Professional Documents
Culture Documents
IAS 1 provides little specific guidance on the presentation of line items in financial
statements, such as the level of detail or number of line items that should be presented in
the financial statements.
Furthermore, IAS 1’s objective is to set out ‘the overall requirements for the presentation of
financial statements, guidelines for their structure and minimum requirements for their
content’.
In doing so, IAS 1 sets out minimum levels of required items in the financial statements by
requiring certain items to be presented on the face of, or in the notes to, the financial
statements and in other required disclosures. The current requirements do not provide a
definition of ‘gross profit’ or ‘operating results’ or many other common subtotals.
The absence of specific requirements arises from the fact that the guidance in IAS 1 relies on
management’s judgement about which additional line items, headings and subtotals: (a) are
relevant to an understanding of the entity’s financial position/financial performance; and (b)
should be presented in a manner which provides relevant, reliable, comparable and
understandable information.
IAS 1 allows entities to include additional line items, amend descriptions and the ordering of
items in order to explain the elements of financial performance due to various activities,
which may differ in frequency and predictability.
Transactions like business combinations may have a significant impact on profit or loss and
these transactions are not necessarily frequent or regular. However, the practice of
presenting non-recurring items may be interpreted as a way to present ‘extraordinary items’
in the financial statements despite the fact that ‘extraordinary items’ are not allowed under
IAS 1. It can also be argued that additional lines and subtotals, as permitted by IAS 1, may
add complexity to the analysis of the financial statements, which may become difficult to
understand if entities use sub-totals and additional headings to isolate the effects of
nonrecurring transactions from classes of expense or income.
IAS 2 – Inventories
Valued at lower of cost and estimated selling price less selling costs (i.e. NRV) for each
separate item or product
The ‘cost’ of inventory includes all costs of getting the item or product to current
location and condition
IAS 7 – Statement of cash flows
Reconciles cash and cash equivalents year-on-year
A cash equivalent is short-term, highly liquid and readily convertible to a known
amount of cash.
Three standard headings
Operating activities
Investing activities
Financing activities.
Cash generated from operations can be derived using the direct method or the indirect
method
The indirect method begins with profit before tax and then adjusts it for non-cash
items, as well as for items that relate to investing or financing activities.
Current Tax
Current tax is the amount of income taxes payable or recoverable in respect of the
taxable profit or loss for a period.
At the period end, an estimated amount is therefore accrued based on the year’s profits
Dr Income statement tax charge
Cr Tax payable
When the tax is actually paid some months later, it is unlikely to be the same amount as
that accrued. An over or under provision is therefore left on the tax payable account.
An overprovision arises where the actual tax paid is less than the estimated tax charge.
This reduces the following year’s tax charge in the income statement.
An under-provision arises where the actual tax paid is more than the estimated charge.
This increases the following year’s tax charge in the income statement.
Deferred Tax
Deferred tax is not a liability to the tax authorities, but rather an accounting adjustment.
It arises because the profit before tax for accounting purposes is not the same amount
as taxable profits for taxation purposes.
This is due to permanent and temporary differences.
Permanent differences are amounts which represent income, or an expense, for
accounting purposes, but are not taxable / allowable for tax purposes e.g. client
entertaining.
Temporary differences are amounts which represent income or an expense for
accounting purposes, and also for tax purposes, but in different periods e.g. depreciation vs
capital allowances.
Deferred tax adjusts for the effects of temporary differences, but not permanent
differences.
Deferred tax should be dealt with by:
1. calculating the temporary difference
2. applying the tax rate to the temporary difference
3. accounting for the resulting deferred tax asset or liability
A temporary difference is calculated by comparing the carrying value of an asset or
liability with its ‘tax base’.
The ‘tax base’ of an asset or liability is the amount attributed to that asset or liability for
tax purposes
If the carrying value > tax base, this is a taxable temporary difference and results in a
deferred tax liability.
If the tax base > carrying value, this is a deductible temporary difference and results in a
deferred tax asset.
The tax rate applied to the temporary difference should be that which is expected to
apply to the period when the asset is realised or the liability is settled, based on tax laws in
place by the reporting date.
The change in a deferred tax asset or liability is accounted for in the financial
statements:
Specific situations
Situation Explanation Treatment
Revaluations Revaluation gains are Normally carrying value
recorded in other exceeds the tax base
comprehensive income and temporary difference will
so any deferred tax arising give rise to a deferred tax
on the revaluation must also liability
be recorded in other
comprehensive income.
Investment properties IAS 12 presumes that the Normally carrying value
carrying amount of exceeds the tax base
investment properties Temporary difference will
measured at fair value will give rise to a deferred tax
be recovered from a sales liability
transaction, unless there is
evidence to the contrary.
Share option schemes Tax relief is not normally This delayed tax relief means
granted until the share that equity-settled
options are exercised. sharebased payment
schemes give rise to a
The amount of tax relief deferred tax asset.
granted is based on the
intrinsic value of the options Carrying amount of SBP NIL
(the difference between the Tax Base of SBP (X)
market price of the shares Tax Rate % X
and the exercise price of the Deferred Tax Asset X
option).
Where the amount of the
estimated future tax
deduction exceeds the
accumulated remuneration
expense, this indicates that
the tax deduction relates
partly to the remuneration
expense and partly to equity.
Dr Deferred tax asset
Cr Equity
Cr Profit or loss
Unused tax losses Where an entity has unused
tax losses, IAS 12 allows a
deferred tax asset to be
recognised only to the extent
that it is probable that future
taxable profits will be
available against which the
unused tax losses can be
utilised.
Fair value adjustments A temporary difference is A deferred tax liability must
created, giving rise to be recognised in the
deferred tax in the consolidated financial
consolidated financial statements.
statements.
Provisions for Upon consolidation This creates a deductible
unrealised profit unrealised profits remaining temporary difference,
within the group at the giving rise to a deferred tax
reporting date must be asset in the consolidated
eliminated. financial statements.
IAS 16 states that property, plant and equipment are tangible items which:
1. are held for use in the production or supply of goods or services, for rental to others,
or for administrative purposes; and
2. are expected to be used during more than one period.
A tangible non-current asset is initially recorded at cost which may include: purchase
price after any trade discounts, transport and handling costs, non-refundable tax such as
import duties, site preparation, installation costs, professional fees, labour costs of the
entity’s own employees (Where asset is self-constructed), borrowing costs, future
dismantling and restoration costs.
Any abnormal costs such as wastage and costs arising from errors do not form part of
the cost of the asset, and must be expensed as incurred
Subsequent expenditure on a non-current asset may be capitalised where it enhances
the economic benefits of the asset in excess of its current standard of performance.
A complex asset is one which is made up of several constituent parts, each with a
different useful life. Each part of the complex asset is depreciated over its useful life and,
after this time, the cost of the replacement part is capitalised.
Where the useful life or residual value of an asset changes, the change is applied on a
prospective basis
A change in the method of depreciation is allowed only where the new method is more
appropriate. The change is applied prospectively
IAS 16 allows non-current assets to be measured using either the cost model or the
revaluation model.
Where the revaluation model is applied, it must be applied consistently to all assets in
the same class, and the valuation must be kept sufficiently up to date so that it is not
significantly different from fair value
An upwards revaluation is credited to other comprehensive income (other than where it
reverses a previous downwards revaluation recognised in the income statement)
A downwards revaluation is charged to the income statement (other than where it
reverses a previous upwards revaluation recognised in other comprehensive income)
Depreciation is charged on a revalued asset as normal, based on a depreciable amount
of valuation less residual value spread over the remaining useful life.
A reserves transfer may be made to transfer the difference between the actual
depreciation charge and the historical cost depreciation charge from the revaluation reserve
to retained earnings
Where a previously revalued asset is disposed of, any balance remaining in the
revaluation reserve relating to this asset is transferred to retained earnings and disclosed in
the statement of changes in equity.
Dismantling Under IAS 16 Property, Plant and Equipment (PPE), the cost of an item
of property, plant and equipment includes the initial estimate of the costs of dismantling
and removing the item and restoring the site on which it is located.
Costs related to major inspection and overhaul are recognised as part of the carrying
amount of property, plant and equipment if they meet the asset recognition criteria in IAS
16 Property, Plant and Equipment. The major overhaul component will then be
depreciated on a straight-line basis over its useful life (i.e. over the period to the next
overhaul) and any remaining carrying amount will be derecognised when the next overhaul
is performed. Costs of the day-to-day servicing of the asset (i.e. routine maintenance) are
expensed as incurred.
Accounting for defined contribution plans is normal accruals accounting, whereby the
employer has an obligation to pay a fixed percentage of an employee’s salary into a pension
plan for their future benefit when they retire.
A grant is recognised in the financial statements only when there is reasonable assurance
that:
1. The entity will comply with the conditions attached to the grant, and
2. The grants will be received
A revenue grant is held as deferred income and released to the income statement over the
period in which the related expenditure is incurred
A capital grant is either :
1. netted off against the cost of the asset with the net amount spread over the asset’s useful
life and charged to the income statement as depreciation; or
2. held as deferred income and released to the income statement over the useful life of the
asset.
Grants which relate to costs already incurred should be recognised in the income statement
in the period in which they become receivable.
A grant in the form of a non-monetary asset may be valued at fair value or a nominal value.
Repayment of government grants should be accounted for as a revision of an accounting
estimate.
The functional currency is the currency of the primary economic environment in which the
entity operates.
Transaction must be translated into the functional currency before it is recorded. The
exchange rate used to initially record transactions should be either:
the spot exchange rate on the date the transaction occurred, or
an average rate over a period of time, providing the exchange rate has not fluctuated
significantly.
Cash settlement
The settled amount should be translated into the functional currency using the spot
exchange rate on the settlement date.
Exchange gains or losses on settlement of individual transactions are recognised in profit
or loss in the period in which they arise.
Treatment of year-end balances
The method of translation requires monetary and non-monetary assets and liabilities to
be translated at the closing rate, and income and expense items to be translated at the rate
ruling at the date of the transaction or an average rate that approximates to the actual
exchange rates.
Overseas loan
The overseas loan should initially be translated into the functional currency using the
historic (spot) rate. The finance cost is translated at the average rate because it
approximates to the actual rate. The cash payment should be translated at the historic
(spot) rate (which, because the payment occurs at the reporting date, is the year-end rate).
A loan is a monetary liability so is retranslated at the reporting date using the closing rate.
Any exchange gain or loss is recognised in profit or loss.
IAS 24 Related Party Disclosures requires an entity’s financial statements to contain the
disclosures necessary to draw attention to the possibility that its financial position and profit
or loss may have been affected by the existence of related parties and by transactions and
outstanding balances with such parties.
A person or a close member of that person’s family is related to a reporting entity if that
person:
(i) The entity and the reporting entity are members of the same group (which means that
each parent, subsidiary and fellow subsidiary is related to the others)
(ii) One entity is an associate or joint venture of the other entity (or an associate or joint
venture of a member of a group of which the other entity is a member)
(iii) Both entities are joint ventures of the same third party
(iv) One entity is a joint venture of a third entity and the other entity is an associate of the
third entity
(v) The entity is a post-employment benefit plan for the benefit of employees of either the
reporting entity or an entity related to the reporting entity. If the reporting entity is itself
such a plan, the sponsoring employers are also related to the reporting entity
(vi) The entity, or any member of a group of which it is a part, provides key management
personnel services to the reporting entity or to the parent of the reporting entity.'
Disclosure of personal guarantees given by directors in respect of borrowings by the
reporting entity should be disclosed in the notes to the financial statements.
IAS 24 deems that parties are not related simply because they have a director or key
manager in common.
Government related entities
1. Government-related entities are defined as entities which are controlled, jointly
controlled or significantly influenced by the government.
2. A reporting entity is exempt from the above disclosures in respect of transactions
and balances that they have with a government that has control, joint control or
significant influence over the reporting entity
3. If this exemption is applied, IAS 24 requires that the following disclosures are made
instead:
details of the government and a description of its relationship with the reporting entity
details of individually significant transactions
an indication of the extent of other transactions that are significant in aggregate.
Where an investor holds 20% or more of the voting power of the investee, it is presumed
that the investor has significant influence unless it can be clearly demonstrated that this is
not the case.
If the investor holds less than 20% of the voting power of the investee, it is presumed that
the investor does not have significant influence, unless such influence can be clearly
demonstrated.
IAS 28 states that the existence of significant influence by an investor is usually evidenced in
one or more of the following ways:
(i) representation on the board of directors or equivalent governing body of the investee
2. Information about the nature and extent of risks arising from financial instruments.
Note: - IFRS 9 requires gains and losses on financial liabilities designated to be measured at
fair value through profit or loss to be split into the amount of change in the fair value which
is attributable to changes in the credit risk of the liability, which is shown in other
comprehensive income, and the remaining amount of change in the fair value of the liability
which is shown in profit or loss.
IFRS 9 allows the recognition of the full amount of change in the fair value in the profit or
loss only if the recognition of changes in the liability’s credit risk in other comprehensive
income would create an accounting mismatch in profit or loss.
Fair value through other comprehensive income – as long as they are not for short-term
trade and have been designated as such
IFRS 9 defines lifetime losses as ‘the expected credit losses that arise from all
possible default events over the life of the instrument’
– The hedging relationship consists only of eligible hedging instruments and hedged
items
– At the inception of the hedge there must be formal documentation identifying the
hedged item and the hedging instrument
– The hedging relationship meets all effectiveness requirements.
Fair value hedge A fair value hedge is a ‘hedge of the exposure to changes in fair
value of a recognised asset or liability or firm commitment to buy that is attributable to a
particular risk and could affect profit or loss (or other comprehensive income if the hedged
item is an investment in equity that has been designated to be measured at fair value
though other comprehensive income (FVOCI))’.
As long as the hedged item is not an investment in equity measured at FVOCI, then the
gain or loss from the change in fair value of the hedging instrument is recognised
immediately in profit or loss.
At the same time the carrying amount of the hedged item is adjusted for the
corresponding gain or loss with respect to the hedged risk, which is also recognised
immediately in profit or loss.
Cash flow hedge A cash flow hedge is a ‘hedge of the exposure to variability in cash
flows that is attributable to a particular risk associated with a recognised asset or liability or
a highly probable forecast transaction, and could affect profit or loss’.
The portion of the gain or loss on the hedging instrument that is determined to be an
effective hedge is recognised in OCI and reclassified to profit or loss when the hedged cash
transaction affects profit or loss.
(ii) the currency of the contract is that in which the related good or service is
routinely denominated in commercial transactions,
(iii) the currency is that commonly used in such contracts in the market in which the
transaction takes place.
Financial guarantee contracts IFRS 9 Financial Instruments says that an entity
should classify all financial liabilities as subsequently measured at amortised cost using the
effective interest method, unless it is a derivative, held for trading, or designated to be
measured at fair value through profit or loss. An entity shall present in profit or loss all gains
and losses on financial guarantee contracts that are designated as at fair value through
profit or loss.
Basic EPS = Profit after tax attributable to the parent – irredeemable preference dividends
Weighted average number of equity shares
Consider:
Market issue at full price – calculate the weighted average number of equity shares
Bonus issue– treat as if these had always been in issue and restate the comparative EPS
Rights issue – treat partly as bonus issue and partly as issue at full market price
Diluted EPS – relevant if there is convertible debt or share option schemes
The recoverable amount is the higher of fair value less costs to sell and value in use.
Fair value is defined in IFRS 13 as the price received when selling an asset in an orderly
transaction between market participants at the measurement date.
Costs to sell are incremental costs directly attributable to the disposal of an asset.
Value in use is the present value of future cash flows from using an asset, including its
eventual disposal.
If the asset has previously been revalued upwards, the impairment is recognised as a
component of other comprehensive income and is debited to the revaluation reserve until
the surplus relating to that asset has been reduced to nil.
The remainder of the impairment loss is recognised in profit or loss.
• The recoverable (impaired) amount of the asset is then depreciated/amortised over its
remaining useful life.
A reversal of an impairment loss is recognised immediately as income in profit or
loss. If the original impairment was charged against the revaluation surplus, it is recognised
as other comprehensive income and credited to the revaluation reserve.
(i) The reversal must not take the value of the asset above the amount it would
have been if the original impairment had never been recorded. The depreciation
that would have been charged in the meantime must be taken into account.
(ii) The depreciation charge for future periods should be revised to reflect the
changed carrying amount.
Indicators of impairment may arise from either the external environment in which the
entity operates or from within the entity’s own operating environment.
Assets should be tested for impairment at as low a level as possible, at individual asset
level where possible. However, many assets do not generate cash inflows independently
from other assets and such assets will usually be tested within the cash-generating unit
(CGU) to which the asset belongs.
Cash flow projections should be based on reasonable assumptions that represent
management’s best estimate of the range of economic conditions that will exist over the
remaining useful life of the asset.
The discount rate used is the rate, which reflects the specific risks of the asset or CGU.
(i) a present obligation (legal or constructive) has arisen as a result of a past event
(the obligating event),
(ii) payment is probable (‘more likely than not’), and the amount can be estimated
reliably.
An obligating event is an event that creates a legal or constructive obligation and,
therefore, results in an entity having no realistic alternative but to settle the obligation.
If a provision has been discounted to present value, then the discount must be unwound
and presented in finance costs in the statement of profit or loss
At the reporting date, a provision should be reversed if it is no longer probable that an
outflow of economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation.
a possible obligation that arises from past events and whose existence will be confirmed by
the outcome of uncertain future events which are outside of the control of the entity, or
• a present obligation that arises from past events, but does not meet the criteria for
recognition as a provision.
This is either because an outflow of economic benefits is not probable or (more rarely)
because it is not possible to make a reliable estimate of the obligation.
A contingent liability is disclosed, unless the possibility of a future outflow of economic
benefits is remote.
A contingent asset should not be recognised:
(i) A contingent asset should be disclosed if the inflow of future economic benefits
is at least probable
(ii) If the future inflow of benefits is virtually certain, then it ceases to be a
contingent asset and should be recognised as a normal asset.
According to IAS 38, the three critical attributes of an intangible asset are:
(i) Identifiability
Measurement
An asset has an indefinite useful life when there is no foreseeable limit to the period
over which the asset is expected to generate net cash inflows. It should not be amortised,
but be subject to an annual impairment review.
A change in amortisation method is adjusted prospectively as a change in estimate
under IAS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors.
IAS 36 states that an entity should assess at the end of each reporting period whether
there is any indication that an asset may be impaired. If any such indication exists, the entity
should estimate the recoverable amount of the asset.
I- the entity intends to complete the intangible asset, and then use it or sell it
IAS 41 – Agriculture
When adopting IFRS Standards for the first time, an opening SFP must be produced at
the date of transition in which the entity must:
Recognise assets and liabilities in accordance with IFRS Standards
Derecognise assets and liabilities that do not comply with IFRS Standards
Measure assets and liabilities in accordance with IFRS Standards
Classify assets in accordance with IFRS Standards.
Gain and losses arising at the date of transition are recorded in retained earnings.
A share-based payment is where an entity receives goods or services in exchange for
shares, share options or cash based on a share price.
The expense of a share-based payment scheme is recognised in profit or loss over the
vesting period based on the number of share-based payments expected to vest. If there are
no vesting conditions, then the expense is recognised immediately.
Grant date: the date a share-based payment transaction is entered into.
Vesting date: the date on which the cash or equity instruments can be received by the
other party to the agreement.
(1) Equity-settled share based payment transactions where a company receives goods or
services in exchange for equity instruments (e.g. shares or share options).
(2) Cash-settled share based payment transactions, where a company receives goods and
services in exchange for a cash amount paid based on its share price.
Modifications
Cancellations
If an entity cancels or settles a share option scheme before the vesting date:
the entity immediately recognises the amount that would otherwise have been
recognised for services received over the vesting period (an acceleration of vesting)
Any payment made to employees up to the fair value of the equity instruments granted
at cancellation or settlement date is accounted for as a deduction from equity.
Any payment made to employees in excess of the fair value of the equity instruments
granted at the cancellation or settlement date is accounted for as an expense in profit or
loss.
2. The absolute amount of its reported profit or loss is 10% or more of the greater, in
absolute amount, of (i) the combined reported profit of all operating segments which did
not report a loss and (ii) the combined reported loss of all operating segments which
reported a loss.
3. Its assets are 10% or more of the combined assets of all operating segments.
Aggregation of one or more operating segments into a single reportable segment is
permitted (but not required) where certain conditions are met, the principal condition being
that the operating segments should have similar economic characteristics. The segments
must be similar in each of the following respects:
(i) power over the investee, that is, the investor has existing rights which give it the
ability to direct the relevant activities (the activities which significantly affect the
investee’s returns);
(ii) exposure, or rights, to variable returns from its involvement with the investee;
(iii) the ability to use its power over the investee to affect the amount of the
investor’s returns. Where a party has all three elements, then it is a parent. Where at
least one element is missing, then it is not.
IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial Statements says that: ‘An investor controls an
investee when the investor is exposed, or has rights, to variable returns from its
involvement with the investee and has the ability to affect those returns through its power
over the investee’.
Any transaction in which an entity obtains control of one or more businesses qualifies as
a business combination and is subject to the measurement and recognition requirements of
IFRS 3 Business Combinations.
IFRS 3 defines a ‘business’ as ‘an integrated set of activities and assets that is capable of
being conducted and managed for the purpose of providing a return in the form of
dividends, lower costs or other economic benefits directly to investors or other owners,
members or participants’. A business consists of inputs and processes applied to those
inputs which have the ability to create outputs.
IFRS 11 classes joint arrangements as either joint operations or joint ventures. The
classification of a joint arrangement as a joint operation or a joint venture depends upon the
rights and obligations of the parties to the arrangement.
Joint venture – where parties have joint control and have rights to net assets of a
separate entity formed for the joint venture
Joint operation – parties have joint control and have rights to the assets and obligations
for the liabilities of the joint operation IFRS 11 requires that a joint operator recognises line
by-line the following in relation to its interest in a joint operation:
In its consolidated financial statements, IFRS 11 requires that a joint venturer recognises its
interest in a joint venture as an investment and accounts for that investment using the
equity method in accordance with IAS 28 Investments in associates and joint ventures
unless the entity is exempted from applying the equity method.
In its separate financial statements, a joint venturer should account for its interest in a
joint venture in accordance with IAS 27 (2011) Separate financial statements, namely:
a) At cost, or
b) In accordance with IFRS 9 Financial instruments
IFRS 12 – Disclosure of interests in other entities
Fair value is defined as the amount received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability
in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.
In IFRS 13, fair value measurements are categorised into a three-level hierarchy based
on the type of inputs.
The three levels are as follows:
Level 1 inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for items identical to the
asset being measured.
Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included within
Level 1 that are directly or indirectly observable.
Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs that are usually determined based on
management’s assumptions.
IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement requires the fair value of a non-financial asset to be
measured based on its highest and best use. This is determined from the perspective of
market participants. It does not matter whether the entity intends to use the asset
differently. The highest and best use takes into account the use of the asset which is
physically possible, legally permissible and financially feasible.
IFRS 13 allows management to presume that the current use of an asset is the highest
and best use unless market or other factors suggest otherwise.
IFRS 13 sets out the concepts of principal market and most advantageous market. Fair
value should be measured based on prices in principal market, which is the market with the
greatest volume and level of activity for the inventory. In the absence of a principal market,
the most advantageous market should be used.
In evaluating the principal or most advantageous markets, IFRS 13 restricts the eligible
markets to only those which can be accessed at the measurement date. If there is a
principal market for the asset or liability, IFRS 13 states that fair value should be based on
the price in that market, even if the price in a different market is higher. It is only in the
absence of the principal market that the most advantageous market should be used.
A contract is an agreement (not necessarily written) between two or more parties that
create enforceable rights and obligations.
The total transaction price should be allocated to each performance obligation in proportion
to stand-alone, observable, selling prices.
For each performance obligation identified, an entity must determine whether it satisfies
the performance obligation over time or satisfies the performance obligation at a point in
time.
An entity satisfies a performance obligation and recognises revenue over time, if one of the
following criteria is met:
the customer simultaneously receives and consumes the benefits provided by
the entity’s performance as the entity performs
the entity’s performance creates or enhances an asset (for example, work in
progress) that the customer controls as the asset is created or enhanced, or
the entity’s performance does not create an asset with an alternative use to the
entity and the entity has an enforceable right to payment for performance
completed to date.
For a performance obligation satisfied over time, an entity recognises revenue over time by
measuring the progress towards complete satisfaction of that performance obligation.
If a performance obligation is not satisfied over time then it is satisfied at the point in time
at which the customer obtains control of a promised asset. The following are indicators of
the transfer of control:
The entity has a present right to payment for the asset
The customer has legal title to the asset
The entity has transferred physical possession of the asset
The customer has the significant risks and rewards of ownership of the asset
The customer has accepted the asset.
IFRS 16 LEASES
Identifying a lease
Lessees are required to recognise an asset and a liability for all leases, unless they are
short-term or of a minimal value. As such, it is vital to assess whether a contract contains a
lease, or whether it is simply a contract for a service.
A contract contains a lease if it conveys ‘the right to control the use of an
identified asset for a period of time in exchange for consideration’ (IFRS 16, para
9).
For this to be the case, the contract must give the customer:
the right to substantially all of the identified asset’s economic benefits, and
the right to direct the identified asset’s use.
Lessee accounting
If the lease is short-term (less than 12 months at the inception date) or of a low value
then a simplified treatment is allowed. In these cases, the lessee can choose to recognise
the lease payments in profit or loss on a straight line basis.
In all other cases, the lessee should recognise a lease liability and a right-of-use asset at
the commencement of the lease:
The lease liability is initially measured at the present value of the lease payments that
have not yet been paid.
The right-of-use asset is initially recognised at cost. This will be the initial value of the
lease liability, plus any lease payments made at or before the commencement of the lease,
as well as any direct costs. The carrying amount of the lease liability is increased by the
interest charge. This interest is also recorded in the statement of profit or loss.
Lessor accounting
Lessor accounting remains largely unchanged from IAS 17 Leases. The lessor must
assess whether the lease is a finance lease or an operating lease. A finance lease is a lease
where the risks and rewards of ownership substantially transfer to the lessee.