You are on page 1of 7

Palliative and Supportive Care (2015), 13, 575– 581.

# Cambridge University Press, 2014 1478-9515/14


doi:10.1017/S1478951513001119

Assessment of sleep disturbance in lung cancer


patients: Relationship between sleep disturbance
and pain, fatigue, quality of life, and
psychological distress

MARE NISHIURA,1 ATSUHISA TAMURA, M.D., PH.D.,


2
HIDEAKI NAGAI, 2
M.D., PH.D., AND
EISUKE MATSUSHIMA, M.D., PH.D.1
1
Section of Liaison, Psychiatry and Palliative Medicine, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical
and Dental University, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
2
Center for Pulmonary Diseases, National Hospital Organization, Tokyo National Hospital, Kiyose-shi, Tokyo, Japan
(RECEIVED October 31, 2013; ACCEPTED November 20, 2013)

ABSTRACT
Objective: We investigated the prevalence of sleep disturbance and psychological distress in lung
cancer patients. We also examined the association between sleep disturbance and psychological
distress, pain, fatigue, and quality of life in the same population.
Method: Fifty lung cancer patients were evaluated. Sleep disturbance was assessed using the
Athens Sleep Insomnia Scale (AIS) and psychological distress using the Hospital Anxiety and
Depression Scale (HADS). Quality of life (QOL), pain, and fatigue were assessed employing the
European Organization of Research and Treatment Quality of Life Questionnaire –Cancer 30
(EORTC QLQ – C30).
Results: We observed that 56% of lung cancer patients had sleep disturbance (AIS score 6)
and 60% had psychological distress (total HADS score 11). Patients with sleep disturbance had
a HADS score of 14.6 + 5.8, a fatigue score of 45.3 + 22.0, and a pain score of 27.2 + 26.2. In
contrast, patients without sleep disturbance had a lower HADS score of 9.9 + 8.1 ( p , 0.05) and
a higher fatigue score of 28.5 + 18.0 ( p , 0.01) and a pain score of 8.7 + 15.8 ( p , 0.01). In
addition, we found a lower QOL in patients with sleep disturbance (46.3 + 20.2) than in those
without (65.2 + 20.7) ( p , 0.05). We also observed a significant correlation between the AIS,
HADS, fatigue, QOL, and pain scores.
Significance of Results: Lung cancer patients suffered from combined symptoms related to
sleep. Sleeping pills improved sleep induction but were not sufficient to provide sleep quality
and prevent daytime dysfunction. Daytime dysfunction was specifically associated with
psychological distress. Additionally, the type of sleep disturbance was related to other patient
factors, including whether or not they received chemotherapy.
KEYWORDS: Sleep disturbance, Lung cancer, Quality of life, Psychological distress, Fatigue

INTRODUCTION difficulty sleeping (Owen et al., 1999; Savard &


Morin, 2001; Davidson et al., 2002; Fiorentino & An-
Sleep disorders are common in cancer patients. Some
coli-Israel, 2007), which is a significantly higher
30 to 52% of newly diagnosed cancer patients have
prevalence rate than in healthy adults or noncancer
patients (Owen et al., 1999; Davidson et al., 2002;
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Mare Nish- Vena et al., 2006; Le Guen et al., 2007). In clinical
iura, Section of Liaison, Psychiatry and Palliative Medicine, practice, however, sleep is not assessed by healthcare
Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical
and Dental University, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan. professionals (Savard & Morin, 2001). In a study of
E-mail: marelppm@tmd.ac.jp. 982 patients with various cancers—including breast,
575
576 Nishiura et al.

gastrointestinal, genitourinary, gynecological, lung, pression (as assessed by medical chart review), (4)
and nonmelanoma skin cancers—the prevalence of no serious cognitive difficulties, and (5) ability to
several manifestations of sleep disturbance was high- complete the questionnaire. Subjects consisted of
est or second highest in lung cancer patients, with an consecutive admissions to the hospital or were inpa-
average prevalence in all cancer patients of 30.5 ver- tients who met the enrollment criteria. The study
sus 36.8% in those with lung cancer (Davidson et al., was approved by the ethics committee of the National
2002). In Japan, despite the high prevalence and sta- Hospital Organization at Tokyo National Hospital.
tus of lung cancer as the most common type of cancer All patients provided written informed consent.
diagnosed (Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare,
2011), few studies have examined sleep disturbance Measures
in lung cancer patients.
Sleep disturbance impairs quality of life (QOL) Sleep Disturbance
(Fortner et al., 2002) and results in a range of psycho- Sleep disturbance was measured using the Athens
logical and somatic conditions, such as increased fa- Insomnia Scale (AIS) (Soldatos et al., 2000), a self-ad-
tigability and irritability, cognitive impairment, ministered instrument that consists of eight items
mood change, poor coordination, psychomotor retar- and has shown good internal reliability and validity
dation, and decreased pain tolerance (Chuman, (Soldatos et al., 2003). The Japanese version of the
1983). AIS has also been validated (Okajima et al., 2011).
A new diagnosis of cancer has been associated The first five items assess difficulty with sleep induc-
with the onset of sleep disturbance (Davidson et al., tion, waking during the night, early morning wak-
2002). Patients experience stress related to the ongo- ing, total sleep time, and sleep quality. The last
ing series of medical events they are subjected to, three items pertain to the next-day consequences of
such as diagnosis, hospital admission, surgery, and insomnia, such as problems with sense of well-being,
treatment, which in turn may induce psychological functioning capacity, and sleepiness during the day.
distress. The relationship between psychological Each item of the AIS is rated on a 0-to-3 scale, with
symptoms and sleep therefore warrants evaluation. 0 corresponding to “no problem at all” and 3 to a
Several studies have reported that the combined “very serious problem.” Patients were requested to
occurrence of sleep disturbance, pain, fatigue, give a positive rating if they had experienced the
anxiety, and psychological distress can occur toge- item at least three times a week during the last
ther in a phenomenon termed “symptom clusters” month. The total score on these eight items ranged
(Donovan et al., 2007; Theobald, 2007; Dirksen, from 0 to 24, with a score 6 considered to represent
2009; Cheng, 2011). Clinician consideration of not sleep disturbance.
only sleep disturbance but also psychological distress
and other symptoms should improve the overall qual- Psychological Distress
ity of life of patients; however, few studies have inves-
Psychological distress was measured using the Hos-
tigated the prevalence of sleep disturbance and its
pital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) (Zig-
association with psychological distress, fatigue,
mond et al., 1983). The HADS consists of 14 items
pain, and QOL in lung cancer patients in Japan.
and has two subscales: anxiety (7 items) and de-
In the present study, we evaluated the prevalence
pression (7 items). Each item of the HADS is rated
of sleep disturbance in lung cancer patients in Japan
from 0 to 3, and the total score ranges from 0 to 42,
and compared patients with and without sleep dis-
with a higher score indicating severe depression
turbance in regard to psychological distress, QOL,
and anxiety. A total score equal to or greater than
pain, and fatigue. In addition, we also examined
11 was set as the cutoff for psychological distress (Ku-
the association between sleep disturbance and
gaya et al., 1998). HADS has also been validated in a
psychological distress, QOL, pain, and fatigue.
cancer population (Herrmann, 1997).

METHOD Quality of Life, Pain, and Fatigue


Quality of life, pain, and fatigue were measured by
Participants
the European Organization of Research and Treat-
Subjects were recruited at the Center for Pulmonary ment Quality of Life Questionnaire –Cancer 30
Diseases at the National Hospital Organization at (EORTC QLQ –C30), version 3 (Aaronson et al.,
Tokyo National Hospital. They were interviewed for 2008). The QLQ –C30 consists of 30 items that assess
assessment of the following enrollment criteria: (1) 5 functional domains (physical, role, emotional, cog-
diagnosis of lung cancer (including recurrence of can- nitive, and social functioning), 8 cancer-related
cer), (2) 20 years of age or older, (3) no history of de- symptoms (including pain and fatigue), financial
Sleep disturbance in lung cancer patients 577

difficulty, and global health status. Scores for each Table 1. Characteristics of the study population
item range from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much) and
are then transformed to a range of from 0 to 100. N 50
Higher scores for global health status show a better Age (years)
Mean 71.8 + 3.5
quality of life, while lower scores for the eight symp- Sex
tom items and financial difficulty show a better sta- Male 35
tus. The Japanese version of the QLQ – C30 was Female 15
used for our study. Quality of life, pain, and fatigue Receiving chemotherapy
were used as outcome variables. Yes (inpatient) 21
Yes (outpatient) 10
No 19
Living situation
Statistical Analysis Living alone 8
Living with family 41
Patients were divided into two groups (poor sleepers: Living in elderly care facility 1
AIS 6, good sleepers: AIS ,6), and the means and Sleeping pill (including minor
standard deviations of the HADS score, QOL, fati- tranquilizer)
gue, and pain of the two groups were calculated. Yes 16
The cutoff score on HADS was set at 11 based on No 34
the Japanese version of HADS, and patients with a
total HADS score of 11 or greater in this version
were identified as having potential adjustment dis- Questionnaire responses indicated sleep dis-
order and major depression (Kugaya et al., 1998). turbance in 32% of patients (n ¼ 16), who were ac-
In order to examine the relationship between cordingly prescribed sleeping medications (e.g.,
chemotherapy and sleep disturbance, patients were triazolam, brotizolam, zolpidem, and etizolam). The
divided into a chemotherapy group and a nonchemo- duration of effect for these sleeping pills generally
therapy group, and sleep disturbance was analyzed. ranges from 2 to 6 hours.
The mean and standard deviation for each item of the AIS values (average value + SD) for all partici-
AIS score and total AIS score were then calculated. pants were 0.88 + 0.75 for sleep induction, 0.52 +
Differences in scores between the two groups were 0.65 (waking during the night), 0.84 + 0.71 (early
compared using the Mann – Whitney U test. Signifi- morning waking), 0.66 + 0.59 (total sleep time),
cance was set at p , 0.05 for all analyses. Corre- 0.74 + 0.69 (sleep quality), 0.54 + 0.68 (well-being
lations among AIS score, HADS score, QOL, during the day), 0.92 + 0.67 (functioning capacity
fatigue, and pain were calculated employing Spear- during the day), and 1.10 + 0.42 (sleeping during
man’s rank correlation coefficient. All statistical pro- the day).
cedures were performed using PASW statistics
software, version 18. Comparison of AIS Scores for Outcome
Variables
Table 2 compares outcome variables between the AIS
RESULTS 6 and AIS ,6 groups. For each parameter, patients
with sleep disturbance (AIS 6) had the following
Patient Characteristics scores: total HADS, 14.6 + 5.8; fatigue, 45.3 + 22.0;
A total of 50 lung cancer patients participated in our QOL, 46.3 + 20.2; and pain, 27.2 + 26.2. In contrast,
study. The characteristics of the study population are patients without sleep disturbance (AIS ,6) had the
presented in Table 1. It has been reported that the
average age of Japanese lung cancer patients is 68 Table 2. Comparison of AIS scores (AIS ≥6 and AIS
years old (n ¼ 15,185) (Kawaguchi et al., 2010). In ,6) for outcome variables
our study, the mean age was 71.8 + 3.5 years, which
is almost representative for Japanese lung cancer AIS ≥6 AIS ,6
statistics. More than half of the patients received che- (Patient with Sleep (Patient Without p
motherapy. In all patients, the prevalence of sleep Variable Disturbance) Sleep Disturbance) Value
disturbance (AIS 6) was 56% (n ¼ 28), and major HADS 14.6 + 5.8 9.9 + 8.1 0.01
psychological distress (HADS 11) was 60% (n ¼ Fatigue 45.3 + 22.0 28.5 + 18.0 0.003
30). A high rate of sleep disturbance was observed, QOL 46.3 + 20.2 65.2 + 20.7 0.01
which is consistent with previous findings (Kaye Pain 27.2 + 26.2 8.7 + 15.8 0.002
et al., 1983; Malone et al., 1994; Engstrom et al.,
1999; Davidson et al., 2002). Data represent mean + SD.
578 Nishiura et al.

Table 3. AIS items of patients with or without chemotherapy

Patients with Chemotherapy Patients without Chemotherapy p


Variable (n ¼ 31) (n ¼ 19) Value

Total AIS score 7.2 + 3.2 4.5 + 2.5 0.017


Sleep induction 1.06 + 0.73 0.61 + 0.69 0.021
Waking during the night 0.61 + 0.72 0.39 + 0.50 0.277
Early morning waking 1.04 + 0.71 0.53 + 0.61 0.012
Total sleep time 0.75 + 0.64 0.56 + 0.51 0.548
Sleep quality 0.93 + 0.75 0.50 + 0.51 0.046
Well-being during the day 0.75 + 0.74 0.28 + 0.45 0.029
Functioning capacity during 1.04 + 0.60 0.72 + 0.73 0.115
the day
Sleeping during the day 1.18 + 0.37 1.00 + 0.47 0.203

Table 4. Correlation of AIS score and predictive factors

AIS Score (Sleep Disturbance) HADS QOL Fatigue

HADS 0.466**
QOL – 0.444** – 0.553**
Fatigue 0.415** 0.562** – 0.531**
Pain 0.405** 0.525** – 0.452** 0.518**

**p , 0.01.

following scores: total HADS, 9.9 + 8.1 ( p , 0.05); fa- 0.466 at absolute value. Significant correlations
tigue, 28.5 + 18.0 ( p , 0.01); QOL, 65.2 + 20.7 ( p , were also seen among predictive factors, with corre-
0.05); and pain, 8.7 + 15.8 ( p , 0.01). Patients with lation coefficients ranging from 0.452 to 0.562 at ab-
sleep disturbance had significantly higher scores for solute value.
HADS, fatigue, and pain, and a significantly lower
score for QOL than those without sleep disturbance, Correlation Between HADS Score and
showing that both the physical and psychological Individual Factors in the AIS
states of patients with sleep disturbance were worse
than that of those without. Correlations between HADS score and the eight
items of the AIS are presented in Table 5. Six items
of the AIS were significantly associated with HADS
Association of Chemotherapy and Sleep
score, with a correlation coefficient ranging from
Disturbance
0.286 to 0.454. In contrast, no correlation was ob-
To demonstrate the association of chemotherapy and served for waking during the night and early morn-
sleep disturbance, both the total score and the score ing. Furthermore, the correlations observed in
on each item of the AIS were compared for patients
with and without chemotherapy (Table 3). There
Table 5. Correlation of HADS score and AIS items
was a significant difference between patients with
and without chemotherapy regarding total score Correlation
and AIS scores on sleep induction, early morning AIS Item Coefficient
waking, sleep quality, and well-being during the day.
Sleep induction 0.286*
Awakenings during the night 0.114
Correlation Among Predictive Factors Early morning awakening 0.116
Total sleep time 0.394**
The correlations among AIS score and predictive fac- Sleep quality 0.436**
tors were calculated to determine which predictive Well-being during the day 0.427**
factors were associated with sleep disturbance, Functioning capacity during the day 0.454**
(Table 4). The AIS score significantly correlated Sleepiness during the day 0.308*
with all other predictive factors, with Spearman’s
rank correlation coefficients ranging from 0.405 to *p,0.05; **p , 0.01.
Sleep disturbance in lung cancer patients 579

Table 5 show an association of psychological status polyuria, given the lower score for waking during
with not only quality of sleep but also daytime func- the night, but rather sleepiness during the day due
tioning. to both tumor- and chemotherapy-related effects (Da-
vidson et al., 2002). Table 3 shows that the AIS scores
Association of Sleep Medication and Sleep for the chemotherapy group were significantly differ-
Disturbance ent from those without in the items of total score,
sleep induction, early morning sleep quality, and
To demonstrate the association of sleeping pills and well-being during the day. This prevalence of exces-
sleep disturbance, each item of the AIS was com- sive daytime sleepiness and daytime dysfunction in
pared for patients taking and not taking sleeping our patients with lung cancer is consistent with pre-
pills (Table 6). In the first five items related to sleep, vious reports (Ginsburg et al., 1995; Cronin et al.,
the AIS scores for sleep induction and waking during 2001; Davidson et al., 2002) and indicates that che-
the night did not significantly differ between those motherapy contributes to sleep disturbance. How-
patients taking and those not taking sleeping pills. ever, the severity of side effects is considered to be
In contrast, AIS scores were statistically significant dependent on the drug. For example, patients treated
for early morning waking, total sleep time, and sleep with Gefitinib have a better QOL than those taking
quality. This result demonstrates that only the AIS paclitaxel (Oizumi et al., 2012). In our study, the
scores for sleep induction and waking during the rate of patients being treated with molecularly targe-
night in patients with sleeping pills were not statisti- ted drugs was 20% (n ¼ 6), and the rate was in-
cally different from those without, meaning that creased. The relationship between type of drug and
sleeping pills improved sleep induction but not to a sleep disturbance was therefore not due to small
sufficient level. study size.
Pain medications have side-effect profiles that po-
tentially disrupt sleep (Cronin et al., 2001). Opioids
DISCUSSION
or nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs),
In this study, we observed that more than half of lung commonly used for pain relief in cancer patients,
cancer patients (28 of 50) had sleep disturbance. Fur- can decrease the quality of sleep. In particular,
ther, patients with sleep disturbance exhibited worse opioids significantly decrease slow-wave sleep and
psychological and physiological symptoms compared rapid eye movement sleep, which is associated with
to those without. fatigue or decreased sleep quality (Cronin et al.,
The average age of patients in our study was 2001; Caldwell et al., 2002). Aspirin and ibuprofen in-
71.8 + 3.5 years. This may explain the higher preva- crease waking during the night and decrease sleep ef-
lence of sleep disturbance compared to previous ficacy (Trenkwalder et al., 2008), while NSAIDs
studies, given the higher prevalence in elderly suppress the production of melatonin during the
people, which can be up to 25% in those in their 60s night (Murphy et al., 1994). In our study, opioids
and 33% in those in their 70s (Foley et al., 1999). were not prescribed and NSAIDs were prescribed
Nocturnal polyuria is common in the elderly for only 18% of patients.
(Fultz et al., 1996) due to the urinary symptoms as- Sleep disturbance has been shown to correlate
sociated with vesical dysfunction in patients with with psychological distress, fatigue, and pain. In
prostatic involvement. In this study, however, the the present study, sleep disturbance was also signifi-
AIS scores on each item indicated that the main cantly associated with psychological distress, fatigue,
cause of sleep disturbance was not nocturnal and pain, and with similar correlation coefficients.

Table 6. AIS items of patients with or without sleeping pills

AIS Item Patients with Sleeping Pills Patients Without Sleeping Pills p Value

Sleep induction 1.06 + 0.77 0.82 + 0.71 0.290


Awakenings during the night 0.69 + 0.79 0.52 + 0.61 0.477
Early morning awakening 1.13 + 0.81 0.64 + 0.63 0.036
Total sleep time 0.94 + 0.57 0.52 + 0.56 0.023
Sleep quality 1.00 + 0.63 0.61 + 0.69 0.048
Well-being during the day 0.75 + 0.68 0.42 + 0.64 0.068
Functioning capacity during the day 0.81 + 0.54 0.88 + 0.74 0.793
Sleepiness during the day 1.00 + 0.37 1.12 + 0.46 0.386

Data represent mean + SD.


580 Nishiura et al.

Results indicated that patients with sleep disturb- causality. Second, we did not evaluate the association
ance had a lower QOL. Regarding the relationship between severity of illness or performance status and
between pain and sleep disturbance, sleep loss has sleep disturbance. Third, many study variables were
been found to lead to decreased pain threshold assessed with one or a very limited number of items
(Roehrs et al., 2006), and increased pain has been re- that do not take into account the multidimensional
lated to sleep disturbance (Fortner et al., 2002; Mer- aspects of these symptoms. Finally, the study design
cadante et al., 2004). In addition, pain may interfere was longitudinal in nature and therefore does not
with the mechanisms of induction and maintenance provide information about the course of sleep dis-
of sleep. turbance over time or in relation to temporal events.
Previous studies have reported that psychological We found that more than half of the patients (28 of
distress is associated with sleep disturbance (Mysta- 50) had sleep disturbance, which was higher than
kidou et al., 2005; Fava et al., 2006; Chen et al., previously reported (Malone, 1994; Herrmann,
2008). We therefore focused on the relationship be- 1997; Davidson et al., 2002; Aaronson et al., 2008).
tween psychological distress and each AIS item. We also identified a correlation with the presence of
Psychological distress was significantly associated an association between AIS, HADS, fatigue, QOL,
with all items, except for “awakenings during the and pain scores. It is therefore important that clini-
night” and “early morning awakening,” and particu- cians be aware that lung cancer patients can suffer
larly affected daytime impairment. Concerning from sleep disorder symptoms, especially patients
daytime impairment, many patients with sleep dis- undergoing chemotherapy, and to consider the treat-
turbance experience a strong sense of fatigue and ment and selection of medication depending on the
pain. This in turn leads to increased psychological symptoms of individual patients.
distress and decreased QOL, and thereby exacer-
bates the original sleep disturbance.
The rate of sleep disturbance in our study was ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
greater than 50%, and sleeping pills were prescribed This study was supported by the National Hospital Organ-
to 30% of patients, which is similar to that reported ization, Tokyo National Hospital, in Japan.
by previous investigators (21.5%) (Davidson et al.,
2002). All sleeping pills prescribed were short-acting
compounds, which improved items such as “sleep REFERENCES
induction” and “awakenings during the night” but Aaronson, N.K., Ahmedzai, A., Berman, B., et al. (2008).
did not improve maintenance of sleep. Therefore, The European Organization for Research and Treat-
longer-acting compounds are needed to improve ment of Cancer QLQ– C30, a quality-of-life instrument
both induction and maintenance of sleep, depending for use in international clinical trials in oncology. Jour-
nal of the National Cancer Institute, 16(3), 261– 266.
on the requirements of the individual patient. Caldwell, J.R., Rpoport, R.J., Davis, J.C., et al. (2002). Ef-
In addition, the combination of sleeping pills and ficacy and safety of a once-daily morphine formulation
antidepressants has been reported to cause a more in chronic moderate-to-severe osteoarthritis pain: Re-
rapid improvement in the symptoms of depression sults from a randomized placebo-controlled, double-
and a greater magnitude of antidepressant benefit blind trial and an open-label extension trial. Journal
of Pain and Symptom Management, 23, 278 –291.
than antidepressants alone (Price et al., 2009). The Chen, M.L., Yu, C.T. & Yang, C.H. (2008). Sleep disturb-
effective treatment of anxiety and depression was ance and quality of life in lung cancer patients undergo-
also reported to lead to an improvement in symptoms ing chemotherapy. Lung Cancer, 62, 391 –400.
related to both sleep and pain (Chung & Tso, 2010). Cheng, K.K.F. & Lee, D.T.F. (2011). Effects of pain, fatigue,
Due to confirmation of the association of sleep dis- insomnia, and mood disturbance on functional status
and quality of life of elderly patients with cancer. Criti-
turbance and psychological distress, the combination cal Reviews in Oncology/Hematology, 78, 127– 137.
of sleeping pills and antidepressants is a possible Chuman, M.A. (1983). The neurological basis of sleep.
treatment for improvement of symptoms. Heart & Lung, 12, 177 –181.
Our study has several limitations that should be Chung, K.F. & Tso, K.C. (2010). Relationship between in-
noted. First, our purpose was to collect data on the somnia and pain in major depressive disorder: A sleep
diary and actigraphy study. Sleep Medicine, 11,
prevalence of sleep disturbance in a wide range of 752– 758.
lung cancer patients. We therefore included patients Cronin, A.J., Keifer, J.C., Davies, M.F., et al. (2001). Post-
who were diagnosed at different times, at different operative sleep disturbance: Influences of opioids and
stages of lung cancer, receiving or not receiving che- pain in humans. Sleep, 24, 39– 44.
motherapy, and inpatients and outpatients. Some Davidson, J.R., MacLean, A.W., Brundage, M.D., et al.
(2002). Sleep disturbance in cancer patients. Social Sci-
patients had a recurrence of cancer, and it was diffi- ence & Medicine, 54(9), 1309–1321.
cult to define their stage. This limits the generaliz- Dirksen, S.R., Epstiein, D.R. & Hoyt, M.A. (2009). Insom-
ability of our findings and the ability to show nia, depression, and distress among outpatients with
Sleep disturbance in lung cancer patients 581

prostate cancer. Applied Nursing Research, 22, tors associated. Supportive Care in Cancer, 12,
154 –158. 355 –359.
Donovan, K.A. & Jacobsen, P.B. (2007). Fatigue, depression, Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare (2011). Vital stat-
and sleep disturbance: Evidence for a symptom in cancer. istics Japan [in Japanese]. Tokyo: Ministry of Health,
Seminars in Oncology Nursing, 23, 127–135. Labour, and Welfare.
Engstrom, C.A., Strohl, R.A., Rose, L., et al. (1999). Sleep Murphy, P.J., Badia, P., Myers., B.L., et al. (1994). Nonster-
alterations in cancer patients. Cancer Nursing, 22(2), oidal anti-inflammatory drugs affect normal sleep pat-
143 –148. terns in humans. Physiology & Behavior, 55,
Fava, M., McCall, W.V., Krystal, A., et al. (2006). Eszopi- 1063– 1066.
clone co-administered with fluoxetine in patients with Mystakidou, K., Tsilika, E., Parpa, E., et al. (2005). Assess-
insomnia coexisting with major depressive disorder. ment of anxiety and depression in advanced cancer
Biological Psychiatry, 59(11), 1052–1060. patients and their relationship with quality of life. Qual-
Fiorentino, L. & Ancoli-Israel, S. (2007). Sleep dysfunction ity of Life Research, 14, 1825–1833.
in patients with cancer. Current Treatment Options in Oizumi, S., Kobayashi, K., Inoue, A., et al. (2012). Quality
Neurology, 9, 337– 346. of life with Gefitinib in patients with EGFR-mutated
Foley, D.J., Monjan, A., Simonsick, E.M., et al. (1999). Inci- non-small cell lung cancer: Quality of life analysis of
dence and remission of insomnia among elderly adults: North east Japan study group 002 trial. The Oncologist,
An epidemiologic study of 6800 persons over three years. 17, 863 –870.
Sleep, 22(Suppl. 2), S366 –S372. Okajima, I., Nakajima, S., Kobayashi, M., et al. (2011). The
Fortner, B.V., Stepanski, E.J., Wang, S.C., et al. (2002). reliability and validity of the Japanese version of Athens
Sleep and quality of life in breast cancer patients. Jour- Insomnia Scale. Sleep Medicine, 12(Suppl. 1), S66.
nal of Pain and Symptom Manage, 24, 471 –480. Owen, D.C., Parker, K.P. & McGuire, D.B. (1999). Compari-
Fultz, N.H. & Herzog, A.R. (1996). Epidemiology of urinary son of subjective sleep quality in patients with cancer
symptoms in the geriatric population. The Urologic and healthy subjects. Oncology Nursing Forum,
Clinics of North America, 23(1), 1– 10. 26(10), 1649– 1651.
Ginsburg, M.L., Quirt, C., Ginsburg, A.D., et al. (1995). Price, M.A., Zachariae, R. & Butow, P.N. (2009). Prevalence
Psychiatric illness and psychosocial concerns of patients and predictors of insomnia in woman with invasive
with newly diagnosed lung cancer. Canadian Medical ovarian cancer: Anxiety a major factor. European Jour-
Association Journal, 152, 701 –708. nal of Cancer, 45, 3262 –3270.
Herrmann, C. (1997). International experiences with the Roehrs, T., Hyde, M., Blaisdell, B., et al. (2006). Sleep loss
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale: A review of vali- and REM sleep loss are hyperalgesic. Sleep, 29, 145–151.
dation data and clinical results. Journal of Psychoso- Savard, J. & Morin, C.M. (2001). Sleep disturbance in the
matic Research, 42, 17– 41. context of cancer: A review of a neglected problem. Jour-
Kawaguchi, T., Matsumura, A., Fukai, S., et al. (2010). Japa- nal of Clinical Oncology, 19, 895 –908.
nese ethnicity compared with Caucasian ethnicity and Soldatos, C.R., Dikeos, D.G. & Paparrigopoulos, T.J. (2000).
never-smoking status are independent favorable prog- Athens Sleep Disturbance Scale: Validation of an instru-
nostic factors for overall survival in non-small cell lung ment based on ICD-10 criteria. Journal of Psychoso-
cancer. Journal of Thoracic Oncology, 5(7), 1001–1010. matic Research, 48, 555 –560.
Kaye, J., Kaye, K. & Madow, L. (1983). Sleep patterns in Soldatos, C.R., Dikeos, D.G. & Paparrigopoulos, T.J. (2003).
patients with cancer and patients with cardiac disease. The diagnostic validity of the Athens Insomnia Scale.
The Journal of Psychology, 114, 107 –113. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 55, 263– 267.
Kugaya, A., Akechi, T., Okuyama, T., et al. (1998). Screen- Theobald, D.E. (2007). Cancer pain, fatigue, distress, and
ing for psychological distress in Japanese cancer insomnia in cancer patients. Clinical Cornerstone,
patients. Japanese Journal of Oncology, 28(5), 333– 338. 6(Suppl. 1D), S15–S21.
Le Guen, Y., Gagnadoux, F., Hureaux, J., et al. (2007). Trenkwalder, C., Hening, W.A., Montagna, P., et al. (2008).
Sleep disturbance and impaired daytime functioning Treatment of restless legs syndrome: An evidence-based
in outpatients with newly diagnosed lung cancer. Lung review and implications for clinical practice. Movement
Cancer, 58(1), 139– 143. Disorders, 23, 2267– 2302.
Malone, M., Harris, A.L. & Luscombe, D.K. (1994). Assess- Vena, C., Parker, K., Allen, R., et al. (2006). Sleep–wake
ment of the impact of cancer on work, recreation, home, disturbance and quality of life in patients with
management and sleep using a general health status advanced lung cancer. Oncology Nursing Forum, 33(4),
measure. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 87, 761 –769.
386 –389. Zigmond, A.S. & Snaith, R.P. (1983). The Hospital Anxiety
Mercadante, S., Girelli, D. & Casuccio, A. (2004). Sleep dis- and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica,
orders in advanced cancer patients, prevalence and fac- 67(6), 361 – 370.

You might also like