Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Issue 0 1 2 Page
MONORAIL DESIGN (AISC 2005) Date 30/4/2009
Prepared By DA
1
Checked By MP
Approved By AJ
2 Main Features:
3 1 Both LRFD and ASD approaches of 13 th edition (2005) of AISC are incorporated for Global Check.
4 2 Resistance factors (Φ) & safety factors (Ω) are considered as required for LRFD & ASD respectively in this spreadsheet.
5 3 Valid for doubly symmetric and singly symmetric Monorail section
6 4 Design of Monorail hanger is included as per API
7 5 Monorail Local check is as per BS 2853
8
10 Notes
11 1 Load factor(LF) requirement as per the code. (LF = 1.0 for ASD and LF = 1.3 or 1.2 for LRFD) are made as input for the user
12 2 Worksheet 'MONORAIL' is for monorail with doubly symmetrical beam (Rolled Section)
13 3 Worksheet 'MONORAIL (singly symmetrical)' is for monorail with singly symmetrical beam (Built up section)
14 4 The SACS axes system / existing co-ordinate system in the spreadsheet is retained.
15 (This is not the same as considered in 2005 edition of AISC).
16 5 Worksheet 'Section properties' has to entering by user for singly symmetrical monorail section properties.
17 6 UC ratio (Bending & Shear) of spreadsheet for doubly symmetrical monorail has been checked with SACS moving load analysis
18 7 Loading for hanger design are taken from monorail doubly or singly symmetrical spreadsheets.
19 Option for loading selection has been created on the spreadsheet (ie. 1 or 2)
20
21
22 Limitation
23 1 The design is valid only for compact and non compact flanges and web.
24 2 The calculation of section properties for the monorail singly simetrical section is limited for the three(3) elements only.
26
27
28 Improvements
29 1 This spreadsheet can be further developed to include the designs of beam with slender web (F5 - AISC 2005)
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
CN1 Rev.2
49
50
51
Project N° - Unit Doc.type Material
2551Y-206 CN 360
Issue 0 1
MONORAIL DESIGN AS PER AISC 2005 & Date 30/4/2009
HANGER DESIGN AS PER Prepared By DA
API Checked By MP
Approved By AJ
1(Simply
7 IPN 550 5m 5m 12T Power 345 M
supported)
14
15
16
Code Check Load factor
17
AISC - ASD 1.00
18
AISC - LRFD 1.30
19
20
168.3mm Dia. x
9.5mm Thk.
1m 12T Monorail Doubly Symmetrical 275 M
24
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
CN1 Rev.2
42
43
44
Material Code Serial N° Rev.
3600 103 0
1 2 Page
Young's
Yield stress
modulus
Young's
Yield stress
modulus
Young's
Yield stress
modulus
2551Y-206
Issue 0
MONORAIL DESIGN (AISC 2005) Date 30/4/2009
Prepared By DA
ROLLED SECTION (Doubly Symmetrical Beam) Checked By MP
Approved By AJ
1. INPUT DATA :
Select design code check : ASD AISC 2005
Acceleration :
ah = 0.10 g {Horizontal acceleration = ~ 10% of vertical accele
av = 1.00 g { Vertical acceleration }
aa = 0.00 g { longitudinal acceleration(axial load ) }
Beam category: HE / HL
Designation: HE 400 A
2. SECTION :
Yield stress: FY = 345.0 Mpa Young's Modulus
SHEET 6 OF 74
Project N° - Unit
2551Y-206
Issue 0
MONORAIL DESIGN (AISC 2005) Date 30/4/2009
Prepared By DA
ROLLED SECTION (Doubly Symmetrical Beam) Checked By MP
Approved By AJ
Span of beam : L = 6.00 m
Support Condition :
support : 0 (Enter =0 or 1 or 2 or 3 )
(see figure)
Effective length K= 1
SHEET 7 OF 74
Project N° - Unit
2551Y-206
Issue 0
MONORAIL DESIGN (AISC 2005) Date 30/4/2009
Prepared By DA
ROLLED SECTION (Doubly Symmetrical Beam) Checked By MP
Approved By AJ
3. Loads for Checking the Beam :
Concentrated Loads : Qv = 1.650 t {Qv = av (Sg + y Sc) } *LF
Qh = 0.165 t {Qh = ah (Sg + Sc) + Sv }* LF
Axial load in beam Pu = 0.000 t {Pu= aa (Sg + Sc)}* LF
4. GLOBAL CHECKS :
Vertical Bending Moment : Maximum Shear force due to vertical
M1 = 2.475 tm (concentrated loads) V1 = 1.650
M2 = 0.562 tm (distributed loads) V2 = 0.374
Mv = 3.037 tm Vv = 2.024
Nominal flexural strength Mn shall be the lower value obtained according to the limit states of yielding (plastic moment) and lat
1.Yielding
Nominal flexural strength (Mn1) = Mp = Fy Wpy = 883.89 [kN-m]
2.Lateral-Torsional Buckling
Limiting length Lp = 1.76 rz √ (E/Fy) = 3148.62 [mm]
rts
2
= √(Iz Cw) / Wy = 6868.55 hence, rts = 82.88 [mm]
Limiting length Lr = 1.95 rts (E/0.7 Fy) √(J c/Wy ho) √(1+√1+6.76 (0.7Fy Wy ho / E J c) 2
=
For doubly symmetric I -shapes: c = 1.00 I shape (select the section here for the value of "c")
Lateral-torsional buckling modification factor (Cb) = 1.00 (for all cases conservatively considered)
Critical stress (Fcr) = Cb π2 E / (Lb / rts)2 √(1+0.078 (J c / Wy ho) (Lb / rts)2) =
Nominal flexural strength (Mn) = 759.35 [kN-m] [ Minimum of Mn1 and Mn2]
SHEET 8 OF 74
Project N° - Unit
2551Y-206
Issue 0
MONORAIL DESIGN (AISC 2005) Date 30/4/2009
Prepared By DA
ROLLED SECTION (Doubly Symmetrical Beam) Checked By MP
Approved By AJ
SHEET 9 OF 74
Project N° - Unit
2551Y-206
Issue 0
MONORAIL DESIGN (AISC 2005) Date 30/4/2009
Prepared By DA
ROLLED SECTION (Doubly Symmetrical Beam) Checked By MP
Approved By AJ
1.37 √ (kv E/ Fy) = 74.67
Web plate buckling co-efficient (kv) = 5.00 (for unstiffened web only)
Nominal shear strength (Vn) = 801.50 [kN]
Safety factor for shear (Ωv) = 1.50
Combined Unity Check Ratio for bottom flange with 100% Lateral Load = 0.098
DEFLECTION CHECK
SHEET 10 OF 74
Project N° - Unit
2551Y-206
Issue 0
MONORAIL DESIGN (AISC 2005) Date 30/4/2009
Prepared By DA
ROLLED SECTION (Doubly Symmetrical Beam) Checked By MP
Approved By AJ
SHEET 11 OF 74
Project N° - Unit
2551Y-206
Issue 0
MONORAIL DESIGN (AISC 2005) Date 30/4/2009
Prepared By DA
ROLLED SECTION (Doubly Symmetrical Beam) Checked By MP
Approved By AJ
Where Cx and Cy are the coefficients for longitudinal and transverse bending stresses
depending on the value of the ratio m given by : m = 2 n / (b-tw)
n = distance from the centreline of the wheel load to the free edge of the flange =
tw = Thickness of web
b = Flange width
Hence, m = 0.149
From Table 5.3 of BS : 1993-6:2007, the Longitudinal and Transverse bending stress coefficients are
Cx = 2.1
Cy = 0.6
Hence
Local longitudinal bending stresses sx = 23.54 N/mm2
SHEET 12 OF 74
Project N° - Unit
2551Y-206
Issue 0
MONORAIL DESIGN (AISC 2005) Date 30/4/2009
Prepared By DA
ROLLED SECTION (Doubly Symmetrical Beam) Checked By MP
Approved By AJ
SHEET 13 OF 74
Material Code Serial N° Rev.
CN 3600 103 0
0 2 3 Page
30/4/2009
DA
MP
AJ
1.25 ( BS 2853 )
(G must be exactly equal to flangewidth or 3/4 of flange width or 1/2 of flange width or
1/4 of flange width)
0.02 t
[kg/m]
1890384.09 [mm4]
2.942E+12 [mm6]
E = 205000.0 Mpa
SHEET 14 OF 74
Material Code Serial N° Rev.
CN 3600 103 0
0 2 3 Page
30/4/2009
DA
MP
AJ
0= L
0.4L
1= L L
2= L2 L1 L2
L1 > L2
3= L
SHEET 15 OF 74
Material Code Serial N° Rev.
CN 3600 103 0
0 2 3 Page
30/4/2009
DA
MP
AJ
y
d
x x
Qh
y
Qv/2 Qv/2
AISC (F2-1)
AISC (F2-5)
AISC (F2-7)
0.066 OK
AISC (F6-1)
SHEET 16 OF 74
Material Code Serial N° Rev.
CN 3600 103 0
0 2 3 Page
30/4/2009
DA
MP
AJ
0.016 OK
SHEET 17 OF 74
Material Code Serial N° Rev.
CN 3600 103 0
0 2 3 Page
30/4/2009
DA
MP
AJ
0.052 OK
0.003 OK
302.75 [Mpa]
0.000 OK
OK
REMARKS
UC < 1.0 - OK
UC < 1.0 - OK
UC < 1.0 - OK
UC < 1.0 - OK
UC < 1.0 - OK
UC < 1.0 - OK
UC < 1.0 - OK
SHEET 18 OF 74
Material Code Serial N° Rev.
CN 3600 103 0
0 2 3 Page
30/4/2009
DA
MP
AJ
UC < 1.0 - OK
SHEET 19 OF 74
Material Code Serial N° Rev.
CN 3600 103 0
0 2 3 Page
30/4/2009
DA
MP
AJ
21.5 mm
11 mm
300 mm
Hence Safe
SHEET 20 OF 74
Material Code Serial N° Rev.
CN 3600 103 0
0 2 3 Page
30/4/2009
DA
MP
AJ
SHEET 21 OF 74
Project N° - Unit Doc. type Material Code
2551Y-206 CN 3600
Issue 0 1
Date 30/4/2009
DESIGN OF HANGERS Prepared By DA
Checked By MP
Approved By AJ
DESIGN OF HANGERS :
(AS PER API-RP 2A - WSD & LRFD)
Designation: 04"x0.339"
Select 1 If loading for hanger design are taken from Monorail with Doubly Symmetrical Beam (Rolled Section)
1
Select 2 If loading for hanger design are taken from Monorail with Singly Symmetrical Beam (Built-Up Section)
Check Monorail design, with ASD or LRFD Methode ASD AISC 2005
1. Design Loads :
Horizontal Load
Perpendicular : Qh1 = 0.20 t {Qh1 = Qh +qh*L/2}
Along monorail Axis : Qh2 = 0.00 t {Qh2 =Pu }
2. Stress Check :
Allowable tensile stress (ASD), Ft = 165.00 N/mm2 {Ft = 0.6*fy} (API WSD - 3.2.1-1)
Project N° - Unit Doc. type Material Code
2551Y-206 CN 3600
Issue 0 1
Date 30/4/2009
DESIGN OF HANGERS Prepared By DA
Checked By MP
Approved By AJ
Allowable tensile stress (LRFD), Ft = 261.25 N/mm2 {Ft = ft * FY} (API LRFD - D.2.1-1)
Bending = 0.137 OK
LF = 1.00
Side sway Ds = (Qhh/LF) x h3/3EI = 0.802 mm
Issue 0 1
Date 30/4/2009
DESIGN OF HANGERS Prepared By DA
Checked By MP
Approved By AJ
Serial N° Rev.
103 0
2 Page
[kg/m]
205000.0 Mpa
Section)
p Section)
D - 3.2.1-1)
Serial N° Rev.
103 0
2 Page
FD - D.2.1-1)
75.20
Serial N° Rev.
103 0
2 Page
1
American wide flange (source = Arbed)
à larges ailes
conformes à ASTM A6 / A 6M
designation
G h b tw tf A Iy Wel.y Wpl.y iy Avz Iz Wel.z Wpl.z iz
W 100 x 100 x 19.3 19.3 106 103 7.1 8.8 24.71 475.9 89.79 103.3 4.39 6.63 160.6 31.19 47.94 2.55
W 130 x 130 x 23.8 23.8 127 127 6.1 9.1 30.30 885.5 139.5 157.2 5.41 7.00 311.0 48.98 74.66 3.20
W 130 x 130 x 28.1 28.1 131 128 6.9 10.9 35.94 1099 167.7 190.9 5.53 8.06 381.4 59.60 90.86 3.26
W 150 x 100 x 13.5 13.5 150 100 4.3 5.5 17.31 685.5 91.40 102.4 6.29 5.88 91.80 18.36 28.26 2.30
W 150 x 100 x 18.0 18.0 153 102 5.8 7.1 23.28 915.9 122.1 138.6 6.33 7.95 125.9 25.37 39.29 2.36
W 150 x 150 x 22.5 22.5 152 152 5.8 6.6 28.48 1206 158.6 176.1 6.51 8.05 386.6 50.87 77.56 3.68
W 150 x 100 x 24.0 24.0 160 102 6.6 10.3 30.52 1342 167.8 191.5 6.63 9.36 182.6 35.80 55.24 2.45
W 150 x 150 x 29.8 29.8 157 153 6.6 9.3 37.90 1714 218.4 243.9 6.73 9.36 555.5 72.62 110.5 3.83
W 150 x 150 x 37.1 37.1 162 154 8.1 11.6 47.32 2220 274.1 309.9 6.85 11.69 706.8 91.79 140.0 3.86
W 200 x 100 x 15.0 15.0 200 100 4.3 5.2 19.14 1280 128.0 145.2 8.18 7.87 86.89 17.38 27.10 2.13
W 200 x 100 x 19.3 19.3 203 102 5.8 6.5 24.91 1662 163.7 188.1 8.17 10.56 115.4 22.63 35.69 2.15
W 200 x 135 x 21 21.0 203 133 5.0 6.4 27.08 1980 195.1 217.7 8.55 9.31 251.3 37.78 58.03 3.05
W 200 x 100 x 22.5 22.5 206 102 6.2 8.0 28.69 2004 194.5 222.8 8.36 11.42 142.0 27.85 43.72 2.22
W 200 x 135 x 26.6 26.6 207 133 5.8 8.4 34.00 2587 250.0 279.8 8.72 10.94 329.8 49.60 76.17 3.11
W 200 x 135 x 31.3 31.3 210 134 6.4 10.2 39.92 3139 298.9 335.3 8.87 12.15 409.6 61.13 93.76 3.20
W 200 x 165 x 35.9 35.9 201 165 6.2 10.2 45.75 3438 342.1 379.4 8.67 11.47 764.3 92.64 141.1 4.09
W 200 x 165 x 41.7 41.7 205 166 7.2 11.8 53.17 4088 398.8 445.6 8.77 13.45 900.5 108.5 165.5 4.12
W 200 x 200 x 46.1 46.1 203 203 7.2 11.0 58.62 4545 447.8 495.6 8.81 13.42 1535 151.2 229.5 5.12
W 200 x 200 x 52 52.0 206 204 7.9 12.6 66.50 5268 511.5 569.0 8.90 14.82 1784 174.9 265.5 5.18
designation
G h b tw tf A Iy Wel.y Wpl.y iy
kg/m mm mm mm mm cm2 cm4 cm3 cm3 cm
designation
G D D t A Iy = lz Wel.y = Wel.z iy = iz
Issue
Date
Prepared By
SECTIONAL PROPERTIES
Checked By
Approved By
DIMENSIONS (uncorroded):
Width Depth Offset Corrosion allowance, Cal = 0
[mm] [mm] [mm] Yield stress, Fy = 245
0 0
260.0 17.5 0.0 Elastic section modulus, E = 2.0E+05
10.0 225.0 0.0
150.0 17.5 0.0
Z
200
Depth, H = 260.00 mm
100
DIMENSIONS (corroded):
Width Depth
Type 0
[mm] [mm] -200 -100 0 100
260.0 17.5 Compact Y
10.0 225.0 Compact
150.0 17.5 Compact
0.0 0.0 -100
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
-200
Summary:
Area
Axial 9425.0 mm2
Y-Shear 7175.0 mm2
Z-Shear 2250.0 mm2
For WEBS
hc/tw = 17.55
Twice the distance between equal area axis & bottom edge
of compression flange, hp = 3.25 [cm]
Mp = 221453203.1 [N-mm]
My = 173152052.1 [N-mm]
(hc/hp) √(E/Fy)
= 162.86
162.86
(0.54 (Mp/My) - 0.09)2
5.70 √(E/Fy) = 162.86
Doc. type Material Code Serial N° Rev.
CN 3600 103 0
0 1 2 Page
30/4/2009
DA
1
MP
AJ
[mm]
[Mpa]
[Mpa]
Z
200
100
0
-100 0 100 200
Y
-100
-200
ection properties
706743.1 mm3
235171.5 mm3
Case 2 (flexure in flanges of doubly & singly symmetric I-shaped
built-up sections)
2551Y-206
Issue 0
MONORAIL DESIGN (AISC 2005) Date 30/4/2009
Prepared By DA
BUILT-UP SECTION (Singly Symmetrical Beam) Checked By MP
Approved By AJ
1. INPUT DATA :
Select design code check : ASD AISC 2005
Acceleration :
ah = 0.10 g {Horizontal acceleration = ~ 10% of vertical accele
av = 1.00 g { Vertical acceleration }
aa = 0.10 g { longitudinal acceleration(axial load )}
Designation: HEB260
SHEET 51 OF 74
Project N° - Unit
2551Y-206
Issue 0
MONORAIL DESIGN (AISC 2005) Date 30/4/2009
Prepared By DA
BUILT-UP SECTION (Singly Symmetrical Beam) Checked By MP
Approved By AJ
Limiting Slenderness parameter for a Compact and Non Compact Web for Strong Axis (Case-11)
lw = hc / tw = 17.55 lpw = 162.86 lrw =
Check If l w > l rw then the web is slender, Hence Mn calculation as per Chapter F5
Limiting Slenderness parameter for a Compact and Non Compact Flange for Strong Axis (Case-2) - Check only the comp
lf = bfc /2tfc = 7.43 lpf = 10.86 lrf =
Limiting Slenderness parameter for a Compact and Non Compact Flange for Weak Axis (Case-2) - Check the comp. & te
SHEET 52 OF 74
Project N° - Unit
2551Y-206
Issue 0
MONORAIL DESIGN (AISC 2005) Date 30/4/2009
Prepared By DA
BUILT-UP SECTION (Singly Symmetrical Beam) Checked By MP
Approved By AJ
Support Condition :
support : 0 (Enter =0 or 1 or 2 or 3 )
(see figure)
Effective length K= 1
4. GLOBAL CHECKS :
Vertical Bending Moment : Maximum Shear force due to verti
M1 = 2.250 tm (concentrated loads) V1 = 1.500
M2 = 0.333 tm (distributed loads) V2 = 0.222
Mv = 2.583 tm Vv = 1.722
1.Compression FlangeYielding
Nominal flexural strength (Mny1) = Mny1 = Rpc Myc = 221.453 [kN-m]
SHEET 53 OF 74
Project N° - Unit
2551Y-206
Issue 0
MONORAIL DESIGN (AISC 2005) Date 30/4/2009
Prepared By DA
BUILT-UP SECTION (Singly Symmetrical Beam) Checked By MP
Approved By AJ
2.Lateral-Torsional Buckling
aw = 0.386 rt = 75.652 mm
Limiting length Lp = 1.1 rt √ (E/Fy) = 2377.63 mm
Limiting length Lr = 1.95 rt (E/FL) √(J /Wyc ho) √(1+√1+6.76 (FL Wyc ho / E J)2 = 14891.93
Lateral-torsional buckling modification factor (Cb) = 1.00 (for all cases conservatively considered)
Iyc / Iz = 0.838
Critical stress (Fcr) = Cb π E / (Lb / rt)2 √(1+0.078 (J / Wyc ho) (Lb / rt)2) =
2
503.25 [Mpa]
Nominal flexural strength (Mny2) = 207.472 [kN-m]
SHEET 54 OF 74
Project N° - Unit
2551Y-206
Issue 0
MONORAIL DESIGN (AISC 2005) Date 30/4/2009
Prepared By DA
BUILT-UP SECTION (Singly Symmetrical Beam) Checked By MP
Approved By AJ
Nominal flexural strength (Mny) = 207.47 [kN-m] [ Minimum of Mny1, Mny2, Mny3 & Mny4]
Safety factor for flexure (Ωb) = 1.67
Design flexural strength, Mny / Ωb = 124.23 [kN-m] Mu / (Mn / Ωb) = 0.204
Nominal flexural strength (Mnz) = 92.19 [kN-m] [ Minimum of Mnz1,1.6 Fy Wz, Mnz2 & Mnz3 ]
Design flexural strength, Mn / Ωb= 55.20 [kN-m] Mu / (Mn / Ωb) = 0.054
2551Y-206
Issue 0
MONORAIL DESIGN (AISC 2005) Date 30/4/2009
Prepared By DA
BUILT-UP SECTION (Singly Symmetrical Beam) Checked By MP
Approved By AJ
SHEET 56 OF 74
Project N° - Unit
2551Y-206
Issue 0
MONORAIL DESIGN (AISC 2005) Date 30/4/2009
Prepared By DA
BUILT-UP SECTION (Singly Symmetrical Beam) Checked By MP
Approved By AJ
COMBINED CHECK (Axial Compression + Bending)
Combined Unity Check Ratio for bottom flange with 100% Lateral Load = 0.313
DEFLECTION CHECK
SHEET 57 OF 74
Project N° - Unit
2551Y-206
Issue 0
MONORAIL DESIGN (AISC 2005) Date 30/4/2009
Prepared By DA
BUILT-UP SECTION (Singly Symmetrical Beam) Checked By MP
Approved By AJ
A. Transverse stress when the trolley is remote from the end of the beam.
Number of Wheels :
(2= for 2 wheel or 4= for 4 wheel) = 4
Distance between wheels G= 150.0 mm
K1 = constant dependent on set-in of wheels for trolleys (or set-in of beam fixings) remote from end of beam or
unsupported joint (Appendix G/ Table 5 of BS2853)
K1 = 1.500
f2 when plotted with f1, should fall under the hatched area of f1-f2 graph :
(Appendix G/ fig 5 for 36 ksi steel fig 6 for 50ksi steel)
A. Transverse stress when the trolley is at the end of the beam or at joint where edges of flanges are unsupported.
K2 = constant dependent on set-in of wheels for trolleys (or set-in of beam fixings) at or near end of beam
(Appendix G/ Table 5 of BS2853)
K2 = 0.770
f2 when plotted with f1, should fall under the hatched area of f1-f2 graph (Appendix G/ fig 5 for 36 ksi steel fig 6 for 50ksi steel - shown below
SHEET 58 OF 74
12
Project N° - Unit
2551Y-206
Issue 0
MONORAIL DESIGN (AISC 2005) Date 30/4/2009
Prepared By DA
BUILT-UP SECTION (Singly Symmetrical Beam)
36 Ksi STEEL Checked By 50
MPKsi ST
f1 (ton/in2)
Approved By AJ
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9
f2 (ton/in2) f2 (ton/in2)
SHEET 59 OF 74
Material Code Serial N° Rev.
CN 3600 103 0
0 2 3 Page
30/4/2009
DA
MP
AJ
1.10 ( BS 2853 )
(G must be exactly equal to flangewidth or 3/4 of flange width or 1/2 of flange width or
1/4 of flange width)
0.04 t
[kg/m]
807447.9 [mm4]
SHEET 60 OF 74
Material Code Serial N° Rev.
CN 3600 103 0
0 2 3 Page
30/4/2009
DA
MP
AJ
Mp = 221.45 [kN-m]
162.86
Web is not Slender - Use Section F4
ange for Strong Axis (Case-2) - Check only the compression flange
28.70
ange for Weak Axis (Case-2) - Check the comp. & tens. flange
SHEET 61 OF 74
Material Code Serial N° Rev.
CN 3600 103 0
0 2 3 Page
30/4/2009
DA
MP
AJ
1.279
E = 200000 Mpa
0= L
0.4L
1= L L
2= L2 L1 L2
L1 > L2
3= L
y
d
x x
Qh
y
Qv/2 Qv/2
the limit states of compression flange yielding (plastic moment), lateral-torsional buckling,
AISC (F4-1)
SHEET 62 OF 74
Material Code Serial N° Rev.
CN 3600 103 0
0 2 3 Page
30/4/2009
DA
MP
AJ
AISC (F4-7)
AISC (F4-5)
AISC (F4-2) & (F4-3)
SHEET 63 OF 74
Material Code Serial N° Rev.
CN 3600 103 0
0 2 3 Page
30/4/2009
DA
MP
AJ
AISC (F4-14)
0.204 OK
AISC (F6-1)
AISC (F6-4)
AISC (F6-2) & (F6-3)
AISC (F6-4)
AISC (F6-2) & (F6-3)
0.054 OK
0.102 OK
0.004 OK
SHEET 64 OF 74
Material Code Serial N° Rev.
CN 3600 103 0
0 2 3 Page
30/4/2009
DA
MP
AJ
177.85 [Mpa]
0.002 OK
SHEET 65 OF 74
Material Code Serial N° Rev.
CN 3600 103 0
0 2 3 Page
30/4/2009
DA
MP
AJ
OK
D allow = L / 500 For Support Condition 0,1,2 and L / 250 For Support
Condition 3
UC = 0.283 OK
REMARKS
UC < 1.0 - OK
UC < 1.0 - OK
UC < 1.0 - OK
UC < 1.0 - OK
UC < 1.0 - OK
UC < 1.0 - OK
UC < 1.0 - OK
UC < 1.0 - OK
SHEET 66 OF 74
Material Code Serial N° Rev.
CN 3600 103 0
0 2 3 Page
30/4/2009
DA
MP
AJ
ton/in2
pendix G/ fig 5 for 36 ksi steel fig 6 for 50ksi steel - shown below) :
50 Ksi STEEL
(ton/in2)
SHEET 67 OF 74
14
2
Material Code Serial N° Rev.
CN 3600 103 0
0 2 3 Page
30/4/2009
DA
50
MPKsi STEEL
f1 (ton/in2)
AJ
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0
f2 (ton/in2)
SHEET 68 OF 74
Project N° - Unit
2551Y-206
Issue
COMPARATIVE STUDY Date
Prepared By
Checked By
Approved By
COMPARATIVE STUDY (1989-ASD, 2005-ASD & 2005-LRFD) - GLOBAL CHECK FOR MONORAIL WITH DOUBLY SYMMETRICAL B
Notes:
1. Bending & Shear UC ratio for ASD 2005 is 15% more than LRFD 2005 due to following reason :
2. (**) The ASD 1989 spreadsheet is using more moment of inertia compare to ASD & LRFD 2005
COMPARATIVE STUDY (SREADSHEET 2005-ASD&LRFD & SACS 2005 ASD&LRFD) - GLOBAL CHECK FOR MONORAIL WITH DOUBLY SYMM
2551Y-206
Issue
COMPARATIVE STUDY Date
Prepared By
Checked By
Approved By
SPAN OF
MONORAIL Flexure
MONORAIL TYPE OF Flexure Flexure Flexure
CAPACITY BEAM SIZES Flexure (Bending) Shear Strong (Bending)
OPERATION (Bending)
Weak Axis Axis (UC
(Bending)
Weak Axis
Shear Strong Axis (Bending)
(T) Strong Axis (UC Strong Axis (UC Ratio) Strong Axis
(M) (UC Ratio) Ratio) (UC
Ratio) (UC Ratio) (UC Ratio)
Ratio)
Notes:
1. (#) The Shear Force due to Torsion is not included in SACS analysis, hence both UC ratio are not comparable
COMPARATIVE STUDY (2005-ASD & 2005-LRFD) - GLOBAL CHECK FOR MONORAIL WITH SINGLY SYMMETRICAL BEAM (B
2005 (ASD)
SPAN OF
MONORAIL TYPE
MONORAIL Bending at Bottom
CAPACITY OF BEAM SIZES Bending at Top
Flange with 100%
Shear Strong
(T) OPERATION Flange (UC + Weak Axis
(M) Lateral Load (UC
Ratio) (UC Ratio)
Ratio)
12 5 POWER IPE450 WITH 300MM WIDTH & 30MM THK. BOTTOM FLANGE PLATE 0.734 0.854 0.428
10 4 POWER IPN340 WITH 250MM WIDTH & 30MM THK. BOTTOM FLANGE PLATE 0.742 0.864 0.390
Project N° - Unit
2551Y-206
Issue
COMPARATIVE STUDY Date
Prepared By
Checked By
Approved By
COMPARATIVE STUDY (API RP 2A -WSD 21TH EDITION & LRFD 1ST EDITION 1993) - DESIGN OF MONORAIL HANGER (
12 1 Monorail Doubly Symmetrical 168.3 Dia. x 9.5mm Thk. 0.218 0.427 0.646
10 1 Monorail Singly Symmetrical 168.3 Dia. x 6.4mm Thk. 0.271 0.691 0.962
Notes:
1. (**) Axial Tension UC ratio for WSD more than LRFD due to following reason :
2. (##) Bending UC ratio for WSD more than LRFD due to following reason :
2005 (LRFD)
Bending at Bottom
Bending at Top Shear Strong
Deflection (UC Flange with 100% Deflection (UC
Flange (UC Axis (UC
Ratio) (**) Lateral Load Ratio) (**)
Ratio) Ratio)
(UC Ratio)
Flexure Flexure
(Bending) Shear Strong Flexure (Bending) (Bending) Shear Strong
Weak Axis Axis (UC Strong Axis (UC Weak Axis Axis (UC
(UC Ratio) Ratio) (UC Ratio)
Ratio) Ratio)
2005 (LRFD)
Bending at Bottom
Bending at Top Shear Strong +
Deflection (UC Flange with 100% Deflection (UC
Flange (UC Weak Axis (UC
Ratio) Lateral Load (UC Ratio)
Ratio) Ratio)
Ratio)