Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Maximum Mark
Parameter mark awarded Comments
2 Not good…no mention of important
Abstract 5
results, methodology used
Introduction and 4 Very unclear…no aims and project
10
Background scope defined
3 Very poor literature review – no
Literature review;
10 structure, no related works. No in-text
references & citations
citation done
Problem definition 10 4 Poor
Section C – ONLY Complete this section if the project is a research or review-oriented topic
Maximum Mark
Parameter mark awarded Comments
10 No methodology discussed, no details
Collection and analysis
30 about data collection and data analysis.
of data
No results shown.
Evaluation/discussion of 3 Very poor. No results shown
10
data/ results
Conclusion with critical 3 Poor
reflection on problem as 10
defined
Maximum Mark
Parameter mark awarded Comments
Detailed requirements
analysis and design 10
specifications
Product 20
Product evaluation 10
Conclusions with critical
reflection on problem as 10
defined
Maximum Mark
Parameter mark awarded Comments
Presentation of report and 6 Poor formatting, and lots of spelling
15
quality of written English mistakes. Poor report structure