You are on page 1of 65

Designing Aluminum Structures

Aluminum Structural
Member Design

Randy Kissell, P.E.


TGB Partnership

Outline
1 Introduction
2 Aluminum alloys and tempers
3 Aluminum material properties
4 Aluminum structural design overview
5 Axial tension
6 Axial compression
7 Flexure

Designing Aluminum Structural Members 2

1
Designing Aluminum Structures

1. Introduction
Why learn aluminum structural design?
To design aluminum structures
To better understand steel structural design

Designing Aluminum Structures 3

Examples of Aluminum Structures


Curtain walls and storefronts
Roofing and canopies
Space frames
Tanks and vessels (corrosive & cryogenic)
Portable structures (scaffolding, ladders)
Highway products (signs, light poles,
bridge rail)

Designing Aluminum Structures 4

2
Designing Aluminum Structures

Science Land Egg (164’ wide)

courtesy of Temcor
Designing Aluminum Structures 5

Science Land Egg

courtesy of Temcor
Designing Aluminum Structures 6

3
Designing Aluminum Structures

The Aluminum Association


Founded in 1933, 50+ members are the
major US producers
AA writes most standards on aluminum;
has worldwide influence
Contact: www.aluminum.org
1525 Wilson Blvd, Suite 600
Arlington, VA 22209
703-358-2960; pubs 301-645-0756
Designing Aluminum Structures 7

2010 Aluminum Design Manual

Designing Aluminum Structures 8

4
Designing Aluminum Structures

Aluminum Design Manual (ADM)


Now issued every 5 years
Latest edition is ADM 2010
Previous editions in 2005, 2000
1st edition (1994) was compilation of
several AA pubs previously issued
separately; most importantly, the
Specification for Aluminum Structures
(SAS)

Designing Aluminum Structures 9

Aluminum Design Manual Contents


The Aluminum Design Manual (ADM)
provides aluminum structural design tools
Part I – Specification for Aluminum Structures
Part II – Commentary
Part III – Design Guide
Part IV – Material Properties
Part V – Section Properties
Part VI – Design Aids
Part VII – Illustrative Examples
Designing Aluminum Structures 10

5
Designing Aluminum Structures

Specification for Aluminum


Structures (SAS)
The Specification for Aluminum Structures
is Part I of the Aluminum Design Manual
SAS is also called “the Aluminum
Specification”
Adopted in BOCA, UBC, SBC, and IBC
It’s the source of all aluminum structural
design requirements in the US

Designing Aluminum Structures 11

Specification for Aluminum


Structures (SAS)
2010 edition is a major rewrite
It’s a unified Specification, with both:
Allowable Strength Design
 For buildings and bridges
Load and Resistance Factor Design
 For buildings only
 Load factors from ASCE 7 (= 1.2D + 1.6L …)

Designing Aluminum Structures 12

6
Designing Aluminum Structures

2010 Specification for


Aluminum Structures (SAS)
A. General Provisions
B. Design Requirements
C. Design for Stability
D. Design of Members for Tension
E. Design of Members for Compression
F. Design of Members for Flexure
G. Design of Members for Shear
H. Design of Members for Combined Forces and
Torsion
J. Design of Connections
Designing Aluminum Structures 13

2010 Specification for


Aluminum Structures (SAS)
L. Design for Serviceability
M. Fabrication and Erection
Appendices
1. Testing
3. Design for Fatigue
4. Design for Fire Conditions
5. Evaluation of Existing Structures
6. Design of Braces for Columns and Beams
New in 2010

Designing Aluminum Structures 14

7
Designing Aluminum Structures

2. Aluminum Alloys and Tempers


Wrought alloy designation system
Aluminum temper designation system
Material specifications

Designing Aluminum Structures 15

Aluminum Isn’t Just One Thing


Like other metals, aluminum comes in
many alloys
Alloy = material with metallic properties,
composed of 2 or more elements, of which
at least one is a metal
Different aluminum alloys can have very
different properties
Alloying elements are usually < 5%

Designing Aluminum Structures 16

8
Designing Aluminum Structures

Alloys
Alloys of iron are called “steel”
Carbon < 0.5% or it’s cast iron
C, Cr, Ni, Mb, Cu, Ti used
Alloys of aluminum are called “aluminum
alloys”
Si, Fe, Cu, Mn, Mg, Cr, Ni, Zn, Ti used

Designing Aluminum Structures 17

Designating Aluminum vs. Steel


Steel is identified by ASTM no. and grade
Example: ASTM A 709 Grade 50
Steel ASTM specs are for one alloy and a few
products (for example, shapes and plate)
Aluminum is identified by AA no., temper,
and product
Example: 6061-T6 sheet
Aluminum ASTM specs are for many alloys
and one product (e.g., ASTM B 209)

Designing Aluminum Structures 18

9
Designing Aluminum Structures

Wrought Alloy Designation System


Number Main Alloy Strength Corrosion
1xxx > 99% Al Fair Excellent
2xxx Cu High Fair
3xxx Mn Fair Good
4xxx Si Good Good
5xxx Mg Good Good
6xxx Mg Si Good Good
7xxx Zn High Fair
8xxx others
Designing Aluminum Structures 19

Wrought Alloy Key


1st digit denotes main alloying element
3rd and 4th digits are sequentially assigned
2nd digit denotes a variation
Example:
2319 is AlCu alloy (2xxx), variation on 2219
2319 composition is identical to 2219 except
slightly more Ti (grain refiner to improve weld
strength); both have 6.3% Cu

Designing Aluminum Structures 20

10
Designing Aluminum Structures

1xxx Alloys (pure Al)


Common uses:
Electrical conductors
Corrosive environments
Examples
1060 (99.60% aluminum)
1100 (99.00% aluminum)
Pro: corrosion resistant, good conductors
Con: Not very strong
Designing Aluminum Structures 21

2xxx Alloys (Al-Cu)


Common Uses
Aircraft parts, skins
Fasteners
Example
2024
Pro: Strong
Con: Not very corrosion resistant; hard to
weld
Designing Aluminum Structures 22

11
Designing Aluminum Structures

3xxx Alloys (Al-Mn)


Common Uses
Roofing and siding
Gutters and downspouts
Examples
3003, 3004, 3105
Pro: Formable, good corrosion resistance
Con: Not that strong

Designing Aluminum Structures 23

4xxx Alloys (Al-Si)


Common Uses
Welding and brazing filler metal
Example
4043
Pro: Flows well
Con: Lower ductility

Designing Aluminum Structures 24

12
Designing Aluminum Structures

5xxx Alloys (Al-Mg)


Common Uses
Marine applications
Welded plate structures
Examples
5052, 5083
Pro: Strong, even when welded
Con: Hard to extrude; those with 3%+ Mg
can have corrosion resistance issues
Designing Aluminum Structures 25

6xxx Alloys (Al-Mg2Si)


Common Uses
Structural shapes
Pipe
Examples
6061, 6063
Pro: Good combination of strength and
corrosion resistance, very extrudable
Con: Lose considerable strength when
welded
Designing Aluminum Structures 26

13
Designing Aluminum Structures

7xxx Alloys (Al-Zn)


Common Uses
Aircraft parts
Two classes
With copper (example: 7075)
Without copper (example: 7005)
Pro: Very strong (7178-T6 Ftu = 84 ksi)
Con: Not very corrosion resistant;
hard to weld
Designing Aluminum Structures 27

How Alloys are Strengthened


Alloying elements (Mg is good example)
Treatment:
Strain hardening (cold working)
Heat treatment
Heat treatable: 2xxx, 6xxx, 7xxx
Non-heat treatable: 1xxx, 3xxx, 5xxx

Designing Aluminum Structures 28

14
Designing Aluminum Structures

Annealed Condition
Before tempering, alloys start in the
annealed condition (-O suffix)
Annealed condition is weakest but most
ductile
Tempering increases strength, but
decreases ductility
Most alloys are annealed by heating to
650oF (melting point is about 1100oF)

Designing Aluminum Structures 29

Strain Hardening
Mechanical deformation at ambient temps
For sheet and plate, deformation is by
rolling to reduce the thickness
Some non-heat treatable alloys undergo a
stabilization heat treatment
Purpose: to prevent age softening
Only used for some Al-Mg (5xxx) alloys

Designing Aluminum Structures 30

15
Designing Aluminum Structures

Strain Hardened Tempers


Temper Ftu (ksi) Description
5052-O 25 Annealed
5052-H32 31 ¼ hard
5052-H34 34 ½ hard
5052-H36 37 ¾ hard
5052-H38 39 Full hard

Designing Aluminum Structures 31

Effect of Strain Hardening 5052

Designing Aluminum Structures 32

16
Designing Aluminum Structures

Heat Treating
1) Annealed material is
solution heat treated
6061-O is heated to 990oF, then quenched
Resulting temper is 6061-T4
2) Solution heat treated material is
precipitation heat treated (artificially aged)
6061-T4 is heated to 350oF and held for 8 hrs
Resulting temper is 6061-T6

Designing Aluminum Structures 33

Heat Treatment Tempers


T1 through T4: naturally aged (6005-T1)
T5 through T9: artificially aged (6063-T6)
Artificial aging makes the stress-strain
curve flatter after yield, which affects the
inelastic buckling strength

Designing Aluminum Structures 34

17
Designing Aluminum Structures

Tempers Summarized
-H is for strain hardened tempers
1xxx, 3xxx, 5xxx alloys
Higher 2nd digit: stronger, less ductile
-T is for heat treated tempers
2xxx, 6xxx, 7xxx alloys
T4 = solution heat treated
T5 and greater = precipitation heat treated

Designing Aluminum Structures 35

ASTM Wrought Aluminum


Specifications
B 209 Sheet and Plate
B 210 Drawn Seamless Tubes
B 211 Bar, Rod, and Wire
B 221 Extruded Bars, Rods, Wire, Profiles
and Tubes
B 241 Seamless Pipe and Seamless
Extruded Tube
B 247 Die Forgings, Hand Forgings,
Rolled Ring Forgings
Designing Aluminum Structures 36

18
Designing Aluminum Structures

ASTM Wrought Aluminum


Specifications
B 308 Standard Structural Profiles
B 316 Rivet and Cold Heading Wire and
Rod
B 429 Extruded Structural Pipe and Tube
B 928 High Magnesium Aluminum Alloy
Sheet and Plate for Marine and Similar
Service (has corrosion resistance reqs)
There are others not included in SAS,
including some used structurally
Designing Aluminum Structures 37

3. Aluminum Material Properties


Strengths
Modulus of Elasticity, Poisson’s Ratio
Ductility
Effect of Welding on Properties

Designing Aluminum Structures 38

19
Designing Aluminum Structures

Aluminum’s Stress-Strain Curve

Stress

Fy
After yield, plastic behavior
Linear region at low strains
slope is E

0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10


0.002 Strain
Designing Aluminum Structures 39

Yield Strength
Aluminum doesn’t exhibit a definite yield
point like mild carbon steel – stress-strain
curve is more like high strength steel’s
0.2% offset is used to define yield
Gage length for yield is 2 in. (50 mm)
Artificially aged tempers have different
shape stress-strain curve vs. non-
artificially aged tempers

Designing Aluminum Structures 40

20
Designing Aluminum Structures

Types of Strengths
Type of Stress Yield Ultimate

Tension Fty Ftu

Compression Fcy 

Shear 0.6Fty Fsu

Designing Aluminum Structures 41

Some Aluminum Alloy Strengths


Alloy-temper, product Fty Ftu
(ksi) (ksi)
5052-H32 sheet & plate 23 31

5083-H116 plate 31 44
< 1.5” thick
6061-T6 extrusions 35 38

6063-T5 extrusions 16 22
< 0.5” thick
Designing Aluminum Structures 42

21
Designing Aluminum Structures

Modulus of Elasticity,
Poisson’s Ratio
Modulus of Elasticity (Young’s Modulus) E
Measures stiffness and buckling strength
Compressive E = 1.02(Tensile E)
Varies by alloy; Ec = 10,100 to 10,900 ksi for
SAS alloys
Compares to 29,000 ksi for steel
Poisson’s ratio ν
Average value = 0.33
Shear Modulus G = 3800 ksi = E/[2(1+ ν)]
Designing Aluminum Structures 43

Ductility
Ductility : the ability of a material to
withstand plastic strain before rupture
Fracture Toughness: Aluminum doesn’t
have a transition temperature like steel
Elongation (e)
Notch-Yield Ratio =
(Ftu of standard notched specimens)/Fty
If notch-yield ratio > 1, that’s good
Designing Aluminum Structures 44

22
Designing Aluminum Structures

Effect of Welding
Other than alloying, strength comes from
strain hardening or artificial aging
Heating (like welding) erases these effects
So welding reduces strengths:
For -H tempers, to annealed (-O)
For -T tempers, to ≈ solution heat treated(-T4)
Reduction is least for 5xxx alloys
Some 2xxx, 7xxx aren’t weldable
Designing Aluminum Structures 45

Welded Strengths
Welded strengths are in SAS Table A.3.5
Notation: add w to subscript
Ftuw = welded Ftu
AWS D1.2 Table 3.2 gives same Ftuw as
SAS Table A.3.5
To qualify groove weld procedures, Ftuw must
be achieved

Designing Aluminum Structures 46

23
Designing Aluminum Structures

Effect of Welding on Strength

Designing Aluminum Structures 47

4. Aluminum Structural
Design Overview
Limit states
Strength limit state design:
Allowable Strength Design (ASD)
Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD)
Analysis

Designing Aluminum Structures 48

24
Designing Aluminum Structures

Limit States
A structural engineer considers limit states
Static strength
 available strength > required strength
Serviceability (deflection, vibration, etc.)
Fatigue

Designing Aluminum Structures 49

What a Structural Engineer Does


Analysis: determine forces, moments in
the structure (required strength)
Use the same methods for all materials
But beware: since aluminum is more flexible
than steel, 2nd order effects may be more
significant
Design: proportion the aluminum structure
to safely resist the loads (provide available
strength)
Designing Aluminum Structures 50

25
Designing Aluminum Structures

ASD vs. LRFD


Allowable Strength Design (ASD):
(strength)/(safety factor) > load effect
allowable strength > load effect
Load & Resistance Factor Design (LRFD):
(strength)(resistance factor) > (load
factor)(load effect)
design strength > (load factor)(load effect)
The difference is load factors

Designing Aluminum Structures 51

Safety/Resistance Factors for


Aluminum Building Structures
Limit State Safety Resistance
Factor Ω Factor 
Yield Ω = 1.65  = 0.90

Rupture Ω = 1.95  = 0.75

Fastener 1.2Ω = 2.34  = 0.65


rupture
Designing Aluminum Structures 52

26
Designing Aluminum Structures

Aluminum Safety Factors


Stress type yielding buckling or rupture

Axial tension 1.65 1.95

Bending tension 1.65 1.95

Axial compression 1.65 1.65

Bending compression 1.65 1.65

Shear 1.65 1.65

Designing Aluminum Structures 53

SAS Section C.2: Analysis


Must Account for:
Axial, flexural, and shear deformations
Second-order effects (P-∆ and P-δ)
Geometric imperfections (use construction
and fabrication tolerances)
Effect of inelasticity on flexural stiffness
(use τb I in place of I )
Uncertainty in stiffness and strength (use
0.8E in place of E, i.e. 8000 ksi)
Designing Aluminum Structures 54

27
Designing Aluminum Structures

Loads for Analysis


For LRFD, use load factors prescribed for
LRFD and use the resulting forces and
moments produced by the analysis to
determine the required strengths Pr
For ASD, use 1.6 times the ASD loads,
then divide the resulting forces and
moments produced by the analysis by 1.6
to determine the required strengths Pr

Designing Aluminum Structures 55

Loads for Analysis


Design LRFD ASD
method
Load 1.2D + 1.6L 1.6(D + L)
Combination
Analysis PLRFD PASD
Results
Required PLRFD PASD /1.6
Strength
Available Rn Rn /Ω
Strength e.g. 28.5 ksi e.g. 19.5 ksi
Designing Aluminum Structures 56

28
Designing Aluminum Structures

Second-Order Analysis
Many structural analysis applications
include 2nd order effects
Most applications address P-Δ (effect of loads
acting on the displaced location of joints)
Some don’t include P-δ (effect of loads acting
on the deflected shape of member between
joints)
To check, compare results to benchmark
examples given in 2005 AISC Spec
commentary Section 7.3
Designing Aluminum Structures 57

P-Δ and P-δ Effects


P-Δ P-δ
P P
Δ

P P
Designing Aluminum Structures 58

29
Designing Aluminum Structures

Geometric Imperfections
Tolerance on
out-of-plumbness
specified by the
designer
This is the
structure
analyzed

Designing Aluminum Structures 59

Effect of Inelasticity
on Flexural Stiffness
Factor τb on flexural stiffness for
inelasticity is a function of how highly
stressed the structure is
τb ranges from:
1.0 for Pr < 0.5Py /α = 0.31Py for ASD
0 for Pr = Py /α = 0.62Py for ASD
In between, τb = (4α Pr /Py)(1 – α Pr /Py)
α = 1.0 for LRFD, 1.6 for ASD

Designing Aluminum Structures 60

30
Designing Aluminum Structures

5. Axial Tension
SAS Chapter D covers axial tension
Tensile limit state is reached at:
Rupture on the net section (Ω = 1.95)
Yield on the gross section (Ω = 1.65)
Same criteria as in AISC for steel
It’s assumed that the net section exists
only over a short portion of the member
length, so yielding there won’t cause much
elongation
Designing Aluminum Structures 61

Net and Gross Sections

Rupture on the Yield on the


net section gross section

Designing Aluminum Structures 62

31
Designing Aluminum Structures

Allowable Tension Stress Example


6061-T6 Extrusions:
Fty = 35 ksi, Ftu = 38 ksi
Allowable stress on the gross section:
F /Ω = Fty /Ω = 35/1.65 = 21.2 ksi
Allowable stress on the net section:
F /Ω = Ftu /(Ω kt) = 38/[(1.95)(1.0)] = 19.5 ksi
Net section always governs

Designing Aluminum Structures 63

Allowable Tensile Stress Example


6063-T5 Extrusions:
Fty = 16 ksi, Ftu = 22 ksi
Allowable stress on the gross section:
F /Ω = Fty / Ω = 16/1.65 = 9.7 ksi
Allowable stress on the net section:
F /Ω = Ftu /(Ω kt) = 22/[1.95)(1.0)] = 11.3 ksi
Gross or net section could govern

Designing Aluminum Structures 64

32
Designing Aluminum Structures

Tension Coefficient kt
kt is a notch sensitivity factor
For alloys in SAS, kt > 1 only for :
2014-T6, 6005-T5, and 6105-T5, kt = 1.25
6066-T6 and 6070-T6, kt = 1.1

Designing Aluminum Structures 65

LRFD Tension Example


6061-T6 Extrusions:
Fty = 35 ksi, Ftu = 38 ksi
LRFD design stress on the gross section:
F = y Fty = 0.90(35) = 31.5 ksi
LRFD design stress on the net section:
F = u Ftu /kt = 0.75(38)/(1.0) = 28.5 ksi
So just like ASD, net section governs.

Designing Aluminum Structures 66

33
Designing Aluminum Structures

Shear Lag in a Channel

flanges are not connected


and not fully stressed at member end

Designing Aluminum Structures 67

Effective Area in Tension (Ae)


SAS Section D.3.2
If all parts of x-section aren’t connected to
joint, full net area isn’t effective in tension
Example: Channel bolted through its web
only (not flanges)
SAS addresses angles, channels, tees,
zees, and I beams

Designing Aluminum Structures 68

34
Designing Aluminum Structures

Effective Net Area Ae


Effective net area =

where
An = net area
x = eccentricity in x direction
y = eccentricity in y direction
L = length of connection in load direction
Ae > An of connected elements

Designing Aluminum Structures 69

Effective Net Area Example


For a tee bolted through its flange only:

neutral axis
of tee

Other examples are in ADM Part II D.3.2


When only a single row of fasteners is
used, L = 0 and Ae = An of connected
elements only
Designing Aluminum Structures 70

35
Designing Aluminum Structures

6. Axial Compression
Column = axial compression member
SAS Chapter E addresses columns
Column strength is the least of:
Member buckling strength
Local buckling strength
Interaction between member buckling and
local buckling strengths

Designing Aluminum Structures 71

Member Strength
Member’s compressive limit states are
Yielding (squashing)
Inelastic buckling
Elastic buckling

Designing Aluminum Structures 72

36
Designing Aluminum Structures

Yielding, Inelastic Buckling, and


Elastic Buckling

Designing Aluminum Structures 73

Elastic Buckling
Elastic buckling stress = Fe = 0.852E / 2
E is the only material property that elastic
buckling strength depends on
 = kL/r = largest slenderness ratio for
buckling about any axis
All other things equal, Fe for aluminum is
1/3 Fe for steel since Ea = Es /3

Designing Aluminum Structures 74

37
Designing Aluminum Structures

Inelastic Buckling
Inelastic buckling strength =
0.85[Bc - Dc(kL/r)]
Bc (y intercept) and Dc (slope) are buckling
constants that depend on Fcy and E
Calculate them by SAS equations in:
Table B.4.1 for O, H, T1 thru T4 tempers
Table B.4.2 for T5 thru T9 tempers
Bc and Dc are tabulated in ADM Part VI
Table 1-1 (unwelded) and 1-2 (welded)
Designing Aluminum Structures 75

Member Buckling
0.85 factor accounts for member out-of-
straightness
k = 1 for all members (see Section C.3)
Allowable member buckling strengths
really haven’t changed from 2005 SAS:

Designing Aluminum Structures 76

38
Designing Aluminum Structures

Yielding
Yield strength is simply Fcy
Yielding depends only on material strength

Designing Aluminum Structures 77

Buckling Strength vs. Slenderness


Stress
Yielding
Fc = Fcy Inelastic Buckling
Fc = 0.85(Bc – DckL/r)

Elastic Buckling
Fc = 0.85π2E/(kL/r)2

Slenderness ratio kL/r

Designing Aluminum Structures 78

39
Designing Aluminum Structures

Slenderness Limits S1, S2


S1 is the slenderness for which yield
strength = inelastic buckling strength
S2 is the slenderness for which inelastic
buckling strength= elastic buckling
strength
Slenderness ratios (kL/r) are not limited by
S1 and S2; S1 and S2 are just the limits of
applicability of compressive strength
equations

Designing Aluminum Structures 79

6061-T6 Column Strength


ADM Part VI, Table 2-19 gives allowable
stresses based on SAS rules
Inelastic buckling allowable is always
< Fcy /Ω = 21.2 ksi, so S1 = 0
For kL/r < 66, Fc /Ω = 20.3 – 0.127(kL/r)
For kL/r > 66, Fc /Ω = 51,350/(kL/r)2
S2 = Cc = 66

Designing Aluminum Structures 80

40
Designing Aluminum Structures

Slenderness Limits Demonstrated


For kL/r = S2 = 66:
Inelastic buckling allowable stress is
20.3 – 0.127(66) = 11.9 ksi
Elastic buckling allowable stress is
51,350/(66)2 = 11.8 ksi ≈ 11.9 ksi
Difference is only due to round off in allowable
stress expressions

Designing Aluminum Structures 81

Column Example
What’s the allowable member buckling
compressive stress for a column given:
6061-T6
Pinned-end support conditions
Length = 95”
Shape is AA Std I 6 x 4.03
rx = 2.53”, ry = 0.95”
No bracing

Designing Aluminum Structures 82

41
Designing Aluminum Structures

Column Example Answer


Column will buckle about minor axis since
slenderness ratio kL/r is larger there:
kL/r = (1.0)(95”)/0.95” = 100
Since kL/r = 100 > S2 = 66 (buckling is
elastic), so
Fc /Ω = 51,350/(100)2 = 5.1 ksi
We need to check local buckling, too

Designing Aluminum Structures 83

Flexural & Torsional


Column Buckling
Deflected shape Undeflected shape

Flexural Buckling Torsional Buckling


(lateral movement) (twisting)

Designing Aluminum Structures 84

42
Designing Aluminum Structures

Types of Column Member Buckling


Flexural (lateral movement)
Torsional (twisting about longitudinal axis)
Torsional-flexural (combined effect)

Designing Aluminum Structures 85

Local Buckling
Local buckling is buckling of an element of
a shape (i.e., a flange or web)
Buckle length ≈ width of element
If local buckling strength of all elements >
yield strength, shape is compact, and local
buckling isn’t a concern
Since aluminum shapes vary widely
(extrusions, cold-formed shapes), we can’t
assume aluminum shapes are compact
Designing Aluminum Structures 86

43
Designing Aluminum Structures

Local Buckling

buckled
shape

Web Buckling Flange Buckling

Designing Aluminum Structures 87

Elements of Shapes are Called:


Element
Flange or web
Component
Plate

Designing Aluminum Structures 88

44
Designing Aluminum Structures

Dividing a Shape Into Elements

Designing Aluminum Structures 89

Elements of Shapes
Cross sections can be subdivided into two
types of elements:
Flat elements (slenderness = b/t )
Curved elements (slenderness = Rb /t )
Longitudinal edges of elements can be:
Free
Connected to another element
Stiffened with a small element

Designing Aluminum Structures 90

45
Designing Aluminum Structures

Element Support Conditions


supported edge stiffened edge free edge

Designing Aluminum Structures 91

Elements in Uniform Compression


Addressed by the SAS
B.5.4.1 Flat element supported on one edge
(flange of an I beam or channel)
B.5.4.2 Flat element supported on both edges
(web of I beam or channel)
B.5.4.3 Flat element supported on one edge,
other edge with stiffener
B.5.4.4 Flat element supported on both edges,
with an intermediate stiffener
B.5.4.5 Curved element supported on both edges
Designing Aluminum Structures 92

46
Designing Aluminum Structures

Local Buckling Strengths


Yielding Fc = Fcy
Inelastic buckling Fc = Bp – Dp (kb/t)
Elastic buckling Fc = 2E /(kb/t)2
Postbuckling Fc = k2 (BpE)1/2/ (kb/t)
k = edge support factor
k = 5.0 for elements supported on 1 edge
k = 1.6 for elements supported on both edges
k2 = postbuckling factor ≈ 2 (Table B.4.3)
Designing Aluminum Structures 93

Postbuckling Strength
Only elements of shapes have
postbuckling strength – members do not
Postbuckling strength is not recognized by
SAS for all types of elements
Postbuckling strength is only recognized
for elements so slender that they buckle
elastically

Designing Aluminum Structures 94

47
Designing Aluminum Structures

Element Strength vs. Slenderness

Designing Aluminum Structures 95

6061-T6 Column Flange Strength


Yielding Fc /Ω = Fcy /Ω
S1 = 6.7 Fc /Ω = 35/1.65 = 21.2 ksi
Inelastic buckling Fc /Ω = [Bp – Dp (5.0b/t)]/ Ω
S2 = 12 Fc /Ω = 27.3 – 0.910b/t
Elastic buckling Fc /Ω = [2E /(5.0b/t)2]/ Ω
S2 = 10.5 Fc /Ω = 2417 /(b/t)2
Postbuckling Fc /Ω = [k2 (BpE)1/2/(5.0b/t)]/ Ω
Fc /Ω = 186 /(b/t)

Designing Aluminum Structures 96

48
Designing Aluminum Structures

Column Local Buckling - Flange


Shape is AA Std I 6 x 4.03:
4”
flange slenderness = b/t
b/t = (4” – 0.19”)/2/0.29” = 6.6
S1 = 6.7 > 6.6 so
Fc /Ω = 21.2 ksi 0.19” 6”

R
0.29”

Designing Aluminum Structures 97

Column Local Buckling - Web


Shape is AA Std I 6 x 4.03:
4”
web slenderness = b/t
b/t = [6” – 2(0.29”)]/0.19” = 28.5
S1 = 7.6 < 28.5 < 33 = S2, so
Fc /Ω = 27.3 – 0.291b/t = 0.19” 6”

Fc /Ω = 27.3 – 0.291(28.5) = 19.0 R


0.29”

Designing Aluminum Structures 98

49
Designing Aluminum Structures

Weighted Average Allowable


Compressive Stress of I 6 x 4.03
Fcf /Ω = 21.2 ksi
4”
Fcw /Ω = 19.0 ksi
Af = 2(4”)(0.29”)
= 2.32 in2
Aw = (6” – 2(0.29”))(0.19”)
0.19” 6”
= 1.03 in2
Fca /Ω = 21.2(2.32) + 19.0(1.03) R
0.29”
(2.32 + 1.03)
= 20.5 ksi

Designing Aluminum Structures 99

The local buckling mode is


shown to the right. Note,
that there is no translation
at the folds, only rotation.
The load factor is 0.10, so
elastic critical local
buckling (Pcrl) occurs at
0.10Py in this member.

Designing Aluminum Structures 100

50
Designing Aluminum Structures

Local Buckling/Member Buckling


Interaction
If the elastic local buckling stress < member
buckling stress, member buckling stress must be
reduced (SAS Section E.5)
Reduced member buckling stress is Frc:
Frc = (Fc)1/3(Fe)2/3
where Fc = elastic member buckling stress
Fe = elastic local buckling stress
This only governs if elements are very slender
and postbuckling strength is used

Designing Aluminum Structures 101

Local/Member Buckling
Interaction Example
Flange elastic buckling stress Fef

Web elastic buckling stress Few

Designing Aluminum Structures 102

51
Designing Aluminum Structures

Local/Member Buckling
Interaction Example
Member elastic buckling stress Fc

Since Fe = 47.9 ksi > Fc = 8.5 ksi, the


member buckling strength need not be
reduced for interaction between local and
member buckling

Designing Aluminum Structures 103

Column Design Summary


Column strength is the least of:
Member buckling strength
Local buckling strength
Interaction between member and local
buckling strengths

Designing Aluminum Structures 104

52
Designing Aluminum Structures

7. Flexure
M M

Beam = flexural member


Beam strength is limited by:
Rupture (Ω = 1.95)
Yielding (Ω = 1.65)
Buckling (local or member) (Ω = 1.65)
Buckling can be:
Flexural stress buckling
Shear stress buckling

Designing Aluminum Structures 105

Yielding and Rupture in Beams


Fy Fy Fu

neutral axis My Mp Mu

Fy Fy Fu

cross section yielding onset full yielding rupture

Designing Aluminum Structures 106

53
Designing Aluminum Structures

Shape Factors
Sec. Element Mp /My Mu /My
No.
F.8.1.1 Uniform stress 1.0 1.0

F.6.1 Curved element 1.17 1.24

F.8.1.2 Flexural stress 1.30 1.42

Designing Aluminum Structures 107

Yielding and Rupture Example


6061-T6 extruded round tube
For rupture, Fb /Ω = 1.24 Ftu /(kt Ω)
for 6061-T6, Fb /Ω = 1.24(38)/[(1.0)(1.95)]
Fb /Ω = 24 ksi
For yielding, Fb /Ω = 1.17 Fty / Ω
for 6061-T6, Fb /Ω = 1.17(35)/(1.65)
Fb /Ω = 25 ksi
So Fb /Ω = 24 ksi (the lesser of the two)

Designing Aluminum Structures 108

54
Designing Aluminum Structures

Major Axis Bending


Load

Top flange
Undeflected shape
(in compression)
buckles laterally

Deflected shape
at ultimate load

Bottom flange
(in tension) stays
In place
Lateral-torsional buckling

Designing Aluminum Structures 109

Weak Axis Bending


Load

Undeflected shape

Deflected shape
at ultimate load

Lateral buckling usually does not govern

Designing Aluminum Structures 110

55
Designing Aluminum Structures

Lateral-Torsional Buckling (LTB)


Section Shape Slenderness

F.2 Open
shapes

F.3 Closed
shapes

F.4 Rectangular
bars
F.5 Single Ls
Designing Aluminum Structures 111

Slenderness Ratio for Beams


Slenderness ratio depends on unbraced
beam length Lb
Lb = length between bracing points or
between a brace point and the free end of
a cantilever beam. Braces:
restrain the compression flange against lateral
movement, or
restrain the cross section against twisting
Appendix 6 addresses brace design
Designing Aluminum Structures 112

56
Designing Aluminum Structures

6061-T6 I-Beam Strength


Inelastic buckling
Fc /Ω = [Bc – Dc (1.2Lb /ry)]/Ω
S2 = 79 Fc /Ω = 23.9 – 0.124 (Lb /ry)
Elastic buckling
Fc /Ω = [2E /(1.2Lb /ry)2]/ Ω
Fc /Ω = 87,000 /(Lb /ry)2

Designing Aluminum Structures 113

LTB Example
What’s the allowable LTB stress for a
beam given:
6061-T6
Length = 86”
Shape is AA Standard I 12 x 14.3
ry = 1.71”
No bracing

Designing Aluminum Structures 114

57
Designing Aluminum Structures

LTB Example Answer


Slenderness ratio is
Lb /ry = 86”/1.71” = 50.3
Since Lb /ry = 50.3 < 79 = S2,
Fc /Ω = 23.9 – 0.124 (Lb /ry)
Fc /Ω = 23.9 – 0.124 (50.3) = 17.7 ksi
Remember to check local buckling, too

Designing Aluminum Structures 115

Moment Variation Over


Beam Length (Cb)
If moment varies along the beam, account
for this using Cb. For doubly sym sections:
Cb = 12.5Mmax
(2.5Mmax + 3MA + 4MB + 3MC)

where MA = moment at ¼ point


MB = moment at midpoint
MC = moment at ¾ point
Designing Aluminum Structures 116

58
Designing Aluminum Structures

Moment Gradient Factor Cb


M M
Cb = 1.0 (min)
M

Cb = 2.3 M

w
Cb = 1.14

Designing Aluminum Structures 117

Moment Gradient Factor Cb


Replace unbraced length Lb with Lb /Cb for
tubes and Lb /√Cb for single web beams
So Lb can be reduced to as little as
0.43Lb = Lb /2.3

Designing Aluminum Structures 118

59
Designing Aluminum Structures

Effective ry (= rye)
F.2.1 allows using ry for rye
It’s easy to determine, but conservative
When Lb / ry > 50, it’s worth determining rye
using F.2.2. It’s more work, but more
accurate

Designing Aluminum Structures 119

Transverse Load Location


Load acts toward shear center
(smallest bending strength)

Load applied at neutral axis

Load acts away from shear center


(greatest bending strength)

Designing Aluminum Structures 120

60
Designing Aluminum Structures

rye for Shapes Symmetric


About the Bending Axis
Load applied toward
shear center

Load applied at shear


center, or no load

Load applied away


from shear center

Designing Aluminum Structures 121

I 12 x 14.3 Beam, 200” long


SAS Apply rye Lb /rye Fb /Ω
Section Load (in.) (ksi)
F.2.1 – 1.71 117 6.4
F.2.2.1 above s.c. 1.80 111 7.0
F.2.2.3 at s.c. 2.08 96 9.4

F.2.2.1 at s.c. 2.10 95 9.6


F.2.2.1 below s.c. 2.45 82 13.1

Designing Aluminum Structures 122

61
Designing Aluminum Structures

Local Buckling of Beam Elements


Beam elements in uniform compression
(flanges) are treated like column elements
in uniform compression (see B.5.4)

Designing Aluminum Structures 123

How Can Beam Elements Be


In Uniform Compression?
To be precise, they can’t
But the SAS idealizes elements parallel to
the neutral axis as being in uniform
compression
Example: the flange of an I-beam or
channel - there is some variation in the
compressive stress across the flange
thickness, but it’s neglected

Designing Aluminum Structures 124

62
Designing Aluminum Structures

Beam Flange Stress

Compression
neutral axis
Tension

cross section bending stress

Designing Aluminum Structures 125

Beam Elements in SAS –Elements


in Flexure (Webs)

B.5.5.1 Flat element - both edges supported


(web of I beam or channel)
B.5.5.2 Flat element - compression edge free,
tension edge supported
B.5.5.3 Flat element with a longitudinal stiffener –
both edges supported (see B.5.5.3 for
stiffener requirements

Designing Aluminum Structures 126

63
Designing Aluminum Structures

Compression Bending Strength


Compression bending strength is the
lesser of:
Member buckling strength
Local buckling strength

Designing Aluminum Structures 127

Weighted Average Bending


Strength (SAS F.8.3)
compression side

If
ccf ccw

Iw
ctf ctw

If

tension side

Designing Aluminum Structures 128

64
Designing Aluminum Structures

Thank You
Please contact me with questions
randy.kissell@tgbpartnership.com
919-644-8250
1325 Farmview Rd, Hillsborough, NC 27278
www.tgbpartnership.com
For a more extensive aluminum seminar:
go to www.asce.org/distancelearning; click on
“View a complete list of ASCE courses”, scroll
down alphabetically to “Aluminum Structural
Design ” (or call 800-548-2723)
Designing Aluminum Structures 129

65

You might also like