Professional Documents
Culture Documents
GARY HUTCHINS,
Plaintiff,
Defendants.
/
COMES NOW THE PLAINTIFF, GARY HUTCHINS, by and through his undersigned
counsel, and hereby sues the defendants, Pinellas County Sheriff Bob Gualtieri, solely in his
official capacity, Deputy Sheriff Mitchell Reed, in his individual capacity, and Deputy Sheriff
INTRODUCTION
1. This is an action brought by a United States citizen, Gary Hutchins, who was the
Victim of false arrest by Pinellas County Sheriff‘s Deputy Mitchell Reed and Pinellas County
Sheriff‘s Deputy Gerald Mason, respectively, who were employed at all relevant times by Pinellas
2. Plaintiff Gary Hutchins alleges Violation of his federal civil rights by Defendants
Deputy Mitchell Reed and Deputy Gerald Mason, specifically his First, Fourth and Fourteenth
Amendment rights of freedom of speech and to be free from a seizure rendered unreasonable by
***ELECTRONICALLY FILED 10/03/2018 12:45:59 PM: KEN BURKE, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, PINELLAS COUNTY***
the absence of probable cause, indeed arguable probable cause. Gary Hutchins also alleges that
Deputies Reed and Mason committed the state law tort of false arrest. Plaintiff seeks declaratory
3. This action arises under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 & 1988 and Florida common law.
4. A11 incidents material to this action occurred in Pinellas County, Florida and
PARTIES
5. Plaintiff Gary Hutchins is an adult United States citizen and, at all relevant times,
6. Defendants Mitchell Reed and Gerald Mason were, at all times relevant to the
matters addressed in this lawsuit, employed as deputies by the Pinellas County Sheriffs Office,
8. Plaintiff timely filed notice with the Pinellas County Sheriffs Office and the Florida
Department of Financial Services pursuant to § 768.28 of the Florida Statutes, regarding his
supplemental state tort claims against Sheriff Bob Gualtieri, in his official capacity. Plaintiff also
has provided Sheriff Gualtieri and the Florida Department of Financial Services the required
amount of time to resolve his claims. There is no administrative exhaustion requirement regarding
9. On November 15, 2014, Gary Hutchins was a patron at the 8th Avenue Pub, in
10. While Mr. Hutchins was at that establishment, Pinellas County Sheriff’s Office
12. While the deputies were outside the 8th Avenue Pub and performing their
investigation, Mr. Hutchins opened the door to see What was happening.
13. Deputies Reed and Mason noticed Mr. Hutchins looking out the pub door at them.
14. Deputy Reed indicated in the offense report, No. 8014-480059, that “[a]s Deputy
Mason and I sat on 8th Avenue discussing What occurred at the pub, Deputy Mason heard the
subject in the red jacket (later identified as Gary Hutchins) make a statement about us deputies
15. Thereafter, Mr. Hutchins and his friend left the 8th Avenue Pub and walked to
another establishment, Harbor Bar, located at 9th Avenue and Main Street in Safety Harbor.
16. Deputy Reed saw Mr. Hutchins leave the 8th Avenue Pub and followed him to
Harbor Bar.
17. Deputy Reed indicated in the offense report, No. 8014-480059, that “[a]s the W/M
in the red jacket walked into the bar, he turned around and flipped his middle finger at me.”
18. While Mr. Hutchins was at Harbor Bar, Deputy Reed parked his vehicle across the
street.
19. While Deputy Reed was parked across the street, he communicated with Deputy
Deputy Reed: “1m [Sic] just listening to see if that idiot says anything that I can hear
Deputy Mason: “he gave 11 [Sic] the finger when he walked in bar”.
Deputy Reed: “I didnt [Sic] see that, but Im [Sic] sure he has to walk out of there
...... i [sic] will stop him to see What his problem is he can always go for disorderly intox
[5122]”.
21. Thereafter, Mr. Hutchins and his friend left Harbor Bar and walked east on Main
Street.
22. Deputy Reed watched Mr. Hutchins and his friend walk east on Main Street. He
drove his vehicle to 3rd Avenue and Main Street and parked at the intersection.
23. While walking with his friend, Mr. Hutchins noticed several Pinellas County
24. Mr. Hutchins commented to his friend, that the police were driving like
“dickheads.”
25. Almost immediately, Deputy Reed exited his cruiser and illegally detained Mr.
Hutchins.
26. While illegally detaining Mr. Hutchins, Deputy Mason arrived and participated in
27. Deputy Reed questioned Mr. Hutchins about his speech and attitude toward law
28. Mr. Hutchins was arrested for using words, in Violation of his constitutional rights.
29. After being illegally detained and arrested, Deputy Reed transported Mr. Hutchins
30. Mr. Hutchins was charged with the misdemeanor offense of Disorderly
Intoxication.
31. Mr. Hutchins was not given any Field Sobriety Tests or a Breath Alcohol Test.
33. As a result of the acts and omissions of Deputies Reed and Mason, Mr. Hutchins
suffered humiliation, embarrassment, inconvenience, restraint on his liberty and harm to his
reputation. He
m
also sustained out-of—pocket expenditures relating to his arrest
Plaintiff, Mr. Hutchins, sues Defendant Reed in his individual capacity, and states:
34. A11 allegations of paragraphs 1 through 33 are realleged in full and adopted herein.
35. Defendant Reed effected an unreasonable seizure of Plaintiff in that there was no
arguable probable cause for his seizure, in Violation of the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments to
Plaintiff,
m
Mr. Hutchins, he suffered the losses described in paragraph 33.
Plaintiff, Mr. Hutchins, sues Defendant Mason in his individual capacity, and states:
37. A11 allegations of paragraphs 1 through 33 are realleged in full and adopted herein.
38. Defendant Mason effected an unreasonable seizure of Plaintiff in that there was no
arguable probable cause for his seizure, in Violation of the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments to
Plaintiff,
M
Mr. Hutchins, he suffered the losses described in paragraph 33.
Plaintiff sues Defendant Sheriff Bob Gualtieri in his official capacity and states:
40. A11 allegations of paragraphs 1 through 33 are realleged in full and adopted herein.
41. Defendants Reed and Mason falsely arrested Mr. Hutchins, which is actionable
against Defendant Gualtieri in his official capacity pursuant to § 768.28 of the Florida Statutes.
42. As a result of Defendants Reed’s and Mason’s false arrest of Mr. Hutchins, he
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays that this Court will enter relief in the following terms:
2. An award of costs and attorney’s fees, on Counts I and II, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §
1 98 8.