system. Hence, all
patient/client data can be displayed and analyzed to assist in clinical decision making and
for outcomes assessment. In addition, selected data from all users of APTA CONNECT
will be de-identified and aggregated to establish a national outcomes database for physical
therapy, providing a rich source of information for use in research and advocacy of
physical therapy services. For more information about APTA’s national outcomes database
and APTA CONNECT, click here.
Background:
6
homes that meet certain conditions for providing high quality care. The demonstration will
be open to free-standing and hospital-based facilities and will include beneficiaries who are
on a Part A stay as well as those with Part B coverage only. CMS intends to conduct the
demonstration in up to five states.
Basic Approach:
Each year of the demonstration, CMS will assess each participating nursing home’s
quality performance based on four domains: staffing, appropriate hospitalizations, MDS
outcomes, and survey deficiencies. CMS will award points to each nursing home based on
how they perform on the measures within each of the domains. These points will be
summed to produce an overall quality score. For each State, nursing homes with scores in
the top 20 percent and homes that are in the top 20 percent in terms of improvement in their
scores will be eligible for a share of that State’s savings pool.
Financing:
A separate savings pool will be estimated for each state in the demonstration.
Nursing homes that volunteer to participate in the demonstration will be stratified and
randomly assigned to experimental and control groups. After each year, CMS will compare
total risk-adjusted Medicare expenditures between the experimental and control groups in
each state. The actual savings pool for each state will be determined based on the
difference in the growth of risk-adjusted Medicare expenditures between the two groups.
Status:
7
What follows is a description of the main documentation elements of patient/client
management: 1) initial examination/evaluation, 2) visit/encounter, 3) reexamination, and 4)
discharge or discontinuation summary.
I. INITIAL EXAMINATION/EVALUATION
A. Examination
The examination component of the patient/client record documents pertinent findings from
the patient’s/client’s history and the systems review along with findings from various test
and measures. It is the findings from these three sections that the physical therapists will
use to evaluate the patient/client and determine the diagnosis, prognosis, and plan of care,
including goals, selected interventions, and discharge planning. Each section of the
examination is described in further detail below:
1. History
8
care, school, and other community activities including play, leisure/recreation, and
socialization.
For patients in a skilled nursing facility, a patient’s history may be gathered from the
hospital discharge summary, current and past facility assessments, previous Minimum
Data Sets (MDS) if applicable, and the nursing/consults section of the patient’s medical
record. Also, the physical therapist should review documentation of the patient’s
previous functional maintenance program or restorative nursing program if applicable
as this will alert the therapist to an understanding of the patient’s prior level of function.
It is critical for the therapist, through comprehensive record review and
patient/caregiver interview, to obtain an accurate social history and anticipated
discharge disposition, including current and potential support structure available upon
discharge. This information is needed for appropriate goal setting and discharge
planning to any setting, including long term placement.
It is important for all providers to provide a complete and thorough history that
highlights pertinent information relevant to the patient’s/client’s or family’s/caregiver’s
reason for seeking physical therapy services. The history should clearly identify the
patient/client and family/caregiver concerns. A patient’s/client’s medical and/or social
history provides essential details used in the physical therapist’s evaluation and
determination of prognosis, goals, and the plan of care. For example, a patient/client
with a wound who also has a history of diabetes may require increased intensity,
frequency, and duration of services. Likewise, a patient/client with a history of a
traumatic brain injury may require increased duration of services due to cognitive
deficits or loss of short term memory. Similarly, physical therapy management of a
pediatric patient/client with cerebral palsy who is living in the foster care system may
require coordination of services across multiple agencies and providers. The impact
that these histories have on the current problem should be identified and clearly
explained in the evaluation and the plan of care.
2. Systems Review
9
include consideration of the child’s safety and well-being, nutrition, behavior/attention,
and self determination.
Because patients/clients are able to access the services of a physical therapist without a
referral in many states, it is important to include a comprehensive systems review to
assist the physical therapist in identifying potential conditions that would require
consultation with or referral to another provider. The APTA Guide to Professional
Conduct states that if findings are outside of the scope of the physical therapist’s
knowledge, experience, or expertise, the physical therapist shall refer to an appropriate
practitioner.
While the systems review is a very important element of the initial examination, this
can be completed in a relatively short period of time by experienced clinicians. In many
cases, it may be the physical therapist who first recognizes a problem that requires
further examination by another clinician. In addition, some patients/clients may not
have seen a primary care physician recently. Failure to perform a complete systems
review can put your patients/clients and you at risk.
Consider the following three examples:
Case 1: A 38-year-old male with a complaint of knee pain presents to your clinic for
an initial evaluation. As part of your initial examination/evaluation you record his
blood pressure at 160/ 98. After a discussion with the patient/client, you call his
family medicine physician regarding these findings concerned that the patient/client
may have undiagnosed high blood pressure. The patient/client returns a week later,
on a new medication to lower his blood pressure.
Case 2: A 47-year-old female with a recent left ankle sprain presents for an initial
evaluation. In addition to weakness in her left ankle, you note weakness throughout
her left side when compared with the right side. This finding along with others from
the patient/client history and examination may lead you to contact another provider
in consideration of a more systemic cause of her symptoms.
Case 3: A 3-month old infant with past medical history of prematurity is referred to
physical therapy with a diagnosis of torticollis. As part of your systems review, you
note that the infant is unable to visually fix or track an adult face or a toy. You
discuss a referral back to the child’s pediatrician or ophthalmologist.
Case 4: An 85 year old male status post left hip replacement with prior level of function
listed as independent presents for an initial examination. In performing a systems review,
the patient presents with moderately impaired cognition that significantly varies from the
patient’s current and prior level of function as documented in the nursing portion of the
assessment. The therapist alerts the nurse and refers the patient to the patient’s primary
care physician for reassessment prior to initiating treatment.
Case 5: A 72 year old female with past medical history of hypertension, anemia, GI bleed,
wrist fracture, and degenerative joint disease (DJD) is referred for gait training, pain
10
management and strengthening status post thoracic compression fracture. During chart
review the therapist notes the patient has been prescribed an anti-hypertensive medication,
a SERM (selective estrogen receptor modulator), and a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory
(NSAID). After patient interview and initial review of systems, the therapist asks to see the
patient’s medications. The patient reports the previously known meds, but also states she is
taking an antidepressant and aspirin daily. Due to the fact the patient has a history of GI
bleed and anemia, you question her regimen of aspirin and NSAID, and call her primary
physician to insure he is aware the patient is taking both. He is not aware, and gives you a
verbal order to discontinue the aspirin. You advise the patient of the verbal order,
document the order, document the consultation with the physician, and communicate the
exchange to a nurse manager.
From the information gathered in the history and systems review, the physical therapist
determines a hypothesis for a diagnosis. The physical therapist then determines which
tests and measures are required to further prove (or disprove) the hypothesized
diagnosis or diagnoses. In the documentation of tests and measures, a physical therapist
should clearly identify the specific tests and measures and any associated finding or
outcome. There is no specific recommendation for how tests and measures are ordered
or displayed; however, the record of findings should be easy to follow. PTs may choose
to document certain systems together, they may follow a natural progression of an
evaluation by patient position (e.g., from seated to supine to prone to standing), or they
may have the patient complete simple tasks before complex activities. In pediatrics, the
physical therapist may decide to present the tests and measures related to participation
and activity (function) before the tests and measures related to body structure and
function.
In addition to more traditional tests and measures (ROM, strength, balance, edema, etc),
the physical therapist should rely on standardized tests and measures. These
standardized tests can be specific to a diagnosis (knee, low back) or a more general
measure relating to disability (OPTIMAL, SF-36) or patient satisfaction. OPTIMAL
(Outpatient Physical Therapy Improvement in Movement Assessment Log) is a patient
self-report instrument designed to assess a patient’s self-reported difficulty and
confidence level on 21 actions that describe movements. You may access the
OPTIMAL tool and related literature at the following link:
http://www.apta.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Home&CONTENTID=30366&TEM
PLATE=/CM/ContentDisplay.cfm
Patient/client satisfaction has been shown to influence the outcomes of care. The
Physical Therapy Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire has been shown to be reliable and
valid. You may access the literature on this tool at the following link:
http://www.ptjournal.org/cgi/reprint/80/9/853
11
Choosing standardized tests and measures requires careful thought and consideration,
including patient/client factors such as tolerance of testing, time involved, environment,
and the psychometrics of the test. Some will quantify pain or function, while others
measure the degree of impairment or disability. In addition, some tests are diagnostic
while others are more prognostic in their intent. Physical therapists should use tests and
measures that produce data that are accurate and precise enough to allow the therapist
to make correct assumptions about the patient/client’s condition. Appropriate use of
standardized tests and measures are valuable in determining the patient’s/client’s
progress and outcomes through the episode of care and can provide a standard measure
of comparison for clinical outcomes. In pediatric practice, outcomes are often
documented by achievement of behavioral objectives; thus, documentation of initial test
and measures should be precise to record the child’s current status on identified priority
tasks, including the conditions and criterion under which the behaviors are
demonstrated. When documenting the results of standardized tests and measures
therapists are encouraged to follow the test’s guidelines related to accurate reporting of
test scores. In addition, therapists should document any variation of the standard
protocol that was needed when administering the test as well as any qualitative findings
that are relevant to interpreting the test results.
It is also important to take into account the environment when considering tests and
measures. For example, testing related to ergonomics may be best performed in the
client’s work environment. In a pediatric practice, when appropriate, tests and
measures at the participation level should be conducted in the child’s natural
environments, at home, school, or community. Observations made during key routines
and activities such as negotiating from the bus to the classroom or negotiating
playground equipment should be documented.
APTA’s Catalog of Tests and Measures is an essential tool that describes available tests
and measures that physical therapists may use in their patient/client examinations. It
contains approximately 500 specific tests and measures used by physical therapists and
approximately 2,000 citations on reliability and validity of measurements obtained
using those tests and measures. You can access information about the Catalog of Tests
and Measures at the following link:
http://www.apta.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Guide_to_Physical_Therapist_Practic
e&template=/ECommerce/ProductDisplay.cfm&ProductID=844
As an additional reference for practice in pediatrics, the Section on Pediatrics has a list
of pediatric assessment tools available on their website at:
http://www.pediatricapta.org/pdfs/AssessScreenTools2.pdf. An additional resource is
CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability (www.canchild.ca). This site provides a
variety of resources on pediatric outcomes and assessment tools.
B. Evaluation
An evaluation is a thought process that may or may not include formal documentation.
This evaluation process is a synthesis of all of the data and findings gathered from the
12
examination and collaborative decision making with the patient/client. The evaluation
process leads to documentation of such items as impairments, activity limitations, and
participation restrictions. It should guide the physical therapist to a diagnosis and prognosis
for each patient/client. In pediatrics, consistent with family-centered care, the
documentation of the evaluation reflects a strength-based approach. An evaluation would
typically include the child’s strengths, readiness to learn a new skill, and areas of concern,
priority or need. Areas of need would include the child’s participation restrictions in the
home, school, and community, activity limitations, and body structure and function
impairments. The evaluation should also note the child and environmental characteristics
hypothesized to be facilitators or barriers to the child’s activity and participation.
The documentation of an evaluation can use formats such as a problem list or a statement
of assessment with key factors (e.g., cognitive factors, comorbidities, social support)
influencing the patient/client status. While the documentation of an evaluation may come in
different formats, the record should convey to the reader what examination factors are
relevant to the current complaint. The evaluation process should arrive at a physical
therapy diagnosis and a prognosis for a functional outcome(s) at the conclusion of physical
therapy services.
Narrative example:
Clinical Impression: Pt is a 68-year-old female with significant limitations in right
knee AROM, strength, weight bearing tolerance. Pt also limited due to pain and
edema in the right leg. Pt requires assistance for transfers, bathing, dressing,
grooming, and gait at this time. Pt was independent in all activities prior to
admission, is otherwise in good health and has good family support. Pt requires
physical therapy intervention to resume normal activity.
Pediatric Narrative Example: John is a three year old boy with significant
developmental delays. He is able to communicate to show his likes and dislikes,
walks independently, feeds himself finger foods, and manipulates toys with both
hands. John can attend to structured learning activities and remembers routines and
activities. He has a very supportive family and two playful siblings. John is ready
to learn to use his motor abilities during play activities and games with other
children. Currently John does not spontaneously initiate play with peers or siblings
and has limited verbal communication. He has difficulty with jumping and ball
skills. John requires supervision on stairs, assistance for eating with utensils,
dressing, and bathing and occasionally falls on outdoor terrain. He requires
physical therapy intervention to promote his strength, balance and motor planning,
especially considering weakness on his left side. A consistent team approach for
communication and positive behavior support is recommended.
Problem list example:
Impairments: Edema, impaired balance, impaired gait, impaired joint mobility,
impaired muscle strength, and pain
Activity Limitation: Inability to stand without minimal assistance, inability to
ambulate greater than 20' with moderate assistance, requires set-up for bathing and
minimal assistance for dressing.
Participation Restrictions: Environmental barriers and home barriers
13
C. Diagnosis
To best understand the scope of practice of the physical therapist related to diagnosis, one
must first understand the concept and use of a disablement model. The concept of
disablement refers to the “various impact(s) of chronic and acute conditions on the
functioning of specific body systems, on basic human performance, and on people’s
functioning in necessary, usual, expected, and personally desired roles in society.” (Jette
AM, 1994; Verbrugge L, 1994) Thus, the disablement model is used to delineate the
consequences of disease and injury both at the level of the person and at the level of
society. The disablement model provides the conceptual basis for all elements of
patient/client management that are provided by physical therapists. The International
Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) was developed by the World
Health Organization in 2001 and was endorsed by the APTA in 2008. The ICF, with a
focus on human functioning, provides a unified, standard language and framework that
facilitates the description of the components of functioning that are impacted by a health
condition. It enables the collection of data as to how people with a health condition
function in their daily lives rather than focusing on their diagnosis or the presence or
absence of disease. The ICF describes the situation of the individual within health and
health-related domains and within the context of environmental and personal factors.
A diagnosis is determined by the physical therapist after the examination and evaluation
process. The objective of the diagnostic process for the physical therapist is to identify
discrepancies that exist between the level of functioning that is desired by the patient/client
and the capacity of the patient/client to achieve that level. Hence, diagnoses made by the
physical therapist are typically made at the impairment, activity, and participation levels.
The diagnosis by a physical therapist should be clearly documented and can take different
formats. In most cases, physical therapists select the corresponding ICD code that reflects
the results of the examination and evaluation process. In addition, the selection of the
appropriate Preferred Physical Therapist Practice Patterns as outlined in the Guide to
Physical Therapist Practice will provide additional insight. A thorough description of the
Preferred Physical Therapist Practice Patterns is available in the Guide to Physical
Therapist Practice, but some examples include:
Impaired Joint Mobility, Motor Function, Muscle Performance, and Range of Motion
Associated With Localized Inflammation (4E)
Impaired Motor Function and Sensory Integrity Associated With Progressive Disorders
of the Central Nervous System (5E)
Impaired Aerobic Capacity/Endurance Associated With Cardiovascular Pump
Dysfunction or Failure (6D)
Impaired Integumentary Integrity Associated With Partial-Thickness Skin Involvement
and Scar Formation (7C)
14
For billing purposes, diagnoses are coded according to ICD coding. While the practice
patterns are also numbered (i.e., 4E—see example above), this numbering is not the same
as ICD coding. When coding diagnoses by ICD for reporting purposes, you may be
required to use codes that relate to the impairment for which you are treating the
patient/client. In fact, some payers have specific policies for reporting medical and
treatment diagnoses, e.g., Medicare’s Local Coverage Determinations (LCDs), so it is
important to be familiar with the specific payer policies. For example, if you have a
patient/client with a cerebral vascular accident, the medical diagnosis code may be 434.9
(artery occlusion, unspecified). But the reason that you are seeing the patient/client may be
best coded as Gait, spastic (781.2). It is best to include more information and incorporate
codes specific to function so the reviewer knows why the patient/client is receiving
therapy. It is recommended that the primary diagnosis on the claim form be the
impairment-based diagnosis. The secondary ICD code could be the medical diagnosis.
Some payers prefer as much specificity in ICD coding as possible. There are opportunities
to include two numbers after the decimal point for some diagnoses. Therefore, it is
recommended that you have a current ICD book.
To meet requirements of various pediatric practice settings, medical diagnoses may also be
noted, i.e. in Early Intervention, medical diagnosis is included secondary to medical
diagnosis being one criterion for eligibility of services under the Individuals with
Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA, 2004). In school-based practice, one of
the disability categories under IDEA is similarly reported to document eligibility of
services. In both early intervention and school-based practice, physical therapy diagnosis
may not be noted on multidisciplinary Individualized Family Service Plans (IFSPs) or
Individualized Education Programs (IEPs); however, the selection of the Preferred Physical
Therapist Practice Pattern can be noted in supplemental physical therapy documentation.
Traditionally, IFSPs and IEPs are team documents to guide early intervention and school
services under IDEA; however they may not include a physical therapy diagnosis but only
a medical diagnosis.
Note 1: Certain state practice acts contain specific regulations regarding physical therapy
diagnosis. The following link will direct you to information about your state practice act:
http://www.apta.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Practice_Management1&Template=/Tagg
edPage/TaggedPageDisplay.cfm&TPLID=201&ContentID=21791
Note 2: Third-party payers also may specifically identify ICD-9 codes paired with CPT
codes that it considers to be medically necessary.
D. Prognosis/Plan of Care
1. Prognosis
15
specific timeframe (i.e., during the acute care stay) as this may significantly affect options
for continued physical therapy and/or skilled care.
In pediatrics it is recommended that therapists document the clinical reasoning that
supports the stated prognosis. As an example: “The child’s prognosis for independent
walking is positive secondary to the child presenting with a Gross Motor Functional
Classification System level of I and a supportive family who provide appropriate
movement opportunities.”
2. Plan of Care
Documentation of the plan of care includes the following components, all of which
are further described below:
1) Overall goals stated in functional, measurable terms that indicate the predicted level
of improvement in function. These goals are made in collaboration with the
patient/client and other appropriate stakeholders.
2) A statement of interventions/treatments to be provided during the episode of care.
3) Duration and frequency of service required to reach the goals.
4) Anticipated discharge plans (May be part of the prognosis or written separately).
5) The physical therapy plan of care for a child from birth to three can be embedded in
the IFSP. The plan of care for a child of school age (3-21) can be embedded in their
IEP, or documented in a 504 plan as a supplemental service to support
modifications and adaptations within the school environment. Both in early
intervention and school based services, the IFSP/IEP plan of care is developed
through team collaboration inclusive of the family and when appropriate, the child.
In early intervention the plan of care includes plans to prepare the child for
transition out of early intervention. In school based services, when the child
reaches the age of 16 the plan of care includes plans to transition the child to
adulthood.
*Note: Medicare includes diagnoses within their documentation requirements for the plan
of care. See http://www.cms.hhs.gov/manuals/Downloads/bp102c15.pdf, Section
220.1.2.B.
Goals
Physical therapists develop goals with the patient/client and/or family/caregiver at the onset
of care for a variety of reasons. Goals provide an opportunity for the patient/client and/or
family/caregiver to describe what functional changes they hope to accomplish through
physical therapy services. The goals established during an initial evaluation, while
dynamic, should provide the foundation on which the plan of care is directed. Furthermore,
the physical therapist can demonstrate progression (or lack of progression) and ongoing
communication of expected outcomes and discharge planning, through updates, changes,
16
deletions, and additions to these initial goals in subsequent documentation (daily notes,
summaries and re-examinations).
The above goals do not identify the specific needs of a patient/client. It is important to go
one step further and express why the patient/client needs to increase their ROM or level of
assistance. For example, the therapist could document the above goals more functionally:
Medicare and third-party payers determine the physical therapy benefit or continuation of
physical therapy services based on evidence of a significant functional change in a
reasonable amount of time. In other words, payers want to see progress. In certain
circumstances, therapists may need to communicate very clearly what this means for the
patient/client. For example, for some patients/clients, progressing from a maximum level of
assistance to a moderate level of assistance may not appear to be a significant change in
their status. However, if that degree of change represents a patient’s/client’s ability to go
home with caregiver support, this must be conveyed in the documentation.
Time frames for the achievement of anticipated goals and expected outcomes are
determined by the physical therapist to maximize the effectiveness of care but must be
realistic. They may be written in terms of time (i.e., days, weeks, months) or in terms of
visits in which the goal will be achieved. PTs also can clarify if the goal is short term or
long term. A short-term goal implies that the patient/client will achieve the activity in the
near future (e.g., in a day, within a week, etc.) or may indicate a change that needs to occur
before long-term or outcome goals can be met or exceeded by the patient/client.
17
Finally, goals should be designed based on collaboration with the patient/client and/or
family/caregiver. The documentation should reflect both collaboration and agreement on
the goals. Updating goals during a physical therapy episode of care is important to clinical
practice and should be documented clearly and frequently. Documentation of goals after
the initial evaluation will be discussed in later sections.
1. Identification of the person who is receiving therapy and will carry out the program.
This is generally the patient/client, but may also be the caregiver or family
members.
2. Description of the movement or activity that the patient/client will perform such as
stand-pivot transfer from bed to chair.
3. A connection of the movement/activity to a specific function such as to eat
breakfast or to perform dressing.
4. Specific conditions in which the activity will be performed such as with full weight
bearing on both lower extremities or with the use of a walker.
5. Factors for measuring performance such as with contact guard assistance or with
2/5 pain on VAS.
6. The time frame for achieving the goal.1
1
Physical Therapy Reimbursement News, Volume 13, Number 3
Examples:
1) Short-term goal: Patient/client will walk from his bedroom to the bathroom with a
walker in 2 minutes within 1 week to prevent accidents which may lead to falls.
2) Short-term goal: Patient/client will report a decrease in pain in the right shoulder
after exercise to 2/10 within 5 visits to enable her to move walker in home.
5) Pediatric long term goal: In 6 months, the child will walk with one hand held from
the family room to the kitchen, a distance of 25 feet, at dinner time.
The physical therapy plan of care should include an intervention plan or a description of the
planned treatment. It is important that physical therapists consider a number of factors
when they write the plan of care for each patient/client. Factors to consider include, but are
not limited to, the following:
18
1) The patient’s/client’s status, including physical, cognitive, and emotional factors
(i.e., acuity, prognosis, learning barriers, language barriers, etc.);
2) The patient’s/client’s expected progression;
3) Discharge disposition/plan (see below); and
4) Whether or not additional staff, either another PT or a PTA, will provide some
of the interventions during the episode of care.
5) The physical therapy plan of care in early intervention and school-based
practice is often incorporated into the child’s general team intervention plan
provided in the IFSP or IEP, respectively. The general plan may also include
general methods or strategies that will be used by the team to assist the child
and family in early intervention or child in school-based practice in meeting
their goals. More specific details regarding the intervention strategies are
contained in the therapist’s supplemental intervention plan or daily visit
documentation notes.
6) The physical therapy plan of care in a skilled nursing facility is incorporated
into the patient’s individualized, interdisciplinary comprehensive care plan
which reflects problem areas documented through data obtained on the MDS.
The therapist should initiate and document patient and caregiver training in
addition to providing the results of the initial evaluation to the interdisciplinary
team.
Plan of Care Example B, by providing more information, is a much better tool for
communicating with other staff in directing the care of the patient/client than Plan
of Care Example A. Writing a more detailed plan of care can improve patient/client
safety and quality of care. Consider a scenario in which a PT and a PTA are not
often in the same vicinity (home health, skilled nursing facility, or acute care). A
plan of care that contains the level of detail shown in Plan of Care Example B, in
conjunction with the patient’s/client’s anticipated goals, can ensure much better
19
coordination of care. Written communication should provide the details of when the
patient/client should be reevaluated by the PT before the plan of care is progressed.
In summary, providing increased detail in the initial goals and the treatment plan identifies
the expected progression of the patient/client. The PT/PTA team can follow the
patient’s/client’s progression more closely and identify any unanticipated problems or red
flags more readily. A detailed plan of care allows patient/client progression (or lack of
progression) to be easily identified.
Discharge Disposition/Planning
It is considered good practice to anticipate discharge planning from the start of every
episode of care. This is particularly important in settings in which a physical therapist’s
evaluation assists in determining discharge disposition or when discharge planning takes
time and coordinated effort with other health care professionals. In other circumstances, a
discharge disposition/plan may be included in a prognosis statement.
In certain pediatric settings, discharge and discontinuation may include additional factors.
In early intervention and school based practice disposition planning is referred to as
transition planning and will be documented in the child’s IFSP and IEP respectively. The
transition plan to discontinue physical therapy services should be collaborative and are
based on the child’s needs. Individual students may not require skilled physical therapy
every year they attend school. They may be discontinued from skilled PT service one year,
but referred again, the next year as their individual needs and the physical environment
changes.
20
Transfer training bed to chair with sliding board; required
moderate physical assist of 1 and 100% verbal cues for
placement of board
Description of equipment provided (sliding board, long
handles sponge) for home use
Description of education/training provided (Pt educated in
proper lifting technique from floor to chest height and able to
demonstrate technique with up to 25 pounds)
Ultrasound at 1.5 W/cm2 for 5' to the L medial knee joint
3) Patient/client response to treatments/interventions.
4) Communication/collaboration with other providers/patient/client/family/
significant other as applicable/indicated.
5) Factors that modify frequency or intensity of intervention and progression
within the plan of care.
6) Plan for next visit(s) including interventions with objectives, progression parameters and
precautions, if indicated within the plan of care.
It is important to convey in the documentation of a visit or encounter (i.e., daily note) that
the interventions provided require the skills of a physical therapist or physical therapist
assistant under the direction and supervision of a physical therapist. Many therapists
consider the daily note to be just a ‘listing’ of what treatments took place. While it is
important to include the interventions provided, this does not demonstrate skilled care.
Demonstration of skilled care requires documentation of the type and level of skilled
assistance given to the patient/client, clinical decision making (PT) or problem solving
(PTA), and continued analysis of patient progress. This can be expressed by recording both
the type and amount of manual, visual, and/or verbal cues used by the therapist to assist the
patient/client in completing the exercise/activity completely and correctly. It can also be
illustrated by documenting why the therapist chose the interventions and/or why the
interventions are still necessary. Some ways of documenting skilled care include
documenting what the therapist observes before, during, and after an intervention, the
patient’s/client’s specific response to the intervention, determining functional progress, etc.
The interventions provided by the physical therapist/physical therapist assistant should
correlate to the impairment, activity limitation, participation restriction, and the goals stated
in the plan of care. For example: “Patient required verbal and manual cues to complete
shoulder flexion and abduction exercises without substitution. Therapeutic exercise and
right shoulder mobilization resulted in increased flexion from 90° to 110° allowing the
patient/client to reach overhead and complete activities of daily living. Patient still unable
to perform overhead activities needed in performance of job duties.” Another example is
“Patient required moderate verbal and manual cues to control movement of right leg in
swing phase of gait. Therapeutic exercise to hip flexors/extensors and knee
flexors/extensors at 50% of one repetition max has resulted in increased strength. Patient
still demonstrates inability to clear right foot 100% of the time during gait increasing her
risk for falls”.
21
When a clinician documents an assessment as “patient/client tolerated treatment well,” it
does not provide evidence of skilled services. In addition, it does not give enough
information regarding your clinical decision making or problem solving to demonstrate
what actually happened if this visit were to be called into question in a legal case.
In pediatrics, especially school based practice there may be some misconception that daily
notes are not required. However, skilled physical therapy intervention should be
documented for each visit. In skilled nursing facility settings, there may not be payer
specific requirements for daily notes. However, it is best practice for clinicians to have a
system in place to track what skilled interventions were provided in daily treatments and
why those treatments required the skills of a physical therapist or physical therapist
assistant so that when the weekly note/progress report is written, there is enough factual
evidence to complete the documentation efficiently and completely.
At its most basic level, a daily note serves as a record of all treatments and skilled
interventions provided along with the time of the services so there is justification for what
services are billed on the claim form. For each daily note, there could also be a notation as
to whether there were changes in the impairments, activity limitations and participation
restrictions as a result of the interventions and if there is progress toward the goals and
ultimately toward discharge. (As noted earlier some payer guidelines restrict a physical
therapist assistant from documenting this information) If any measurements are taken, they
should be recorded and relate back to the achievement or lack of achievement toward the
functional goals. When a physical therapist is completing the daily notes, and the ongoing
assessment is demonstrated, frequently with this level of detail, a progress summary or
progress report may not be required.
C. Progress Reports
Physical therapists may choose to title certain daily notes as progress reports/summaries
and include this level of detail at one time. Progress reports/summaries should be
22
performed regularly on all patients to substantiate the ongoing need for physical therapy
services. The report should provide an update on the patient’s/client’s status as it relates to
the physical therapy goals and plan of care. Keep in mind that any note that requires
assessment of the patient/client and his/her progression or lack of progression can only be
written by a physical therapist. Physical therapist assistants cannot write this type of
assessment as noted in APTA policy, Medicare regulations, other third-party payer rules,
and state law. While the physical therapist is responsible for progress reports/summaries,
the physical therapist may use data gathered by PTAs.
In early intervention, a team progress report is provided on a six month basis when the
team reviews the IFSP. In this review, the family and child’s progress toward their
outcomes and objectives are noted and the plan of care is revised as indicated. In school
based practice progress reports to parents are required on the same frequency that parent’s
receive reports on academic progress.
In the Home Health setting, a progress report is required as part of the recertification
process if services are going to continue beyond the current 60 day episode of care.
Recertification is required to be completed in the last 5 days of the current certification
period. There is also a requirement of individual notes for every patient encounter.
In the Skilled Nursing Facility setting, a weekly progress note may be the only required
documentation. The physical therapist and physical therapist assistant should collaborate
on the information presented in the weekly note to insure the information supports the
skilled nature of the services provided during the week and provides objective evidence of
progress towards goals. Any further assessment of what changes to the plan of care might
need to be made should be completed by the physical therapist.
Physical therapists and physical therapists assistants are required to support the
reporting of timed procedure and modality codes in their clinical documentation in many
settings. This requirement derives from the Common Procedural Terminology (CPT)
http://www.apta.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Coding&Template=/TaggedPage/Tagged
PageDisplay.cfm&TPLID=59&ContentID=16527 code definitions for procedures and
modalities reported by physical therapists. The time reported should reflect direct one-on-
one contact time with the patient (e.g., Medicare requires documentation of total treatment
time spent on timed codes). If the setting does not use CPT coding, such as Home Health
and Part A Medicare skilled nursing facilities, then the documentation must substantiate the
total visit time.
For Medicare regulations on timed codes and documentation of time, please refer to
http://www.cms.hhs.gov/transmittals/downloads/R1019CP.pdf
23
Medicaid regulations may have specific language on documentation for each state. Refer
to the following web site for more information:
http://www.apta.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Medicaid_Resource_Center&Template=/
TaggedPage/TaggedPageDisplay.cfm&TPLID=251&ContentID=27388
Many therapists choose to document in a standard SOAP note format for their daily notes
and progress notes. While commonly used in clinical practice, SOAP notes are often
incomplete. If a physical therapist utilizes the SOAP format, the following guidelines are
recommended:
S: Subjective: This should reflect the patient’s (and at times caregiver’s) self report
of status and response to previous treatment(s). Some tests and measures that
are subjective may be included in the subjective portion of the SOAP note (e.g.,
self report such as the SF-36).
O: Objective: This should reflect the physical therapist’s objective findings made
through observation of the patient, as well as measurements and tests, such as
circumferential measurements for edema, range of motion measurements, or
heart rate before and after exercise. The treatment provided to the patient and
the response to treatment on that specific date also should be included in this
category, but it should not be in place of objective data.
A: Assessment: This should reflect the physical therapist’s clinical decision making
or the physical therapist assistant’s clinical problem solving, including their
professional assessment of the patient’s progress, response to therapy,
remaining functional limitations and possible precautions. It should never say
“treatment tolerated well.”
P: Plan: The physical therapist should provide specific information related to the
plan for future services including patient/caregiver education and any possible
changes in the treatment program. Do not simply say “continue.”
Flow sheets are another common form of documentation for daily notes. While they may
be a useful format to note specific interventions such as exercises, and parameters such as
repetitions and weights, flow sheets often lack space for the physical therapist to include
the elements that made those interventions skilled treatment as well as the assessment of
the patient’s status and plans for ongoing care. Evidence of skilled decision making and
other critical factors should be included in the daily documentation. APTA’s Guidelines:
Physical Therapy Documentation of Patient/Client Management (BOD G03-05-16-41),
state that “… other notations or flow charts are considered a component of the documented
record but do not meet the requirements of documentation in and of themselves.”
24
PROS CONS
Simple format that is well understood and Does not easily offer a category for
frequently used by physical therapists. treatment on a specific date of service.
Prompts (S, O, A, P) remind physical Physical therapists might not know what
therapists to include specific information.information to place in a specific category
or fail to include useful information
because a category does not exist. For
instance, the SOAP format does not clearly
indicate where they should document a
conversation with a physician or case
manager.1
1
A Payer’s Guide to Physical Therapy Documentation for Patient/Client Management,
Alexandria, VA: Department of Reimbursement, APTA; 2006.
Reexamination is the process of performing selected tests and measures after the
initial examination to evaluate progress and to modify or redirect interventions. The tests
and measures may be repeated from the initial examination and/or include new elements of
tests and measures in order to evaluate the patient/client’s status. Reexamination may be
indicated more than once during a single episode of care and for a number of reasons. A
reexamination might be indicated for a number of reasons. However, due to certain payer
regulations, many therapists confuse a clinical reexamination with a billable reevaluation
code. In general, a billable reexamination of a patient/client should occur whenever there is
an unanticipated change in the patient’s/client’s status, a failure to respond to physical
therapy intervention as expected, the need for a new plan of care, and/or requirements
based on state practice acts or other requirements
(https://www.fsbpt.org/LicensingAuthorities/index.asp)
In clinical practice, a reexamination and reevaluation can serve many purposes. One of the
most important objectives of the reexamination is to determine the patient’s/client’s
progress or lack of progress toward the established goals and prognosis. The reevaluation
compares similar data at two points in time and determines whether or not the plan of care
needs to be updated or changed and how this will affect the expected outcomes and
timeframe of care.
Physical therapy goals should be addressed noting where progress has (or has not) been
demonstrated. If appropriate, new timeframes and new goals should be established, as well
as confirmation of the clinical evaluation or impression, prognosis, and discharge
recommendations. If progress has not occurred as expected, reasons for the lack of progress
should be included (i.e., illness, comorbidity, etc). In addition, any changes to the
interventions should be documented. Reexaminations can be performed and recorded only
by the physical therapist.
In the case of the geriatric patient/client, it is recommended to document vital signs (e.g.
blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate and pulse oximetry), as well as to record any
medication changes with implications for functional recovery. This information may
contribute to the information gathering for the Minimum Data Set (MDS).
25
In most cases in pediatric early intervention practice, the comprehensive team re-
examination report is required annually as part of the annual formal team review of
eligibility for services and review of the IFSP. In school based practice, comprehensive
team reexamination, reevaluation and reassessment for the integrated educational
assessment are performed every three years or as mandated by state and federal regulations
(Individuals with Disability Education Improvement Act, 2004). This is a minimal
requirement and may be done more frequently as indicated either by child’s change of
status, parent request and team decision or any requirements of individual state practice
acts.
It is the position of APTA and many state policies and payer regulations that only physical
therapists can complete the discharge summary. Discharge occurs based on the physical
therapist’s analysis of the patient’s/client’s achievement of the predicted goals and
expected outcomes. Important concepts to include in the discharge summary include
current patient/client status; attainment of goals; goals that have not been attained; and
recommendations and instructions that were provided to the patient/client, such as home
program, equipment provided, and any patient/client or caregiver training/education. When
a patient/client is discharged to another level of service (i.e., from an acute setting to home
health or another inpatient setting), evidence of coordination of care should also be
included. Issues related to patient/client compliance also may be noted as well as the
number of completed visits. A discharge summary should comment if the patient/client
stops coming to therapy against recommendation of the physical therapist. If the
patient/client is discharged prior to achievement of goals and outcomes, there should be
documentation as to the status of the patient/client and the rationale for discontinuation.
In pediatric early intervention, a discontinuation summary is typically written in the format
of a Transition Report which provides information on the child’s status and progress during
birth to three services as they transition to preschool services under Part B of the
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act, 2004. In school based practice,
the closure of physical therapy intervention is termed discontinuation of services. This
terminology is consistent with IDEA legislation. The decision is reflected in the IEP.
Written documentation of the discontinuation should include a summary of the student’s
progress, the current status, and the rationale for discontinuing services. Discontinuation
summaries in both early intervention and school based programs typically also provide
recommendations for community resources to support the child’s continued health, fitness,
development, and well-being. In both early intervention and school based practice settings,
a decision to discharge/discontinue physical therapy services is decided between the
26
physical therapist and the team. The decision is related to whether physical therapy
services are needed to support the child’s and family’s outcomes on the Individualized
Family Service Plan in early intervention or on the child’s goals on the Individualized
Education Program in school.
27
Documentation by physical therapists, physical therapist assistant graduates, or
others pending receipt of an unrestricted license shall be authenticated by a licensed
physical therapist, or, when permissible by state law, documentation by physical
therapist assistant graduates may be authenticated by a physical therapist assistant.
Documentation by students (SPT/SPTA) in physical therapist or physical therapist
assistant programs must be additionally authenticated by the physical therapist or,
when permissible by state law, documentation by physical therapist assistant
students may be authenticated by a physical therapist assistant. The following links
will provide information regarding student documentation/billing requirements:
http://www.apta.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Assistants_Aids_Students&TEMP
LATE=/CM/ContentDisplay.cfm&CONTENTID=31946
Documentation should include the referral mechanism by which physical therapy
services are initiated. Examples include:
Direct access when permissible by state law.
Request for consultation from another practitioner.
Referral from practitioner authorized to refer per Medicare
regulations or state practice act.
A. Evidenced-Based Practice
Of course, before you can document evidence-based practice, therapists must first know
how to integrate evidence into clinic practice.
28
2. Through the use of standardized outcome measures, which are an effective
means of evaluating and communicating changes in a patient’s/client’s
impairments and/ or functioning.
3. By selecting and implementing an appropriate plan of care and
interventions/treatments based on available research or clinical guidelines
and that reflect patient perspectives and preferences and their influence on
the plan of care.
Keeping up-to-date with current research and expert opinion may be difficult, but there are
many tools available to make the process easier. While it is not the intent of this Defensible
Documentation for Patient/Client Management Resource to teach evidence-based practice,
the following are some tools that can get you started.
B) Catalog of Tests and Measures. Describes tests and measures and links to available
research on their validity and reliability that physical therapists may use in their
patient/client examinations. The catalog is only available on CD combined with the
Guide to Physical Therapist Practice. Available at:
http://www.apta.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Practice_Management1&Template=/
Ecommerce/ProductDisplay.cfm&ProductID=844
E) Open Door. Provides members with free access to full-text journal articles and other
resources relevant to clinical practice whenever and wherever they need it.
http://www.apta.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Research&Template=/MembersOnly.
cfm&ContentID=32354#a
B. Demonstrating Progress
29
As stated previously, the therapist should carefully consider how the goals, in conjunction
with the treatment plan, provide a roadmap for communication and patient/client
progression. The initial goals are written after the physical therapist evaluates the findings
from the initial examination and determines the patient’s/client’s prognosis in specific
terms.
What will the patient’s/client’s mobility be like when he or she completes the episode of
care? Is it likely the patient/client will be able to return to his/her prior level of
functioning? Will he or she require an assistive device or other equipment to promote
safety and independence? Will he or she require assistance from a caregiver or community
service? What is the potential for improvement in the patient’s/client’s strength, balance,
and endurance? What is the impact of a child’s home/family situation on his/her
developmental progress?
After determining the anticipated outcomes the next step is to establish specific criteria for
each outcome. These should be written in terms of function whenever possible and include
specific parameters. Parameters are the objective statements of a goal that make it
“measurable” and ensure that anyone who reads the goals will have a clear picture of what
outcome is expected. Physical therapists can specify the anticipated patient/client goals by
a variety of methods including timeframes, expected outcomes (distance, level of
assistance, etc). “Measurable goals” are further clarified by the examples below:
After the initial evaluation, updating the goals shows others how the patient/client is
achieving (or not achieving) the predicted outcome. If a patient/client achieves a goal, this
should be documented so others may also know what the patient/client has achieved. This
is important in all settings so other health care providers (i.e., nurses, physicians, case
managers, etc) will know that the patient/client has achieved the goal. These changes will
then drive the subsequent care of the patient/client. Clearly documenting updates of a
patient’s/client’s physical therapy goals communicates to third-party payers any functional
changes in a patient’s/client’s status and the benefits of the service along with the need for
continued services, if indicated. Consider the following: To what extent was the evidence
considered prior to developing and implementing the intervention plan that has resulted in
less than optimal progress?
30
The goals should be updated regularly depending on the length of the episode of care. The
goals should be updated whenever there is a change in the patient’s/client’s progress or
medical status. When goals are initially set by the physical therapist in conjunction with the
patient/client and/or family/caregiver, the achievement of the goals is dependent on many
factors that may affect the patient’s/client’s progress toward the goals. The physical
therapist makes the best prediction of when a patient/client will accomplish the goals, but
this can change for a variety of reasons. For example, if the goal is to transfer from bed to
chair with minimal verbal cues within 3 days, but the patient/client has more difficulty with
bed mobility than expected (an essential component of the goal achievement), then the goal
would need to be revised in terms of timeframe or level of assistance.
Note: State laws and certain third-party payers may have specific expectations on how
often goals are updated.
What if a patient/client does not demonstrate the expected progress toward his or her goals?
In this case, the physical therapist must analyze/consider any factors that may have
prevented progression. For example: Was there a medical issue that prevented progression?
Was the patient/client unable to participate in physical therapy as expected? Whenever
there is little or no progress toward the anticipated goals, the reasons for the delay should
be clearly documented and discussed. The physical therapist should also indicate what
measures are being taken to overcome the problems over the next treatment period.
Documentation of these clinical decision-making processes indicates the physical
therapist’s involvement in the overall care management of the patient/client.
Unsubstantiated evidence of medical necessity and skilled care are two of the most
common reasons for payment denial in physical therapy. According to most third-party
payers, every patient/client visit must be both medically necessary and require skilled
intervention. To effectively establish medical necessity, the documentation must clearly
indicate WHY intervention is indicated at the current time. Evidence of skilled service
must reflect why the skills of a therapist are required to deliver the necessary intervention
versus another provider. Evidence of these two elements is expected in the patient/client
records. Documentation of skilled services is also discussed in the section on “Visit/
Encounter Notes.”
Suggestions for how a physical therapist might support these two elements in clinical
documentation include:
31
3) Make sure documentation is not repetitive, re-stating the same thing day after
day.
4) Make sure that when you re-read your own documentation, there is no doubt
that only a skilled physical therapist could have provided the treatment.
Suggestions for how a physical therapist assistant might support these two elements in
clinical documentation include:
1) Document how the patient/client tolerated the intervention(s) at every visit or event.
2) Document how specific exercises or activities will help the patient/client achieve a goal.
3) Make sure documentation is not repetitive, re-stating the same thing day after
day.
4) Make sure that when you re-read your own documentation, there is no doubt
that only a skilled physical therapist assistant could have provided the treatment.
Lastly, when a payer requests documentation for a particular date of service, review the
note(s). It may be necessary to send supporting documentation for additional dates of
service, such as the most recent summary of progress or reevaluation, so the payer can fully
appreciate the context in which that date of service was provided.
For more detailed information on skilled care and medical necessity, go to Appendix E.
Thorough documentation is both a benefit and protection for the patients/clients and the
therapist. It serves the patient/client well because it gives all providers involved with the
patient’s/client’s care the information they need to make informed decisions and render the
best possible care. High-quality documentation serves you well because it is the one thing
that provides a real-time, historical account of your encounters with patients/clients and can
be an important source of evidence in the event your care is called into question.
Record information only on proper forms, and write legibly. If your handwriting is
illegible, the note may be considered as not having been written at all.
Date, time, and sign every note. Often, there will be questions regarding the timing of
events within the course of a day. If you include the time, there will be no question as
to the chronology of events.
32
Record information as close as possible to the time that you deliver care. Don’t
document in advance, and don’t leave important notations for the end of the day or the
end of the week.
Do not change the documentation after the fact. Make identified revisions in
documentation according to your facility/practice policy to eliminate any questions
about authenticity.
Describe the patient’s/client’s symptoms as they are elicited and offered. Use
quotations properly. If a patient/client reports an adverse situation, make sure you
respond accordingly and document your response or assessment of the situation.
Report the facts in an organized and systematic manner with adequate detail and in
chronological order.
Follow both internal protocol and external regulations (including HIPAA privacy and
security regulations) and policies relative to patient/client confidentiality. These
regulations and policies may come from the federal, state, or local government and/or
reimbursement sources or other entities. It is important to be mindful of this issue when
handling incoming calls related to a patient’s/client’s condition and/or when using
electronic documentation.
When using electronic documentation, take steps to protect the confidentiality of the
record and alert authorized users to their responsibility to maintain the confidentiality
of the record at all times.
33
Document all attempts to contact the referral source and/or payment source (e.g., the
insurer). In addition, document any communication with anyone.
Release records only upon consultation with your risk manager and in accordance with
organizational/practice policies and laws.
Report any information regarding a patient/client incident separately from the medical
record, using the proper incident report form.
Information in bulleted list is adapted and excerpted from APTA’s Risk Management in Physical Therapy: A
Quick Reference, 2nd edition (Alexandria, VA: APTA; 2005) and Spanish for Physical Therapists: Tools for
Effective Communication (Alexandria, VA: APTA; 2006).
34
section is not to be inclusive, but instead to 1) raise awareness that additional regulations
may exist, and 2) provide suggestions to therapists on how to improve documentation given
certain unique problems may that occur in a specific setting.
In addition to the standards established under professional guidelines, there are also
accreditation standards such as those established by the Joint Commission. This includes
documentation of “hand-offs” (i.e., transferring the care of the patient/client to another
therapist) to ensure continuity of care, patient/client safety event reporting,
multidisciplinary documentation of goals, processes for receiving/transcribing verbal
orders, and patient/client education, to name a few. In addition, there are certain
abbreviations that may not be used and are included in the Joint Commission "Do Not Use
List".
You may use this link to learn more about the Joint Commission standards:
http://www.jointcommission.org
For more helpful information related to physical therapy in the acute care setting, visit the
Acute Care Section’s website at www.acutept.org
When providing physical therapy services to address physical fitness for individuals
or groups in either traditional or non-traditional settings, it is important from a professional
and liability perspective that you document the services you provide. The level of detail in
your documentation should be based on the complexity of the patient or client, the intricacy
of the plan of care, and the frequency of change. More complex patients/clients or settings
may necessitate significantly more detail while some community settings and less complex
patients or clients may require shorter and less detailed notes. Regardless, all services
provided as physical therapy to patients or clients should address the five components of
35
patient/client client management: examination, evaluation, diagnosis, prognosis, and
intervention. For more information visit the Physical Fitness for Special Populations web
page at: www.apta.org/pfsp
C. Home Health
Providing physical therapy services in the home health setting involves creativity,
flexibility, and solid documentation skills. Physical therapists need to employ their full
scope of assessment skills in order to manage a medically complex individual without the
support of a medical facility or quick access to additional staff. Home health services under
Medicare Part A are subject to 60-day episodes of care. Due to the relationship between
therapy visits and reimbursement under the home health Prospective Payment System
(PPS), therapy documentation is under significant scrutiny to determine if services are
medically necessary. Attention to detail and use of the various assessment and intervention
tools available to physical therapy must be very clear in the documentation. In addition,
documentation of impairments, activity limitations, and participation restrictions and
strategies to improve functioning is essential. More information on home health PPS can
be found at: http://www.cms.hhs.gov/HomeHealthPPS. For payers other than Medicare, it
is important to determine whether there are payer-specific physical therapy documentation
requirements.
The need for physical therapy alone ensures program eligibility under the Medicare
program for home health, thus allowing the physical therapist to assume primary
responsibility for care. In these cases, the admission to service is completed by the physical
therapist and involves agency-specific consent forms, the OASIS tool, and the
comprehensive assessment. This assessment must include therapy-specific items, an overall
view of health status and risk factors, and a medication regimen review. All aspects of
physical therapy in the home health setting require integration of good documentation
practice to support the delivery of clinical care.
In cases that involve the services of a physical therapist and a physical therapist assistant
(where allowed by law), routine communication is critical to ensure appropriate direction,
supervision, and implementation of the plan of care. Clearly written documentation is an
36
effective tool for communication and evidence of verbal interaction must be reflected in the
medical record. Both the physical therapist and the physical therapist assistant share the
responsibility in documenting that the supervision requirements are being met.
Home Heath physical therapists and physical therapist assistants may have access to
electronic health records and documentation systems which include patients’ personal
health information (PHI). It is important that appropriate safeguards to protect the
organization’s data are implemented. This would include physical safeguards which are
physical measures, policies, and procedures to protect electronic information systems and
equipment from natural and environmental hazards, and unauthorized intrusion. For more
information on privacy and security of personal health information, go to the following
link:
http://www.apta.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=HIPAA1&Template=/TaggedPage/Tagge
dPageDisplay.cfm&TPLID=183&ContentID=18513
For more helpful information related to physical therapy in the home health setting, visit
the Home Health Section’s website at www.homehealthsection.org
D. Outpatient Services
Payment sources for outpatient physical therapy services are varied, which offers many
challenges. Third-party payment is when an entity outside of the physical therapist/patient
relationship pays the bill. Examples are private payers, managed care organizations,
provider networks, direct contracts with employers, Medicare, Medicaid, public school
systems, and workers' compensation programs. First-party payment is when the patient
pays the bill for treatment and then may choose to submit the claim to his or her insurance
company. For all payment systems, it is important to understand CPT and ICD- 9 CM
coding. It is also necessary to understand the difference between billing and payment
policy; each payer may implement its payment systems differently, regardless of the coding
on the claim. For more information, please follow the following link:
http://www.apta.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Reimbursement2&Template=/MembersO
nly.cfm&ContentID=27185.
For other helpful information related to physical therapy in the private practice outpatient
setting, visit the Private Practice Section’s website at www.ppsapta.org
37
E. Skilled Nursing Facility / Long Term Care
Patients residing in a skilled nursing facility (SNF) can receive physical therapy treatment
under the Medicare Part A (inpatient) benefit or the Medicare Part B (outpatient) benefit.
Medicare Part A services are paid for using a prospective payment system (PPS)
methodology, while Part B services are paid for under the Physician Fee Schedule.
To qualify for Medicare Part A services, a patient must require daily skilled nursing and/or
rehabilitation services, and have had a 3-day qualifying stay in a hospital. For more
information, follow this link:
http://www.apta.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=SNFs1&Template=/TaggedPage/TaggedP
ageDisplay.cfm&TPLID=174&ContentID=18289
The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is the assessment instrument that determines the Part A per
diem payment in the SNF PPS. The information on the MDS classifies residents into
resource utilization groups (RUGs) to determine payment to the facility.
The treatment you provide in a SNF must meet the same standard of being “skilled
services” as in any other setting; therefore, it is critical that the documentation illustrate
this. The information you record on the patient’s chart must support the MDS level being
billed. Because SNFs also provide outpatient services, your documentation for Part A
services must meet criteria as explained in The Components of Documentation section. The
combination of therapy documentation and nursing documentation should support the
skilled services provided at the RUG level being billed.
Services provided to patients in the long-term care setting under Medicare Part B follow
the same guidelines as other outpatient physical therapy settings.
For treatment under either Part A or Part B, there was a revision in the Medicare Benefit
Policy Manual, Chapter 8, Section 30.4.1.1, which clarifies that the initial therapy
evaluation of a SNF patient must be performed in the SNF; you cannot use an evaluation
that was performed in the acute care or rehabilitation hospital settings. You may find more
information about SNF-related therapy evaluations by going to the following link:
http://www.cms.hhs.gov/Transmittals/downloads/R73BP.pdf. Finally, the effective
delivery of physical therapy services, and the documentation of such, has an impact in the
state and federal survey process. It is important to understand the survey process and the
role of physical therapy in the facility.
For more helpful information related to physical therapy in the long-term care/skilled
nursing facility setting, visit the APTA Section on Geriatrics’ Web site at
www.geriatricspt.org
38
Patients admitted to an inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) receive physical therapy
treatment under Medicare Part A, which is paid for using a prospective payment system
(PPS) methodology. To qualify for Medicare Part A services, a patient must require at least
3 hours of rehabilitation services 5 days per week. For more information, follow this link:
http://www.apta.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Hospitals1&Template=/TaggedPage/
TaggedPageDisplay.cfm&TPLID=172&ContentID=18287
A long-term care hospital (LTCH) has greater than 25 days as an average length of stay. A
facility also may be considered a LTCH if the length of stay averages 20 or more days, and
80 percent or more of its annual Medicare discharges have diagnoses that reflect a finding
of neoplastic disease in the 12-month cost-reporting period ending in 1997. LTCHs usually
provide extended medical and rehabilitative care for clinically complex patients who
frequently suffer from multiple chronic and acute conditions. Services typically include
comprehensive rehabilitation, respiratory therapy, head trauma treatment, and pain
management. The LTCH system uses the same Diagnosis Related Groups (DRGs) for
payment as are used under the inpatient hospital PPS. However, they are weighted to
reflect the greater complexity of the cases.
H. Pediatrics
1. Early Intervention
Physical therapist practice in early intervention (EI) incorporates unique features that may
alter the typical physical therapy documentation process. Physical therapy services
39
provided to children from birth to age 3 years are part of a child’s and family’s
Individualized Family Service Plan (IFSP) under Part C of the Individuals with Disability
Education Act (IDEA) (2004). Early intervention services are family centered and typically
provided in the child’s natural environment. Documentation is family friendly, written in
lay language with minimal medical or technical terminology so that it is meaningful to all
team members, including the family and nonmedical professionals. In early intervention
documentation, the physical therapist (PT) refers to the child as a “child” rather than as a
“patient” or “client,” as reflected in the Guide to Physical Therapist Practice. In addition to
state physical therapy practice acts, compliance with the delivery of physical therapy as
part of EI services is regulated by IDEA federal legislation and its corresponding state
legislation on early intervention. Also, in some states payment for a portion of early
intervention physical therapy services may be through the state’s Medicaid plan or other
payer sources. Documentation, therefore, needs to meet the standards established by each
of these specific payers. All physical therapists documenting services to children need to be
aware of both federal and state requirements for how long medical records are to be
maintained.
Initial Examination
In early intervention, physical therapists collaborate with other team members, including
the family, in the development of the IFSP. This plan documents the child’s current levels
of development; information voluntarily provided by the family on their resources,
priorities, and concerns related to enhancing the development of their child; measureable
results or outcomes (child and family); early intervention services to be provided (including
length, frequency, intensity, duration, and method of delivering services); natural
environment in which services will be provided; identification of service coordinator; and
plan for transition (components listed in IDEA 2004, Sec. 636). A physical therapist may
elect to provide additional documentation in the form of a supplemental intervention plan
that delineates more specifically the physical therapy intervention strategies to be used in
providing early intervention services for the child.
Visits
In early intervention, physical therapists typically document their visits (also known as
daily encounters) on a standard form developed at the county or state level for early
40
intervention services. In many cases, the family receives a copy of the form, and so it is
structured to be family friendly. This form also is shared with other early intervention
providers who serve the child. The documentation usually is structured to capture what
interventions were performed during the visit to address the outcomes on the IFSP,
progress towards achievement of the outcomes, family input, suggestions for the family,
and follow-up plans of the provider. In addition, in some counties or states, a more detailed
progress note may be required periodically, such as bimonthly.
Reexamination
Discharge/Discontinuation
IDEA, in early intervention, does not require formal physical therapy “discharge
summaries” because the entire team, of which the PT is part, makes the decisions on
discontinuing services. However, it is important that the physical therapist check his or her
state practice act and physical therapy board regulations to determine if there are
requirements for the completion of a discharge summary. To find information on your state
practice act, click here. The physical therapist may document what is referred to either as 1)
a discontinuation summary, if the child is “graduating from” or leaving early intervention
service, or 2) a transition summary if the child is transitioning to preschool services under
Part B of IDEA (if applicable in the state).
Resources
McEwen I. Providing Physical Therapy Services Under Parts B & C of the Individuals
with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). Alexandria, Va: Section on Pediatrics of APTA;
2000.
Public Law 108-446, Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004,
118 Stat. 2647-2808.
41
Building the Legacy: IDEA 2004. U.S. Department of Education. http://idea.ed.gov. Part B
of this Web site, services for children 3-21, is currently available and provides general
information on the legislation that is also relevant to early intervention. Part C of this
Web site is under development and will provide resources on implementation of Part C
IDEA regulations.
2. School-Based
Physical therapy is provided in the school system as a related service for a student
qualifying for special education under IDEA (Individuals with Disabilities Education Act,
2004). Physical therapy services also may be provided to individuals under Section 504 of
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 if the student does not meet the eligibility criteria for
inclusion in special education but has a disability as defined under federal law. Under
Section 504 physical therapy may provide specific accommodations, modifications, and
adaptations enabling students to access and participate in the educational environment (see
Section 504 below). In addition, there are school-based services that are covered under the
Medicaid program.
Physical therapy is a related service under Part B of IDEA; a supportive service to assist a
child with a disability to benefit from special education services. Special education
provides specially designed instruction to meet the individual needs of a student with a
federally recognized disability. An Individualized Education Program (IEP) team develops
an educational program for each identified student based on his or her unique needs.
Members of the IEP team include the student’s parents/guardians, a regular education
teacher, a special education teacher, a representative of the public agency, someone who
can interpret the instructional consequences of the evaluation results, other individuals who
have knowledge and/or expertise relevant to the child (such as the physical therapist), and
the child, if appropriate. The IEP team collaborates to develop the IEP document. The IEP
document outlines current levels of educational performance (this includes physical
functioning), measurable annual goals (in most states, objectives), specific special
education, related services and supplementary aids/services to be provided, how the child
will participate with their non-disabled peers, modifications necessary for state or district
assessments, projected dates for services, modifications, frequency, duration, a description
of how the goals will be monitored and progress reported, as well as appropriate transition
plans.1 Physical therapists are a part of the IEP team; however, educational goals are
discipline free, meaning the goals are developed by the team to meet the needs and
priorities of the student. The IEP team decides if physical therapy services are necessary as
part of the student’s educational goals or their access and participation in the educational
42
environment. The IEP team determines the frequency and duration of relevant physical
therapy services, based on the recommendations of the PT.
As a related service, a physical therapy examination for a student receiving special
education services is required initially and again at least once every 3 years as part of the
integrated educational assessment, when a physical/motor concern has been identified for
that student (check your state practice act because it may differ). The evaluation and
assessment of the student reflects how the student is functioning in the educational
environment. Observations may be necessary in the classroom(s), cafeteria, school bus,
playground, and other locations throughout the school. Input from the educators as well as
other school personnel is essential. Unlike more traditional medical model assessments,
the IEP assessment must be presented in a format all members of the IEP team can
understand.
As part of the IEP team, after each interaction, physical therapists document all:
Strategies,
Interventions,
IDEA requires that progress be reported to parents at the same frequency that is provided to
children who do not have a disability, concurrent with the issuance of report cards.
Physical therapy services may be discontinued in the school system if the IEP team decides
the services are not necessary to the student’s educational goals or their access/participation
in the educational environment. Based upon the recommendations of the IEP team,
physical therapy services are available at any time during the student’s participation in the
educational system, usually through the age of 21. It may be appropriate to discontinue
physical therapy services one year but later resume the services as the student’s needs and
priorities change. The IEP team can determine from one year to the next whether physical
therapy services will be necessary during the upcoming school year based upon the planned
educational objectives and the student’s ability to access/participate in the current
educational environment. Although the discontinuation of physical therapy services would
be noted in the IEP document, the physical therapist needs to summarize the student’s
current status as part of a final summary to close the current episode of care.
Transition Planning
43
technology or training necessary for a student’s successful integration in new
environments.
Documentation for school-based physical therapy services that follow IDEA regulation and
philosophies are similar to procedures described in the Guide to Physical Therapist
Practice. There are a few differences in terminology and procedures. School-based PTs use
the terms “child” or “student” instead of “client” or “patient.” These PTs collaborate with
IEP team members for instructional objectives, compared with the typical approach for the
establishment of discipline-specific goals.
Physical therapists need to be familiar with their individual state’s practice act and
regulations related to school services to ensure that documentation required by the local
school district for the IEP is sufficient to meet all aspects of professional documentation in
their state. Supplemental documentation of daily visits, specific procedures and assessment
time frames may be indicated to ensure compliance with professional documentation
standards. All therapists documenting services to children need to be aware of their state
requirements for how long documents are to be maintained. If services are billed through
Medicaid additional documentation may be necessary.
If the student does not meet the eligibility criteria for inclusion in special education,
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 entitles people with disabilities protection
under civil rights law. Children or students with a permanent or temporary disability, a
physical or mental impairment that limits one or more major life activities, might need
physical therapy at school to accommodate for the disability. The local school district may
have a written 504 plan with the type of accommodation along with the frequency and
duration of physical therapy services; however, individual physical therapists must also
ensure that their own documentation follows the requirements and criteria of their
individual state practice acts.
For more helpful information related to physical therapy in the pediatric setting, visit the
Pediatric Section’s website at www.pediatricapta.org
Reference
1
Building the Legacy: IDEA 2004. Washington, DC: US Department of Education, 2004.
Available at:
http://idea.ed.gov/explore/view/p/%2Croot%2Cdynamic%2CTopicalBrief%2C10%2C.
Accessed on March 26, 2008.
Resources
McEwen, I. Providing Physical Therapy Services Under Parts B & C of the Individuals
with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), Section on Pediatrics, APTA 2000.
Public Law 108-446, Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004,
118 Stat. 2647-2808.
44
http://www.ed.gov/policy/speced/reg/narrative.html Special Education & Rehabilitative
Services, The Rehabilitation Act.
References to state laws governing physical therapy services are found throughout this
document. Every state has different language in their state practice acts, and many include
specific language related to documentation of patient/client services. They may include
issues of specific types of documentation required, minimum timeframes for
documentation, and even scope of practice issues. In determining what is required by your
state, you must review your state law.
http://www.apta.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Practice_Management1&Template=/Tagg
edPage/TaggedPageDisplay.cfm&TPLID=201&ContentID=21791
Abbreviations can be a quick and efficient way of documenting information. However, use
of unknown or confusing abbreviations can be the source of communication breakdown.
APTA does not endorse any particular set of abbreviations and recommends that physical
therapists use abbreviations sparingly. Facilities/agencies should clearly define what
abbreviations are allowed in clinical documentation.
Improper and excessive use of abbreviations also can cause frequent denials in payment. A
clinic may wish to develop a key of frequently used abbreviations on most documentation
forms or request that therapists completely spell any word the first time it is written with
the shortened form in parentheses; for example, American Physical Therapy Association
(APTA). In addition, you should send your approved abbreviation list with any requested
documentation that will be reviewed by payers. This will assist the payers in their review
process.
Specific content of medical records may vary from clinic to clinic depending on
state law, survey/accreditation standards, payer regulations, and local facility policy.
Content also can vary according to specific patient/client related needs, events, and
activities.
45
Below is a list of documents and forms that may be included in patient/client records (this
list is not inclusive):
46
contractor if you have any questions about what service dates to include). For appeals
of a claim for therapy provided in the SNF, send all supportive documentation
(including nursing notes and the MDS) to demonstrate the need for skilled services.
You may choose to support your appeal with your state practice act, APTA’s Guide to
Physical Therapist Practice, APTA’s Standards of Practice, a copy of the
patient’s/client’s benefit language, and the records of any conversations that the office
staff has had with the payer’s professional services personnel. For more information
about Medicare’s five levels of appeal, go to:
http://www.cms.hhs.gov/MLNProducts/downloads/MedicareAppealsProcess.pdf
There is no one answer to that question. There are a variety of rules, regulations, or
standards that might apply (i.e., HIPAA or state statute, whichever is the longest). The
American Health Information Management Association (AHIMA) publication “Practice
47
Brief: Retention of Health Information (Updated)” can assist in determining the
requirements for your particular service. It can be found at
http://library.ahima.org/xpedio/groups/public/documents/ahima/bok1_012545.hcsp?dDocN
ame=bok1_012545
This publication includes AHIMA’s retention standards in addition to tables citing agency,
federal, and state laws or regulations covering retention standards.
In addition, there are may be regulations regarding retention of records in the Medicare
Conditions of Participation.
In Pediatric settings, PT’s who provide services to children in federally funded school
settings to which the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) applies, should
follow the provisions of the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA)
governing educational records. Physical therapy documentation in this setting would be
considered a part of the child’s educational record. You can access information about
FERPA at the following web site: http://www.ed.gov/policy/gen/guid/fpco/index.html
The 2009 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Final Rule (CMS-1403-FC) modified the
requirement that “a provider or supplier is required to maintain ordering and referring
documentation, including the NPI, received from a physician or eligible NPP” in order to
“match the information on the Medicare claims form”. Since there may be delays in claims
submission and payment, CMS revised the requirement to maintain ordering and referring
documentation for 7 years from the date of service, rather than 7 years from the date of
payment. However, it is important to check all rules, regulations, or standards that might
apply (i.e. state statute) and adhere to the most strict.
No. The medical record for the patient/client should be in one chart. All patient/client
management should be documented in one place and should be inclusive of all diagnoses
regardless of insurance.
According to HIPPA and other federal and state regulations, health information is protected
and must remain confidential. One problem with taking charts home is how they are
transported to and from the office and who might have access to the medical records at any
given time. If you transport records anywhere, you must ensure that they are kept in a
locked bag and remain accessible only to you at all times. You should always comply with
the policies and procedures of your clinic or facility related to the management of patient
records.
48
For PT’s in school-based settings, the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA)
(20 U.S.C. § 1232g; 34 CFR Part 99) is a Federal law that protects the privacy of student
education records. The law applies to all schools that receive funds under an applicable
program of the U.S. Department of Education. For more information, go to:
http://www.ed.gov/policy/gen/guid/fpco/ferpa/index.html
According to HIPPA, FERPA and other federal and state regulations, health information is
protected and must remain confidential. If you utilize a personal computer for
documentation of patient services, you must comply with all federal and state regulations
regarding confidentiality; include password access, encryption, etc.
You may receive verbal orders in an inpatient or outpatient setting. Depending on the
practice setting, you should check with the policies and procedures of the clinic or facility,
state practice act, and payer requirements to determine if there are any procedures for
documenting verbal orders. In addition, if the facility or practice is accredited by an agency
such as CARF, CHAPS, or Joint Commission there may be particular standards that are
required for compliance. Medicare also includes procedures for documenting verbal orders
in its requirements in the hospital conditions of participation.
Can I use flow sheets for documenting and tracking changes in a patient’s/client’s
exercise program?
APTA’s Guidelines: Physical Therapy Documentation of Patient/Client
Management, (BOD G03-05-16-4) states that “other notations or flow charts are considered
a component of the documented record but do not meet the requirements of documentation
in and of themselves.” If a flow sheet is used, additional documentation needs to be
included, such as the patient’s/client’s response to the intervention or any adverse
reactions. Evidence of skilled decision making and other factors related to the intervention
are always a requirement and should be included in the daily documentation.
49
D. Content
APTA’s Guidelines: Physical Therapy Documentation provides the information that APTA
recommends being included in the style/format you select. The information may be
organized in a way that works for your setting. You can find these guidelines and other
pertinent information on documentation at PT Practice/Documentation.
The Guide to Physical Therapist Practice is a good source for determining the appropriate
terminology. You may also refer to the Guide for both “anticipated goals” and “expected
outcomes” when addressing function in your notes. Generally, anticipated goals and
expected outcomes are related to impairments and functional limitation. Global outcomes
are related to disability, secondary prevention, and optimization of patient/client
satisfaction. The language in the Guide should be helpful in ensuring that your notes
adequately address function.
For additional information on the topic, review PT Magazine articles such as the following:
Generally, documentation by exception means that the facility has determined a clinical
protocol or pathway of interventions, goals or outcomes that are expected in the course of a
patient’s episode of care, sometimes with timeframes. The protocol or pathway is then
copied and placed in the patient’s chart. The only documentation then is any status or event
which is not indicated on the protocol or pathway.
APTA does not recommend this type of documentation for physical therapists for many
reasons. It does not allow for an individualized plan of care nor will it meet most payer or
regulatory requirements for documentation. You may consider having a pre-formatted
evaluation or treatment note, but interventions, goals and prognosis, along with the
timeframes for each should be individualized to the patient / client needs.
50
APTA does not have an approved abbreviations list. There are many partial published
listings of abbreviations and acronyms, such as those found in any of the widely used
medical dictionaries (e.g., Dorland’s, Webster’s, Stedman’s). There are perhaps as many
variations in the forms of many abbreviations as there are listings (e.g., one source
abbreviates “twice a day” as “b.i.d.” while another source abbreviates it “BID.” One of the
most comprehensive and authoritative listings is a book titled Medical Abbreviations:
28,000 Conveniences at the Expense of Communications and Safety, by Neil M Davis
(published by Neil M Davis Associates, Huntingdon Valley, PA). This edition was
published in 2006. This book should be found at any medical library or PT school library.
A cautionary note: The more abbreviations you use, the lower the chance that all readers
will be able to understand what you are trying to communicate. Use abbreviations
sparingly.
Should incident reports be kept in the patient’s/client’s chart, or a separate file? Do the
circumstances of an incident make a difference relative to how it is reported and filed?
It is prudent to develop an incident reporting form and related policies and procedures in
consultation with legal counsel to ensure that you have addressed the needs of your
setting appropriately. If you don't already have an attorney, APTA’s legal resources Web
page –
http://www.apta.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Risk_Management2&CONTENTID=375
75&TEMPLATE=/CM/ContentDisplay.cfm is a good place to start your search. This page
has been designed to help members find attorneys who are familiar with their state laws
and can provide them with personalized assistance.
Other Considerations
A. Confidentiality
51
accessible/readable by unauthorized individuals. If there is a name on the chart, it should be
kept face-down so the name is not displayed, and the chart should never be left unattended.
Therapists should be careful not to discuss patient/client cases in open/public areas such as
elevators or lunch rooms.
The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) addresses the
security and privacy of protected health information (PHI) in all mediums. It includes
provisions for establishing and maintaining proper access, use and disclosure of PHI and
electronic protected health information (EPHI), which includes patient/client care
documentation and related data such as billing records. Some of the main objectives of
HIPAA are to decrease fraud and abuse and protect patient’s/client’s rights including the
privacy of health-related data. It is important that you have procedures in place related to
HIPAA and that you know the regulations for governing you as a covered entity for
releasing any patient/client information.
There are other specific agreements such as the HIPAA Business Associate agreement that
you may encounter. The definition of a business associate is a person or organization that
performs a function or activity on behalf of a “covered entity” such as an interpreter service
that is providing interpretation services for your patient/client.
If you need additional information regarding HIPAA go to:
http://www.apta.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=HIPAA1&Template=/TaggedPage/Tagge
dPageDisplay.cfm&TPLID=183&ContentID=18513 or
http://www.cms.hhs.gov/HIPAAGenInfo/
In Pediatric settings, PT’s who provide services to children in federally funded school
settings to which the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) applies, should
follow the provisions of the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA)
governing educational records. FERPA is a Federal law that protects the privacy of student
educational records. Physical therapy documentation in this setting would be considered a
part of the child’s educational record. You can access information about FERPA at the
following web site: http://www.ed.gov/policy/gen/guid/fpco/ferpa/index.html
B. Incident Reporting
The September 1996 PT Magazine article titled “Incident Reports: Protecting the
Record.”
The Joint Commission Web site at http://www.jointcommission.org/ and the
Commission on Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities Web site at
http://www.carf.org/. If you are Joint Commission or CARF accredited, you will
definitely want to be sure you are in compliance with any standards or requirements
they may have regarding incident reporting. If you are not accredited by either of
these groups, you may still find their standards and guidelines useful as you
craft/review your policies and procedures in this area.
52
If you have workers' compensation insurance (WCI) for your staff, then you might
find it useful to contact your WCI carrier to see if they have any particular forms or
information that they look for on incident reports.
Finally, following are some general Dos and Don'ts related to incident reporting, excerpted
from Risk Management in Physical Therapy: A Quick Reference, an APTA
publication. This publication is available for purchase through our Service Center at
800/999-2782, ext. 3395 or via our online store at www.apta.org (Order No. P-169-05,
member price $9.49).
DO follow the incident reporting policy that is in place in your workplace and alert
the risk manager and/or immediate supervisor to what has happened as soon as
possible.
DO notify the referring physician or other health care provider immediately
whenever an injury occurs, existing signs or symptoms worsen, or new signs or
symptoms develop.
DO ensure that the patient/client receives appropriate care after an incident. Most
facilities provide this care at no cost.
DO listen to your patient’s/client’s concerns, be supportive, and be calm.
DO record only factual information regarding the incident when you fill out an
incident report. Once you complete an incident report, it should be given directly to
the supervisor or risk manager, and you should wait for further direction before
doing anything else.
DO isolate, tag, and secure any equipment involved in an incident so that it will not
be used again until it has been certified as completely safe.
DO be available for follow-up as needed after the incident. If it seems likely that the
incident is going to lead to a claim, you will want to consult with your risk
manager/supervisor and notify your professional liability carrier, who can provide
guidance.
53
C. Electronic Patient Records
D. Documentation Tools
54
A. Authentication
The process used to verify that an entry is complete, accurate, and final.
Indications of authentication can include original written signatures and, for
secured electronic record systems only, computer "signatures."
Authentication/Designation may be state and facility and other regulations.
B. Medicare Regulations
There are many regulations relating to the physical therapy evaluation and treatment
of patients/clients who have Medicare coverage. The regulations can change often, and it is
important that you stay informed of any changes that occur. You may access current
information at the following link:
http://www.apta.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Medicare1&Template=/TaggedPage/Tag
gedPageDisplay.cfm&TPLID=32&ContentID=18290
Clinician
Certification
For Medicare payment purposes, certification of the plan of care requires the
Physician/Non Physician Provider (NPP) approval of the plan. This is required within 30
treatment days after the initial therapy visit. An initial certification may be written for a
period of up to 90 days.
Recertification
Recertification of the Plan of Care requires the Physician/Non Physician Provider approval
of the plan. Effective January 1, 2008, CMS extended the recertification period to up to 90
days. This means that the initial plan of care must be recertified when the initial plan of
care is extended or at least once every 90 days – whichever comes first.
http://www.apta.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Fee_Schedule1&Template=/Mem
bersOnly.cfm&ContentID=44000
Progress Reports
For Medicare Part B (outpatient services) payment purposes, progress reports should be
completed at least once every 10 treatment days or once during the interval (30 calendar
days or one month), whichever is less. Progress reports may be provided more often than
required when the physical therapist judges them appropriate. In most Medicare Part A
55
settings (i.e. skilled nursing facilities), progress reports or weekly notes should be
completed weekly.
Re-evaluation
Documentation
56
The following areas are the most frequently noted errors when providers are
submitting medical documentation to CERT contractors.
4. Paid claims error rate. This is based on dollars paid after the Medicare
contractor made its payment decision on the claim. This rate includes fully denied
claims for carriers/DMERCs/FIs/QIOs. The paid claims error rate is the percentage
of total dollars that all Medicare FFS contractors erroneously paid or denied and is a
good indicator of how claim errors in the Medicare FFS Program affect the trust
fund. CMS calculated the gross rate by adding underpayments to overpayments and
dividing that sum by total dollars paid. This error rate is quantified in dollars.
5. All Other Claims. This means all outpatient, fee-for-service Medicare Part B
claims.
7. Other errors. These include instances in which provider claims did not meet
benefit category requirements or other billing requirements.
The following link will assist you with billing and coding questions:
http://www.apta.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Coding&Template=/TaggedPage/Tagged
PageDisplay.cfm&TPLID=59&ContentID=16527
57
Association (AMA) and are updated annually. For more information, click on the
following link: http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/category/3113.html
ICD-9 CM -The International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision is based
on the World Health Organization’s International Classification of Diseases. ICD-
9-CM codes are updated annually and become effective on October 1 each year.
When billing for services provided by a physical therapist, it will be necessary to
specify the diagnosis that is being treated. For more information, click on the
following link:
http://www.apta.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Coding&TEMPLATE=/CM/Cont
entDisplay.cfm&CONTENTID=22529.
Other notations or flow charts are considered a component of the documented record but do
not meet the requirements of documentation in or of themselves.
Students in physical therapist or physical therapist assistant programs may document when
the record is additionally authenticated by the physical therapist or, when permissible by
law, documentation by physical therapist assistant students may be authenticated by a
physical therapist assistant.
Discharge
Discharge occurs when the anticipated goals and expected outcomes have been
achieved and is based on the physical therapist’s analysis of the of the patient’s/client’s
achievement of the anticipated goals and expected outcomes. Discharge does not occur
with a transfer to another site of care.
Discontinuation
58
therapy services. When services are terminated prior to goal achievement, patient/client
status and the reason for termination are documented.
Goals can be considered in terms of impairments in body structures and functions, activity
limitations, participation restrictions, and prevention.
Prevention
There are three types of prevention in which physical therapists are involved:
Primary: Preventing a target condition in a susceptible or potentially
susceptible population through such specific measures as general health
promotion efforts.
Secondary: Decreasing duration of illness, severity of disease, and number
of sequelae through early diagnosis and prompt intervention.
Tertiary: Limiting the degree of disability and promoting rehabilitation and
restoration of function in patients with chronic and irreversible diseases.
Appendices
APPENDIX A: Documentation Resources
Code of Ethics
http://www.apta.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Policies_and_Bylaws&TEMPLATE=/C
M/ContentDisplay.cfm&CONTENTID=25854
59
link will direct you to information about your state practice act:
http://www.fsbpt.org/licensing/index.asp
Medicare
http://www.cms.hhs.gov/Manuals/IOM/itemdetail.asp?filterType=none&filterByDID=-
99&sortByDID=1&sortOrder=ascending&itemID=CMS012673&intNumPerPage=10
http://www.cms.hhs.gov/mcd/search.asp?from2=search.asp&
Other
Additional regulations by payers and practice settings are discussed in specific sections of
this document.
60
Documentation of systems review may include gathering data for the
following systems:
Cardiovascular/pulmonary
Blood pressure
Edema
Heart rate
Oxygen saturation
Respiratory rate
Integumentary
Pliability (texture)
Presence of scar formation
Skin color
Skin integrity
Musculoskeletal
Gross range of motion
Gross strength
Gross symmetry
Height
Weight
Neuromuscular
Gross coordinated movement (e.g., balance, locomotion,
transfers, and transitions)
Motor function (motor control, motor learning)
Documentation of tests and measures may include findings for the following categories:
Aerobic capacity/endurance
Anthropometric characteristics
Arousal, attention, and cognition
Assistive and adaptive devices
Circulation (arterial, venous, lymphatic)
61
Cranial and peripheral nerve integrity
Environmental, home, and work (job/school/play) barriers
Ergonomics and body mechanics
Gait, locomotion, and balance
Integumentary integrity
Joint integrity and mobility
Motor function
Muscle performance
Neuromotor development and sensory integration
Orthotic, protective, and supportive devices
Pain
Posture
Prosthetic requirements
Range of motion (including muscle length)
Reflex integrity
Self-care and home management (including activities of daily living and instrumental
activities of daily living)
Sensory integrity
Ventilation and respiration
Work (job/school/play), community, and leisure integration or reintegration (including
instrumental activities of daily living)
62
Documentation of reexamination shall include the following elements:
63
individual may experience in his/her involvement in life situations. The presence of a
participation restriction is determined by comparing the individual’s participation to that
which is expected of an individual without a disability in the individual’s culture or society.
Disability: Disability is an umbrella term encompassing impairment, activity limitation
and participation restriction. Disability describes the negative aspects of the interaction
between an individual's health characteristic and that person's contextual factors.
Prevention: Activities that are directed toward (1) achieving and restoring optimal
functional capacity, (2) minimizing impairments, functional limitations, and disabilities, (3)
maintaining health (thereby preventing further deterioration or future illness), (4) creating
appropriate environmental adaptations to enhance independent function. Primary
prevention: Prevention of disease in a susceptible or potentially susceptible population
through specific measures such as general health promotion efforts. Secondary prevention:
Efforts to decrease the duration of illness, severity of diseases, and sequelae through early
diagnosis and prompt intervention. Tertiary prevention: Efforts to limit the degree of
disability and promote rehabilitation and restoration of function in patients/clients with
chronic and irreversible diseases. Also see Episode of physical therapy prevention.
https://www.cms.hhs.gov/apps/er_report/preview_er_report.asp?from=public
&which=long&reportID=7&tab=4
Consider:
1) What was done in the visit which required the skills of a physical therapist or physical
therapist assistant? You might want to consider why you had to provide the intervention
and another provider or caregiver could not? What knowledge, training and skills were
used to provide the intervention?
Non- skilled: Patient attempted to get out of chair independently. Noted difficulty getting to
edge of chair. Multiple attempts required to come to standing position
Skilled: Provided transfer training from sit to stand. Patient requires tactile and verbal cues
to facilitate trunk flexion.
64
Skilled: Moderate assistance provided with gait training to compensate for left sided
neglect and assist with weight shifting for proper progression of bilateral lower extremities.
Pt able to demonstrate ambulation 30’ x 1 with standard walker
Non- skilled: Bike x 15’ followed by treadmill x 10’ at 3.0 followed by therapeutic
exercises per flow sheet.
Skilled: Prior to activity HR- 83 BP- 128/89 and SaO2 – 98% on room air. Patient
monitored during the following activities: bike x 15’ followed by treadmill x 10’ at 3.0
mph. Patient’s vital signs after activity as follows: HR- 123 BP- 146/89 and SaO2 – 89%
on room air. Patient also visibly fatigued and short of breath. After 5’ rest, vital signs
returned to baseline.
Patient/client educated in the use of progressive exercises to facilitate trunk stabilization for
improved balance during gait.
Training provided in don / doffing lower extremity prosthesis with verbal and manual cues
for technique and safety.
Ambulation training with standard walker to facilitate proper foot placement. Patient/client
requires frequent monitoring of vital signs due to poor endurance and cardiac risk factors.
Patient requires VS monitoring to determine impact of activity on cardiovascular status /
CV response to exercise.
Document complications and safety issues as a result of the patient/clients current status
such as:
Fall risk – Patient ambulates 30’ x 1 requiring moderate assistance for mobility and for safe
progression of standard walker. Pt remains at significant risk for falling at this time.
Reduced mobility/ Risk for further complications – Patient is unable to perform bed
mobility without further intervention and training. At present, he does not have enough
strength or motor control to roll or weight shift to either side thus remains at risk for
complications of skin breakdown and respiratory complications.
Inability to complete tasks (i.e. activities of daily living) – At this time, patient limited in
strength, endurance and balance. As a result she is currently unable to perform activities of
65
daily living that she was previously able to do independently, including dressing, bathing
and cooking.
Note: Physical therapists and physical therapist assistants working in skilled nursing
facility or home health settings should strive to complement the documentation of other
health care providers, such as nursing and the other therapy disciplines. Therefore every
effort must be made to facilitate communicate so the documentation can be consistent
throughout the medical chart.
Transfer Training example: Patient seen for transfer training from bed to chair. Initial status
was maximal assist. Patient trained with tactile and verbal cues to promote trunk flexion
and facilitate appropriate lower extremity muscle contraction. Patient able to demonstrate
both improved pelvic tilt and more effective hip extensor firing. Will continue to facilitate
proper and safe technique as patient continues to require moderate assistance. Prognosis for
independent transfers remains good.
Visit #1: Gait training with patient in parallel bars. Patient unable to shift weight to affected
side with verbal cueing. Applied manual cues however patient required maximal assistance
to shift weight and was unable to maintain weight shift for progression of unaffected lower
extremity. Patient complains of vertigo and BP found to be 96/ 65. Blood pressure and
complaints return to normal after sitting x 5 minutes.
Visit #2 - Vital signs normal at start of visit. Gait training with patient in parallel bars.
Patient unable to shift weight to affected side with verbal and manual cues. Requires
maximal assistance to shift weight in standing. Modified exercise program to include
activities to promote weight shifting in other postures.
Visit #3: Vital signs normal at start of visit. Training with patient to weight shift in sitting.
Pt able to shift weight to unaffected side after training in sitting. Requires moderate
assistance for trunk control when attempts to weight shift to affected side. Pre-gait training
in parallel bars demonstrates increased ability in standing tolerance from 1 minute to 3.6
minutes. Will continue to progress pre-gait activities at this time.
66
67