Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Standards set a
common language
By Rajvant Nijjhar, director of iVEES, Independent Verifiers of Energy Efficiency Savings
S
tandards are important for
a number of reasons. Firstly,
a standard ensures that we
all talk the same common
language, as the meaning of
key terms is clearly defined. Secondly,
they create definitive and repeatable
tools, methodologies or approaches,
providing a level playing field.
This CPD article discusses the
standards making process, followed
by an overview of key International
Standards related to energy
management (below) together with key
points of note.
• ISO 50001: Energy Management
Systems;
• ISO 50002: Energy Audits;
• ISO 50006: Energy baselines; and
• ISO 50015: Measurement and
Verification of energy performance
(Please note abbreviated titles for
convenience) Upon majority approval of two thirds from the start. Even if a definition has
The standards making process ‘yes’ vote, and at least five participating been previously agreed in a previous
for International Standards as set countries, ISO agree to its development standard, this can change or be adapted
out by the International Standards and a convenor(s) is appointed. for the scope and purpose of the new
Organization (ISO) is a tried and tested Participating member countries of that standard being proposed.
formal process set within strict rules TC can then choose to participate and 3) The review process typically
and directives (www.iso.org/directives) put forward country experts or simply continues on from WD to Committee
with a voting or balloting process for be involved at the voting stage. Draft, (CD). Again, a series of collated
approval. The various stages are: 2) Typically, the next stage is a comments in set tabular format are
1) A New Work Item Proposal (NWIP) Working Draft (WD) – a document disposed of at various meetings.
is first proposed by a nominating written by an expert in the nominating Sometimes these comments can be
country outlining the scope, the country (usually the same expert that numerous. The latest TC301 meeting
business need and the timescales put forward the NWIP). This is circulated has a Working Group (WG) developing
(between two to four years) to within for review, via international meetings the next revision of ISO 50001 due for
which they would like to see a new or otherwise to the participating publication in Jan 2019. The meeting
standard published. This is presented countries’ mirror committee for held in Stockholm, June 2016 had over
to a relevant ISO Technical Committee comment. The review or feedback 900 comments for review, though more
(TC) and discussed at the next Plenary is returned in a set tabular format commonly, comments are usually in the
meeting. A recent example of an NWIP provided by ISO and collated by the 400- 600 range. Comments are either
proposed to TC301 on ’Standardization appointed convenor of the standard. then accepted, rejected or modified to
in the field of Energy Management During international meetings, this is ensure a fair and transparent process.
and Energy Savings’ is one on Energy commented upon by the experts sent The convenor is responsible for
Efficiency Financing Tools (full title to by the participating country working on managing this and keeping the peace
be finalised). This is then circulated to that standard. At this stage, the scope and so must remain neutral!
each participating country’s National and document is being defined and 4) The final few stages - Draft
Standards Body for further circulation refined; fundamentals are being agreed International Standard (DIS) to Final
to their mirror committee. After upon – such as an international view Draft International Standard (FDIS) to
discussion within the mirror committee, point of the definition of ‘energy’ or International Standard (IS) are then
a decision to vote ‘yes’, ‘no’ or ‘abstain’ ‘energy performance improvement’. It’s considered to be tweaking rather
is made within a set balloting period. important to get the vocabulary right than any fundamental re-writes.
The standard is now also open for Fig. 1 The standard maybe summarised in
comments by the public. A standard a snapshot as shown in Fig.1 :
can go from DIS straight to IS if there
is a majority two thirds ‘yes’ vote or no KEY POINTS TO NOTE:
technical changes. At DIS/FDIS, the ISO • ISO 50001 requires continual
editing team make final editing changes improvement in energy performance - a
before the standard is published. measurable result related to energy
Participating countries may adapt the use, energy efficiency or energy
front cover with their own graphics and consumption;
National Standards Body branding. • Requires top management
A key tenant of the whole ISO commitment including the provision of
approach is the consensus from resources;
participating countries. At each stage • Is not limited to any one sector or
there is a voting process managed size or shape of an organisation;
by the National Standards Body of • Self-declaration is allowed.
the participating country e.g. BSi in However, for ESOS purposes external
the UK. This enables an international certification is required;
standardised approach to be developed. • The standard is currently
Although it is not uncommon to have being revised to meet the High
two WDs or CDs, an DIS and FDIS as Level Structure (HLS) - as are other
the various stages, it is possible to go management systems standards; and
straight from NWIP to DIS ballot for • Although the next revision is due
approval to become an international for publication in Jan 2019, this will not
standard if the NWIP written was a very Courtesy of ISO 50001 impact ESOS as a superseded standard
good draft in the first place. may still be used for three years after a
It is worth mentioning at this revised version is published.
stage some key differences between requirements or ‘thou shall’ standard. • Energy planning: policy
a standard and a protocol – not An estimated 15,000 organisations development, understanding your ISO 50002 brief overview
necessarily saying one is better than worldwide are believed to be ISO significant energy uses (i.e. what ISO 50002 on Energy audits was
the other. A standard is established 50001 certified (Jan 2016 estimation) equipment or process uses the most adopted and adapted from the
under stricter guidelines such the ISO or to have implemented the standard. amount of energy), and undertaking an European Standard on Energy Audits
Directives that focus on the consensus Following its publication in July energy review that looks at the wider - EN16247. Sometimes, standards are
approach with the balloting process 2011, other Type II guidance or ‘thou picture, leading to the identification of developed at a European standard
ensuring each participating country should’ standards have been recently opportunities. The process involves and then they are deemed to have
has a say. A protocol may be written published such as ISO 50002 in Energy developing an energy baseline for international importance and so
by a committee with their own rules Audits, ISO 50003 on Energy Auditors, comparing energy performance they are brought into discussion at
of engagement. For example, the ISO 50004 on guidance to 50001, ISO before and after implementation of the ISO TC level and via the NWIP
convenor in the development of a 50006 on Energy Baselines and ISO improvement measures and setting process, they might become an
standard has to be neutral whereas 50015 on M&V principles and guidance. objectives and targets for improvement. international standard. EN16247 had
that for a protocol, they may have Please note above are all abbreviated • An action plan to achieve these several parts – e.g. part 1 on general
overall veto rights. For these reasons, titles and the international spelling of targets is then required to be developed requirements has become ISO 50002
a standard may also take longer to the words such as ‘organization’ etc. and implemented. Understanding on ‘good quality’ energy audits, and
produce than a protocol. Although these guidance how you will measure and monitor the remaining parts 2-5 (buildings,
A standard may also have more standards are ‘thou should’ – when an the energy performance is also a process, transport, and competency
international input compared to a organization is externally audited, the requirement. Top management must of energy auditors respectively) are
protocol – for example TC301 has guidance standard tends to become assign necessary resources. currently still EN standards although
twenty-eight participating member ‘thou shall’ standard, or good reason • Checking that you have met your they may eventually be developed into
countries with voting rights and needs to be provided to the auditor as targets is important to establishing your International Standards, if they are
several other liaison organisations to why the organisation has decided energy performance improvement. approved via the NWIP process and
and ordinary country members with not to implement a particular clause. • Once these results are known, taken forward.
no voting rights. In the development it is necessary to act on any non- As the aim of the standard is
of a protocol, experts might be ISO 50001 brief overview conformities or deviations from the good quality audits, the process
chosen or selected by the convenor This is the ‘Energy management expected result before setting new of implementation for ISO 50002
whereas under a standard they are systems’ overarching standard targets for further improvement. This therefore involves:
sent to represent expert views by their that follows PLAN-DO-CHECK-ACT management review need not only • Energy auditor competency –
nominating country standards body. (PDCA) format in line with other occur at the end of the process but top having the right skills and knowledge
In some sense, a protocol might be management systems standard. In management is expected to review and as well as experience, objectivity or
more user friendly as this provides addition, ISO 50001 is also looking record the status of the management transparency;
more information around best practice for an improvement in your energy system during the PDCA cycle to ensure • Understanding the aims of the
examples compared to a standard that performance. To implement the it’s working effectively. audit, any criteria or timescales to
hasmore defined statement orientated standard, the scope and boundary • New legislation or other adhere to etc. as well as delivering a
requirements. of the organisation will need to be requirements such as better indoor sample format report of energy savings;
established. And as a management air quality could affect the energy • Next a start-up meeting with all
ISO 50000 series of standards system standard, each stage in the review. This means that you may need interested parties is required to discuss
The ISO 50000 series has ISO 50001 process will need to be documented. to develop new targets and measures a brief about the energy audit objective,
on ‘Energy Management Systems The process of implementation and update the energy review. And so scope, boundaries and depth before
in organizations’ as the Type I involves: continues the cycle of improvement. agreeing the practical arrangements
For details on how to obtain your Energy Institute CPD Certificate, see entry form and details on page 28
For details on how to obtain your Energy Institute CPD Certificate, see entry form and details on page 28
■ True
■ False