You are on page 1of 12

DETERMINANTS OF EFFECTIVE SMS ADVERTISING: AN

EXPERIMENTAL STUDY

Dimitris Drossos, Geroge M. Giaglis, George Lekakos, Flora Kokkinaki,


and Maria G. Stavraki

ABSTRACT: Mobile advertising has become one of the most popular applications in mobile commerce, particularly in the form
of text advertising through SMS (Short Messaging Service). However, in the study of mobile advertising little is known regarding
the effectiveness of SMS advertising and the factors contributing to its success. This research investigates the significance of a
number of factors associated with SMS advertising effectiveness through an experimental study. The findings indicate that
incentive, interactivity, appeal, product involvement, and attitude toward SMS advertising in general directly influence attitude
toward the advertisement, attitude toward the brand, and purchase intention. The results of the study suggest that a stronger
focus on these factors is necessary to improve the effectiveness of SMS advertising campaigns.

SMS campaigns are proliferating around the world. In an "wireless marketing." The search was limited to scholarly
empirical study of the state of interactive marketing in five journals, conference proceedings, and papers with full text
large developed markets (United States, Japan, Germany, UK, access. Additional research, according to the same search
and France) and two key emerging markets (China and criteria, yielded four additional papers, which were not
Brazil), Barwise and Farley (2005) found that 19% of the accessible through the above databases. The Appendix
participant firms were already using text messaging either as a includes the references to these papers as well.
direct response or as a "push" channel. Nevertheless, the
Figure 1 presents the variables that were cited the most
academic literature is short of empirical studies investigating
frequently with regard to SMS recipients' cognitive, emotional,
the importance of the factors that determine SMS advertising
and behavioral responses. In much of the research, the focus
effectiveness.
was mainly on message and medium factors that could be
In line with efforts to identify determinants of successful experimentally manipulated. Consumer-related factors (e.g.,
advertising campaigns in other media (e.g., Baltas 2003; attitude toward SMS advertising in general) were also used in
Chittenden and Rettie 2003; Korgaonkar, Moschis, and our study due to empirical evidence suggesting that consumers
Bellenger 1984; Stewart and Koslow 1989), this paper attempts have generally negative attitudes toward mobile advertising
to conceptualize and test factors that influence the effects of a (Tsang, Ho, and Liang 2004).
mobile advertising campaign, with particular emphasis on
Figure 1. Percentages of Factors Represented in Mobile
push advertising via Short Messaging Service (SMS) text. In
Literature Research
the next section, we identify the factors that may influence the
effectiveness of SMS advertising and then develop a number of
hypotheses that are tested experimentally in the remainder of
the paper.
Prior Research on Mobile Advertising
Before we developed our hypotheses, we identified the factors
that had the potential to influence mobile advertising effects.
To this end, we carefully reviewed the relevant mobile
advertising and marketing literature. Initially, we retrieved 36
papers by querying the electronic text databases Business
Source Premier, Elsevier's ScienceDirect, Emerald (MCB),
Kluwer, Wiley InterScience, and ACM (the Appendix provides
the respective references). The keywords used were "mobile
advertising," "mobile marketing," "wireless advertising," and

Journal of Interactive Advertising, Vol 7 No 2 (Spring 2007), pp. 16‐27. 
© 2010 American Academy of Advertising, All rights reserved 
ISSN 1525‐2019 
17  Journal of Interactive Advertising  Spring 2007
 

INDEPENDENT VARIABLES show that the level of interactivity is positively associated with
ad and product attitudes. Thus, we hypothesize that:
Location and Time
H2: SMS advertisements that have an element of
Location-based advertising is regarded as one of the most
interactivity lead to more positive Aad and Ab and to
interesting opportunities mobile commerce has to offer
more positive PI than SMS advertisements that have no
because of its impact on the perceived informational utility of
interactive elements.
the location-aware advertisement. Various studies have
empirically verified an increase in advertisement effectiveness Incentive
through spatial advertising (Andersson and Nilsson 2000;
Individuals are interested in deriving some monetary benefit
Gopal and Tripathi 2006). Andersson and Nilsson (2000), for
from direct marketing programs (Milne and Gordon 1993). In
example, evaluated location-sensitive SMS campaign
a Nokia-sponsored survey, conducted by HPI Research Group,
effectiveness based on traditional communication effect
almost nine out of ten participants (86%) agreed that there
measures, and showed that SMS campaigns were effective and
should be a trade-off for accepting advertisements on their
did have a positive impact especially on brand awareness and
mobile devices (Pastore 2002). Prior research proposes that
purchase intention. In the current research, ‘ad localization' is
price discounts are particularly effective in inducing effects,
considered as sending information to consumers based on
such as purchase acceleration and product trial (Shi, Cheung,
their location, in order to convince them to visit a local store.
and Prendergast 2005). Previous studies have shown that
Furthermore, consumer behavior theory points to the
retail price promotions change consumers' purchase decisions
interdependence of time and location (Kang, Herr, and Page
and that retailers use price promotions more frequently to
2003). Targeting prospects at the right time and place actually
boost store sales (Chen, Monroe, and Lou 1998). We therefore
implies minimum perceived effort for the prospect in buying
hypothesize that:
the advertised product. Measuring actual time (for example,
11:00 p.m.) and location by distance (for example, 2 km from H3: SMS advertisements that offer incentives lead to more
point of sale) seems inadequate to fully capture the notion of positive Aad and Ab and to more positive PI than
"right time and place." Therefore, time and location have been advertisements without incentives.
examined under the umbrella of the perceived effort to buy the
Ad Source (Credibility)
advertised product (Cronin, Brady, and Hult 2000). It is
therefore expected that: The term "ad source" is used to refer to traits of the
communicator (whether an individual or a company), and
H1: SMS advertisements lead to more positive attitudes includes expertise, trustworthiness, attractiveness, and power.
toward the advertisement (Aad) and the brand (Ab) and Mackenzie and Lutz (1989) found that credibility strongly
to more positive purchase intentions (PI) when the influences attitude toward the advertiser, which in turn is an
perceived effort to buy the advertised product is low. important predictor of attitude toward the ad. Corporate
Interactivity credibility is defined as "the extent to which consumers believe
that a firm can design and deliver products and services that
Interactive elements of a mobile ad attempt to elicit cognitive
satisfy customer needs and wants" and has been found to have
responses by allowing the viewer to search for more
direct positive effects on attitude toward the ad, the brand, and
information through the mobile device. By providing
purchase intent (Choi and Rifon 2002). We focus on source
interactivity, the advertiser attempts to increase viewer
expertise and trustworthiness and expect that:
involvement by creating a two-way communication in real
time, instead of the usual one-way connection in media H4: SMS advertisements from expert and trustworthy
advertising (Lohtia, Donthu, and Hershberger 2003). This sources lead to more positive Aad and Ab and to more
study regards interactivity as an objective medium positive PI than SMS advertisements from less expert and
characteristic and adopts the "communicator's perspective" of trustworthy sources.
interactivity, meaning that if a mobile ad allows for a
Appeal
reciprocal communication, then it is considered as more
interactive than a comparable ad with no such feature Message appeals are usually divided into rational and
(Hoffman and Novak 1996; Wu 2006). Sundar and Kim (2005) emotional ones (Johar and Sirgy 1991). Rational appeals are
18  Journal of Interactive Advertising  Spring 2007
 

typically based on factual information and focus on product products. Due to the limited information quality that SMS
attributes. Emotional appeals, on the other hand, typically advertisements can convey to consumers we expect that:
intend to create positive emotions and develop a brand
H6: Aad, Ab and PI will be less favorable when an SMS
personality. Emotional appeals have been found to be most
advertisement concerns a high-involvement product,
effective when brand response involvement and advertising
compared to an advertisement for a low-involvement
message involvement are low, whereas rational appeals are
product taking into consideration both think and feel
found to be relatively more effective when customers are
dimensions.
highly involved with the brand and the advertisement (Baker
and Lutz 2000). Johar and Sirgy (1991) have proposed that Attitude toward Mobile Advertising in General
value-expressive advertising appeals are persuasive when the
The study of attitude toward advertising in general may be
product is value-expressive, whereas utilitarian appeals are
especially significant because it influences attitudes toward a
persuasive when the product is utilitarian. A series of studies
specific ad, an important antecedent of brand attitudes (e.g.,
by Shavitt (1990) yielded evidence about the attitude functions
Alwitt and Prabhaker 1992; Mackenzie and Lutz 1989). Tsang,
associated with different products, and showed that attitudes
Ho, and Liang (2004) also found that consumers have
toward products that serve different functions respond to
generally negative attitudes toward mobile advertising unless
different types of advertising appeals. In this research, we
they have specifically consented to receive the advertising
assess SMS advertisements' use of emotional appeals for a
messages. Thus, it is possible that attitudes toward specific
"feel" product of moderate involvement and we hypothesize
mobile advertisements are influenced by attitudes toward
that:
advertising via cellular phones in general. We therefore expect
H5: SMS advertisements for a "feel" product that use that:
emotional appeals lead to more positive Aad and Ab and
H7: Aad, Ab and PI for the advertised product will be less
to more positive PI than SMS advertisements that use
favorable when a consumer has a generally negative
rational appeals.
attitude toward mobile advertising, than when a
Product Involvement consumer has a generally positive attitude toward mobile
advertising.
In light of our initial review of prior research on mobile
advertising, there is a need for comparative research that Prior to the next section, it should be noted that ad relevance
explores whether mobile phone users react differently to was not manipulated in our experiment but was controlled
diverse types of products. As Malhotra (2005) argues, "it is through pre-testing to choose products of moderate relevance
likely that the relative effect of cognition versus affect varies... to test hypotheses H1-H7. This was intentionally selected in
across objects (e.g., perfumes vs. mutual funds)" (p. 480). order to avoid possible confounding problems via the selection
According to the FCB Grid (Ratchford 1987; Vaughn 1986), of products that were of either low or high interest to the
products differ in their "feel or think" nature. When consumer.
individuals base their purchase decision mainly on how they
DEPENDENT VARIABLES
feel about the product, then the product is characterized as
"feel"; when the purchase decision is based mainly on The measures of effectiveness used in our study were attitude
thoughts, then the product is characterized as "think" toward advertisement, brand, and purchase intention. Attitude
(Ratchford 1987). As Laurent and Kapferer (1985) argue, the toward the ad is a strong mediator of advertising effectiveness
degree to which consumers process advertising (Batra and Ray 1986; Homer 1990) and studies have shown a
communications and react to the message in an active or strong positive relationship between the ad and brand attitude,
passive way depends on their involvement with the product. which in turn is positively related to purchase intention.
The Elaboration Likelihood Model (Petty and Cacioppo 1986) Figure 2 summarizes our conceptual model. We believe that
suggests that involvement affects motivation to process consumer attitudes (Aad and Ab) and purchase intention (PI)
information. People with high product involvement may be are affected by each of the aforementioned ad characteristics
more likely to explore more product-specific information. If (location and time, interactivity, incentive, appeal, ad source,
advertisement arguments are strong, involved consumers may appeal, and product involvement).
be more likely to form a positive attitude toward the advertised
19  Journal of Interactive Advertising  Spring 2007
 

Figure 2. Conceptual Model: Factors Affecting Consumer advertisements. Each participant belonged either in group 1
Attitudes and Purchase Intention (N=50) or group 2 (N=47). Group 1 participants saw seven
SMS advertisements. To be more illustrative, the first SMS
message advertised the fictitious Goldy chocolate bar that
could be bought in a store approximately five kilometers away
from the experimental location. The second ad had no
interactivity element, while the third ad informed the
participant about the price of Goldy but used no price-off
incentive. The fictitious product Delight instant coffee was
employed to test ad source credibility, following the
manipulation procedure of Goldberg and Hartwick (1990).
Conversely, participants in group 2 could buy Goldy from a
shop which was located just a few meters away (advertisement
1); could learn more about the new brand through an SMS
reply (advertisement 2); and, in the third ad, could buy the
chocolate bar with a price-off discount. The experimental
conditions are illustrated in Table 1.

METHOD Figure 3. Illustration of an SMS Advertisement

Sample
Management Science students from a large university located
in Athens, Greece, participated in the experiment. A student
sample may be better than a sample taken from the general
population in terms of predictive validity (Danaher and
Mullarkey 2003). Ninety-seven students were randomly
assigned to two groups of approximately equal size. Fifty
students formed group 1, while the remaining forty-seven
students formed group 2. Each group saw seven different SMS
advertisements corresponding to the aforementioned
manipulated variables. Among the 97 participants, 58 were
female, while 39 were male. The majority of the participants In order to control other possible confounding effects, twenty-
were 19-23 years old (92.3%), while the remaining 7.2% were seven product categories were pre-tested for the "feel/think"
24-28 years old. Mobile phone ownership reached 100%, with nature of the product (following Ratchford 1987) and
69.1% of the participants using SMS one or more times per involvement. The categories of chocolate bar (moderate
day. We also took into account previous experience with SMS feel/moderate involvement) and instant coffee (moderate
advertising. Twenty-two of the participants stated that they feel/moderate involvement) were selected to examine the
had never received an SMS advertisement. effects of the independent variables, except for the product
involvement conditions. The product categories of sun glasses
Procedure (high feel/high involvement), laptop (high think/high
The participants read instructions indicating that they were to involvement), CD-Recordable (moderate think/moderate
evaluate SMS advertisements for six fictitious products since involvement), and potato chips (moderate feel/moderate
prior familiarity with the advertised brands could potentially involvement) were selected to examine the possible effects of
confound our results (Dahlen 2001). Each advertisement was product involvement.
described as permission-based and was shown via a mobile The arguments contained in the advertisements were also
phone screen to increase external validity (Figure 3). All selected based on a preliminary study, where different
participants were asked to state their attitude toward mobile arguments were tested for persuasiveness, comprehensibility,
advertising in general prior to the evaluation of the SMS familiarity, and emotional versus rational appeal (following
20  Journal of Interactive Advertising  Spring 2007
 

Petty and Cacioppo 1986). Arguments of equal persuasiveness, data collection instrument as short as possible. Thus, six
comprehensibility, and familiarity were selected to avoid constructs were measured with a single-item.
confounding effects.
RESULTS
Table 1. Experimental Conditions
Manipulation Checks
As anticipated, the participants in group 1 (M = 4.63, SD =
2.13) perceived buying the chocolate bar as more effortful (t =
6.03, df = 95, p < 0.001) than the participants in group 2 (M =
2.35, SD = 1.15). Moreover, group 1 respondents (M = 3.04,
SD = 1.41) found the second SMS ad less interactive (t = -2.39,
df = 95, p < 0.05) than group 2 respondents (M = 3.77, SD =
1.57). When the participants were asked to state if the offer
provided any cost savings, the group 1 participants' mean was
3.30 (SD = 1.35) and group 2 participants' mean was 5.40 (SD
Finally, the likelihood that participants would go through the
= 1.33) (t = -7.7, df = 95, p < 0.001). The respondents in group
information in the advertisements was not constrained to be
1 reported that the SMS advertisement's appeal was indeed
either very high or low. Participants could choose to read the
emotional (M = 3.08, SD = 1.2) while the respondents in group
advertisement or not, according to their motivation. As such,
2 reported a rational appeal (M = 4.08, SD = 0.9) (t = -4.5, df =
these experiments were conducted under moderate
95, p < 0.001). In terms of product importance, the
elaboration conditions. Importantly, these are likely to be the
participants perceived the potato chips and the CD-R as
conditions under which many recipients will receive
products of lower involvement (Mpotato chips = 3.03, SD =
advertisements in real life conditions.
1.6 and MCD-R = 5.26, SD = 1.4) than the sun glasses and the
MEASURES laptop (Msun glasses = 5.95, SD = 1.28 and Mlaptop = 6.36, SD
Most of the constructs employed in this study were adapted = 1.2) (tthink = -6.24, df = 96, p < 0.001 and tfeel = 16.38, df =
from prior research. Table 2 provides the studies for the 96, p < 0.001). Finally, the manipulation of credibility was also
operationalization of the employed constructs. successful. The participants in group 2 perceived the advertiser
as more credible (M = 4.7, SD = 0.92) than the participants in
Table 2. Operationalization of the Employed Constructs group 1 (M = 3.9, SD = 1.07) (t = -3.96, df = 95, p < 0.001).
Impact of Manipulated Variables on Advertising Effects
Table 3 denotes the t-values for the experimental conditions.
Hypotheses were tested at the 5% significance level. Five out of
the seven independent variables were found to have significant
effects on the dependent variables.
Location and Time. H1 was not supported (p > 0.05). In the
presence of products of moderate involvement and arguments
of moderate persuasiveness, SMS advertisements did not lead
to more positive Aad and Ab, or to more positive PI when
received closer to the selling point.
Interactivity. The direct effects of interactivity features were
tested for a moderate feel product with modest persuasive
arguments. The SMS ad prompted the consumer to send an
SMS to learn more about the advertised chocolate. This
Since this study attempted to shed light on the effects of a specific interactive feature led to more negative attitudes
great number of factors, the authors intentionally selected toward the advertisement and the brand, and to more negative
reliable scales that incorporated few items in order to keep the purchase intentions than SMS advertisements that did not
21  Journal of Interactive Advertising  Spring 2007
 

have any interactive element. Therefore, H2 was not attitude toward SMS advertising interacted with any of the
supported. above variables manipulated in this experiment. Responses of
general attitude toward SMS advertising were divided into two
Incentive. H3 stated that SMS advertisements that offered
groups based on a median split. Changes in the relationships
incentives would lead to more positive attitudes toward the
between the independent and dependent variables in the
advertisement and the brand, and to more positive purchase
presence of general attitude toward SMS advertising were
intentions than advertisements without any incentives. H3 was
examined using ANOVA. To support the hypothesis that
partially supported, although the use of incentives for the
general SMS advertising attitudes moderate these
specific product type did not positively influence attitude
relationships, we needed to see significant changes in attitudes
toward the brand.
and purchase intentions among the interaction term measures.
Ad Source. Unexpectedly, advertiser credibility did not seem However, the moderator effects were not significant at p <
to influence the dependent variables as predicted by H4. 0.05.
Although it is contradictory to the existing mobile advertising
Table 4. Main Effects of General Attitude toward Mobile
literature, it should be taken into account that all SMS
Advertising on Attitudes and Purchase Intentions
advertisements manipulated in the experiment were perceived
as permission-based. Permission-based marketing, as studied
in the mobile advertising context, seems to have a moderating
effect on source credibility (Tsang, Ho, and Liang 2004).
Appeal. Even though the product employed in the
advertisements was aimed at satisfying a sensory need,
respondents preferred the factual appeal. Thus, H5 was not
supported, and in fact, the results were significant in the
opposite direction.
Product Involvement. While examining the "think and feel"
product dimensions related to the dependent variables, H6
DISCUSSION
was partially supported. The "feel" importance dimension did
not result in any significant relationship, although intense The results from our experiment offer insight into the effects
systematic (central) information processing for low versus of location and time, interactivity, incentives, ad source
high "think" products concluded in partial support of the sixth credibility, appeal, product involvement, and attitude toward
hypothesis. mobile advertising in general, on the effectiveness of mobile
text advertisements. In accordance with the specific
Table 3. Differences in Attitudes and Purchase
experimental settings under which our research took place, the
Considerations between Experimental Conditions
following paragraphs summarize and reflect on our findings
for each of the seven factors tested.
Location and Time
The location of the SMS advertisement recipient did not affect
the dependent variables significantly. Although location-based
advertising has been heralded as one of the most promising
opportunities in mobile commerce because of its impact on
perceived informational utility, our research did not reveal any
main direct effects. However, interdependence may still exist
between location and the remaining manipulated variables.
General Attitude toward SMS advertising. The results revealed This issue calls for further research.
significant direct effects of general attitudes toward SMS
advertising on the dependent variables (Table 4). Thus, H7
was partially supported. In addition, we tested whether general
22  Journal of Interactive Advertising  Spring 2007
 

Interactivity Ad Source (Credibility)


Contrary to our expectations, the use of interactive messages Surprisingly, the source of the advertisement did affect the
led to negative attitudes and purchase intentions for the dependent variables significantly. A possible rationale is that
particular product category studied. Research on interactivity the perceived uncertainty and privacy cost effects on mobile
has been rather inconclusive (Liu and Shrum 2002). Some advertising communications may occur when providing
studies on online web advertisements found interactivity as a personal data to opt-in databases and not during a permission-
strong cue aiding the persuasive function of the online ads based SMS communication, as was the case of our test.
(Sundar and Kim 2005), while others have concluded that Permission-based marketing may alleviate the negative effects
interactivity has a negative effect on advertising effectiveness of a non-reputable advertiser, at least within the context of an
(Bezjian-Avery, Calder, and Iacobucci 1998). Our uncluttered advertising medium as in our case (where nearly
experimental conditions showed a negative influence of 76.3% of the respondents had received few, if any, SMS
interactivity. One explanation for this could be the use of the advertisements before). Research in this area is at an
chocolate bar in tests of the interactivity variable. A chocolate embryonic stage and calls for further research to determine the
bar belongs to the self-satisfaction FCB quadrant (Lepkowska- effects of source credibility as mobile advertising clutter grows.
White, Brashear, and Weinberger 2003) and the pre-test
Appeal
results showed a moderate purchase importance. In the
absence of a unique selling proposition (USP), since the The use of rational appeals led to more positive attitudes and
experimental conditions employed arguments of moderate purchase intentions than emotional appeals, despite the fact
persuasiveness to avoid confounding effects, the interactivity that testing was performed on a "feel" product. Although
feature showed negative direct effects. Additionally, the several studies on online environments have demonstrated
participants of the second group in our experiment had to that the use of emotional appeals in different product
send an SMS to find out more information about the categories exhibit higher effects (e.g., Drossos, Vrehopoulos,
advertised product. Sending an SMS implies some additional and Ferles 2006), in the mobile context participants responded
monetary cost for a low-cost product, and this could have more favorably to the informative content strategy. While
negatively affected the dependent variables. Thus, it is essential mobile devices are perceived as ideal for convenient anytime
to explore the nature of mobile interactivity and determine the shopping, their small screens and low-resolution displays
conditions in which interactivity may be useful in an render the development of graphic applications a challenge. In
advertising context. the absence of sound, image, and motion that could effectively
convey and demonstrate the product's ability to satisfy a
Incentive
sensory need, text advertisements may be ineffective in
As expected, we confirmed that the use of incentives in SMS producing an influential emotional appeal. Instead, the quality
advertisements led to more positive attitudes and purchase of information may play a more crucial role.
intentions. This is in line with similar research in Internet
Product Involvement
advertising, where most web surfers look for incentives to read
an advertisement before they click on it (Lohtia, Donthu, and Attitudes and buying intentions were less favorable when the
Hershberger 2003). In most cases, the presence of promotional SMS advertisement concerned a high-involvement product,
information, such as price reductions or discounts in banner compared to an advertisement for a low-involvement product.
advertisements, is associated with higher click-through-rates In contrast to the web, the mobile environment is likely to
(Hupfer and Grey 2005). Additionally, in accordance with the affect attitudes and purchase intentions for high involvement
mobile literature (e.g., Barwise and Strong 2002), our research "think" products negatively because of its inherent limitation
supports that users expect a reward for receiving SMS in enabling information search. However, there could be a
advertisements. Moreover, the use of incentives alleviates the significant increase in the frequency of impulse purchases,
effects of negative attitudes toward SMS advertising on the especially in low value, low involvement product categories
dependent variables. The work of Tsang, Ho, and Liang (2004) (Kannan, Chang, and Whinston 2001).
provides further support for our research.
23  Journal of Interactive Advertising  Spring 2007
 

Attitude toward Mobile Advertising in General International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and
Services, Boston, MA.
As expected, attitudes and buying intentions were less
favorable when a consumer had a negative attitude toward AAdvani, Rajiv and Khaled Choudhury (2001), "Making the
mobile advertising in general. Our data suggest that most of B2C Wireless," Business Strategy Review, 12 (2), 39-49.
respondents hold negative attitudes about receiving mobile
Alwitt, Linda F. and Paul R. Prabhaker (1992), "Functional and
advertisements. The mean overall attitude score was just 2.81
Belief Dimensions of Attitudes to Television Advertising:
on a seven-point Likert scale. Given the unique nature of
Implications for Copytesting," Journal of Advertising Research,
mobile phones, agencies and managers should examine the
32 (5), 30-42.
features of their opt-in database to effectively target
consumers. Andersson, Annica and Johanna Nilsson (2000), Wireless
Advertising Effectiveness: Evaluation of an SMS Advertising
Limitations and Future Research
Trial, Master's Thesis in Marketing, Stockholm School of
Our contribution is an empirically-validated framework, Economics Andersson.
which is clearly lacking in the majority of existing research
Baker, William E. and Richard J. Lutz (2000), "An Empirical
regarding the potential and critical success factors of mobile
Test of an Updated Relevance-Accessibility Model of
advertising. The validity and generalization of our results are
Advertising Effectiveness," Journal of Advertising, 29 (1), 1-14.
of course limited by a number of factors. We have chosen to
base our study on student attitudes. Although this seems like a Balasubramanian, Sridhar, Robert A. Peterson, and Sirkka L.
logical decision given the participation of this age group to Jarvenpaa (2002), "Exploring the Implications of M-commerce
mobile advertising campaigns, our findings would be more for Markets and Marketing," Journal of the Academy of
helpful if we had examined a more representative sample. Marketing Science, 30 (4), 348-361.

Moreover, while identifying the factors that influence mobile Baltas, George (2003), "Determinants of Internet Advertising
advertising, we could not capture the relative importance Effectiveness: An Empirical Study," International Journal of
(weight) of each factor and constituent variable on the Market Research, 45 (4), 505-513.
campaign's success. Although interdependence may exist
Barnes, Stuart J. (2002a), "Wireless Digital Advertising: Nature
between the manipulated variables, our experimental design
and Implications," International Journal of Advertising, 21 (3),
did not allow us to conclude about their interaction effects.
399-420.
Furthermore, this paper has based its findings on products of
--- (2002b), "Under the Skin: Short-range Embedded Wireless
moderate involvement and arguments of moderate
Technology," International Journal of Information
persuasiveness. Different results may appear when employing
Management, 22 (3), 165-179.
different product categories and argument qualities.
Barwise, Patrick (2001), "TV, PC, or Mobile? Future Media for
On issues of future research, our paper offers some potential
Consumer e-Commerce," Business Strategy Review, 12 (1), 35-
research avenues. Two significant research questions emerge
42.
as a direct consequence of the work presented here. On the
one hand, research could be directed toward identifying the --- and Colin Strong (2002), "Permission Based Mobile
clusters of consumers that are more positively inclined toward Advertising," Journal of Interactive Marketing, 16 (1), 14-24.
SMS advertisements. On the other hand, investigating the --- and John U. Farley (2005), "The State of Interactive
interaction of the aforementioned message characteristics Marketing in Seven Countries: Interactive Marketing comes of
through a full factorial experimental design could elicit a more Age," Journal of Interactive Marketing, 19 (3), 67-80.
precise picture of correlates of successful SMS advertising
campaigns. Batra, Rajeev and Michael L. Ray (1986), "Affective Responses
Mediating Acceptance of Advertising," Journal of Consumer
REFERENCES Research, 13 (2), 234-249.
Aalto, Lauri, Nicklas Göthlin, Jani Korhonen, and Timo Ojala Berkowitz, Eric N. and John R. Walton (1980), "Contextual
(2004), "Bluetooth and WAP Push Based Location-aware Influences on Consumer Price Responses: An Experimental
Mobile Advertising System," in Proceedings of the 2nd Analysis," Journal of Marketing Research, 17 (3), 349-358.
24  Journal of Interactive Advertising  Spring 2007
 

Bezjian-Avery, Alexa, Bobby Calder, and Dawn Iacobucci Advertising Effectiveness," Journal of Consumer Research, 17
(1998), "New Media Interactive Advertising vs. Traditional (2), 172-179.
Advertising," Journal of Advertising Research, 38 (4), 23-32.
Gopal, Ram D. and Arvind K. Tripathi (2006), "Advertising via
Chen, Shih-Fen S., Kent B. Monroe, Yung-Chien Lou (1998), Wireless Networks," International Journal of Mobile
"The Effects of Framing Price Promotion Messages on Communications, 4 (1), 2-16.
Consumers' Perceptions and Purchase Intentions," Journal of
Haghirian, Parissa, Maria Madlberger, and Andrea Tanuskova
Retailing, 74 (3), 353-372.
(2005), "Increasing Advertising Value of Mobile Marketing -
Chittenden, Lisa and Ruth Rettie (2003), "An Evaluation of e- An Empirical Study of Antecedents," in Proceedings of the 38th
mail Marketing and Factors Affecting Response," Journal of Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii,
Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, 11 (3), 1-10.
203-217.
Heinonen, Kristina and Tore Strandvik (2003), "Consumer
Choi, Sejung Marina, and Nora J. Rifon (2002), "Antecedents Responsiveness to Mobile Marketing," Center for Information
and Consequences of Web Advertising Credibility: A Study of and Communication Research at the Stockholm School of
Consumer Response to Banner Advertisements," Journal of Economics, http://web.hhs.se/cic/roundtable2003/papers/D22
Interactive Advertising, 3 (1) (accessed on 3/15/2006). Heinonen_Strandvik.pdf (accessed on 01/10/2005).
Crichard, Mark (2003), "Privacy and Electronic Hoffman, Donna L. and Thomas P. Novak (1996), "Marketing
Communications," Computer Law & Security Report, 19 (4), in Hypermedia Computer-Mediated Environments:
299-303. Conceptual Foundations," Journal of Marketing, 60 (July), 50-
68.
Cronin, J. Joseph, Michael Brady, and G. Tomas M. Hult
(2000), "Assessing the Effects of Quality, Value, and Customer Homer, P.M. (1990), "The Mediating Role of Attitude toward
Satisfaction on Consumer Behavioral Intentions in Service the Ad: Some Additional Evidence," Journal of Marketing
Environments," Journal of Retailing, 76 (2), 193-218. Research, 27 (1), 78-86.
Dahlen, Micael (2001), "Banner Advertisements through a Hristova, Nataliya and Gregory O'Hare (2004), "Ad-me:
New Lens," Journal of Advertising Research, 41 (4), 23-30. Wireless Advertising Adapted to the User Location, Device
and Emotions," in Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International
Danaher, Peter J. and Guy W. Mullarkey (2003), "Factors
Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii.
Affecting Online Advertising Recall: A Study of Students,"
Journal of Advertising Research, 43 (3), 252-267. Hupfer, Maureen and Alex Grey (2005), "Getting Something
for Nothing: The Impact of a Sample Offer and User Mode on
De Reyck, Bert and Zeger Degraeve (2003), "Broadcast
Banner Ad Response," Journal of Interactive Advertising, 6 (1)
Scheduling for Mobile Advertising," Operations Research, 51
(accessed on 3/15/2006).
(4), 509-517.
Johar, J. S. and M. Joseph Sirgy (1991), "Value-expressive
Drossos, Dimitris, Adam Vrehopoulos, and Ioannis Ferles
versus Utilitarian Advertising Appeals: When and Why to Use
(2006), "Predicting the "Click-Through Rate Performance of
Which Appeal," Journal of Advertising, 20 (September), 23-33.
Banner Advertisements on the Web," in Proceedings of the
35th European Marketing Academy Conference, Athens, Jones, Andrew (2002), "Wireless Marketing: The Linking
Greece. Value of Text Messaging," International Journal of Advertising
& Marketing to Children, 3 (2), 39-44.
Funk, Jeffrey L. (2005), "The Future of the Mobile Phone
Internet: An Analysis of Technological Trajectories and Lead Kaasinen, Eija (2003), "User Needs for Location-Aware Mobile
Users in the Japanese Market," Technology in Society, 27 (1), Services," Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 7 (1), 70-79.
69-83.
Kang, Yong-Soon, Paul M. Herr, and Christine M. Page
Goldberg, Marvin E. and Jon Hartwick (1990), "The Effects of (2003), "Time and Distance: Asymmetries in Consumer Trip
Advertiser Reputation and Extremity of Advertising Claim on Knowledge and Judgments," Journal of Consumer Research, 30
(3), 420-429.
25  Journal of Interactive Advertising  Spring 2007
 

Kannan, P. K., Ai-Mei Chang, and Andrew Whinston (2001), Banner Advertising Click-through Rates," Journal of
"Wireless Commerce: Marketing Issues and Possibilities," in Advertising Research, 43 (4), 410-418.
Proceedings of the 34th Hawaii International Conference on
Long, Ju, Andrew B. Whinston, and Kerem Tomak (2002),
System Sciences, Hawaii.
"Calling All Customers," Marketing Research, 14 (3), 28-35.
Kavassalis, Petros, Ntina Spyropoulou, Dimitris Drossos,
Mackenzie, Scott B. and Richard J. Lutz (1989), "An Empirical
Evangelos Mitrokostas, Gregory Gikas, and Antonis
Examination of the Structural Antecedents of Attitude toward
Hatzistamatiou (2003), "Mobile Marketing: Framing the
the Ad in an Advertising Pretesting Context," Journal of
Market Inquiry," International Journal of Electronic
Marketing, 53 (2), 48-65.
Commerce, 8 (1), 55-7.
Malhotra, Naresh K. (2005), "Attitude & Affect: New Frontiers
Kerckhove, Anne (2002), "Building Brand Dialogue with
of Research in the 21st Century," Journal of Business Research,
Mobile Marketing," International Journal of Advertising &
58 (4), 477-482.
Marketing to Children, 3 (4), 37-42.
Malloy, Alisha D., Upkar Varshney, and Andrew P. Snow
Korgaonkar, Pradeer K., George P. Moschis, and Danny N.
(2002), "Supporting Mobile Commerce Applications using
Bellenger (1984), "Correlates of Successful Advertising
Dependable Wireless Networks," Mobile Networks and
Campaigns," Journal of Advertising Research, 24 (1), 47-53.
Applications, 7 (3), 225-234.
Laurent, Gilles and Jean-Noël Kapferer (1985), "Measuring
Milne, George R. and Mary Ellen Gordon (1993),"Direct Mail
Consumer Involvement Profiles," Journal of Marketing
Privacy-efficiency Trade-offs within an Implied Social
Research, 12 (February), 41-53.
Contract Framework," Journal of Public Policy & Marketing,
Lepkowska-White, Elzbieta, Tomas G. Brashear, and Marc G. 12 (2), 206-215.
Weinberger (2003), "A Test of Ad Appeal Effectiveness in
Muehling, Darrel D. (1987), "An Investigation of Factors
Poland and the United States," Journal of Advertising, 32 (3),
underlying Attitude-toward-advertising-in-general," Journal of
57-67.
Advertising, 16 (1), 32-40.
Leppäniemi, Matti, Heikki Karjaluoto, and Jari Salo (2004),
Okazaki, Shintaro (2004), "How do Japanese Consumers
"The Success Factors of Mobile Advertising Value Chain,"
Perceive Wireless Advertisements? A Multivariate Analysis,"
EBusiness Review, 4, 93-97.
International Journal of Advertising, 23 (4), 429-454.
Leung, Chi Hong, Yuen Yan Chan, and Candy Suk Ching
Pastore, Michael (2002) "Incentives Still Key to Mobile
Chan (2003), "Analysis of Mobile Commerce Market in Hong
Advertising" http://www.clickz.com/stats/sectors/wireless/
Kong," in Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on
article.php/10094_965061 (accessed on 05/20/2006).
Electronic Commerce, Pittsburgh: Pennsylvania.
Petty, Richard E. and John T. Cacioppo (1986),
Lichtenstein, Donald R. and William O. Bearden (1989),
Communication & Persuasion: Central & Peripheral Routes to
"Contextual Influences on Perceptions of Merchant-supplied
Attitude Change, New York: Springer-Verlag.
Reference Prices," Journal of Consumer Research, 16 (1), 55-66.
Petty, Ross D. (2003), "Wireless Advertising Messaging: Legal
Liu, Scott S. and Patricia A. Stout (1987), "Effects of Message
Analysis and Public Policy Issues," Journal of Public Policy &
Modality and Appeal on Advertising Acceptance," Psychology
Marketing, 22 (1), 71-82.
and Marketing, 4 (3), 167-187.
Ranganathan, Anand and Roy H. Campbell (2002),
Liu, Yuping and L. J. Shrum (2002), "What Is Interactivity and
"Advertising in a Pervasive Computing Environment," in
Is It Always Such a Good Thing? Implications of Definition,
Proceedings of the 2nd ACM International Workshop on
Person, and Situation for the Influence of Interactivity on
Mobile Commerce, 28 (September), 10-14.
Advertising Effectiveness," Journal of Advertising, 31 (4), 53-.
Ratchford, Brian T. (1987), "New Insights about the FCB
Lohtia, Ritu, Naveen Donthu, and Edmund K. Hershberger
Grid," Journal of Advertising Research, 27 (4), 24-38.
(2003), "The Impact of Content and Design Elements on
Ratsimor, Olga, Tim Finin, Anupam Joshi, and Yelena Yesha
(2003), "eNcentive: A Framework for Intelligent Marketing in
26  Journal of Interactive Advertising  Spring 2007
 

Mobile Peer-to-peer Environments," in Proceedings of the 5th Vaughn, Richard (1986), "How Advertising Works: A
International Conference on Electronic Commerce, Pittsburgh: Planning Model Revisited," Journal of Advertising Research, 26
Pennsylvania. (February/March), 57-66.
Saari, Timo, Niklas Ravaja, Jari Laarni, Marko Turpeinen, and Watson, Richard T., Leyland F. Pitt, Pierre Berthon, and
Kari Kallinen (2004), "Innovation, Management & Strategy: George M. Zinkhan (2002), "U-commerce: Expanding the
Psychologically Targeted Persuasive Advertising and Product Universe of Marketing," Journal of the Academy of Marketing
Information in E-commerce," in Proceedings of the 6th Science, 30 (4), 333-347.
International Conference on Electronic Commerce, Delft: The
Wu, Guohua (2006), "Conceptualizing and Measuring the
Netherlands.
Perceived Interactivity of Websites," Journal of Current Issues
Scharl, Arno, Astrid Dickinger, and Jamie Murphy (2005), and Research in Advertising, 28 (Spring), 87-104.
"Diffusion and Success Factors of Mobile Marketing,"
Yuan, Soe Tsyr and Chiahsin Cheng (2004), "Ontology-based
Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 4 (2), 159-
Personalized Couple Clustering for Heterogeneous Product
173.
Recommendation in Mobile Marketing," Expert Systems with
Shavitt, Sharon (1990), "The Role of Attitude Objects in Applications, 26 (4), 461-476.
Attitude Functions," Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,
Yuan, Soe Tsyr and Eva Tsao (2003), "A Recommendation
26 (March), 124-148.
Mechanism for Contextualized Mobile Advertising," Expert
Shi, Yi-Zheng, Ka-Man Cheung, and Gerard Prendergast Systems with Applications, 24 (4), 399-414.
(2005), "Behavioural Response to Sales Promotion Tools,"
Zaichkowsky, Judith Lynne (1985), "Measuring the
International Journal of Advertising, 24 (4), 467-486.
Involvement Construct," Journal of Consumer Research, 12 (3),
Stewart, David W. and Scott Koslow (1989), "Executional 341-352.
Factors and Advertising Effectiveness: A Replication," Journal
APPENDIX: Retrieved References for Mobile Advertising
of Advertising, 18 (3), 21-32.
Studies
Sundar, S. Shyam and Jinhee Kim (2005), "Interactivity and
Persuasion: Influencing Attitudes with Information and
Involvement," Journal of Interactive Advertising, 5 (2)
(accessed on 3/15/2006).
Tsang, Melody M., Shu-Chun Ho, and Ting-Peng Liang
(2004), "Consumer Attitudes toward Mobile Advertising: An
Empirical Study," International Journal of Electronic
Commerce, 8 (3), 65-78.
Varshney, Upkar (2001), "Location Management Support for
Mobile Commerce Applications," in Proceedings of the 1st
International Workshop on Mobile Commerce, Rome: Italy.
--- (2003), "Location Management for Mobile Commerce
Applications in Wireless Internet Environment," ACM
Transactions on Internet Technology, 3 (3), 236-255.
--- and Ron Vetter (2001), "A Framework for the Emerging
Mobile Commerce Applications," in Proceedings of the 34th
Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii.
--- and --- (2002), "Mobile Commerce: Framework,
Applications and Networking Support," Mobile Networks and
Applications, 7 (3), 185-198.
27  Journal of Interactive Advertising  Spring 2007
 

ABOUT THE AUTHORS


Dimitris Drossos is a Ph.D. Candidate in the Department of
Management Science and Technology at the Athens
University of Economics and Business and currently teaches e-
marketing at the Technological Educational Institute of Patras.
He is currently doing research on mobile advertising, as well
as m-commerce technologies and services.
Dr. George M. Giaglis is an Associate Professor of eBusiness
at the Athens University of Economics and Business. His main
research interests lie in the areas of mobile and wireless
applications and services; ubiquitous, pervasive, and wearable
information systems; business process modeling and
simulation; and information systems evaluation. He has
published more than 100 articles in leading journals and
international conferences. Since 2001, he has been the Director
of the ISTLab Wireless Research Center
(http://www.mobiforum.org/).
Dr. George Lekakos is an Adjunct Lecturer at the Department
of Management Science and Technology, Department of
Computer Science, University of Cyprus. Dr. Lekakos'
research interests are in the area of personalized and adaptive
systems, human-computer interaction, and machine learning.
He has published more than 30 papers in international
journals and conferences, and he is the co-editor of books and
conference proceedings.
Dr. Flora Kokkinaki is an Assistant Professor in the
Department of Marketing and Communication at the Athens
University of Economics and Business. Her research interests
include attitude theory and consumer decision-making. She
has published in the British Journal of Psychology, the British
Journal of Social Psychology, and the Journal of Economic
Psychology.
Maria G. Stavraki is a Ph.D. Candidate in the Department of
Marketing and Communication at the Athens University of
Economics and Business. Her research interests include
consumer behavior and affective processes in attitude change.

You might also like