Professional Documents
Culture Documents
4, 5, 6, 7 Faculty
of Economics and Management Sciences
Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, Malaysia.
Abstract
The role play by Small and Medium Scale Enterprises (SMEs) in economic growth and
sustainable development of any nation cannot be downsized. Nigeria, in particular, SMEs serves
as the major employer of labour and represent about 95% of its enterprises, This statistic is a
pointer to the expected contribution of this segment to the economy. This study discusses the
nature of SMEs: Government and financial institutions supports in Nigeria. This study discovers
that despite Government and financial institutions support towards SMEs in Nigeria, SMEs fall
short of expectations that make the Nigerian economy un-stable than what it is expected.
Therefore, this study recommends that the SMEs entrepreneurs should re-strategize the ways
there do carry out operations from as-usual to un-usual. The Government should appoint
525
www.hrmars.com
International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences
March 2015, Vol. 5, No. 3
ISSN: 2222-6990
competent people to handle ministries and parastatals, provide adequate funds to SMEs and
make sure it gets to the right people that are in need of it for its potentials to revive back, and
the financial institution should subsidize the loan requirement and interest rate to SMEs
entrepreneurs. Therefore, with this SMEs will have a comfortable place to play around in Nigeria
as it serves as the major mover of the economy.
1.1 Introduction
Obadan (2003) claimed that Nigeria is a blessed and prosperous country with enormous
human, petroleum, agricultural, gas and untapped solid mineral resources, with all these
blessed natural resources still yet Nigeria has not developed. Nigeria has gone through political
instability that has resulted in a climate of social tension and the unpredictable market for
businesses since her independent from British rule in 1960. The powerful and peaceful takeover
of government by the military through coup and the indigenization policy of the late 1970’s has
make investors or individual with excellent high spirit of doing business to feel reluctant to
invest in any kind of business despite hitherto saw the country as significant and growing
market. Although perceived corruption, inadequate infrastructural facilities, policy instability,
and lack of accountability of public funds gives set back on the market but it is as a result of the
inconsistency of the Government. This fact, make the World Bank to described Nigeria as a
paradox (World Bank, 1996). Nigeria’s challenges in terms of development are vast, including
SMEs development. But enormous oil wealth has brought few benefits to the average person.
As a result, the factors such as; corruption, crime and inadequate infrastructural facilities make
entrepreneurs not to create enough jobs in the country which tremendously affect the
economy. In Nigeria almost two-third of its citizen are living below the poverty line; about half
are unemployed, and overall GNP per capital falls below the average for sub-Saharan Africa
(World Bank, 2002).
Ariyo (2000) states that at the forefront of recent efforts to modernize and improve
Nigeria’s ailing economy, there has been a sharp focus on macroeconomic stabilization and the
pursuit of investment liberalization, and massive trade programmes in order to encourage
Foreign Direct Investment in the country. Multi-national corporations help to bring in foreign
exchange and also contribute towards creating jobs in the country that give room for high
revenue generation, but in real sense, how they boost and promote the economic development
and how there have been assisting in attaining sustainable prosperity are not well appreciative
or merely speculative. Consequently, for Nigeria to reach its full potential in terms of economic
and social development, SMEs should not be neglected or ignore because it contributes
simultaneously to the economy of the country actually. Therefore, the policies of trade
liberalization and the encouragement of foreign direct investment have to be pursued in
conjunction with a systematic and resolute effort to boost the development and growth of
526
www.hrmars.com
International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences
March 2015, Vol. 5, No. 3
ISSN: 2222-6990
SMEs in the country (Dabo, 2006). Nigeria, like other developing countries with relatively low
per capital income, looks forward to industrialization to give it the structural transformation
that is imperative in its quest for growth and development. Consequently, one of the most
critical development issues in Nigeria is the need to design and implement policies and
strategies for an efficient, competitive and diversified economy that will create employment,
generate wealth and eradicate poverty. To achieve these goals, therefore, a strong and viable
entrepreneurial base is seen as being essential for the attainment of growth and prosperity in
the economy (Dabo, 2006).
The entrepreneurship that is part of SMEs is very relevant to the empowerment of the
citizens for sustainable development. It gives substantial opportunities for the assumption and
the use of local raw materials for vertical and horizontal linkages. Therefore, it has been
estimated that the growth and development of SMEs would improve the economy and welfare
of Nigerians. Also, new businesses bring new and improved products and services thereby
increasing competition and challenging existing business to improve their performance
(Carpenter, 2001). Study conducted by Nigeria Corporate Affair Commission posits that almost
ninety percent of companies in Nigeria in 2001 absorb less than fifty people while in another
study conducted by Nigeria Federal Office of Statistic opined that ninety-seven percent of
Nigeria businesses also absorb less than or below one hundred employees or staffs, while going
through the earlier explanation of SMEs it clearly signifies that almost ninety-seven percent of
the entire business in the country are all small businesses. Similarly, a study by the International
Finance Corporation (IFC) in the same period estimates that ninety-six percent of all companies
in Nigeria are SMEs, compared to fifty-three percent in USA and sixty-five percent in the EU
(World Bank, 2002). Carpenter (2001) and Kalanje (2002) argue that SMEs are significantly
contributing to the Nigerian economy, with about ten percent of total manufacturing output
and seventy percent of industrial employment. Similarly, according to Owualah (1999) claimed
that SMEs in the country account for forty percent of its output and at the same time account
thirty percent to value added in the manufacturing sector and he further opined that during
1972, SMEs accounted for seventy-four percent of the national employment and fifteen
percent of that been accounted by the manufacturing sector with less than one hundred
employees or staffs. The current status of the contribution of the manufacturing sector to GDP
is seven percent with 1.4 million employment level (The Nigerian Financial Standard, May 3,
2004 p. 1 & 18).
In Nigeria, SMEs account for fifty percent to employment on average and also fifty
percent of its industrial output. SMEs represent about ninety percent of the industrial sector in
terms of number of enterprises or firms, and however they contribute a meager one percent of
GDP. With these, it is inappropriate when we are talking about countries or comparing
countries like Thailand, India and Indonesia where SMEs contribute almost forty percent to GDP
(Ariyo, 2004). Industrial and economic developments are flourished by SMEs in the country
through efficient utilization of local resources; production of intermediate goods and services;
transformation of rural technology. SMEs are the backbone, and there play a significant role in
527
www.hrmars.com
International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences
March 2015, Vol. 5, No. 3
ISSN: 2222-6990
the business landscape of any country, but there are also faced with a lot of obstacles that
make the sector not to contribute optimally to the economy. In this regard, Aregbeyen (1999)
argues that the industrial development of Nigeria depends, to a large extent, on the growth and
development of SME potentials. Although Nigeria witness reasonable but fluctuating growth in
the industrial sector, in 1957 the manufacturing sector account only two percent of the GDP
and it rose to ten percent in 1972 and it further increase to sixteen percent in 1981. The
industries helped to reduce unemployment, and provided a base for Agro based industrial take-
off and helped the Nigerian economy to grow.
Nonetheless, SMEs are constrained or face with high numbers of obstacles that are as a
result of inadequate fund that does not allow the sector to grow and expand rapidly. He further
suggests that for SMEs to improve, expand and modernize its operations competitively there
are needs for SMEs to have access to long-term funding. Similarly, Ariyo (2000) identifies some
of the bottlenecks faced by the indigenous SMEs to include gaining access to bank credits,
financial markets; corruption; lack of transparency and high bureaucratic costs which seriously
resulted to undercapitalization of the sector. Thus, she argue, which was further compounded
in the early period of the oil boom by a seeming government indifference in it enormous
support and the role SMEs play in the national economic development and competitiveness in
the country. Ariyo (2000) claimed that the Government did not promote, and provide tangible
and lasting policies to support small business sector despite the benefit provided by the oil
boom. Similarly, Uzodika (1999) stressed that SMEs was negatively affected due to lack of
support from government to the sector. The government spent resources and time on a large
public project that seem to be less significant, without given emphasis on SMEs in the country.
The woeful capital projects, the government engage upon, are the $10 million Ajaokuta Steel
Complex Investment, the Bachita Sugar Factory, the Iwopin paper mill and the Leyland Daf are
all good example of the less important public project carry out by the government. With these
the EIU (1999) stressed that the government concentrate its resources on woeful public
enterprises while showing neglect or abandonment to SMEs, these are considered as effective
reason financial support to SMEs and contribution to SMEs to the economy remain weak.
Therefore, it is concluded that the assessment of the past contributions of Nigerian
governments to SMEs and the manufacturing sector of small business shows a poor
performance. Abundant devaluation of the Naira came into existence as a result of the
establishment of SAP in 1986, by then most of the SMEs fold up or collapsed as a result of
quantum of the Naira that they required purchasing the right amount of foreign exchange for
their raw-material considerably. Most are forced to fold up due to inadequate working capital
that is necessary to import raw material regularly. The bank does not help them which is the
cause as a result of the fact that most of them are undercapitalized or almost get distressed
because of the effect of SAP. These usually continue until the Naira was devalued, but the
inflation rate and the interest rate got out of hand. With these, the SMEs sector was entirely
reduced significantly, and the country economy became weak and slow, and the following
conditions ensured that, buying and selling became the mainstay of the economy, the real
sector became inactive, the country became a dumping ground for other economies,
528
www.hrmars.com
International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences
March 2015, Vol. 5, No. 3
ISSN: 2222-6990
They are no doubt to say that unemployment has escalated when the ingredient and the
mechanism for building and sustaining SMEs were dismantled and not encourage by SAP.
Unemployed is the issue disturbing and confronting Nigeria, and as a result of that it causes
violent, crime and make the urban and rural area un-rest. Statistically, fourty-eight percent of
Nigeria population are unemployed and over one million of Nigeria graduate from the tertiary
institution, join any job not because there want it. Example, a lot of people join the army
because of high unemployment in the country. We must develop and sustain SMEs by
empowering unemployed people through technical training and support. Countries where
SMEs enjoyed adequate support, it provides over sixty-five percent of employment and at the
same time contributes significantly to the GDP. In Nigeria, the SMEs sector remains stagnant as
a result of so many constraint or problem that faces the industry.
SMEs cut across the industrial sector although the majority is Agro- Allied and food
processing. There are quite some wood products and product furniture, in non-metallic
mineral, in plastic wares, in clothing, tailoring, and the rest. Considering the facts that they form
a large pool of indigenous enterprise and technical know-how and a breeding ground for
entrepreneurial management, the SMEs sector needs to be supported and prepared for the
uprising in economic activities in Nigeria (Mohammed and Nzelibe, 2014).
2.4 Government Programmes and Financial Institutions Support to Small and Medium Scale
Enterprises
Sunusi (2003) opined that over the years, the Federal Government did not fold its arms to
watch the performance of SMEs wallow in the gamut of problems. It has taken various steps,
including monetary, fiscal and industrial policy measures to improve the performance of SMEs
and diversify the country dominance of over – reliance on the oil sector economy. According to
Sunusi (2003) some of the government programs, policies, and schemes towards achieving the
performance of SMEs are:
implement the SMEs world bank loan scheme under which a sum of N241.8 million were
approved and the actual disbursement were 36.5% lower than the approved amount during
1981 and 1988. By then banks also financed one hundred and twenty projects, which is under
world bank loan scheme, and out of them some, are cancelled as a result of lapses from the
project sponsors to contribute to their counterpart funding. NBCI face a lot of operational
obstacles or problems, in the state of insolvency in 1989, and it later became Bank of Industry
in 2002.
531
www.hrmars.com
International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences
March 2015, Vol. 5, No. 3
ISSN: 2222-6990
stopped. And total disbursements of US$ 107.1 million were recorded as at June 1996 in
respect of 102 projects.
of this scheme was to reduce SMEs borrowing and consequently relieve them from interest and
other bank charges that were not favourable to their capital structure. It advocated the
provision of financial, advisory, technical and managerial support to the performance of SMEs
in Nigeria (Dabo, 2006).The objective of SMIEIS was to address some of the factors impeding
the attainment of the full potentials of SMEs. It is anticipated that as banks get involved in SME
funding and management, confidence in the sub-sector will improve, such that international
financial institutions will be encouraged to provide needed financial support for SMEs in Nigeria
(CBN, 2003). Also, the CBN had sought and obtained the co-operation of SEC, in enhancing the
registration of venture capital companies being set up by banks for participation in the scheme
(Dabo, 2006).
The SMEDAN function as been contained in the enabling Act which is summarized as
follows:
Stimulating, coordinating and monitoring the development of the MSMEs sector, initiating and
articulating policy ideas for micro, small and medium enterprises’ growth and development,
facilitating and promoting development programmes or initiative, support services in other to
accelerate the modernization of MSME operations in the country, serving as vanguard for
poverty reduction, rural industrialization, job creation and enhance sustainable livelihoods,
Linking SMEs to internal and external sources of finance, appropriate technology, and technical
skills as well as to large businesses, promoting information and providing access to industrial
infrastructures such as layouts, incubators, and industrial parks, intermediating between
MSMEs and the Government while SMEDAN is the voice of the MSMEs, working with other
institutions like private and the public sectors to create an effective enabling environment for
businesses to flourish in general, and MSME activities, in particular.
A well develop MSMEs sector have known as the one that can fight poverty in the country. The
coming up of SMEDAN has justified the need to develop the Nigeria’s MSMEs in a well
structured and efficient manner (Ekwem, 2011).
bureaucratic bottlenecks and end up in the account of public office holders. Nigeria remains a
country with high potentials, but an equally high inertia to develop. Nigeria has the largest
market in the African continent where investment opportunities are beckoning to be exploited,
but yet SMEs is faced with so many constraints. With this, it makes the SMEs in Nigeria to be
low when compared to many countries. This study recommends that the SMEs entrepreneurs
should re-strategize the ways there do carry out operations from as-usual to un-usual. The
Government should appoint competent people to handle ministries and parastatals, provide
adequate funds to SMEs and make sure it gets to the right people that are in need of it for its
potentials to revive back, and the financial institution should subsidize the loan requirement
and interest rate to SMEs entrepreneurs. Therefore, with this SMEs will have a comfortable
place to play around in Nigeria as it serves as the major mover of the economy.
535
www.hrmars.com
International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences
March 2015, Vol. 5, No. 3
ISSN: 2222-6990
References
Obadan, M. (2004). ‘Rationalisation of Public Sector in Nigeria. Financial Standard. Vol. 5 No.
24.
Owualah, S. L. (1999). Tackling Youth Unemployment Through Entrepreneurship. International
Small Business Journal, 17(3), 49-59.
Sanusi, J. O. (2003). Overview of Government’s Efforts in the Development of SMEs and the
Emergence of Small and Medium Industries Equity Investment Scheme (SMIEIS). Lagos on
10th of June.
Small and Medium Industries Equity Investment Scheme (SMIEIS) (2006). A paper Presented at
the National Summit on SMIEIS Organised by the Bankers‟ Committee and Lagos
Chambers of Commerce and Industry (LCCI), Lagos on 10th June 2003. Retrieved on
15/06/2008 from http://www.cenbank.org/OUT/SPEECHES/2003/GOVADD-10BJUNE.PDF
SMEDAN. (2005). Small and medium enterprises performance in Nigeria: A report presented at African
entrepreneurship seminar organized in collaboration with the Scientific Committee on
Entrepreneurship of the University of Essex. United Kingdom on the 5th of June.
537
www.hrmars.com