DESIGN BASIS REPORT

RESIDENTIAL BULDING AT ADHERI EKTA, MUMBAI

STRUCRURAL DESIGN BASIS REPORT

SUBMMITING ENGINEER - PALLAV BISEN

Page | 1
 DESIGN BASIS REPORT

Table of Contents

Foreword .......................................................................................................................................3
Project Description.........................................................................................................................3
Architectural floor plan .................................................................................................................4
Structural floor plan .......................................................................................................................7
List of Code....................................................................................................................................9
Deign parameter.............................................................................................................................11
Software input data in Etabs .........................................................................................................12
Loading parameter .......................................................................................................................13
Load calculation ............................................................................................................................16
Risk indicators ...............................................................................................................................24
Stability check ..............................................................................................................................28

Page | 2
 DESIGN BASIS REPORT

Foreword

This report covers the minimum design requirement to establish the unified design basis that will
form the overall design philosophy to be adopted in the structural design of the building.

The design will aim to achieve.

Structural & functional integrity.

Desirable Structural performance under characteristic service design loads.

Resistance to loads due to natural phenomena Like Wind and earthquakes.

Structural durability & maintainability.

Project Description

Project : G+12 RESIDENTAIL BUILDING

Location : ADHERI EKTA, Mumbai.

Structural Floor : Stack Parking floor + Ground Floor +11 Typical Floor + Terrace +
OHT&LMR

Project Information Data

Specific requirements of a floor like habitual, sinking, kitchen and toilet area for services. External
architectural features, and entrance canopies will be provided as required by architects. The
relevant information will be obtained from them in the form of drawings.

Lift loads and lift machine room equipment and cutout layouts will be obtained from the lift
manufacturers. An impact factor will be considered in the lift supporting structures.

Soil report provided by geotechnical constants.

Site Environment Data

Average weather data:

Temperature: Max 45˚c Min 15˚c

Wind direction & basic wind pressure: As per IS 875 (Part III)
Page | 3
 DESIGN BASIS REPORT

Seismic Data : As per IS 1893-2016

Rainfall: Rainy season: June to October.

Avg. Annual rainfall ----2000 mm.
Max Rainfall ----150mm.In 24Hrs

Architectural Floor Plan

Ground Floor Plan

Page | 4
 DESIGN BASIS REPORT

First Floor Plan

7th To 10th Floor Plan

Page | 5
 DESIGN BASIS REPORT

11th Floor Plan

Terrace Floor Plan

Page | 6
 DESIGN BASIS REPORT

Structural Floor Plan

Ground Floor Plan

IST Floor Plan

Page | 7
 DESIGN BASIS REPORT

Typical Floor Plan

7th to 10th floor plan

Page | 8
 DESIGN BASIS REPORT

Terrace floor plan

List of Code

Design Load (Other Than Earthquake)

IS Code Description
Dead Loads - Unit Weight of Building Material
IS 875(Part 1): 1987
and Stored Material
IS 875(Part 2): 1987 Imposed Loads
IS 875(Part 3): 1987 Wind Loads

Design for Earthquake Resistance

IS Code Description
Criteria for earthquake resistance design of
IS 1893:2002
structures.
Earthquake Resistant Design and Construction
IS 4326: 1993
of Buildings – Code of Practice
Ductile Detailing of Reinforced Concrete
IS 13920: 1993 Structures Subjected to Seismic Forces - Code
of Practice.

Page | 9
 DESIGN BASIS REPORT

Design of plain and RCC Concrete Element

IS Code. Description.
IS 456: 2000 Plain and Reinforced Concrete - Code of practice
Structural use of concrete. Design charts for
SP 16 singly reinforced beams doubly reinforced
beams and columns.
Handbook on Concrete Reinforcement &
SP 34
Detailing
Indian Standard Code of practice for design &
IS 1904 construction foundations in Soil: General
Requirements
Indian Standard Code of Practice for Design and
IS 2950
Construction of Raft Foundation (Part – 1)

Proposed Approach of Structural Analysis

The building is an R.C.C shear wall/columns and beam, slab frame structure.
After preliminary sizing of various structural members, computer model of the structural frame of
the building will be generated for carrying out computer analysis for the effects of vertical and
lateral load that are likely to be imposed on the structure.

The building structure will be analyzed using the ETABS software.

Geometrical dimensions, member properties, and member-node connectivity, including

eccentricities, will be modeled in the analysis problem. Variation in material grades, if present,
will also be considered.

Wind load derivations will be carried out using gust factor method in accordance with the relevant
codes.

The seismic loads will be derived from the results of dynamic analysis of the structure in
accordance with the relevant code of practice.

The permissible values of the load factors and stresses will be utilized within the purview of the
Indian Standards.

The computer analysis will evaluate individual internal member forces, reactions at foundation
level and deflection pattern of the entire structure and in the individual members. This data will
then be used to verify the adequacy of the member sizes adopted and after further iterations arrive
at the most appropriate design of the structural members. Some re-runs of the analysis program

Page | 10
 DESIGN BASIS REPORT

might be required for arriving at the optimum structural space frame characteristics that satisfy the
strength and stability criteria in all respects.

Space frame analysis will be carried out for gravity loads, wind loads and seismic load.

Design Parameters

For the design of R.C.C. elements, the Limit State Method will be used as per IS 456-2000.
The building is RCC frame structure with columns shear walls/cores; floor slabs being used as
diaphragms in redistribution of lateral forces.

The minimum Grade of Concrete in all RCC structural members beam and slab shall be M 25

The Grade of Concrete in RCC shear wall shall be M 30

The concrete of Grade M20 shall be used in filling, plain concrete, leveling courses and other non-
structural items.

The density of reinforced concrete is assumed as 25 kN/m3

Minimum cement content, water cement ratio etc. shall conform to IS 456:2000 provisions for
durability and strength criteria.

High Yield Strength Deformed bars conforming to IS: 1786 with Fy = 500MPa

Covers to reinforcement shall be in accordance with IS: 456:2000 corresponding to moderate

exposure conditions for the super-structure or severe exposure conditions for the sub-structure and
to satisfy a fire rating of 2 hrs.

Value Engineering Exercises

In order to optimize the material consumption, sample analysis and design exercises have been
undertaken with different combinations of member sizes and the required reinforcement and
formwork will be estimated. Results of these exercises have been considered in arriving at the
structural scheme of the building.

Page | 11
 DESIGN BASIS REPORT

Software Input Data in Etabs model

Section Used For Framing Structure

Slab

Slab 150mm thickness – for habitual floor (Indication pink color)

Slab 125 mm thickness - For habitual floors (Indication brown color)
Slab 200mm thickness - For staircase (Indication blue color)
Slab 200mm thickness - For water tank and lift machine room (Indication green color)
Slab 200 mm thickness - For sunk slab (Indication blue yellow)

Beam
B150X300 - Secondary Beam (Indication green yellow)
B230x600 - Primary Beams (Indication red yellow)

Shear Wall
300 mm Thickness (Indication blue yellow)

Page | 12
 DESIGN BASIS REPORT

Support
Fixed Support translation x, y, z axis and rotation about x, y, z axis restraints.

Loading parameters

Self-Weights

Self-weight of the structural members will be considered on the basis of the following properties.

Density of reinforced concrete 25 KN/m3

Density of plain concrete 24 KN/m3
Density of steel 78.5 KN/m3
Density of floor finishes/plasters 21 KN/m3
Density of soil 18 KN/m3
Density of light weight concrete blocks 10 KN/m3
Plastering / Screeds 21 KN/m3
Cementitious water proofing 2.0 KN/m3

(As per IS code 875-part 1)

Dead load (DL):

Dead load including self-weight of various materials & finished items relevant to the design work
and shall be considered as per IS: 875 (Part I). Suspended loads if any such as cable tray, piping
& lighting fixtures shall also be considered as dead loads.

Imposed Gravity Loads on floors

The loads assumed are not imposed by the intended use of occupancy of a building including the
weight of movable partitions, distributed/concentrated loads, loads due to impact & vibrations &
Page | 13
 DESIGN BASIS REPORT

dust load etc. shall be considered. These loads are assumed only for the purpose for study and
comparison for the more effective model of the structure.

(AS per IS 875-2015 Part-2 clause 3.1 Table 1, Table 2)

Load Component UDL (kN/m2)

Fitness Centre Slab
Dead load 1.5
Live load 4

Load Component UDL (kN/m2)

Canopy slab
Dead load 1.5
Live load 0.75

Load Component UDL (kN/m2)

FRD Slab
Dead load 1.5
Live load 3

Load Component UDL (kN/m2)

Stack parking
maintains slab
Dead load 1.5
Live load 1.5

Load Component UDL (kN/m2)

Habitual Slab
Dead load 1.5
Live load 2

Load Component UDL (kN/m2)

Lift Slab
Dead load 10
Live load 0.75

Page | 14
 DESIGN BASIS REPORT

Load Component UDL (kN/m2)

Lobby Slab
Dead load 1.5
Live load 3

Load Component UDL (kN/m2)

Security office Slab
Dead load 1.5
Live load 3

Load Component UDL (kN/m2)

OHT Slab
Dead load 35
Live load 0.75

Load Component UDL (kN/m2)

Refuge Slab
Dead load 1.5
Live load 5

Load Component UDL (kN/m2)

Service Slab
Dead load 1.5
Live load 1.5

Load Component UDL (kN/m2)

Staircase
Dead load 3
Live load 3

Load Component UDL (kN/m2)

Terrace slab
Dead load 3
Live load 2

Load Component UDL (kN/m2)

Sunk slab or toilet
slab
Dead load 3
Live load 2

Page | 15
 DESIGN BASIS REPORT

Load calculation

Sunk slab load calculation

Dead load = light weight filling material + floor finish

Light weight filling material = thickness of filling x density of material

=0.15 x 8
=1.2 kN/m2
Floor finish = (density of cement motor x thickness of cement motor + density of tiles x
Thickness of tiles + density of plaster x thickness of plaster)

= 0.025x21+0.025x23+0.015x21
=1.2+0.525+0.575+0.315
=1.4 kN/m2

Dead load = 1.2+1.4

=2.6 kN/m2
=3 kN/m2 Approx. (As per IS 875-2015 Part 1 All material density Taken)

Water Tank load calculation

Flat no in floor = Typical floor 9 having no of flat 4

= Floor 10 th having no of flat 3
=Floor 11 th having no. of flat 2

Total no. of flat =9x4+3+2

=41
Considering no of persons in each flat is 5

So total no. of person in building 41x5=205

Required water for 205 persons =135x205=27675 liters of one day

(Considering 135 LPCD from the UPPFI Guideline)

Considering 2 days of storage of water =2x27675=55350 liters

Therefore,

Volume of water tank =55350/1000= 55.35 m3

Deal load of water =55.35x1000=55350 kg

Page | 16
 DESIGN BASIS REPORT

Considering density of water 1000 kg/m3

Dead load of water in kN =0.00981x55350=542.985kN

Area of water tank supporting slab =16.33 m2

Deal load of water tank in kN/m2 =542.985/16.33=33.25 kN/m2

So providing Dead load of water tank slab =35 kN/m2

Lift machine Room load calculation

Mechanical data for lift

Lift type = counter weight type

12 person capacity of lift

Passenger weight = 820 kg

Lift car weight =800 kg

Counter weight = 1620 kg

Impact factor = 2 (As per IS 875 part 2)

Total weight of lift core = (820+800+1620) x2

= 6480 kg
=64.8 kN
Total weight of Tow lift core = 2 x 64.8
=129.6

Area of slab supporting lift = 20.45

Dead load of lift = 129..6/20.45

= 6.32 kN/m2
=10 kN/m2 (Providing)

Wall load calculation

Thickness of wall x density of material x (floor to floor height – depth of beam)

Page | 17
 DESIGN BASIS REPORT

External Wall Load Calculation = 0.15 x 10 x (2.9-0.6)

=3.45 KN/m

Internal Wall Load Calculation = 0.1 x 10 x (2.9-0.6)

= 2.3 KN/m2

Parapet Wall Load Calculation = 0.15 x 10 x 1.2

=1.8 KN/m2
Water Tank Wall Calculation
Volume of Tank = L x B x H

55.35 = 16.33 x H
H = 3.38 m
= 3.4 m
= 0.15 x 25 x 3.4 = 12.75 KN/m2

Water Tank Top cover slab load calculation

Total load of top cover slab of water tank =density of concrete x thickness of slab
=25x0.125
=3.125 kN/m2
Top cover slab of water tank having tow way action so the load transfer machines of nearby
element shown in figure

Page | 18
 DESIGN BASIS REPORT

Area of tringluer portion

B2 /4 = (3.22x3.22)/4
=2.59 m2
Load shared by triangular portion on beam
=2.59x3.125
=8.09 kN

Area of trapezoidal portion

= (B (2L-B))/4
= (3.22x (2x5.07-3.22))/4
=5.57 m2

Load shared by trapezoidal portion

=5.57x3.12
=17.40 kN

Load on beam
(Assumption 60% load shared by beam)
=60%x17.40
=10.44 kN
40% shared by shear wall

Wind load Calculation

AS per Is 875 part 3 clause 7 if the structure having frequency less than 0.1 then analysis done as
per gust factor method.

Page | 19
 DESIGN BASIS REPORT

Guest factor analysis is done for the structure.

Gust factor is defend as the ratio between peak wind gusts and mean wind speed over a period of
time, can be used along with other statistics to examine the structure of the wind. Gust factor are
heavily dependent on upstream terrain condition (roughness), but are also affected by transition
flow regimes,

Design wind speed Vz = Vb x K1 x K2 x K3

Vb Basic wind velocity for Mumbai= 44 m/s
(As per 875 2015 part 3 clause 6.2 annex A)

k1= 1 probability factor (Risk coefficient) for a design life of 50 years

(As per 875 2015 part 3 clause 6.3.1 table 1 (General building)

k2=Terrain roughness and height factor

(As per 875 2015 part 3 table 33)
Terrain category = 2 (Mumbai is located in coast near coast area with expose of building
few obstruction)

k3= 1 Topography factor

(As per Is 875 2015part 1 per 3 clause 6.3.3)

FLOORS Fx Fy

OHT&LMR 97.86 240.70

TERRACE 97.86 240.70
11 100.25 246.60
10 100.25 246.60
9 100.25 246.60
8 100.25 246.60
7 100.25 246.60
6 100.25 246.60
5 71.36 175.42
4 71.36 175.42
3 73.40 180.46
2 96.29 236.75
1 88.49 217.56
G 30.76 75.64
Table of wind load in x and y direction

Page | 20
 DESIGN BASIS REPORT

Earthquake load Calculation

Zone = III (IS 1893-2016 Part 1 Fig. 1 seismic zone of India)

&
(IS 1893-2016 part 1 annex E)
Location: Mumbai city

Zone Factor = 0.16 (1893-2016 Part 1 Clause 6.4.2 Table 3)

Approximate Time Period Ta= (As per 1893-2016 part 1 clause 7.6.2)

Considering Building with infilled wall Panel

At X direction = 0.09h/√dx
=0.09 x 43.9 / √20.52
=0.872 Sec

At Y Direction = 0.09h/√dy
=0.09 x 23.3 / √17.65
=0.940 Sec

Importance Factor = 1.2 Building having occupancy more than 200.

(As per 1893-2016 part 1 clause 7.2.3 Table 8)

Response Reduction Factor= 5 RC building with special moment resisting fame (SMRF)
(As per 1893-2016 part 1 clause 7.2.6 table 9)

The Design Base Shear is given by

Vb = Z/2 x I/R x Sa/g, (Per As 1893-2016 part 1 clause 6.4.2)

Where,

Z= Zone Factor

I = Importance Factor

R= Response Reduction Factor

Sa/g = horizontal acceleration coefficient

Page | 21
 DESIGN BASIS REPORT

Design lateral force (As per 1893-2016 part 1 clause 7.2.1)

Vb = Ah.W,

Where,

Ah= Design horizontal acceleration spectrum value as per using the fundamental Natural period
Time period

W= Seismic weight of the building

Qi = Vb x Wihi2 / ∑Wjhj 2 (As per 1893-2016 part 1 clause 7.6.3)

Where,

Qi =Design lateral force at floor

Wi =Seismic weight of floor

Percentage of imposed load to be considered in seismic weight calculation

50% for live load grater then 3 KN/m2
(As per 1893 part 1 clause 7.3.1 table 10)

Dynamic analysis of space frame done by response spectrum method and scaling for static base
shear and dynamic base shear done as per IS 1893-2016 part 1 clause 7.7.3

Eccentricity ratio (applied to diaphragms other than torsional irregulaty) = 5 %

Since the structure is an R.C.C. structure a damping value of 5% will be considered

(As per is 1896 part 1 clause 7.2.4)

Temperature Load calculation

For terrace slab temperature load is considered. Temperature taken for the load is 30 C0 for slab
and beams.

Uniform temperature change =Maximum day time temperature – minimum night time temperature
=45 C0 – 15 C0 = 30 C0

Page | 22
 DESIGN BASIS REPORT

Bending Moment Diagram

Shear Force Diagram

Page | 23
 DESIGN BASIS REPORT

Axial Force Diagram

Risk Indicators

Orthogonal axis: (Not consider)

When the local axis of column and shear wall are not parallel or perpendicular to the global x and
y direction. The structure is said to be structurally Irregular structural mathematical model is done
in such way that this Irregularity is not found because the vertical load carrying element in global
x and global y direction

P delta analysis: (Consider)

P-delta is secondary effect on shear forces and bending moment of lateral force resisting elements
generated under the action of vertical gravity loads interacting with the lateral displacement of
building resulting from the seismic effects.
This additional demand is in addition to the earthquake shear demands. Which means that if we
have not considered the P-delta demands and if we provided insufficient shear resistance, than the
building might get collapse? So it is beneficial to take the P-Delta effects while designing the
building.

Page | 24
 DESIGN BASIS REPORT

Factor taken 1.5 for deal load in P delta analysis

Buckling analysis: (not consider)

But as per the analysis observation structure is more stable.

Height to width ration found to be

43.9/22.5=1.95
So ratio is less than 6 then not required for buckling analysis.

Stability of Structures

For the purpose of stability of the structure as a whole against overturning, the restoring moment
shall not be less than 1.2 times the maximum overturning moments due to dead load plus 1.4 times
the maximum overturning moments due to imposed loads. Especially for uplift of raft foundation
.In case where dead load provides the restoring moments only 0.9 times in dead load shall be
considered. The restoring moments due to imposed loads shall be ignored.

The factor of safety against sliding shall not be less than 1.40.

Factor of safety against buoyancy shall be not less than 1.20 ignoring the superimposed loading.

Torsional Irregularity Check

Building having torsion ally irregular when the ration of maximum horizontal displacement at one
end of floor is more than 1.2 times its average horizontal displacement at the far end of same floor
in that direction
(AS per UBC code)
Story Load Directi Maxim Avera Rat Ax Acc. Wid Eccentr
Case/Co on um ge io Torsion th icity
mbo
OHT& SPEX X 15.314 14.58 1.0 0.7660 0.03830 5.47 0
LMR Max 1 5 2 101 5
TERR SPEX X 18.378 15.74 1.1 0.9464 0.04732 19.6 0
ACE Max 2 67 86 43 2
8/11 SPEX X 17.297 14.83 1.1 0.9439 0.04719 19.6 0
Max 6 66 42 711 2
10 SPEX X 16.119 13.84 1.1 0.9407 0.04703 19.6 0
Max 9 64 56 779 2
9 SPEX X 14.806 12.74 1.1 0.9377 0.04688 19.6 0
Max 1 62 91 954 2

Page | 25
 DESIGN BASIS REPORT

8 SPEX X 13.34 11.49 1.1 0.9350 0.04675 19.6 0

Max 6 6 95 474 2
7 SPEX X 11.728 10.12 1.1 0.9321 0.04660 19.6 0
Max 3 59 1 548 2
6 SPEX X 9.992 8.64 1.1 0.9287 0.04643 19.6 0
Max 56 84 922 2
5 SPEX X 8.163 7.074 1.1 0.9247 0.04623 19.6 0
Max 54 13 565 2
4 SPEX X 6.283 5.458 1.1 0.9202 0.04601 19.6 0
Max 51 47 237 2
3 SPEX X 4.416 3.845 1.1 0.9160 0.04580 19.6 0
Max 49 16 079 2
2 SPEX X 2.66 2.32 1.1 0.9129 0.04564 19.6 0
Max 47 03 517 2
1 SPEX X 1.173 1.013 1.1 0.9311 0.04655 19.6 0
Max 58 39 696 2
G SPEX X 0.398 0.206 1.9 2.5922 0.12961 17.6 2.28878
FLOO Max 33 04 021 59 671
R

Load
Case/Comb Direct Maxi Aver Rat Acc. widt Eccentr
Story o ion mum age io Ax Torsion h icity
OHT& 25.73 1.0 0.797 0.03988 11.5
LMR SPXY Max Y 27.585 9 72 628 138 2 0
TERRA 25.47 1.0 0.826 0.04132 21.5
CE SPXY Max Y 27.79 3 91 522 61 098 0
23.78 1.0 0.818 0.04094 22.4
11 SPXY Max Y 25.825 2 86 882 411 398 0
21.93 1.0 0.816 0.04080 22.4
10 SPXY Max Y 23.782 7 84 168 842 398 0
19.93 1.0 0.816 0.04081 22.4
9 SPXY Max Y 21.609 2 84 216 08 398 0
17.76 1.0 0.816 0.04082 22.4
8 SPXY Max Y 19.259 2 84 434 172 398 0
15.44 1.0 0.816 0.04083 22.4
7 SPXY Max Y 16.75 6 84 648 242 398 0
13.01 1.0 0.816 0.04084 22.4
6 SPXY Max Y 14.113 2 85 936 68 398 0
10.49 1.0 0.817 0.04086 22.4
5 SPXY Max Y 11.388 7 85 339 693 398 0
1.0 0.817 0.04086 22.4
4 SPXY Max Y 8.633 7.958 85 247 233 398 0

Page | 26
 DESIGN BASIS REPORT

1.0 0.815 0.04076 22.4

3 SPXY Max Y 5.938 5.48 84 374 869 398 0
1.0 0.808 0.04041 22.4
2 SPXY Max Y 3.449 3.197 79 237 184 398 0
1.0 0.792 0.03963 22.4
1 SPXY Max Y 1.453 1.36 68 667 336 398 0
G 1.8 2.280 0.11404 19.4 2.21529
FLOOR SPXY Max Y 0.589 0.325 15 874 372 25 929

Soft Story stiffness check

If soft story is a whose lateral strength is less than that of story above
Percentage of Stiffness of below story –stiffness of present story /stiffness of below story
If it is more than 70% then the story is soft story
(As per 16700-2016 clause5.3)
Story Load Case Stiffness Soft story
OHT&LMR SPEX 162519.612 48.33
TERRACE SPEX 314575.658 36.44
11 SPEX 494997.883 18.14
10 SPEX 604759.554 10.23
9 SPEX 667463.913 5.7
8 SPEX 709423.485 4.67
7 SPEX 744214.12 3.8
6 SPEX 778572.33 6.09
5 SPEX 820149.643 5.74
4 SPEX 879264.94 11.22
3 SPEX 980660.049 11.22
2 SPEX 1209531.58 38.6
1 SPEX 1970007.837 82.79
G FLOOR SPEX 7031432.001 27.08
SP SPEX 9677313.993 Stable

Story Load Case Stiffness Soft story

OHT&LMR SPXY 92349.751 49.95
TERRACE SPXY 184532.086 33.23
11 SPXY 276389.44 18.18
10 SPXY 331351.901 9.09
9 SPXY 365895.324 7.69
8 SPXY 391245.426 4.87
Page | 27
 DESIGN BASIS REPORT

7 SPXY 414821.05 6.81

6 SPXY 441429.515 6.83
5 SPXY 476058.179 9.6
4 SPXY 525179.606 13.33
3 SPXY 601010.616 21.05
2 SPXY 764950.075 44
1 SPXY 1378442.672 78.87
G FLOOR SPXY 6525677.307 36.19
SP SPXY 10227076.91
Construction sequence analysis (consider)

Construction sequence analysis required to be performed for the building having non-uniformly
distributed vertical stiffness and also in case of building having floating column and transfer girder.
In this project need to be consider building having non- uniformly distributed vertical stiffness

Creep analysis (consider)

In this project deflection in serviceability model deflection criteria is not stratified the need for
creep analysis

Ritz vector used in model analysis

For missing model participating added its more realistic result. Model participating ration more
the 90%

Stability Checks

Maximum allowable Deflection in analysis

Maximum deflection against cantilever or any individual element allowed span/350 or 20mm

=Span /350
=6575/ 350
= 18.78 mm (allowable)

Deflection in slab- deflection in column

= 9.217-3.621
= 5.596

Actual deflection due to creep

= 16.788 (deflection in building)

Page | 28
 DESIGN BASIS REPORT

Check Calculations Values Limits

Deflection 6575/350 16.78 18.78

Modal Analysis

Mode Period Sum UX Sum UY RZ Sum RX Sum RY Sum RZ

1 1.52 0.0025 0.6674 0.0002 0.3599 0.0015 0.0002
2 1.347 0.0227 0.6684 0.6259 0.3603 0.0122 0.626
3 1.019 0.6877 0.6705 0.019 0.362 0.3438 0.6451
4 0.401 0.6887 0.7902 0.0033 0.5826 0.3454 0.6483
5 0.379 0.6922 0.7946 0.1181 0.5902 0.3514 0.7664
6 0.306 0.8006 0.7948 0.0035 0.5909 0.5925 0.7698
7 0.219 0.8007 0.8294 0.0015 0.6263 0.5928 0.7713
8 0.198 0.8014 0.8332 0.0309 0.6301 0.5936 0.8022
9 0.172 0.8112 0.8434 0.0091 0.6448 0.605 0.8114
10 0.164 0.8449 0.8468 0.0054 0.6495 0.6432 0.8168
11 0.15 0.845 0.8633 0.0047 0.6774 0.6433 0.8215
12 0.135 0.8462 0.8633 0.001 0.6774 0.6472 0.8225
13 0.12 0.8476 0.864 0.0184 0.6789 0.6493 0.8408
14 0.115 0.8533 0.8789 0.0024 0.7059 0.6607 0.8433
15 0.109 0.8643 0.8946 0.0000319 0.7339 0.6809 0.8433
16 0.104 0.8716 0.8959 0.0069 0.7358 0.6929 0.8502
17 0.097 0.8749 0.8966 0.0001 0.737 0.7003 0.8503
18 0.087 0.8774 0.8986 0.0149 0.7426 0.7041 0.8653
19 0.084 0.8777 0.9206 0 0.7914 0.7045 0.8653
20 0.079 0.8866 0.9207 0.003 0.7915 0.7192 0.8683
21 0.072 0.8868 0.9207 0.0004 0.7923 0.7195 0.8687
22 0.066 0.8869 0.9256 0.0036 0.8053 0.7195 0.8723
23 0.062 0.9047 0.9264 0.0018 0.8067 0.7535 0.8741
24 0.06 0.9073 0.9329 0.0102 0.8193 0.7582 0.8843
25 0.047 0.9113 0.9338 0.0024 0.8212 0.7694 0.8867
26 0.034 0.9119 0.9485 0.0118 0.8497 0.7712 0.8985
27 0.03 0.9463 0.9486 0.0004 0.8499 0.8411 0.8989
28 0.027 0.9468 0.9568 0.054 0.8671 0.8429 0.9529
29 0.022 0.9713 0.957 0.0076 0.8676 0.9157 0.9605
30 0.021 0.9717 0.9869 0.001 0.9563 0.9168 0.9615
Page | 29
 DESIGN BASIS REPORT

The time period of the 1st mode of the translation is 1.52 sec.

Rz valve in first mode is 0.2% < 5%. The 1st mode is not torsional.

The first mode of the building is in translation mode. So total mass of the building participated in
X direction is 97.17% & in Y direction 98.69% achieving which is greater than 90% according
to IS1893:2016 table 6

The first three modes contribute at least 65 % mass participation factor in each principal plan
direction
(As per IS 1893: 2016 table 6)

Sum of Ux fires three mode =68.77

Sum of Uy first three mode =67.05

The fundamental lateral natural periods of the building in tow principal plan direction are away
from each other by at least 10 %
As per IS1893:2016 table 6
(1.52-1.347) x100 = 17.3%

The natural period of fundamental torsional mode of vibration shall not exceed 0.9 times the
natural period of the fundamental translation mode of vibration as per IS 16700:2017 clause 5.5.1

Time period of torsional mode = 1.347

Time period of fundamental mode = 1.52

= 0.9x1.52
= 1.368 >1.347 (time period of torsional mode)

Maximum story displacement in a Seismic analysis

Maximum story displacement due to seismic load is 21.16 mm in X-Direction. According to IS

16700-2017 clause 5.4.1 allowable displacement is (H/250) 178 mm.

Maximum story displacement due to seismic load is 26.94 mm in Y-Direction. According to IS

16700-2017 clause 5.4.1 allowable displacement is (H/250) 178 mm.

Page | 30
 DESIGN BASIS REPORT

Check Values Limits

Story displacement X 21.16 178
Story displacement Y 26.94 178

Page | 31
 DESIGN BASIS REPORT

Maximum allowable displacement in Wind analysis

Maximum story displacement occurred due to wind load which is 10.34 mm in X-Direction.
According to IS 456:2000 allowable displacement is (H/500) 89 mm.

Maximum story displacement occurred due to wind load is 48.80 mm in Y-Direction. According
to IS 456:2000 allowable displacement is (H/500) 89 mm

.
Check Values Limits
Story displacement X 10.34 89
Story displacement Y 48.80 89

Page | 32
 DESIGN BASIS REPORT

Maximum allowable drift for Seismic analysis:

Maximum story drift occurred in X-direction due to Seismic load is 0.000749. This story drift is
less than allowable story drift which is 0.004 x story height 2.9 = 0.0116 according to
IS1893:2016.

Maximum story drift occurred in Y-direction due to Seismic load is. This story drift is less than
allowable story drift which is 0.004x story height 2.9 = 0.0116 according to IS1893:2016

Page | 33
 DESIGN BASIS REPORT

Check Values Limits

Story drift X 0.000749 0.0116
Story drift Y 0.000987 0.0116

Maximum story shears due to seismic and wind analysis:

Story shear Seismic Wind

Direction x 1612.93 1245.18
Direction y 1493.02 1394.027

Here, Earthquake base shear is more governing than wind base shear.

Load Combination

The results obtained from the computer analysis in the form of member forces and reactions will
be used for design the structural members. Following load combinations of the member forces will
be considered for arriving at the design forces.

For dead 1.5 D For dead and live 1.5 D + 1.5 L

load

For wind load 1.5D + 1.5 Wx For wind load 1.5D + 1.5 Wy
In x direction In y direction

1.5D -1.5 Wx 1.5D -1.5 Wy

1.5D + 1.5 Wx 1.5D + 1.5 Wy

0.9D + 1.5 Wx 0.9D + 1.5 Wy

0.9D - 1.5 Wx 0.9D - 1.5 Wy

1.2 D +1.2 L + 1.2 1.2 D +1.2 L + 1.2 Wy

Wx

1.2 D +1.2 L -1.2 1.2 D +1.2 L -1.2 Wy

Wx

Page | 34
 DESIGN BASIS REPORT

For Earthquake 1.5D + 1.5 Spex For Earthquake load 1.5D + 1.5 Spey
load In x In y direction
direction

0.9D + 1.5 Spex 0.9D + 1.5 Spey

1.2 D +1.2 L + 1.2

Spex 1.2 D +1.2 L + 1.2 Spey

Load combination for Soft story

For Earthquake 1.5D + 2.5 Spex For Earthquake load 1.5D + 1.5 Spey
load In x In y direction
direction

0.9D + 2.5 Spex 0.9D + 2.5 Spey

1.2 D +1.2 L +
2.5Spex 1.2 D +1.2 L + 2.5 Spey

The fundamental translation lateral natural period in any of the horizontal plan direction, shall not
exceed 8 sec, considering sectional properties as per table 6 16700-2016 considering serviceability
model (AS per clause 5.5.2 16700-2016)

Stiffness Modification Factor

(As per IS 16700:2017 clause 7.2 table 6)

Serviceability model

Slab = 0.3 Ig
Beam = 0.5 Ig
Column = Ig
Shear wall = Ig

Beam Column
Cross- section (axial) 1 Cross- section (axial) 1
area area

Shear area in 2 1 Shear area in 2 1

direction direction

Page | 35
 DESIGN BASIS REPORT

Shear area in 3 1 Shear area in 3 1

direction direction

Torsional constant 0.5 Torsional constant 1

Moment if inertia 0.5 Moment if inertia 1

about 2 axis = about 2 axis =

Moment of inertia 0.5 Moment of inertia 1

about 3 axis about 3 axis

Slab Shear wall

Membrane f11 1 Membrane f11 1
direction direction

Membrane f12 1 Membrane f12 1

direction direction

Membrane f12 1 Membrane f12 1

direction direction

Bending m11 0.3 Bending m11 1

direction direction

Bending m22 0.3 Bending m22 1

direction direction

Bending m12 0.3 Bending m11 1

direction direction

Shear v13 direction 1 Shear v13 direction 1

Shear v23 direction 1 Shear v23 direction 1

Check of serviceability

1. Maximum deflection against cantilever or any individual element allowed span/350 or 20mm
Span /350
6575/350 = 18.78 mm or 20 mm (allowable)

Deflection in slab
Page | 36
 DESIGN BASIS REPORT

=14.173 mm
Deflection is column
=4.562

Deflection in slab – axial in column

= 14.173-4.562
= 9.611

Actual deflection due to creep

= 3x 9.611= 28.833(deflection in building)

28.883>20mm (allowable)…………………………..Unsafe

Its valve is higher than limiting valve then it is unsafe then we have to go for material nonlinear
analysis. Creep

Serviceability criteria

Creep Analysis +Including P-delta +shrinkage+ Material Strength + Construction sequence

(As per CEB-FIP-94)

Page | 37
 DESIGN BASIS REPORT

Strength Criteria

For Design
Construction sequence + P Delta analysis
Because bending moment more so achieving strength of building.

After design of all member check of rebar percentage for value engineering propose.
Maximum percentage of rebar in beam = 0.9 % > 4 %
Maximum percentage of rebar in shear wall = 1.432 % > 4 %

Hence satisfied criteria of value engineering.

Page | 38