You are on page 1of 4

The PMI® James R.

Snyder Center for Project Management


Knowledge & Wisdom
Project Scope Management
Derived from the Greek term “skopos” Project Scope Management is a set of processes. A process is a “set of interrelated
and the Italian term “scopo” meaning actions and activities performed to achieve a specified set of products, results, or
“target or aim” “scope” has been used services” (PMI 2004).
in the nautical sense to denote the
“length of cable or hawser on which a Five processes are included in Project Scope Management:
ship rides” indicating the boundary
point wherein a ship may venture freely ¾ Scope Planning is the first part of the overall project management plan
while moored or anchored (Webster’s processes, and is used in developing the project scope management plan. It
Third International Dictionary). Scope can be broadly defined, or very detailed in accordance with project necessity
specifies and describes the boundaries (Dinsmore and Cabanis-Brewin 2006). It describes the what, where, and how
wherein resources may be used within a of the deliverable(s) and should be written keeping the customer or user as

2007, Issue 1
project, the aim of which is to produce audience in mind, clearly delineating the point where the project begins and
a result or results. A Guide to the Project ends (Martin 2005, Martin and Tate 2000). Environmental and organizational
Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® factors are taken into account, as well as stakeholder input (Sutterfield, Friday-
Guide) – Stroud and Shivers-Blackwell 2006). Utilizing expert opinion, options
Third Edition defines Project Scope as identification, plus product and stakeholder analysis, a document is derived,
"The work that must be performed to showing how scope will be defined, verified, and controlled (Thatcher and
deliver a product, service, or result with Sarvis 1990).
the specified features and functions"
(PMI 2004). The overall process has ¾ Scope Definition creates a project scope statement "to gain an appropriate
been described as the “summation of all consent among all the stakeholders taking charge of the scope definition of the
deliverables required as part of the project", to confirm complementary objectives (Sanz Perez and Bucero Torres

PM KnowledgeWire
project” (Kerzner 2006). “Defining and 2004). Decisions made at this time impact success at each successive project
managing the project scope influences stage (Smith 1990). A clear statement of the intended product or service that
the project’s overall success” (PMI is included within the project and expected by the stakeholders helps belay
2004). Effective scope management is delays by establishing a set of clear goals and objectives, serving as a sort of
considered essential to project success project map to keep the project on track (Heldman, Baca and Jansen 2005, Lo
(Dekkers and Forselius 2007, Valvo 2004, Monaghan 1990). The definition process produces a formal
Frohnhoefer 2003, Peters and Homer, declaration of the boundaries of the project, what it is and is not; what is
1997). included and what is excluded (Peters and Homer 1997). Statements about
what is NOT included within the scope sometimes are needed as part of the
assumptions to avoid misinterpretation of the scope (O’Connor 2001). This
document can “later be used to control and manage scope at both the project
and subproject levels” (Thompson 1996), and as a stakeholder
communication tool (Burek 2006). The definition process feeds back into the
scope management plan and also sets the stage for the creation of the work
breakdown structure (WBS) (Hamburger 1996, Woolshlager 1986).

¾ A Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) creates a hierarchical breakdown of


activities and end products (deliverables), thereby defining and organizing the
project work that is to be completed (Richman 2006). It decomposes, or
breaks down tasks into smaller components for ease of execution. Lowest level
components are work packages, wherein work effort can be managed and
estimated reliably. A well-formed WBS can serve as a “foundational
agreement” between all stakeholders as to the end deliverable(s), and as a
communication tool (Heldman, Baca and Jansen 2005). Outputs of this
process include the WBS and the WBS dictionary, which gives a detailed
account of the work to be performed in each WBS element (Haugan 2003).

¾ Scope Verification achieves formal acceptance of the project scope and


associated deliverables (PMI 2004). Carried out whenever one or more
deliverables are ready to be handed over, this process provides feedback to
ensure that the work performed matches the set requirements. Verification is
a continuous process that can occur concurrently with other scope
management processes (Khan 2006). Thorough scope verification can greatly
minimize delays (Webster Jr. 2000).
2007, Issue 1 ● page 2 PM KnowledgeWire
Additional – Resources Project Scope Management, cont. from page 1

From the Knowledge & Wisdom Center’s ¾ Scope Control creates a formal system through which all change requests and corrective actions
online catalog, Knowledgebase: are processed and controlled (PMI 2004). Change happens. Scope control minimizes project peril
by providing a formal change process, thereby mitigating costly overruns and delays (Batavia 1999,
Web-site links Zells 1995). It reduces the impact of unauthorized scope changes, or “scope creep”. Scope creep
is the addition of “features and functionality (project scope) without addressing the effects on
A Guide to the Project Management Body of time, costs, and resources, or without customer approval “ (PMI 2004). Creep causes a project to
Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) - Third Edition. extend beyond the bounds of its original objectives. Creep can be internal or external (Abramovici
Chapter 5: Project Scope Management. 2000). For example, an engineer may insert a change to a specification thinking that it may be
useful, or a customer may insist on a change. Either unauthorized change may affect the project
(available for viewing at no additional cost
baseline. Scope controls keep out the creep.
via the PMI Members Area).
Project Scope Management is critical to project success. Possessing a clearly defined scope statement and an
U.S. Center for Disease Control (CDC) –
encompassing WBS, verifying that scope and work are in line with project objectives and deliverables, and
Project Scope Planning
maintaining scope control, all work to keep your project from going adrift, keeping it within scope
boundaries. “The expenditure of time, effort and cost in managing the scope process up front is rewarded in
U.S. Air Force Journal of Defense Software terms of improved performance, and costs saved in rework” (Hooks and Farry 2001).
Engineering - Estimating and Managing
Project Scope for New Development References
U.S Department of Energy and University of Articles:
California, Environmental Energy
Technologies Division, E.O Lawrence Abramovici, Adrian. 2000. Controlling scope creep. PM Network, 14(1): 44-48.
Berkeley Laboratory- Project Scope and
Research Topics Batavia, Rajen. 1999. Front-end loading--a path to a successful project. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual
PMI Seminars & Symposium. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
State of Washington, Information Services Burek, Paul. 2006. Developing a complete project scope statement in 2 days. In Proceedings of the PMI
Board - Scope Global Congress-North America. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
Tasmanian Government Project Management Dekkers, Carol and Pekka Forselius. 2007. Increase ICT project success with concrete scope management.
Guildelines (Version 6.0) (Section 2 - In Proceedings of the PMI Global Congress 2007 - Asia Pacific. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management
Planning and Scoping) Institute.

PMI Literature – Case Studies (Scope): Frohnhoefer, Ray W. 2003. Enterprise project management and estimating. In Proceedings of the PMI
Global Congress 2003—North America. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
Project Management Institute, 2005. Lack of
support. PM Network,19(1): 1. Hamburger, David H. 1996. Managing the evolution of the project plan: a not so revolutionary solution to a
Lack of risk and scope management traditional problem. In Proceedings of the 28th PMI Annual Seminars & Symposium. Newtown Square, PA:
procedures lead to system failure. Project Management Institute.
CID: 6772
Khan, A. 2006. Project scope management. Cost engineering 48(6): 12-16.
Wagner, Ellen. 2004. Against all odds, a case
study on scope and stakeholder management Lo Valvo, Pier Paolo. 2004. Project scope management dynamics - exploring the advisor dimensions of the
(....and then some). In Proceedings of the PMI project manager. In Proceedings of the PMI Global Congress 2004—Europe. Newtown Square, PA: Project
Global Congress 2004-North America. Management Institute.
Newtown Square, PA: Project Management
Institute. Martin, Paula and Karen Tate. 2000. What's in a project plan? PM Network, 14(4): 33.
Although "Against All Odds, a Case Study"
highlights scope and stakeholder management Monaghan, T.R. 1990. Concept determination and process for the project definition. In Proceedings of the
practices. 21st Annual Seminars & Symposium. Upper Darby, PA: Project Management Institute.
CID: 6720
O’Connor, Edward A. 2001. Preparing an effective business plan for your project. In Proceedings of the 33rd
Blackburn, David and Roger Glass. 1996. PM PMI Annual Seminars & Symposium. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
evolution : it's a question of scope. In
Proceedings of the 28th PMI Annual Peters, Lee A. and John L. Homers. 1997. It’s not time, cost, or quality that ensures project success: learn
Seminars & Symposium. Newtown Square, project fundamentals which are the keys to project success. In Proceedings of the 29th PMI Annual
PA: Project Management Institute. Seminars & Symposium. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
The Wisconsin Department of
Transportation’s experiences with “Scope Sanz-Perez, Francisco Javier and Alfonso Bucero Torres. 2004. Scope management with graphics. In
Change” is shared. Proceedings of the PMI Global Congress 2004--Europe. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
CID: 4140
2007, Issue 1 ● page 3 PM KnowledgeWire
eReads & Reference
Achieving Project Management
Success Using Virtual Teams by References, cont’d.
Parviz F. Rad and Ginger Levin
ISBN:1932159037 J. Ross Smith, Mark A. 1990. Establishing influence factors to determine scope in the definition phase In Proceedings of the 21st
Publishing © 2003 Annual Seminars & Symposium. Upper Darby, PA: Project Management Institute.
Chapter 2 - Management of
Sutterfield, J. Scott, Shawnta S. Friday-Stroud and Sheryl L. Shivers-Blackwell. 2006. A case study of project and
Project Things - 2.2 Scope stakeholder management failures: lessons learned. Project Management Journal, 37(5). 26-35.
Definition
Thatcher, John R. and Jeffrey G. Sarvis. 1990. The application of holistic thinking to the scope definition of process
Customer-Centered Products: plants. In Journal of Project Management. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual Seminars & Symposium. Upper Darby,
Creating Successful Products PA: Project Management Institute.
Through Smart Requirements
Management by Ivy F. Hooks Thompson, Gary R. 1996. Project definition: an alternative to the patchwork Project. PM Network 10(5):29-31.
and Kristin A. Farry Woolshlager, Larry C. 1986. Scope Management. Project Management Journal 17(3):37-42.
ISBN:0814405681 AMACOM
© 2001 (272 pages) Zells, Lois. 1995. Change control: myth or reality? In Proceedings of the 26th PMI Annual Seminars & Symposium. Upper
Chapter 4: Creating a Shared Darby, PA: Project Management Institute.
Vision- Scoping the Project up
Front (Why Scope?) Books

Dinsmore, Paul C. and Jeannette Cabanis-Brewin. The AMA Handbook of Project Management - Second Edition. New York, NY:
Improving Your Project AMACOM, 2006.
Management Skills by Larry
Richman AMACOM © 2006 Haughan, Gregory T. The Work Breakdown Structure in Government Contracting. Vienna, VA: Management Concepts, 2003.
ISBN: 0814408753
Heldman, Kim and Baca and Jansen. PMP: project management professional: study guide. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Pub., 2005.
Chapter 3 - Defining Project
Scope and Requirements Hooks, Ivy F. and Kristin A. Farry. Customer-Centered Products: Creating Successful Products Through Smart Requirements
Management. New York, NY: AMACOM, 2001.
Newell, Michael W. and The
Kerzner, Harold. Project Management : A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling - 9th ed. Hoboken, NJ: John
Project Management Question Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2006.
and Answer Book by Michael
W. Newell and Marina N. Martin, Paula K. Sponsoring a Project. Cincinnati, OH: Martin Training Associates, 2005.
Grashina ISBN:0814471641
Project Management Institute. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) - Third Edition. Newtown
AMACOM © 2004. Square, PA: Project Management Institute, 2004.
Chapter 2 - Scope
Richman, Larry. Improving Your Project Management Skills. New York, NY: AMACOM, 2006.
PM 101 According to the Olde
Webster, Francis M., Jr. PM101 According to the Old Curmudgeon: An Introduction to the Basic Concepts of Modern Project
Curmudgeon: An Introduction to Management. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute, 2000.
the Basic Concepts of Modern
Project Management by Francis Webster’s Third New International Dictionary of the English Language – Unabridged. s.v. “scope.”
M. Webster Jr.
ISBN:1880410559 Project
Management Institute © 2000.
Chapter 7 - Scope Management

The Project Management Tool


Kit: 100 Tips and Techniques
for Getting the Job Done Right
by Tom Kendrick
ISBN:0814408109 AMACOM
© 2004.
Chapter 84 - Scope
Process/Scope Definition

Project Manager's Spotlight on


Planning by Catherine A.
Tomczyk Jossey-Bass © 2005
Publisher: Jossey-
ISBN:0782144136
Chapter 2 - Defining Project
Objectives, Goals, Scope, and
Requirements

Sponsoring a Project by Paula K.


Martin Martin Training
Associates © 2005 (48 pages)
ISBN:0972396454

The Work Breakdown Structure


in Government Contracting by
Gregory T. Haugan Management
Concepts © 2003 (125 pages)
ISBN:1567261205

Earned Value Project


Management, Third Edition by
Quentin W. Fleming and Joel M.
Koppelman
Project Management Institute ©
2005 (240 pages)
ISBN:1930699891
Chapter 5: Scope the Project
(Understanding the Project
(What’s In . . . What’s Out))

The Project Management Office 6-9 October 2007


Toolkit by Jolyon Hallows Atlanta, Georgia, USA
AMACOM © 2002 (259 pages)
ISBN:0814406637
Chapter 6: Supporting Project The Georgia World Congress Center &
Managers (Managing Scope
Changes)
The Hyatt Regency Atlanta

The AMA Handbook of Project To subscribe to PM KnowledgeWire send an email with the subject line ‘Subscribe to KnowledgeWire to kwc@pmi.org
Management, Second Edition by
Paul C. Dinsmore and Jeannette © 2007 Project Management Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.“PMI” and the PMI logo are service and trademarks registered in the United States and other
nations; “PMP” and the PMP logo are certification marks registered in the United States and other nations; “PMBOK”, “PM Network”, and “PMI Today” are
Cabanis-Brewin (eds) trademarks registered in the United States and other nations; and “Project Management Journal” and “Making project management indispensable for
AMACOM © 2006 (518 pages) business results.®” are trademarks of the Project Management Institute, Inc. 035-002-2002 (rev. 1-06)
ISBN:0814472710
Chapter 8: Project Scope DISCLAIMER: The material supplied by the Knowledge & Wisdom Center is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as advice or
instruction. PMI does not endorse, recommend, or warrant the accuracy of the information provided. The recipient uses the information at his/her own risk
Management in Practice and responsibility. Links to Web sites are provided solely for the convenience of the customer. PMI does not endorse and is not responsible or liable for any
content, advertising, products, or other materials on or available from such sites or resources.
The PMI eReads & Reference
online book program is a member
benefit that gives you around-the-
clock access to the full unabridged
contents of 250 project management
and business texts from PMI and
other leading publishers. Visit
www.pmi.org to read, reference and
research today!

You might also like