You are on page 1of 10

Table 1

Name of Zone COVERAGE 1 2 3 4 5


Schemes
Block No. of Village Pop ID of Projected Total Capacity of Flow rate to Mouza Name Longitude Latitude
2011 OHR Population Consumer OHR the OHR,
for 2045 demand considering considering
Full Part Total
considering 25% of the 20 hrs
10% total demand pumping
distribution [(3)*0.25/1000]
loss
ltrs/d m3 m3/hr

A 11 0 7385 31 11259 919511 230 51 Kukurchari (112) 86°-18'-07.50"E 23°-00'-48.00"N


Parsa B 14 0 12355 29 18837 1538329 385 85 Lakhanpur (95) 86°-18'-14.20"E 23°-03'-34.00"N
C 16 0 9341 30 14241 1163054 291 65 Ransi (140) 86°-20'-42.10"E 23°-03'-07.90"N
A 7 0 8554 9 13042 1065064 266 59 Banjora (75) 86°-28'-05.80"E 23°-06'-26.90"N
B Barabazar 21 0 13304 12 20284 1656489 414 92 Raidih(55) 86°-25'-15.80`"E 23°-08'-55.07"N
C 9 0 7874 10 12005 980397 245 54 Baro Mukri (85) 86°-24'-25.00"E 23°-05'-10.12"N
Puryara
D 20 0 13341 11 20340 1661096 415 92 Bamundiha (041) 86°-21'-57.60"E 23°-06'-47.70"N
E 22 0 14790 17 22549 1841512 460 102 Raigara (004) 86°-19'-54.10"E 23°-10'-35.00"N
F 17 0 13051 16 19898 1624988 406 90 Dubrajpur (002) 86°-17'-58.59"E 23°-10'-08.07"N
A 33 0 11153 2 17004 1388667 347 77 Shawda (085/210) 86°-40'-24.40"E 23°-04'-08.57"N
Chepua B 24 0 14571 3 22215 1814244 454 101 Chepua (157) 86°-36'-13.16"E 23°-04'-22.13"N
C 22 0 9020 1 13752 1123086 281 62 Piragarya (105) 86°-41'-48.90"E 23°-01'-04.50"N
A Manbazar -I 29 0 18002 6 27446 2241440 560 125 Kadlagora (050) 86°-36'-24.90"E 23°-05'-53.00"N
Jitujori
B 14 0 18243 5 27814 2271447 568 126 Metyala (045) 86°-35'-07.60"E 23°-07'-15.00"N
A 7 0 7539 4 11494 938686 235 52 Hullung (029)(42) 86°-33'-18.30"E 23°-05'-25.40"N
Bamni
B 9 0 6492 7 9898 808323 202 45 Keshargaria(34) 86°-31'-42.60"E 23°-07'-37.80"N
A 8 0 10723 8 16349 1335128 334 74 Daka Kendu (016) 86°-29'-29.80"E 23°-06'-07.90"N
Damda
B 15 0 13422 13 20463 1671182 418 93 Kesya (009) 86°-27'-52.50"E 23°-08'-05.30"N
A 6 0 14004 15 21351 1743647 436 97 Dharampur (016) 86°-32'-18.60"E 23°-11'-15.70"N
Kenda B Puncha 8 0 12002 25 18298 1494377 374 83 Kenda (017) 86°-30'-08.80"E 23°-12'-15.20"N
C 9 0 7763 18 11836 966576 242 54 Darodi (002) 86°-27'-01.20"E 23°-13'-33.60"N
Name of Zone COVERAGE 1 2 3 4 5
Schemes
Block No. of Village Pop ID of Projected Total Capacity of Flow rate to Mouza Name Longitude Latitude
2011 OHR Population Consumer OHR the OHR,
for 2045 demand considering considering
Full Part Total
considering 25% of the 20 hrs
10% total demand pumping
distribution [(3)*0.25/1000]
loss
ltrs/d m3 m3/hr
bbbba A 6 0 10049 14 15321 1251207 313 70 mmmmm 86°-30'-43.80"E 23°-10'-55.20"N
Table 2

Sl. Item Cost


No. Civil & Mechanical Electrical Instrumentati Total
Pipeline on
1 Raw water
intake
2 Approach bridge
3 Raw water
transmission
main
4 Water treatment
plant
5 Clear water
reservoir cum
pump house
6 Electrical sub-
station
7 Clear water
transmission
main
8 Booster pumping
station no. 1
9 Booster pumping
station no. 2
Base Cost
1 DESIGN NORMS AND CRITERIA
The design norms and criteria adopted are generally in line with Manual for Water
Supply and Treatment published by the Central Public Health and Environmental
Engineering Organization (CPHEEO) and BIS recommendations. Wherever felt
necessary guidelines laid down in other internationally accepted manual/ text books are
followed. Same are further elaborated in respective items of work as enumerated in
subsequent sections.

1.1 Supply Norms


The water demand has been worked out considering per capita water supply rate of 70
litres/capita/day. This is in line with the recommendation of CPHEEO Manual for towns
with piped water supply, but without sewerage system.
This being a rural water supply project, no additional provision towards bulk supply of
water to meet industrial/ commercial demands has been kept. If such demand crops-up
in future, it is expected that it will have its own independent system. However, water will
be supplied to various educational centers, health centers, public places viz. market
places, religious centers, Government offices etc.
On overall perspective an additional provision of 10% of domestic demand has been
considered to meet non-domestic requirements and distribution loss in the system.
No additional provision for fire demand has been considered as the population of
individual settlements is less than 50,000.
Intermittent supply of water to the community is conceived; the total duration of supply is
considered to be 8 hours a day. The period of supply may be judiciously decided
depending on the consumers’ water usage pattern.

1.2 Pressure Requirements


The proposed water supply distribution system will mostly cover areas with rural
characteristics. Minimum pressure requirement of 7m at the consumer end should be
adequate as most of the residential units are expected to be single storied. This is also in
line with the RFP stipulations.

1.3 Peak Factor


Considering variation of water usage pattern with time in a day, the peak factor rate has
been considered as 3.0.

1.4 Pipe Material


All pipes of size 100 mm and above diameter are proposed to be of ductile iron (DI) of
Class K7 conforming to IS:8329 with cement mortar lining inside. For pipe sizes less
than 100 mm dia., plastic pipes [high density polyethylene (HDPE)] of class PE 80 and
pressure rating PN 6 conforming to IS 4984 are proposed to be used.

1.5 Minimum Pipe Size


The minimum pipe size is recommended to be 90 mm dia. (outer) (internal diameter 79.8
mm).

1.6 Hydraulic Design of Pipeline


The hydraulic design of the distribution main is based on hydraulic design criteria i.e.
head loss in transmission and flow velocities. Hydraulic design of the water supply
distribution network has been carried out through computer aided software “Looped
Water Distribution Network Design Program – Version 4 of The World Bank”.
1.6.1 Head Loss Computation
Hazen Williams formula, used to calculate the head loss in straight length of pipe, is
given by :
V = 0.85 * C * R0.63 * S0.54
For circular conduit, the above formula can be expressed as follows :
V = 4.567 * 10-3 * C * d0.63 * S0.54
Q = 1.292 * 10-6 * C * d2.63 * S0.54
Where,
V = velocity in m/sec
Q = flow in m3/hr
C = Hazen Williams roughness coefficient = 130 for DI pipe with cement mortar lining
inside & 140 for HDPE pipe
R = hydraulic mean depth, defined as ratio of cross sectional area and wetted
perimeter
D = pipe diameter in mm
S = slope of hydraulic grade line (i.e. head loss) in m/m
An additional provision of 15% has been kept in the design to account for the head
losses due to various types of fittings, valves etc.
In the hydraulic analysis carried out using “Looped Water Distribution Network Design
Program – Version 4 of The World Bank”, the input length of pipes has been increased
by 15% over the actual pipe lengths (measured lengths) to account for the head loss due
to fittings, valves etc.

1.7 Velocity of Flow


In design of distribution systems, ideally the minimum design velocity should be 0.6m to
prevent the possibility of siltation inside the pipe, which eventually not only increases the
head loss inside pipe, but also increases the risk of corrosion. However, in most of the
cases, it is not possible to maintain such velocity considering the design flow and
minimum pipe size criteria. It is recommended to provide adequate number of washout
(scour) valves at strategic locations to minimize the chance of siltation.

1.8 Pipeline Profile


Pipeline profile is proposed to follow closely to the ground profile, in general at a depth of
1.0m below the ground. Wherever pipelines need to cross any river/ natural waterbodies,
the pipeline will be placed over pipe supporting structures. In such case, the pipe bottom
level is proposed to be placed at least 300 mm above the high water level. In any case
the pipelines are to be laid below the hydraulic grade line (HGL).

1.9 Capacity of Overhead Reservoirs


In discussion with the Client, the capacities of the overhead reservoirs have been
worked out considering 8 hours storage equivalent of the total average water demand
within the command area of the reservoirs inclusive of non-domestic demand and
distribution losses (considered to be 10% in totality).

1.10 Design Criteria for Civil Works


The design of civil works for overhead reservoirs shall be based on the stipulations
mentioned in this note that follows the tender specifications. Specialized interactive and
supplementary design specifications shall be adopted only in the absence of definite
provisions in this note on any particular issue.

1.10.1 Standard Specifications/ Codes of Practice


The design and construction of all its components shall conform to the latest revision
and/ or replacements of the following or any other Indian standard specifications and
codes of practice, in addition to the books of reference listed here :

Specification Description of Specification


IS 456 Code of practice for plain and reinforced concrete
IS 800 Code of practice for general construction in steel
IS 1893 Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures.
IS: 875 (Part 1) Code of practice for building and structures – dead loads
IS: 875 (Part 2) Code of practice for building and structures – imposed
loads
IS: 875 (Part 3) Code of practice for building and structures – wind loads
IS:2911 (Part I Section 2) Code of practice for design and construction of pile
foundations, Part I : concrete piles, section 2 : bored cast-
in-situ piles
IS:1786 Indian standard specifications for cold twisted steel bars for
concrete reinforcement
Specification Description of Specification
IS:3370 Code of practice for concrete structures for storage of
liquids
IS:6403 Code of practice for determination of bearing capacity of
shallow foundations
IS: 8009 Code of practice for calculation of settlements of
foundations
IS: 13920 Ductile detailing of RCC structures subject to seismic
loading

1.10.2 Design Philosophy


The design of the various components of the work shall generally be carried out in
accordance with the technical specifications and relevant IS codes.

1.10.3 Design Parameters


Loading
Dead Load
Sl. No. Item Description Density (MT/cum)
1 Plain concrete 2.2
2 Reinforced concrete 2.5
3 Steel 7.8
4 Earth filling 1.9
Live Load
The live load shall be considered as per IS:875 and the load from the equipment as is
necessary.
Wind Load
The basic wind speed shall be considered as 47 m/sec. The wind load shall be
calculated as per IS:875 part III and shall be as calculated below :
Wind pressure = 0.6Vb2
Where,
Vb = design wind speed = basic wind speed x k1 x k2 xk3
k1 = probability factor (risk coefficient) = 1.07 (refer Table 1, IS 875, Part III)
k2 = terrain height and structure size factor = varies between 1.1 to 1.13 depending on
height of the structure with terrain category 1 and class A (refer Table 2)
k3 = topography factor = 1.0
Thus design wind speed Vb = 47 x 1.07 x (1.1 to 1.13) x 1.0 = 55.32 to 56.83 m/sec
The design wind pressure = 0.6 x Vb 2 = 1836 to 1938 N/m2 = 0.187 to 0.198 T/ m2
Effect of Temperature
Temperature effect shall be considered as per IS:456.
Seismic Load
The site is located in Seismic Zone III. Equivalent static load method using seismic
coefficients as specified in IRS Bridge Rules & as per IS:1893 shall be considered to
compute the horizontal forces for design.
Seismic horizontal coefficients calculated as per IS 1893 are furnished below :
 Zone factor Z = 0.16
 Importance factor I = 1.5
 Response reduction factor R : The value of ‘R’ shall be different for different
component of the structures and their locations. For stability analysis the value of ‘R’
shall be considered as 1.0.
 Sa/g = Acceleration of the structure under first predominant fundamental mode of
vibration and will depend on the corresponding time period of vibration which shall be
obtained from analysis of the whole structure.
 Based on the above analysis the final value of the horizontal seismic coefficient shall
be calculated as per the formula h = z/2 x Sa/g x I/R
 The analysis shall be performed in STAAD computer software.

Earth Pressure
The active earth pressure, passive pressure, dynamic augmentation in active earth
pressure and dynamic decrement in passive earth pressure in designing the
underground structures and foundation shall be considered as given in the IS code.
Load Combination
Structures shall be designed with the following load combinations :
 Combination I : Dead Load (DL) + Live Load (LL)
 Combination II : Combination I + Wind Load (WL)
 Combination III : Combination I + Seismic Force on DL + 50% LL

1.10.4 Material Property


Structural Steel
The grade of steel shall be generally conforming to IS 102 (weldable steel). Steel grade
conforming to E-250 (Fe 410) will be considered in general in design.
Concrete
The grade of concrete shall be M30 in both tank proper part and staging structure of the
OHRs.
Reinforcement Steel
The ductile reinforcement steel shall be uncoated HYSD BAR (Fy-500) conforming to IS
1786.

2 PROPOSED SYSTEM
2.1 Water Supply Zoning
The entire service area within xxx Block has been divided into a number of zones, each
having an overhead reservoir with independent water supply system. An indication of the
proposed water supply zones (total xx nos.) has been given in the RFP as was originally
conceived. Under the present study, a re-thought regarding the zoning of the proposed
water supply system has been given taking into consideration the ground topography,
existing road network, location of the settlements, administrative boundaries of Gram
Panchayats/ Mouzas and physical barriers viz. railway lines and rivers/ streams/ major
drainage courses. Based on these considerations the number of zones proposed is xx,
each having an overhead reservoir with independent water supply system.
Proposed water supply zone delineations with position of the overhead reservoirs is
given in Drg. No. xxxx.
The locations of the overhead reservoirs for each of the water supply zones have been
judiciously selected at an elevated position to ensure even distribution of water supply
over the entire command area, keeping into consideration the land availability for
construction of the same. Locations of the different overhead reservoirs are summarized
in Table 4.
Table 4 : Locations of Different Overhead Reservoirs

Sl. Water Supply Location of OHR JL Position


No. Scheme Name of Name of No. Longitude Latitude
Mouza Gram
Panchayat
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Salient details of the different water supply zones including proposed capacities of the
overhead reservoirs is given in Table 5.

You might also like