UNIV. CONDORI GUTIERREZ DANIEL - Resolución 1E.

Parcial 2da Instancia #CIV3306- 4/ 5/ 2016

1. Resolver la estructura mostrada conociendo el versor n123 perpendicular al plano 123, el ángulo a2 entre la recta
12 y el eje X,el ángulo a1 entre las rectas 12 y 13, el ángulo a3 entre la recta 12 y el resorte, longitud L de la barra
13, M de la barra 12 y N de 14. La carga q está en el plano 123 como el resorte y los planos de los apoyos en 2 y 3.
La barra 14 ha sido construida 3 mm más corta.

t
L≔5 m M≔5 m N≔4 m q≔3 ―
α ≔ 20° m
2 6 kg E tn
A ≔ 22 cm E ≔ 2.1 ⋅ 10 ―― E ≔ ―― ――
2
cm 1000 cm 2
SOLUCIÓN:
Cálculo de coordenadas
⎡0⎤ ⎡5⎤ ⎡ 0 ⎤ ⎡0⎤ ⎡1⎤
C1 ≔ ⎢ 0 ⎥ C2 ≔ ⎢ 0 ⎥ C3 ≔ C4 ≔ ⎢ 0 ⎥ = ⎢ 0 ⎥ u12 ≔ ⎢ 0 ⎥
⎢⎣ 0 ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣ 0 ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣ N ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣ 4 ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣ 0 ⎥⎦
⎡ l123 ⎤
u123 u123 (l123 , m123 , n123) ≔ ⎢ m123 ⎥
⎢⎣ n123 ⎥⎦
de prueba

l123 ≔ .1 m123 ≔ .2 n123 ≔ .3

Restricciones

2 2 2
l123 + m123 + n123 ＝ 1
l123 ＝ 0
Solver Valores

n123 ＝ cos (α)

⎡0 ⎤
u123 ≔ (l123 , m123 , n123) = ⎢ 0.342 ⎥
⎢⎣ 0.94 ⎥⎦

⎡ l13 ⎤
C3 u13 l13 , m13 , n13 ≔ ⎢ m13 ⎥
( )
⎢⎣ n13 ⎥⎦
de prueba

l13 ≔ .1 m13 ≔ .2 n13 ≔ .3

Restricciones

2 2 2
l13 + m13 + n13 ＝ 1
u13 (l13 , m13 , n13) ⋅ u123 ＝ 0
Solver Valores

l13 ＝ cos (110°)

⎡ −0.342 ⎤
⎡ −1.71 ⎤
u13 ≔ (l13 , m13 , n13) = ⎢ 0.883 ⎥
⎢⎣ −0.321 ⎥⎦ C3 ≔ u13 ⋅ L = ⎢ 4.415 ⎥
⎢⎣ −1.607 ⎥⎦

Coordenada del Momento

-1-
 UNIV. CONDORI GUTIERREZ DANIEL - Resolución 1E. Parcial 2da Instancia #CIV3306- 4/ 5/ 2016

Coordenada del Momento

vector unitario 3-2 para hallar el moemnto
U13 ≔ C3 U12 ≔ C2 U14 ≔ C4
⎡ 6.71 ⎤ ⎡ 0.819 ⎤
⎢ ⎥ U32
U32 ≔ U12 − U13 = −4.415 u32 ≔ ――― = ⎢ −0.539 ⎥ ‖u32‖ = 1
⎢⎣ 1.607 ⎥⎦ ‖U32‖ ⎢⎣ 0.196 ⎥⎦

float , 4 ⎡ 0.8192 ⋅ a − 1.71 ⎤

U15 (a) ≔ u32 ⋅ a + U13 ――→ ⎢ −0.539 ⋅ a + 4.415 ⎥
⎢⎣ 0.1962 ⋅ a − 1.607 ⎥⎦
⎡ 0.8192 ⋅ a − 1.71 ⎤
UM (a) ≔ U15 (a) − U14 → ⎢ −0.539 ⋅ a + 4.415 ⎥
⎢⎣ 0.1962 ⋅ a − 5.607 ⎥⎦
de prueba

a≔3
Restricciones

u32 ⋅ UM (a) ＝ 0 ⎡ 2.288 ⎤

Solver

a≔ (a) = 4.88 UM (a) = ⎢ 1.785 ⎥

Valores

⎢⎣ −4.65 ⎥⎦

⎡ 2.288 ⎤
U15 ≔ U15 (a) C5 ≔ U15 = ⎢ 1.785 ⎥
⎢⎣ −0.65 ⎥⎦

Magnitud del momento en el punto 5

⎡0⎤ ⎡5⎤ ⎡ −1.71 ⎤ ⎡0⎤ ⎡ 2.288 ⎤

C1 = ⎢ 0 ⎥ C2 = ⎢ 0 ⎥ C3 = ⎢ 4.415 ⎥ C4 = ⎢ 0 ⎥ C5 = ⎢ 1.785 ⎥
⎢⎣ 0 ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣ 0 ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣ −1.607 ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣ 4 ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣ −0.65 ⎥⎦

MATRIZ DE RIGIDEZ
⎡ E⋅A ⎤
0 0
En barras biarticuladas ⎢ ――
L ⎥ ⎡0⎤
⎢ k≔⎢0⎥
K'E_oo ＝ K'O_ee ＝ −K'_oe ＝ −K'_eo ＝ 0 0 0⎥ ⎢⎣ 1 ⎥⎦
⎢ ⎥
⎣ 0 0 0⎦
Matriz de rotación
BARRA 1-3
W13
W13 ≔ u13 ⨯ k w13 ≔ ――― v13 ≔ w13 ⨯ u13
‖W13‖
⎡ −0.342 ⎤ ⎡ 0.932 ⎤ ⎡ −0.116 ⎤
u13 = ⎢ 0.883 ⎥ w13 = ⎢ 0.361 ⎥ v13 = ⎢ 0.3 ⎥
⎢⎣ −0.321 ⎥⎦ ⎣⎢ 0 ⎥⎦ ⎣⎢ 0.947 ⎥⎦
‖u13‖ = 1 ‖w13‖ = 1 ‖v13‖ = 1

Rxu13 ≔ stack ⎛⎝u13 , v13 , w13 ⎞⎠

T T T

⎡ −0.342 0.883 −0.321 ⎤ ⎡ −0.342 −0.116 0.932 ⎤

T
⎢
Rxu13 = −0.116 0.3 0.947 ⎥ ⎢
Rxu13 = 0.883 0.3 0.361 ⎥
⎢⎣ 0.932 0.361 0 ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣ −0.321 0.947 0 ⎥⎦

Matriz de rotación
-2-
UNIV. CONDORI GUTIERREZ DANIEL - Resolución 1E. Parcial 2da Instancia #CIV3306- 4/ 5/ 2016

Matriz de rotación
BARRA 3-2
W32
W32 ≔ u32 ⨯ k w32 ≔ ――― v32 ≔ w32 ⨯ u32
‖W32‖
⎡ 0.819 ⎤ ⎡ −0.55 ⎤ ⎡ −0.164 ⎤
u32 = ⎢ −0.539 ⎥ ‖u32‖ = 1 w32 = ⎢ −0.835 ⎥ ‖w32‖ = 1 v32 = ⎢ 0.108 ⎥ ‖v32‖ = 1
⎢⎣ 0.196 ⎥⎦ ⎣⎢ 0 ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣ 0.981 ⎥⎦

Rxu32 ≔ stack ⎛⎝u32 , v32 , w32 ⎞⎠

T T T

⎡ 0.819 −0.539 0.196 ⎤ ⎡ 0.819 −0.164 −0.55 ⎤

T
Rxu32 = ⎢ −0.164 0.108 0.981 ⎥ Rxu32 = ⎢ −0.539 0.108 −0.835 ⎥
⎢⎣ −0.55 −0.835 0 ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣ 0.196 0.981 0 ⎥⎦

Matriz de rotación
BARRA 1-2
W12
W12 ≔ u12 ⨯ k w12 ≔ ――― v12 ≔ w12 ⨯ u12
‖W12‖
⎡1⎤ ⎡ 0⎤ ⎡0⎤
u12 = ⎢ 0 ⎥ ‖u12‖ = 1 w12 = ⎢ −1 ⎥ ‖w12‖ = 1 v12 = ⎢ 0 ⎥ ‖v12‖ = 1
⎢⎣ 0 ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣ 0 ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣ 1 ⎥⎦

Rxu12 ≔ stack ⎛⎝u12 , v12 , w12 ⎞⎠

T T T

⎡1 0 0⎤ ⎡1 0 0⎤
T
Rxu12 = ⎢ 0 0 1 ⎥ Rxu12 = ⎢ 0 0 −1 ⎥
⎢⎣ 0 −1 0 ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣ 0 1 0 ⎥⎦

Matriz de rotación
BARRA 1-4
⎡1⎤ ⎡0⎤
⎡0⎤
v14 ≔ ⎢ 0 ⎥ ‖v14‖ = 1 w14 ≔ ⎢ 1 ⎥ ‖w14‖ = 1
u14 ≔ ⎢ 0 ⎥ ‖u14‖ = 1 ⎢⎣ 0 ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣ 0 ⎥⎦
⎢⎣ 1 ⎥⎦

Rxu14 ≔ stack ⎛⎝u14 , v14 , w14 ⎞⎠

T T T

⎡0 0 1⎤ ⎡0 1 0⎤
T
Rxu14 = ⎢ 1 0 0 ⎥ Rxu14 = ⎢ 0 0 1 ⎥
⎢⎣ 0 1 0 ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣ 1 0 0 ⎥⎦

U24
BARRA 2-4 U24 ≔ U14 − U12 u24 ≔ ―――
‖U24‖
W24
W24 ≔ u24 ⨯ k w24 ≔ ――― v24 ≔ w24 ⨯ u24
‖W24‖
⎡ −0.781 ⎤ ⎡0⎤ ⎡ 0.625 ⎤
u24 = ⎢ 0 ⎥ ‖u24‖ = 1 w24 = ⎢ 1 ⎥ ‖w24‖ = 1 v24 = ⎢ 0 ⎥ ‖v24‖ = 1
⎢⎣ 0.625 ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣ 0 ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣ 0.781 ⎥⎦

Rxu24 ≔ stack ⎛⎝u24 , v24 , w24 ⎞⎠

T T T

⎡ −0.781 0 0.625 ⎤ ⎡ −0.781 0.625 0 ⎤

T
Rxu24 = ⎢ 0.625 0 0.781 ⎥ Rxu24 = ⎢ 0 0 1⎥
⎢⎣ 0 1 0 ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣ 0.625 0.781 0 ⎥⎦

U34
-3-
UNIV. CONDORI GUTIERREZ DANIEL - Resolución 1E. Parcial 2da Instancia #CIV3306- 4/ 5/ 2016

U34
BARRA 3-4 U34 ≔ U14 − U13 u34 ≔ ―――
‖U34‖
W34
W34 ≔ u34 ⨯ k w34 ≔ ――― v34 ≔ w34 ⨯ u34
‖W34‖
⎡ 0.233 ⎤ ⎡ −0.932 ⎤ ⎡ −0.276 ⎤
u34 = ⎢ −0.602 ⎥ ‖u34‖ = 1 w34 = ⎢ −0.361 ⎥ ‖w34‖ = 1 v34 = ⎢ 0.712 ⎥ ‖v34‖ = 1
⎢⎣ 0.764 ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣ 0 ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣ 0.645 ⎥⎦

Rxu34 ≔ stack ⎛⎝u34 , v34 , w34 ⎞⎠

T T T

⎡ 0.233 −0.602 0.764 ⎤ ⎡ 0.233 −0.276 −0.932 ⎤

T
Rxu34 = ⎢ −0.276 0.712 0.645 ⎥ Rxu34 = ⎢ −0.602 0.712 −0.361 ⎥
⎢⎣ −0.932 −0.361 0 ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣ 0.764 0.645 0 ⎥⎦

MATRIZ DE RIGIDEZ
barra 1-2
En ejes locales
⎡ E⋅A ⎤
0 0
⎢ ――
M ⎥ ⎡ 9240 0 0 ⎤
K2'_11 ≔ ⎢ 0 0 0⎥=⎢ 0 0 0⎥ K1'_22 ≔ K2'_11 K'_12 ≔ −K2'_11 K'_21 ≔ −K2'_11
⎢ ⎥ ⎢
⎣ 0 0 0⎦ ⎣ 0 0 0 ⎥⎦

En ejes glovales
⎡ 9240 0 0 ⎤
T
K2_11 ≔ Rxu12 ⋅ K2'_11 ⋅ Rxu12 = ⎢ 0 0 0⎥
⎢⎣ 0 0 0 ⎥⎦
K1_22 ≔ K2_11 K_12 ≔ −K2_11 K_21 ≔ −K2_11
barra 1-3
En ejes locales
⎡ E⋅A ⎤
0 0
⎢ ――L ⎥ ⎡ 9240 0 0 ⎤
K3'_11 ≔ ⎢ 0 0 0⎥=⎢ 0 0 0⎥ K1'_33 ≔ K3'_11 K'_13 ≔ −K3'_11 K'_31 ≔ −K3'_11
⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥
⎣ 0 0 0⎦ ⎣ 0 0 0⎦
En ejes glovales
⎡ 1081 −2791 1016 ⎤
T
K3_11 ≔ Rxu13 ⋅ K3'_11 ⋅ Rxu13 = ⎢ −2791 7205 −2622 ⎥
⎢⎣ 1016 −2622 954 ⎥⎦
K1_33 ≔ K3_11 K_13 ≔ −K3_11 K_31 ≔ −K3_11
barra 1-4
En ejes locales
⎡ E⋅A ⎤
0 0
⎢ ――
N ⎥ ⎡ 11550 0 0 ⎤
K4'_11 ≔ ⎢ 0 0 0⎥=⎢ 0 0 0 ⎥ K1'_44 ≔ K4'_11 K'_14 ≔ −K4'_11 K'_41 ≔ −K4'_11
⎢ ⎥ ⎢
⎣ 0 0 0⎦ ⎣ 0 0 0 ⎦⎥
En ejes glovales
⎡0 0 0⎤
T
K4_11 ≔ Rxu14 ⋅ K4'_11 ⋅ Rxu14 = ⎢ 0 0 0⎥
⎢⎣ 0 0 11550 ⎥⎦
K1_44 K4_11 K_14 K4_11 K_41 K4_11
-4-
 UNIV. CONDORI GUTIERREZ DANIEL - Resolución 1E. Parcial 2da Instancia #CIV3306- 4/ 5/ 2016

K1_44 ≔ K4_11 K_14 ≔ −K4_11 K_41 ≔ −K4_11

barra 3-2
En ejes locales L32 ≔ ‖U32‖
⎡ E⋅A ⎤
0 0
⎢ ――
L32 ⎥ ⎡ 5639.979 0 0 ⎤
K2'_33 ≔ ⎢ 0 0 0 ⎥ = ⎢ 0 0 0⎥ K3'_22 ≔ K2'_33 K'_23 ≔ −K2'_33 K'_32 ≔ −K2'_33
⎢ ⎥
⎣ 0 0 0 ⎦ ⎣⎢ 0 0 0 ⎥⎦
En ejes glovales
⎡ 3784 −2490 906 ⎤
T
K2_33 ≔ Rxu32 ⋅ K2'_33 ⋅ Rxu32 = ⎢ −2490 1638 −596 ⎥
⎢⎣ 906 −596 217 ⎥⎦

K3_22 ≔ K2_33 K_23 ≔ −K2_33 K_32 ≔ −K2_33

barra 3-4
En ejes locales L34 ≔ ‖U34‖
⎡ E⋅A ⎤
0 0
⎢ ――
L34 ⎥ ⎡ 6295.438 0 0 ⎤
K4'_33 ≔ ⎢ 0 0 0⎥=⎢ 0 0 0⎥ K3'_44 ≔ K4'_33 K'_43 ≔ −K4'_33 K'_34 ≔ −K4'_33
⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥
⎣ 0 0 0⎦ ⎣ 0 0 0⎦
En ejes glovales
⎡ 342 −883 1121 ⎤
T
K4_33 ≔ Rxu34 ⋅ K4'_33 ⋅ Rxu34 = ⎢ −883 2279 −2894 ⎥
⎢⎣ 1121 −2894 3675 ⎥⎦
K3_44 ≔ K4'_33 K_43 ≔ −K4_33 K_34 ≔ −K4_33
barra 2-4
En ejes locales L24 ≔ ‖U24‖
⎡ E⋅A ⎤
0 0
⎢ ――
L24 ⎥ ⎡ 7215.228 0 0 ⎤
K4'_22 ≔ ⎢ 0 0 0 ⎥ = ⎢ 0 0 0⎥ K2'_44 ≔ K4'_22 K'_42 ≔ −K4'_22 K'_24 ≔ −K4'_22
⎢ ⎥
⎣ 0 0 0 ⎦ ⎣⎢ 0 0 0 ⎥⎦
En ejes glovales
⎡ 4400 0 −3520 ⎤
T
K4_22 ≔ Rxu24 ⋅ K4'_22 ⋅ Rxu24 = ⎢ 0 0 0⎥
⎢⎣ −3520 0 2816 ⎥⎦
K2_44 ≔ K4_22 K_42 ≔ −K4_22 K_24 ≔ −K4_22

MATRIZ DE RIGIDEZ EN NUDOS

-5-
 UNIV. CONDORI GUTIERREZ DANIEL - Resolución 1E. Parcial 2da Instancia #CIV3306- 4/ 5/ 2016

MATRIZ DE RIGIDEZ EN NUDOS

RIGIDEZ ACUMULADA EN NUDOS
Nudo 1
⎡ 10321 −2791 1016 ⎤
K11 ≔ K2_11 + K3_11 + K4_11 = ⎢ −2791 7205 −2622 ⎥
⎢⎣ 1016 −2622 12504 ⎥⎦
Nudo 2
⎡ 17424 −2490 −2613 ⎤
K22 ≔ K1_22 + K3_22 + K4_22 = ⎢ −2490 1638 −596 ⎥
⎢⎣ −2613 −596 3033 ⎥⎦
Nudo 3
⎡ 5207 −6163 3043 ⎤
K33 ≔ K1_33 + K2_33 + K4_33 = ⎢ −6163 11122 −6112 ⎥
⎢⎣ 3043 −6112 4846 ⎥⎦

Nudo 4
⎡ 10694.967 0 −3519.623 ⎤
K44 ≔ K1_44 + K2_44 + K3_44 = ⎢ 0 0 0 ⎥
⎢⎣ −3519.623 0 14365.699 ⎥⎦

RIGIDEZ ENSAMBLADA
⎡ K11 K12 K13 K14 ⎤ ⎡0 0 0⎤
⎢ K21 K22 K23 K24 ⎥ K0 ≔ ⎢ 0 0 0 ⎥
K＝⎢ ⎢⎣ 0 0 0 ⎥⎦
K31 K32 K33 K34 ⎥
⎢⎣ K41 K42 K43 K44 ⎥⎦

K1 ≔ augment (K11 , K_12 , K_13 , K_14)

K2 ≔ augment (K_21 , K22 , K_23 , K_24)
K3 ≔ augment (K_31 , K_32 , K33 , K_34)
K4 ≔ augment (K_41 , K_42 , K_43 , K44)
K ≔ stack (K1 , K2 , K3 , K4)
⎡ 10321 −2791 1016 −9240 0 0 −1081 2791 −1016 0 0 0⎤
⎢ −2791 7205 −2622 0 0 0 2791 −7205 2622 0 0 0⎥
⎢ 1016 −2622 12504 0 0 0 −1016 2622 −954 0 0 −11550 ⎥
⎢ −9240 0 0 17424 −2490 −2613 −3784 2490 −906 −4400 0 3520 ⎥
⎢ 0 0 0 −2490 1638 −596 2490 −1638 596 0 0 0⎥
⎢ 0 0 0 −2613 −596 3033 −906 596 −217 3520 0 −2816 ⎥
K=⎢
−1081 2791 −1016 −3784 2490 −906 5207 −6163 3043 −342 883 −1121 ⎥
⎢ ⎥
2791 −7205 2622 2490 −1638 596 −6163 11122 −6112 883 −2279 2894
⎢ ⎥
−1016 2622 −954 −906 596 −217 3043 −6112 4846 −1121 2894 −3675
⎢ ⎥
⎢ 0 0 0 −4400 0 3520 −342 883 −1121 10695 0 −3520 ⎥
⎢ 0 0 0 0 0 0 883 −2279 2894 0 0 0⎥
⎣ 0 0 −11550 3520 0 −2816 −1121 2894 −3675 −3520 0 14366 ⎦

ANÁLISIS DE CARGAS
Cargas directas sobre nudo ϕD_i
⎡0⎤
ϕD_1 ≔ ⎢ 0 ⎥ ϕD_2 ≔ ϕD_1 ϕD_3 ≔ ϕD_1 ϕD_4 ≔ ϕD_1
⎢⎣ 0 ⎥⎦

Cargas indirectas sobre barra ϕ'_ij

-6-
 UNIV. CONDORI GUTIERREZ DANIEL - Resolución 1E. Parcial 2da Instancia #CIV3306- 4/ 5/ 2016

Cargas indirectas sobre barra ϕ'_ij

barrra 3-2
Momento
⎡ 2.087 ⎤
UM (a)
uM ≔ ―――― Mx ≔ uM ⋅ 5 = ⎢ 1.628 ⎥
‖UM (a)‖ ⎢⎣ −4.242 ⎥⎦

Monmento en ejes Globales_en ejes locales de la barra

⎡ Mu ⎤ ⎡ 0 ⎤
Mu45 ≔ Rxu32 ⋅ Mx ⎢ Mv ≔ Mu45 = −4.326 ⎥
⎥ ⎢
⎢⎣ Mw ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣ −2.507 ⎥⎦
Fuerzas de equilibrio
ΣM32 ＝ 0 ΣM23 ＝ 0
Mw
Fv2 ≔ −―― = 0.306 Fv3 ≔ −Fv2 = −0.306
L32
Mv
Fw2 ≔ ―― = −0.528 Fw3 ≔ −Fw2 = 0.528
L32
Ejes locales
⎡ 0 ⎤ ⎡ 0 ⎤ ⎡ 0 ⎤ ⎡ 0 ⎤
FlL23 ≔ ⎢ Fw3 ⎥ = ⎢ 0.528 ⎥ FlL32 ≔ ⎢ Fw2 ⎥ = ⎢ −0.528 ⎥
⎢⎣ Fv3 ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣ −0.306 ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣ Fv2 ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣ 0.306 ⎥⎦
Ejes globales
⎡ 0.082 ⎤ ⎡ −0.082 ⎤
T T
FG23 ≔ Rxu32 ⋅ FlL23 = 0.313 ⎢ ⎥ FG32 ≔ Rxu32 ⋅ FlL32 = ⎢ −0.313 ⎥
⎢⎣ 0.518 ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣ −0.518 ⎥⎦
barrra 1-3
Carga distribuida
Resolviendo la carga q en x,y,z U234
U234 ≔ U34 ⨯ U32 u234 ≔ ―――
‖U234‖
⎡ 0.233 ⎤ ⎡ 0.393 ⎤ ⎡ lq ⎤
u34 = ⎢ −0.602 ⎥ u234 = ⎢ 0.777 ⎥ uq (lq , mq , nq) ≔ ⎢ mq ⎥
⎢⎣ 0.764 ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣ 0.492 ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣ nq ⎥⎦
de prueba

lq ≔ .1 mq ≔ .2 nq ≔ .3
Restricciones

2 2 2
lq + mq + nq ＝ 1
u34 ⋅ uq (lq , mq , nq) ＝ cos (120°)
Solver Valores

u234 ⋅ uq (lq , mq , nq) ＝ 0

⎡ −0.8867 ⎤ ⎡ −2.66 ⎤
≔ ( lq , mq , nq = ⎢ 0.4619 ⎥
) qx ≔ ⋅ q = 1.386 ⎥
⎢
⎢⎣ −0.0203 ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣ −0.061 ⎥⎦

⎡ −4.655 ⎤
1
Qx ≔ qx ⋅ 3.5 ⋅ ―= ⎢ 2.425 ⎥ resultante
2 ⎢⎣ −0.107 ⎥⎦
2 1
g≔― ⋅ 3.5 + (L34 − 3.5) = 6.172 h ≔ ―⋅ 3.5 = 1.167
3 3
⎡ 0.74 ⎤ ⎡ 3.915 ⎤
Qx ⋅ h Qx ⋅ g
ϕ43 ≔ −―― = ⎢ −0.385 ⎥ ϕ34 ≔ −――= ⎢ −2.039 ⎥
L34 ⎢⎣ 0.017 ⎥⎦ L34 ⎢⎣ 0.09 ⎥⎦
FUERZAS NODALES POR MALA FABRICACIÓN
-7-
 UNIV. CONDORI GUTIERREZ DANIEL - Resolución 1E. Parcial 2da Instancia #CIV3306- 4/ 5/ 2016

FUERZAS NODALES POR MALA FABRICACIÓN

BARRA 1-2
⎡ ϕ12 ⎤ ⎡ K2_11 K_12 ⎤ ⎡ ∆12 ⎤
⎢⎣ ϕ21 ⎥⎦ ＝ ⎢⎣ K_21 K1_22 ⎥⎦ ⋅ ⎢⎣ ∆21 ⎥⎦
⎡ 3 ⎤
⎢ ――
1000 ⎥ ⎡0⎤
∆21 ≔ ⎢ 0 ⎥ ∆12 ≔ ⎢ 0 ⎥
⎢ ⎥ ⎢⎣ 0 ⎥⎦
⎣ 0 ⎦

K1 ≔ augment (K2_11 , K_12)

J ≔ stack (∆12 , ∆21)
K2 ≔ augment (K_21 , K1_22)
K ≔ stack (K1 , K2)
⎡ 9240 0 0 −9240 0 0 ⎤ ⎡0 ⎤
⎢ 0 0 0 0 0 0⎥ ⎢0 ⎥
⎢ 0 0 0 0 0 0⎥ ⎢0 ⎥
K=⎢ J=⎢
−9240 0 0 9240 0 0 ⎥ 0.003 ⎥
⎢ 0 0 0 0 0 0⎥ ⎢0 ⎥
⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥
⎣ 0 0 0 0 0 0⎦ ⎣0 ⎦
⎡ 693 ⎤
−
⎡ x12 ⎤ ⎢ ―― 25 ⎥
⎢ y12 ⎥ ⎢ 0 ⎥
⎢ z12 ⎥ ⎢ ⎥
0
⎢ x21 ⎥ ≔ K ⋅ J → 693 ⎥
⎢
⎢ y21 ⎥ ⎢ ―― ⎥
⎢ 25 ⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎣ z21 ⎦ ⎢ 0 ⎥
⎢⎣ 0 ⎥⎦

⎡ x12 ⎤ ⎡ −27.72 ⎤ ⎡ x21 ⎤ ⎡ 27.72 ⎤

ϕMF_41 ≔ ⎢ y12 ⎥ = ⎢ 0 ⎥ ϕMF_14 ≔ ⎢ y21 ⎥ = ⎢ 0 ⎥
⎢⎣ z12 ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣ 0 ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣ z21 ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣ 0 ⎥⎦

Resmen de cargas
Internas
⎡ 3.915 ⎤ ⎡ 3.915 ⎤ ⎡ 0.082 ⎤ ⎡ −0.082 ⎤
ϕ34 = −2.039 ϕ34 = ⎢ −2.039 ⎥
⎢ ⎥ ϕ23 ≔ FG23 = 0.313 ⎥
⎢ ϕ32 ≔ FG32 = ⎢ −0.313 ⎥
⎢⎣ 0.09 ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣ 0.09 ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣ 0.518 ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣ −0.518 ⎥⎦

Error de fabricación
⎡ 27.72 ⎤ ⎡ −27.72 ⎤
ϕMF_14 = ⎢ 0 ⎥ ϕMF_41 = ⎢ 0 ⎥
⎢⎣ 0 ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣ 0 ⎥⎦

CARGA EN NUDOS (ESTADO FIJO)

-8-
UNIV. CONDORI GUTIERREZ DANIEL - Resolución 1E. Parcial 2da Instancia #CIV3306- 4/ 5/ 2016

CARGA EN NUDOS (ESTADO FIJO)

Nudo 1
Carga acumulada ϕA_i
Carga directa ϕD_i
⎡0⎤
ϕD_1 = ⎢ 0 ⎥
⎢⎣ 0 ⎥⎦
Sematoria de cargas del estado fijo ΣjϕF_ij
ΣϕF_33 ≔ ϕ34 + ϕ32
ϕA_1 ≔ ϕD_1 − ΣϕF_33
⎡ −3.833 ⎤
ϕA_1 = ⎢ 2.352 ⎥
⎢⎣ 0.428 ⎥⎦

⎡ 3.833 ⎤
ϕRR ≔ −ϕA_1 = ⎢ −2.352 ⎥ ϕRδ ≔
⎢⎣ −0.428 ⎥⎦

Nudo 2
Carga acumulada ϕA_i
Carga directa ϕD_i
⎡0⎤
ϕD_2 = ⎢ 0 ⎥
⎢⎣ 0 ⎥⎦
Sematoria de cargas del estado fijo ΣjϕF_ij
ΣϕF_22 ≔ −FG23
ϕA_1 ≔ ϕD_2 − ΣϕF_22
⎡ 0.082 ⎤
ϕA_1 = ⎢ 0.313 ⎥
⎢⎣ 0.518 ⎥⎦

⎡ −0.082 ⎤
ϕRR ≔ −ϕA_1 = ⎢ −0.313 ⎥ ϕRδ ≔
⎢⎣ −0.518 ⎥⎦

-9-