Professional Documents
Culture Documents
LITERACY THROUGH
THE USE OF
TECHNOLOGY Brittny Bol
Maria Lira
Health Science 660D
June 15, 2018
Running head: POLICY BRIEF 1
Table of Contents
Abstract………………………………………………………………………… Page 2
A. Background/Problem……………………………………………….. Page 3
V. References………………………………………………………………… Page 10
Running head: POLICY BRIEF 2
Abstract
Our nation has had a health literacy problem for more than 15 years. This issue can only be
understood using that exact data from back in 2003 which is clearly unacceptable. Health literacy
is affecting the United States population as a whole and it is also continuously still being a
burden all rooting from the same problem. Technology evolves very quickly and many agencies
are currently using this and technology itself as an advantage to provide the most effective health
care services to the patients they serve. Policy makers as one of the most important and influent
stakeholders hold the capacity to see make the change through funding and also taking advantage
of technology to address this highly concerning and continuous issue in our nation. This nation
has and will continue to suffer if no policy actions are taken, and the sooner they are addressed
I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A. Background/ Problem:
As a national standard set by Healthy People 2020, health literacy is a social determinant
of health that is affecting our nation (NACIHL, n.d.). Health literacy has always been a problem
for our nation and in today’s day we are focusing more on how this issue can be addressed and
what actions can be taken to provide the most effective and proactive action to make it a
permanent solution. The only data available that provides a depiction of this problem at large
came from the National Assessment of Adult Literacy which found that 53 percent of Americans
were intermediate in health literacy; this means that only about half of the nation is able to read
instructions on a medical label and follow them (HHS, 2003). The quote “all adults, regardless of
their health literacy skills, were more likely to get health information from radio/television,
friends/family, and health professionals than from print media” clearly shows that technology is
Lack of updated information in regards to health literacy research is one policy change
recommendation for the provision of more accurate and updated information. An issue cannot
be solved if there are not adequate and accurate timely facts provided to address that issue.
Policies that address the provision of funding for agencies that are currently implementing
technology in a form that helps address or decrease health literacy would be another
recommendation. The increase in funding for agencies such as non-profits can provide the
research needed to evaluate the implementations of technology they are currently using and
A. The problem:
According to the CDC, health literacy is defined as, “the capacity to obtain, process and
understand basic health information and services needed to make appropriate health decisions”.
The current problem is that 77 million adults in the United States would have difficulty with
common health tasks, such as following directions on a prescription drug label or adhering to a
childhood immunization schedule using a standard chart (NACIHL, n.d.). In 2003 the National
Assessment of Adult Literacy (NAAL) was conducted to measure adult health literacy in the
United States and it divided health literacy levels into four categories; proficient, intermediate,
basic, and below basic. To score at intermediate health literacy levels it means that a person can
“read instructions on a prescription label, and determine what time a person can take the
medication”, therefore those 77 million adults not scoring a proficient level of health literacy
would have difficulty with as previously mentioned common health tasks (NACIHL, n.d.).
It is important to note that even people with strong literacy skills can face health literacy
challenges. Some ways that health literacy can be a challenge for people is when people are not
familiar with medical terms or how their bodies work, when they have to interpret numbers and
make a health care decision, or when they are diagnosed with a serious illness and are scared or
confused (NACIHL, n.d.). Health literacy affects how people can navigate the healthcare system
such as filling out complex forms and locating providers and services (“Health Literacy - Fact
Sheet: Health Literacy Basics,” n.d.). If a person has a chronic illness and they do not know how
to locate the services that they need or fill a prescription, then they cannot make well informed
health decisions. Health literacy also affects how people manage their chronic conditions
Running head: POLICY BRIEF 5
because they may not understand their illness and the need to adhere to medication or other self-
care management.
Limited health literacy affects adults in all racial and ethnic groups, ranging from 28
percent white adults to 65 percent Hispanic adults (“National Action Plan to Improve Health
Literacy - health.gov,” n.d.). According to the National Network of Libraries, the United States
Department of Health and Human Services recognizes that “culture affects how people
communicate, understand and respond to health information” (NNLM, 2018). Therefore, there is
a cultural competency component that needs to be addressed when addressing health literacy in
the United States. There are also individuals with limited English proficiency (LEP) and they
experience not only a health literacy barrier, but also a language barrier when it comes to
communicating about health information and services (“Health Literacy - Fact Sheet: Health
The problem with low health literacy is that people start turning to technology to find the
answers that they may be looking for about matters that affect their health. According to the
NAAL report of 2003, “higher percentages of adults with below basic or basic health literacy
than adults with intermediate health literacy received a lot of information about health issues
from radio or television”. The problem with this is that because of lack of understanding about
medical terminology the person listening to these sources may not fully understand what the
radio or television is discussing. The NAAL also found that all adults no matter what health
literacy level obtained health information from family or friends, radio or television or their
health care provider rather than printed media (NAAL, 2003). This could be due to the fact that
people with low health literacy might not always know how to address their health concerns with
their physician and seek the use of technology through radio or television rather than printed
Running head: POLICY BRIEF 6
media. As the CDC states, “low health literacy is a threat to the health and wellbeing of
Americans”. The need for improvement in health literacy means that as a nation this is a
The root cause of the health literacy is that health information is not easily accessed because
of the way that it is designed, delivered, or distributed, and people do not have the skills to
understand health information that is presented to them. According to the NAAL, even high
school and college graduates can have limited health literacy (HHS, 2000). This shows that the
level of education is not the problem, it is the way that health information is presented. A study
looked at patient education material available on the internet and found that many of it was
written at high school or college reading levels, and the average United States resident reads at
8th grade or below reading level (Stossel, Segar, Gliatto, Fallar, & Karani, 2012). This example
shows how health information is now well designed and is contributing to the health literacy
problem in America yet not considering if individuals have a language barrier. As previously
mentioned, cultural competence and linguistics is also an impactful factor for health literacy and
again being another root cause. This is an example of how health information is not distributed
As with any other health or health care issue, financial burdens almost always play
enough of a role for changes to be implemented. According to the presented report on “Low
Health Literacy: Implications for National Health Policy” the cost for low literacy to the United
States economy is that of $106 to $ 238 billion annually, which represents between 7 percent and
17 percent of all personal health care expenditures (NNLM, 2018). The reason for this financial
Running head: POLICY BRIEF 7
burden can come from patients not understanding discharge instruction after leaving the hospital,
using the emergency room instead of urgent care or primary doctor, or even from having to go to
the emergency room because they did not adhere to their medication and needed emergency
intervention. All of these situations can be alleviated if there was better health communication
This financial burden to the United States could also be alleviated if there was funding
provided to research. As stated before, in 2003 the National Assessment of Adult Literacy was
conducted, and it provided the initial data about health literacy in the United States. Currently, 15
years have passes since this assessment was conducted and we need to know where Americans
are today when it comes to health literacy. Research can provide the information needed to once
again address the issue of health literacy in our nation, evaluate what is currently being done, and
most importantly how it can be changed to be the most effective and less costly change for our
nation.
One way that health literacy is being addressed at different organizations such as Kaiser
Permanente, is through the 24/7 nurse helplines or their creation of phone applications (Kaiser,
2018). These new innovative forms help their patients to be able to have the extra time they need
if they have questions in regards towards their health for which they might not have had during
the in-person appointment with their primary care provider. This also might help reduce the use
of unreliable internet websites that the public uses to find health or illness information that can
be misleading and incorrect. It is already a concerning problem that people might not fully
Running head: POLICY BRIEF 8
understand medical terminology or how to properly take their medications and having the
The reason why this current approach is failing is because it is not addressing the root cause
of health literacy. As stated before, the root cause of health literacy is from health information
not being easily accessed because of the way that it is designed, delivered, or distributed. A 24/7
nurse helpline only addresses the root cause of how health information is distributed. Patients do
have a place to call and get accurate health information, but that does not mean that they now
how to fully understand the scope of their illness or how to manage and self-care their chronic
conditions. The problem with this approach is that people who do not have health literacy may
not know about this service that their health care providers have, or they may not know what it is
for, therefore may not take advantage of this resource. There is much policy work that can be
V. POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS:
Addressing health literacy in the United States is needed due to the burden of costs and
health outcomes of individuals. The recommendations found below are from the National Action
Plan to Improve Health Literacy from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services,
1. Develop and disseminate health and safety information that is accurate, accessible, and
actionable.
science information and curricula in child care and education through the university level.
4. Support and expand local efforts to provide adult education, English language instruction,
community.
6. Increase basic research and the development, implementation, and evaluation of practices
7. Increase the dissemination and use of evidence-based health literacy practices and
interventions.
B. Importance of action:
It can be clearly understood that 15 years ago and to this day health literacy issues
continue to be too large of a burden for our nation to carry. Our nation’s policy makers need to
see how much of a negative effect this issue is costing not only in monetary form but more
importantly the health of our populations in every form we choose to see it. Technology use is
one of the most evolving, quickest and maybe even economic forms that we can help address our
nation’s health literacy issue. The sooner funding for the above recommendations is provided,
the sooner action can be taken hence providing our nation with higher literacy levels in hopes of
References:
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2018). Understanding Literacy & Numeracy |
https://www.cdc.gov/healthliteracy/learn/UnderstandingLiteracy.html
Health Literacy - Fact Sheet: Health Literacy Basics. (2000). Retrieved June 11, 2018, from
https://health.gov/communication/literacy/quickguide/factsbasic.htm
Kaiser Permanente. (2014). Urgent Care | Kaiser Permanente. Retrieved June 11, 2018, from
https://thrive.kaiserpermanente.org/care-near-you/southern-california/urgent-care/
Koh, H. K., Berwick, D. M., Clancy, C. M., Baur, C., Brach, C., Harris, L. M., & Zerhusen, E.
G. (2012). New Federal Policy Initiatives To Boost Health Literacy Can Help The Nation
Move Beyond The Cycle Of Costly “Crisis Care.” Health Affairs, 31(2), 434–443.
https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2011.1169
National Action Plan to Improve Health Literacy - health.gov. (n.d.). Retrieved June 9, 2018,
from https://health.gov/communication/initiatives/health-literacy-action-plan.asp
Schillinger, D. (2002). Association of Health Literacy With Diabetes Outcomes. JAMA, 288(4),
475. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.288.4.475
Stossel, L. M., Segar, N., Gliatto, P., Fallar, R., & Karani, R. (2012). Readability of Patient