Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Template
You will be completing this portion of the STEP document using the following
link:
STEP Standard 1, Part I
After completing the e-doc portion, submit the PDF you receive into the Learning
Management System (LMS).
You will be completing this portion of the STEP document using the following
link:
STEP Standard 1, Part II
After completing the e-doc portion, submit the PDF you receive into the Learning
Management System (LMS).
“SS.6-8.WGGS.14. Describe the factors that shape identity - including institutions, religion, language, social
class, geography, culture, and society” (Nevada Department of Education, 2018).
“SS.6-8.WGGS.24. Describe the roles of political, civil, and economic organizations in shaping people’s
lives” (Nevada Department of Education, 2018).
“SS.6-8.WGGS.28. Analyze and explain the cultural, physical, and environmental characteristics of places
and regions and how these affect the lives of the people who live there” (Nevada Department of Education,
2018).
“SS.6-8.WGGS.31. Explain how the relationship between the environmental characteristics of place and the
production of goods influence the spatial patterns of world trade” (Nevada Department of Education, 2018).
Learning Goal
Students will gain a better understanding and be able to articulate how history and physical
geography have shaped North America’s diverse cultural identity.
Measurable Objectives
1. Students will be able to detail why physical geography has affected the development of
the United States and Canada.
2. Students will be able to identify and compare the factors that cause variations in the
climate and vegetation present in the United States and Canada.
3. Students will be able to describe the three main factors that have influenced the cultural
geography of the United States.
4. Students will make observations on how immigration and physical geography have
influenced the cultural geography of Canada.
5. Students will connect how the distribution of national resources impacts the economy of
the United States and Canada.
6. Students will investigate how human actions have modified the environment of the
United States and Canada.
Pre-Assessment Data: Whole Class - Once you have assessed your students’ knowledge on the topic,
collect and analyze the pre-assessment data to determine if you will need to modify the standards,
learning goal, or measurable objectives that will be addressed during instruction.
Number of Students
Partially Proficient
(70%-79%) 20
Minimally Proficient
(69% and below) 139
At this time, I do not plan to change any of my written objectives or the learning goal since the pretest
was written with both in mind. The standards all still apply for the same reason.
The pre-assessment was used in a way to introduce the students to the new unit, but also as a formative
assessment to gauge what they already know. A very similar assessment will be accomplished at the end
of the unit to show students how much they have learned and as a summation to the unit.
I was not surprised by the data provided by the pretest. I did expect a few more students to fall in the
partially proficient range, but I think many were intimidated by needing to answer a short/long answer
question about something they weren’t entirely familiar with. I will be keeping the test questions in mind
as I plan and execute my upcoming lessons and ensuring that all meet the standards and objectives for the
overall unit.
Post-Assessment – Copy and paste the post-assessment you plan to use to assess the students’ knowledge
of the topic after implementing the unit lessons. The post-assessment can be the same as the pre-
assessment, a modified version, or something comparable that measures the same concepts. Include the
scoring criteria used to determine whether the student Exceeds, Meets, Approaches, or Falls Far Below the
learning goal and measurable objectives.
Video Recording Link: If you are turning your video in through OneDrive, just note it here.
Post-Test Data: Whole Class - Once you have assessed your students’ learning on the topic, collect and
analyze the post-test data to determine the effectiveness of your instruction and assessment.
Number of Students Number of Students
Pre-Test Post-Test
Highly Proficient
(90%-100%) # #
Proficient
(80%-89%) # #
Partially
Proficient
# #
(70%-79%)
Minimally
Proficient
# #
(69% and below)
Based on your analysis of the whole class post-test data, what is your interpretation of the student
learning? Cite examples and provide evidence of student learning that helped you come to this
conclusion.
Based on the whole class post-test data, write one paragraph analyzing the effectiveness of your
instruction and assessment and effect on student learning. Cite examples and provide evidence of
student learning to support this analysis.
Using the information obtained in Standard 1, select one subgroup population to focus on for this
analysis. Provide a brief rationale for your selection (1-3 sentences).
Post-Assessment Data: Subgroup (Gender, ELL population, Gifted, students on IEPs or 504s, etc.)
Partially
Proficient
# #
(70%-79%)
Minimally
Proficient
# #
(69% and below)
Based on your analysis of the subgroup post-test data, what is your interpretation of the student
learning? Cite examples and provide evidence of student learning that helped you come to this
conclusion.
Based on the subgroup class post-test data, write one paragraph analyzing the effectiveness of
your instruction and assessment and effect on student learning. If there is a student or group of
students who have not mastered the objectives, discuss what you will do in future days to aid
students' understanding with respect to the unit’s objectives. Cite examples and provide evidence
of student misconceptions to support this analysis.
Proficient
(80%-89%) # #
Partially
Proficient
# #
(70%-79%)
Minimally
Proficient
# #
(69% and below)
Based on your analysis of student learning, discuss the next steps for instruction, including an
objective that would build upon the content taught in this unit of instruction.