9 views

Uploaded by api-296773342

- Vibrating Screen
- physicsequationscards
- Classified IGCSE General Physics
- lesson plan format- mass
- Chapter 1 Hydr Tp
- Phy Answers
- Deformation Past Paper Questions
- Sample harmonic motion by ibrar ahmad awkum
- Physics mock exam 2017.docx
- Assignment 2
- Tutorial 5
- GCE Examinations
- sisimos 1 GDL.xlsx
- Space
- Core Practical 9
- Exper N° 4
- Boundary Behavior.pdf
- Elliot Wave eBook
- Bai-et-al-Tower
- Frequency Wavelength Speed Experiment Philip Salmony

You are on page 1of 15

Gait Analysis

Senior Engineering - Period 1

Mr. Tronconi

October 12, 2018

Kidder-Buell, King, Klinge, Marr 2

Abstract

In this experiment, the gait of four students was observed in order to analyze general walking patterns.

The data was used to formulate an equation which derives height from leg length and step frequency. The

program used to take data on the students’ gait was a mobile phone application called Physics Toolbox

Accelerometer. The cell phone was attached to the students’ lower backs, while they each walked 10 steps

in a straight line. The phone application took detailed data of the accelerations experienced in three axis,

and automatically converted this information to a spreadsheet. The data was analyzed in order to make

observations on the gait of the general population. The data collected in this experiment was not extensive

enough to create and test the accuracy of equations that predict the height and frequency of steps taken in

one second of any subject.

Kidder-Buell, King, Klinge, Marr 3

Table of Contents

Introduction 4

Method 4

Results 4

Discussion 14

Conclusion 14

References 14

Appendix 15

Kidder-Buell, King, Klinge, Marr 4

Introduction

A fundamental concept in gait analysis is oscillations, which is a repetitive motion about an equilibrium

position, where the amplitude is the maximum displacement from equilibrium. Oscillations are seen

everyday, in the pendulum of a clock, people’s natural gait, waves of the ocean, vibrations of guitar

strings, etc. For this project, the repetitive motion is each of us walking. The equations that help represent

oscillations are frequency and wave speed.

f = T1 , where f represents frequency, where T represents period

c = λν , where c represents wave speed, where λ represents wavelength, where ν represents frequency

In addition, the kinetic energy of each person can be calculated through the equation:

K E = 21 mv 2 , where m represents mass in kg, where v represents velocity in m/s

In this experiment, the equations of frequency, wave speed, and kinetic energy will be used with relation

to each of our natural gaits to help answer the question, “What is the relationship between the height and

gait frequency for walking humans?”

Method

First we measured the height and weight of each person, as well as their shoe sizes and tried to describe

their walk. We duct-taped the phone to the lower back of each person, in contact with the skin. In our first

trial, each person walked in a straight line for 10 steps. Everyone started with their right foot and walked

how they normally would. For the second trial we walked in a straight line for 10 steps and starting with

the right foot again, but we had a backpack on our backs, using both straps, that weighed 16 lbs. The app

we used to record the data was called Physics Toolbox Accelerometer.

Results

Table 1.1 - Information about each test subject

Subject Height (cm) Weight (kg) Shoe Size (US Description of

mens) walk

tiptoes

waddles a little,

sways side to side

ground for long

time, sways side

to side

Kidder-Buell, King, Klinge, Marr 5

steps with no

abnormal

movements

Subject Meters walked in 10 steps Meters walked in 10 steps with

16 pound backpack

Dean Ben Austin Liz

In the following charts, the subjects were not wearing the backpack. Blue represents gFx, red

represents gFy, and yellow represents gFz.

Kidder-Buell, King, Klinge, Marr 6

(Dean)

Frequency: 1.56 steps/second

d (m)

v = t (s)

6.73 m

v = 5s

v = 1.346 m/s

1 2

KE = 2 mv

1 2

KE = 2 (63.50kg)(1.346m/s)

K E = 57.52 J

Kidder-Buell, King, Klinge, Marr 7

(Ben)

Frequency: 1.67 steps/second

Kinetic Energy: 85.65 J

d (m)

v = t (s)

7.83 m

v = 5s

v = 1.566 m/s

1 2

KE = 2 mv

1 2

KE = 2 (69.85kg)(1.566/s)

K E = 85.65 J

Kidder-Buell, King, Klinge, Marr 8

(Austin)

Frequency: 1.76 steps/seconds

d (m)

v = t (s)

7.88 m

v = 5s

v = 1.576 m/s

1 2

KE = 2 mv

1 2

KE = 2 (58.97kg)(1.576m/s)

K E = 73.23 J

Kidder-Buell, King, Klinge, Marr 9

(Liz)

Frequency: 1.57 steps/second

Kinetic Energy:

d (m)

v = t (s)

6.97 m

v = 5s

v = 1.394 m/s

1 2

KE = 2 mv

1 2

KE = 2 (62.14kg)(1.458m/s)

K E = 60.38 J

Kidder-Buell, King, Klinge, Marr 10

In the following charts, the subject was wearing a 7.26kg backpack. Blue represents gFx, red

represents gFy, and yellow represents gFz.

(Dean)

Frequency: 1.67 steps/second

d (m)

v = t (s)

7.29 m

v = 5s

v = 1.458 m/s

1 2

KE = 2 mv

1 2

KE = 2 (70.76kg)(1.458m/s)

K E = 75.21 J

Kidder-Buell, King, Klinge, Marr 11

(Ben)

Frequency: 2.3 steps/second

d (m)

v = t (s)

7.40 m

v = 5s

v = 1.48 m/s

1 2

KE = 2 mv

1 2

KE = 2 (77.11kg)(1.48m/s)

K E = 84.45 J

Kidder-Buell, King, Klinge, Marr 12

(Austin)

Frequency: 1.67 steps/second

d (m)

v = t (s)

7.52 m

v = 5s

v = 1.504 m/s

1 2

KE = 2 mv

1 2

KE = 2 (66.22kg)(1.504m/s)

K E = 74.90 J

Kidder-Buell, King, Klinge, Marr 13

(Liz)

Frequency: 1.54 steps/second

d (m)

v = t (s)

7.03 m

v = 5s

v = 1.406 m/s

1 2

KE = 2 mv

1 2

KE = 2 (69.40kg)(1.406m/s)

K E = 68.60 J

After performing basic calculations, we were able to derive a predictive model that predicts frequency:

f=(m[kg])/(23(h[m])

It works by plugging in an individual’s mass and height and retrieving the frequency as an output. The

model is most likely not very accurate as we used the averages of only four people. Also, our range of age

among test subjects was very small, so this model is likely even less reliable when used to calculate the

step frequency of a person with large age variance. We found this model by graphing regressions of

weight vs. height and weight v frequency, and comparing the lines. We took basic observations in an

attempt to deduct the best method of formulating a predictive model. After this we made a table of our

weights, height, and frequency and compared the data. We multiplied frequency by height, and divided

our weight by that product. We averaged the quotients of that function to find our constant K to be about

Kidder-Buell, King, Klinge, Marr 14

20. This equation allows us to predict the number of steps each subject took in one second, however we

were unable to measure it accurately to allow us to determine if our equation is accurate.

Height = L(1.64 steps/s) − 0.0153

We are able to predict the height of someone by using their leg length and multiplying it by the average

frequency. We then subtracted a constant, 0.0153, that was derived from the average standard deviation

between all of our heights. This worked with Liz, who has a leg length of 1.08m and a height of 1.76m,

and Ben, who has a leg length of 1.09m. The equation was slightly off with the predicted heights of

Austin and Dean; it added an inch to Austin’s height and subtracted one from Dean’s. This may be

because the measurements taken of the subjects’ legs is slightly off for these two subjects. Overall, this

model equation is able to predict the height of a subject with a deviation of about one inch.

Discussion

Our data was inconsistent. Austin was the shortest person in our group, 168 centimeters, but he walked

the second farthest length. Liz was the second shortest person, and she walked the second shortest length

without the backpack, and the shortest length with it. Ben was the second tallest person, at 177

centimeters, and he walked the farthest in both trials. Dean was the tallest in the group, at 183

centimeters, and he walked the shortest length without the backpack, but with it, he walked the second

shortest. The person who took the least steps per second walked the shortest distance, but the reason for

this was unclear to us. Our data did not seem to correspond to height or weight. It may have been related

to stride length. We should have done more trials with each person. We conducted three tests with each

subject, but should have done it a few more times in order to determine whether or not our data was

accurate. We only measured our subjects’ height, weight, shoe size, and the distance they walked in 10

steps. Because our data didn’t correspond with our results, this means we should have measured more to

try to figure out what determines the gait. We could have measured stride, how long their foot is on the

ground, and their waist circumference. In the future, we will conduct more tests, with more subjects, and

will collect more data from each subject before the tests. Our predictive model was very accurate despite

the inconsistent data we collected. Although we were unable to figure out what determines the gait

frequency of each subject, it was correct because we were able to find the height of the subjects using our

predictive equation.

Conclusion

In the end,we were unable to conclude what determines gait frequency of someone because the data that

we gathered was very inconsistent in terms of our height, weight, and shoe size. We conducted multiple

tests with and without us wearing a backpack. We were able to create an equation that predicts height,

f=(m[kg])/(23(h[m]), because the data required to determine this was simple to record and we did so in a

uniform fashion. Our group worked well together when conducting the trials. We communicated with one

Kidder-Buell, King, Klinge, Marr 15

another other well and used our resources to benefit us. We learned that very specific data is hard to

obtain consistently, especially with the measuring devices we had access to. Finding an equation for the

height of the subject was one of the main challenges for we had. We learned that different variables

coming together with one or more constants can determine the height of the subject. Our equation works

but with a minute amount of inaccuracy.

References

Tronconi, Claudio. “Gait Analysis.” STEM Engineering, Mr. Tronconi,

sites.google.com/students.nusd.org/stemse/unit-2/u2-gait-analysis?authuser=2.

Chrystian Vieyra. Physics Toolbox Accelerometer. Vieyra, October 5, 2018. Version 1.3.3.

Knight, Randall Dewey, et al. College Physics: a Strategic Approach. Pearson, 2018.

Appendix

See results section.

- Vibrating ScreenUploaded byinstrutech
- physicsequationscardsUploaded byapi-270744420
- Classified IGCSE General PhysicsUploaded bybriannamuham1249
- lesson plan format- massUploaded byapi-358693305
- Chapter 1 Hydr TpUploaded byKaushik Suthar
- Phy AnswersUploaded byGunalan Subramaniam
- Deformation Past Paper QuestionsUploaded byNudrat
- Sample harmonic motion by ibrar ahmad awkumUploaded byIbrar ahmad
- Physics mock exam 2017.docxUploaded bysulayajanny
- Assignment 2Uploaded byapi-3775936
- Tutorial 5Uploaded bySwarnava Sanyal
- GCE ExaminationsUploaded byJimlon0
- sisimos 1 GDL.xlsxUploaded byAnonymous YB3KLC
- SpaceUploaded byAnonymous qg9vyWh
- Core Practical 9Uploaded byDanKimberley
- Exper N° 4Uploaded byCarlosSebástian
- Boundary Behavior.pdfUploaded byJonathan Majaw
- Elliot Wave eBookUploaded bymr25000
- Bai-et-al-TowerUploaded byLae Oerdi
- Frequency Wavelength Speed Experiment Philip SalmonyUploaded byPhilip Salmony
- WavesUploaded byKeith Marie Yee
- IT in B-2 Information ConceptsUploaded byAbdul Wahab
- PhysicsGCEOLevelPhysicsJITrevisionP4Uploaded byAlyssa Cole
- Chapter 5.docxUploaded byyeni
- Solution 2Uploaded byrastpanjgah
- Vibration EngUploaded byHessel Juliust Wongkaren
- Walking Bcbsa WalkguideUploaded byFauzi Mohd Som
- Christ Church Messenger February 2014Uploaded bydfortmanny
- Ex.F.redactedUploaded byjoemullin
- AIEEE PhysicsUploaded byKrishna Hiras

- copy of 2nd status summary for project pegasusUploaded byapi-459385313
- plane projectUploaded byapi-459385313
- plane status summaryUploaded byapi-296773342
- flashlight for stemUploaded byapi-296773342
- biotech creative engineering- coral bleaching 1Uploaded byapi-301982359
- desert isolationUploaded byapi-296773342
- pegasus update march 6Uploaded byapi-296773342
- instrumentsstemUploaded byapi-296773342
- digestive and excretoryUploaded byapi-296690344
- energyjustification672016 1Uploaded byapi-296773342
- deforestationUploaded byapi-296773342
- outdoor classroom materials list - sheet1 1Uploaded byapi-296773342
- rube goldberg pptxUploaded byapi-296773342
- copy of crime sceneUploaded byapi-296692561

- GEF-SGP-CCD-QPR5.docxUploaded byUtkarsh Ghate
- Bill of QuantitiesUploaded bymcwong_98
- Globotek Holdings Inc 131-page prospectus dated Jan. 2011Uploaded byHarry the Greek
- t5_s06_r3Uploaded bylucky
- Antenna IsolationUploaded byTshering Wangdi
- 1gffdj,mbv nvcb.pdfUploaded bysamsung684
- ResumeUploaded byVisaal Pradhan
- EMBRAERUploaded byKim Mikah Go
- Case3 Corporate WACC ComputationUploaded bygauravroongta
- HenssgeUploaded byJustyna
- Consumer Resistance to Internet BankingUploaded byDanyal Khan
- Basic DynamicsUploaded byRogerio
- H&K-USA Product Catalog 2010Uploaded byMario Lopez
- abney cv 11 15Uploaded byapi-244175983
- FenopediaUploaded byCMDfromNagpur
- Gauff Consultants Sept 2012Uploaded byDe Mee
- Topic08 Files IOUploaded bynazhaahmadkamal
- Bidirectional Isolator RelayUploaded byBOBLOUDER
- 00995811Uploaded bysameeraapr8
- 64529401 Systems Thinking Creative Holism for ManagersUploaded byAndrews Dwomoh
- resume3onlineUploaded byapi-242546556
- 2010-0819Uploaded byhipo
- anwiringdiagram.pdfUploaded byRenan Almeida
- Tele e3lm10Uploaded bynightronic2
- KMC_DraftNotificationUploaded byCielo Azul
- Chinese to GoUploaded byjeekberg
- data.table.pdfUploaded byPedroM.F.Nakashima
- Urban Response to Inter NationalizationUploaded byDaisy
- Carpenter & Patterson Constant EffortUploaded byNavab Khan
- 16-Helicopter Performance 2008Uploaded byStiven Castellanos