Professional Documents
Culture Documents
126 © 2014 Ernst & Sohn Verlag für Architektur und technische Wissenschaften GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin · Structural Concrete 15 (2014), No. 2
R. Breitenbücher/G. Meschke/F. Song/Y. Zhan · Experimental, analytical and numerical analysis of the pullout behaviour of steel fibres considering different fibre types, inclinations and concrete strengths
Shape Length [mm] Diameter [mm] Aspect ratio [l/d] Tensile strength [MPa]
LVDT
2.2.1 Effect of fibre shape
Mounting ring
Fig. 4 depicts the load-displacement relationship for vari-
Concrete specimen ous fibre shapes with embedded length Lf = 20 mm and in-
clination angle θ = 0° in a high-strength concrete matrix
Glue
(fc = 84 MPa). Based on the experimental results, it was
found that for deformed (hooked-end) fibres, the mechani-
cal anchorage has a dominant influence on the pullout re-
sponse and the embedment length is less dominant.
Fig. 2. Schematic view of pullout test setup
Therefore, in this paper, as an example, the fibre pullout
behaviour with an embedment length of 20 mm is dis-
cussed. In order to perform pullout tests for straight fibres,
quirement of 1.0 % precision tolerance). As shown in the hooked end of a normal-strength steel fibre (Dramix
Fig. 2, the concrete specimen was glued to a thick cylindri- RC-80/60-BN) was chopped off with pliers. Every curve in
cal steel block attached to the testing rig with one bolt. the figure represents the average result of six specimens
The protruding end of the steel fibre was then clamped se- for one test case.
curely by the grip. The pullout displacement was mea- As shown in Fig. 4, the pullout responses of the
sured continuously by three LVDTs; the three LVDTs were fibres differ from each other significantly. For the straight
mounted in an aluminium frame with an angle of 120° be- fibres, only the interfacial friction between fibre and ma-
tween each other and the frame attached to the specimen trix is relevant for the bond; after fully debonding at a very
using three screws. The tips of the LVDTs touched the low load of 80 N, the pullout force drops noticeably. In
bottom surface of a thin aluminium plate fixed to the fibre contrast, due to their mechanical anchorage, the pullout
by means of two fine screws. Load was applied at a cross- loads of deformed fibres continue to increase after
arm travel rate of 0.5 mm/min; the tests were conducted debonding. As a consequence of the stronger anchorage in
up to a maximum displacement of 10 mm. the high-strength concrete matrix, both crimped and twin-
cone fibres broke in all test series shortly after the ultimate
2.2 Results and discussion load was exceeded. It was observed by other researchers
that all aligned twin-cone fibres (tensile strength = 1198
Each pullout test for each configuration investigated was MPa) ruptured in both normal (40 MPa) and high-strength
repeated six times. Fig. 3 illustrates the typical scatter of (85 MPa) concretes; however, for aligned crimped fibres
experimental results and the average curve for the case of (tensile strength = 1037 MPa), no fibre fracture has been
fibre RC-80/60-BN tested with an embedment angle of 0° observed even in high-strength concrete [14].
and a length of 20 mm, the results of which will be dis- In the case of hooked-end fibres (RC-80/60-BN), af-
cussed in section 2.2.2. The standard deviation of the ter the peak load, the hooked end tended to be progres-
peak pullout forces is 23.85 % and the maximum standard sively mobilized and straightened, which was accompa-
deviation of the pullout forces in the post-peak regime is nied by a decrease in pullout force and a further increase
39.28 %. The deviation varies depending on the testing in pullout displacement. After a certain displacement
1000
fc = 84 MPa
450 900
RC-80/60-BN Lf = 20 mm
400 800 Twin-coned
Lf = 20 mm
θ = 0°
350 θ = 0° 700
Pullout load [N]
Pullout load [N]
Table 3. Average results from pullout tests of steel fibres with various 2.2.2 Effects of fibre and concrete strength
shapes
The effects of fibre and concrete strength on the fibre pull-
Fibre shape Ppeak Δpeak Wpeak σmax σmax/fy out responses are depicted in Fig. 5. In both concretes
[N] [mm] [N × mm] [MPa] [%] tested, high-strength steel fibres (RC-80/60-BP) achieved
nearly double the pullout resistance up to the frictional
straight 83.0 0.03 2.1 188 15.0
sliding stage compared with the normal-strength fibres
crimped 298.2 0.14 35.8 593.6 47.5 (RC-80/60-BN). Fibres embedded in high-strength con-
crete exhibited a comparatively larger pullout load than
hooked-end 356.1 0.45 133.4 806.4 64.5
those in normal-strength concrete, which is in accordance
twin-cone 907.0 0.25 189.3 1155.4 105.0 with the findings in reported experiments [3, 4]. This effect
was more pronounced in the case of fibres made of high-
strength steel.
In comparison with normal-strength fibres, which
(approx. 4.5 mm), the pullout process is mainly controlled showed a similar configuration of the load-displacement
by frictional resistance. Since the hook is usually partially curves in both concretes tested, the high-strength fibres ex-
straightened, an additional frictional force can be generat- hibited significantly different load-displacement curves.
ed [15], which leads to a higher frictional pullout resis- For high-strength fibres tested in normal-strength concrete
tance than for straight fibres. This force can be calculated (Fig. 5), the ultimate pullout load was reached at a rela-
by an empirical formula proposed by Soetens et al. [12]. tively large level of displacement. After the first peak of the
The load-displacement curves were further analysed load-displacement curve, the pullout curve dropped rela-
by comparing displacement Δpeak, work Wpeak, tensile tively slowly. Moreover, a second peak in the pullout curve
stress in fibre σmax and utilization of tensile capacity (fibre was not observed. Such a pullout response indicated that
efficiency, σmax/fy) at peak pullout load Ppeak. Table 3 the mechanical anchorage of the hook was only utilized to
shows that the twin-cone fibres had the highest Ppeak and a low level due to the low concrete strength. In other
Wpeak values. The tensile capacity of this fibre has a uti- words, less energy was consumed to straighten the hook in
lization rate exceeding 100 %. However, final rupture of this situation.
these fibres occurred at a very small displacement in all Hence, the fibre efficiency for high-strength fibres
series. Therefore, the overall absorbed energy is consider- tested in normal-strength concrete showed the lowest val-
ably lower when compared with the hooked-end fibres un- ue, 42.7 % (Table 4). It should be noted, however, that
der complete pullout without rupture. these fibres in high-strength concrete showed a remark-
To obtain ductile behaviour of concrete after crack- ably higher efficiency of 61.6 %. This was nearly at the
ing, fibre rupture at a small crack width (i.e. fibre slip)
should be avoided. Rather, the fibre should be pulled out
of the concrete matrix with a high utilization of its tensile 700
capacity. RC-80/60-BP Lf = 20 mm
Besides fibre shape, the pullout behaviour of a single 600 fc = 84 MPa
θ = 0°
steel fibre in a concrete matrix can be affected by other RC-80/60-BP
factors as well, e.g. fibre dimensions or surface properties. 500 fc = 44 MPa
Pullout load [N]
Table 4. Average pullout results for various fibre and concrete strengths
Concrete strength Fibre type Ppeak [N] Δpeak [mm] Wpeak [N × mm] σmax/fy [%]
450 900
RC-80/60-BN RC-80/60-BP
30° 45°
400 fc = 84 MPa 800 fc = 84 MPa
30° 60° 15°
45° Lf = 20 mm Lf = 20 mm
350 700
150 300
100 200
50 100
0 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Displacement [mm] Displacement [mm]
Fig. 6. Influence of fibre inclination angles on pullout response: normal-strength fibre (left) and high-strength fibre (right) embedded in high-strength
concrete
same level as could be proven for normal-strength fibres in force to decrease. Indeed, in the pullout tests with high-
high-strength concrete (64.5 %). strength fibres a remarkable increase in the maximum
pullout load was found at inclination angles between 30°
2.2.3 Effect of fibre inclination angle and 45°.
In general, the pullout displacement at ultimate load
In terms of the inclination angle, pullout tests were per- increases and the slope of the pre-peak branch decreases
formed on both straight and hooked-end fibres. These re- as the inclination angle rises, particularly for inclination
sults are considered for the validation of analytical models angles > 30°. For inclined fibres, an additional stress, de-
in section 3. Here, the pullout behaviour of hooked-end rived from the pullout force, is exerted on the concrete
fibres will be discussed in detail. Considering the findings matrix wedge where the fibre enters the matrix [16]. With
by Robins et al. [3] (especially that the pullout responses of rising inclination angles, the effect of this stress concentra-
hooked-end fibres with 10–20 mm embedment length tion increases as well, resulting in an increase in localized
were generally the same for each respective orientation) matrix crushing and spalling at the exit point. This phe-
and the overall goal of this research, pullout tests were car- nomenon was more relevant for high-strength steel fibres
ried out on normal- and high-strength hooked-end fibres [13]. Meanwhile, fibre rupture also occurred, depending
in high-strength concrete (84 MPa) with an embedment on fibre strength and inclination angle. As demonstrated
length of 20 mm and inclination angles of 0°, 15°, 30°, 45° in Fig. 6 and Table 5, fibres tend to break more easily with
and 60°. the increase in inclination angle, especially for the normal-
The pullout curves for normal-strength fibres strength fibres. At an inclination angle of 60°, three to six
(RC-80/60-BN) and high-strength fibres (RC-80/60-BP) fibres out of six pullout tests ruptured, i.e. under these con-
embedded with different inclination angles in high- ditions 50–100 % failed due to fibre rupture.
strength concrete are shown in Fig. 6. In the case of fibre In terms of usability and durability, in most concrete
pullout without rupture, the ultimate load for normal- structures the maximum allowable crack width is designed
strength fibres did not change significantly with the in- (according to the code) to be < 0.4 mm [17]. However, in
crease in inclination angle. This has also been observed in order to investigate the material/structural behaviour at
previous experiments [14]. In comparison with the aligned the ultimate limit state, experiments on steel fibre-rein-
fibre (0°), a slight increase in the maximum pullout force forced concrete are mostly performed until a deformation
at an inclination angle of 30° could be identified; however, or displacement of several millimetres occurs in the post-
increasing the angle to 45° caused the maximum pullout cracking stage. In this paper, in order to compare fibre ef-
Table 5. Number of broken fibres for different fibre strengths and inclina- Table 6. Influence of inclination angle on pullout work up to a fibre slip of
tion angles 1.0 mm
B
MB
Based on this interface law, the differential equations for
force equilibrium and strain compatibility along the fibre VB
k
axis can be solved. The distribution of interfacial slip and C
frictional stress, as well as fibre stress and strain along the a) c)
fibre axis, and finally the pullout force and displacement
relations (F-U diagram) at the free end can be solved for Fig. 8. Straight fibre pullout with inclination: a) idealized geometrical state,
the complete pullout process. The essential parameters b) section AB as cantilever, c) section BC as beam on elastic foundation
w x exp x C1 sin x C 2 cos x
exp x C 3 sin x C 4 cos x
(3)
1/4
k
with as the stiffness coefficient, where k is
4EI
the elastic foundation stiffness. Using the boundary condi- Fig. 10. Results of numerical simulation for a low-strength fibre with 30°
inclination angle: distribution of the scalar damage variable at the end of
tions (MB and VB) obtained from the analysis of fibre sec- pullout
tion AB, the constants C1–4 are determined and the deflec-
tion along section BC is obtained, as well as the resulting
lateral pressure connected with additional frictional shear trix, which has very high bending stiffness and is even
stresses along the interface. The integration of the stresses “cutting” into the concrete.
along the fibre generates the tensile force TB at the current In the present work, in addition to the analytical
exit point B. model described above, 3D finite element simulations
These two sub-models are accompanied by the deter- were performed using the commercial software Abaqus in
mination of the spalling size S from the following criteri- order to obtain more insights into the pullout behaviour of
on, assuming a uniform tensile stress distribution over the a straight fibre with an arbitrary inclination angle. In the
lateral area Asp of a cone-shaped spalling of the matrix: numerical simulations, an ideal plastic J2 plasticity model
and the concrete damage plasticity model implemented in
VB ft Asp(S) (4) Abaqus are used as material models for steel fibre and
concrete matrix respectively. Frictional contact is defined
where ft is the tensile strength of the concrete matrix and along the steel-concrete interface. Cracking and compres-
Asp a function of the spalling size S. The spalling size is sive crushing of the concrete as well as large deformations
computed from geometrical considerations assuming a have been considered. Fig. 10 shows the contour plot of
generic, drop-like cross-section for the spalling cone. concrete damage obtained from the pullout simulation of
A numerical algorithm has been developed to solve a fibre with 30° inclination angle.
the unknowns and to compute finally the free end pullout
force P = FA cos ϕ + VA sin ϕ corresponding to the increas- 3.2 Hooked-end fibre pullout
ing pullout displacement Δ; a force–displacement diagram
(P – Δ relation) is generated. The model presented above At the very beginning of pullout, the whole fibre is elastic.
was validated successfully by means of the experimental As the load increases, some regions become plastic. Only
results presented in section 2 (Fig. 9). The considerable in- when both curved segments of the hook are plastic does
crease in the pullout force in the last stage is caused by the the fibre start to slide in the channel. Another favourable
very short fibre segment remaining embedded in the ma- factor for the slip of the fibre is the inelastic deformation
of the surrounding concrete due to the lateral pressure at
the interface, which leads to a widening of the channel in
High strength concrete, normal strength steel, 30° the matrix.
180 In order to support the analytical formulation, 3D
Experiments numerical models for the hooked-end fibre pullout behav-
160 Model
iour were also developed. The finite element model com-
140
prises approx. 46 000 tetrahedral elements; one analysis
120
performed on a normal desktop PC takes approx. 20 h.
Load [N]
100
The numerical simulation provides not only the pullout
80
load-displacement relation at the free end, but also an in-
60 sight into the problem and support for the formulation of
40 the analytical model (Fig. 11).
20
0 3.2.1 Anchorage effect of hook
0 5 10 15 20
Displacement [mm]
The anchorage effect of the hook during pullout was
Fig. 9. Pullout load-displacement relation for inclined straight fibres: model analysed in the analytical model, which is included as an
results vs. experimental results for normal-strength fibre in high-strength additional component in the straight fibre pullout model
concrete with 30° inclination angle described in the previous section.
b) Me
a) e
Tc d Te
Vc
Ve
f1
μf1
c Mc c μf2 f2
Vc
a b Tc Mc
c) d) Me
Tc
g1 Vc e
Te
d
μg1 Mc
c μg2 Ve
b g2
Fig. 14. Force diagrams for fibre segments in channel to be used for
Fig. 11. Numerical simulation of the hooked-end fibre pullout: pullout load- analysing different key states: for KS-1 and 2 use a) and b); for KS-3 use b)
displacement diagram (top), contour plot of von Mises stress (bottom left, and c); for KS-4 use b); for KS-5 use d) (arrows indicate predicted positive
[MPa]) and concrete compressive damage variable during pullout (bottom forces)
right)
Tc cos f1 Vc sin
e
d Tc sin Vc cos f1 (5)
ρ α α
ρ f1 sin f1(1 cos ) Mc
c l2
a We shall consider the yield condition of the cross-section
b
at point c in the following simplified form, which is often
l1
applied as a design criterion for steel structures:
Normal strength concrete, normal strength steel, 0° High strength concrete, high strength steel, 30°
500 1000
Experiments Experiments
Model Model
400 800
Load [N]
Load [N]
300 600
200 400
100 200
0 0
0 2 4 6 8 10 0 2 4 6 8 10
Displacement [mm] Displacement [mm]
Fig. 15. Validation of pullout model: model results vs. experimental results Fig. 16. Validation of pullout model: model results vs. experimental results
for normal-strength hooked-end fibres in normal-strength concrete without for high-strength hooked-end fibres in high-strength concrete with 30° in-
inclination clination angle
4 Summary and conclusions transverse loading on the interface, fibre yielding and
matrix damage are taken into account.
In this paper, the pullout behaviour of various configura- – For steel fibres with hooked ends, the contribution of
tions of steel fibres embedded in a concrete matrix has the hook is captured by a series of key states during the
been systematically investigated by means of laboratory pullout; for every key state, the additional pullout force
tests, analytical models and numerical simulations. is calculated directly from the equilibrium conditions.
The following conclusions can be drawn from the experi- This force is considered in the model for straight fibres,
mental results: allowing prediction of the pullout load-displacement re-
– Non-straight fibres achieved a higher pullout resistance lations of an inclined hooked-end steel fibre in a con-
and fibre efficiency than straight fibres. Due to strong crete matrix.
anchorage in high-strength concrete, crimped and twin-
cone fibres ruptured prematurely in all test cases. In Acknowledgements
contrast, hooked-end fibres showed a complete pullout
behaviour and exhibited a more ductile response. Financial support was provided by the German Research Foun-
– In general, pullout resistance increased with fibre dation (DFG) within the scope of projects B1 and B2 of the Col-
strength as well as with concrete strength. Compared laborative Research Centre SFB 837. This support is gratefully
with normal-strength hooked-end fibres, the concrete acknowledged.
strength had a greater influence on the pullout respons-
es of high-strength hooked-end fibres. Regarding fibre References
efficiency, normal-strength and high-strength fibres
reached nearly the same level in high-strength concrete. 1. Naaman, A. E.: Fibre reinforcement for concretes. Concrete
– With increasing fibre inclination, the pullout displace- International: Design and Construction 7, 1985, pp. 21–25.
ment corresponding to the ultimate load increases; fibre 2. Mandel, J., Wei, S., Said, S.: Studies of the properties of the
efficiency and pullout work decreases; fibre rupture was fiber-matrix interface in steel fiber reinforced mortar. ACI
more likely to occur, especially in the case of normal- Materials Journal 84, 1987, pp. 101–109.
3. Robins, P., Austin, S., Jones, P.: Pullout behavior of hooked
strength hooked-end fibres; localized concrete spalling
end steel fibres. Materials and Structures 35, 2002, pp. 434–
at the fibre exit point was more pronounced, especially
442.
in the case of high-strength hooked-end fibres. 4. Naaman, A. E., Namur, G., Alwan, J., Najm, H.: Fiber pullout
and bond slip. I: Analytical study. II: Experimental valida-
An analytical model for the fibre pullout behaviour has tion. Journal of Structural Engineering 117, 1991, pp. 2769–
been developed and successfully validated by means of 2800.
the experimental campaign. Finite element simulations of 5. Leung, C., Shapiro, N.: Optimal steel fiber strength for rein-
the complete pullout process were carried out to support forcement of cementitious materials. Journal of Materials in
the development of the analytical model. It was demon- Civil Engineering 11, 1999, pp. 116–123.
strated that the model is capable of capturing the major 6. Laranjeira, F., Aguado, A., Molins, C.: Predicting the pullout
mechanisms involved in various situations of the pullout response of inclined straight steel fibers. Materials and
Structures 43, 2010, pp. 875–895.
of single fibres. In particular, the following components of
7. Alwan, J., Naaman, A. E., Guerrero, P.: Effect of mechanical
the model have been proposed:
clamping on the pullout response of hooked steel fibers em-
– An interfacial friction law serves as the basis for the so- bedded in cementitious matrices. Concrete Science and En-
lution to the equilibrium and compatibility equations gineering 1, 1999, pp. 15–25.
along the fibre. In the case of straight fibres inclined 8. Chanvillard, G.: Modeling the pullout of wire-drawn steel
with respect to the loading direction, the additional fibers. Cement and Concrete Research 29, 1999, pp. 1027–
complexities induced by fibre misalignment, i.e. the 1037.
9. Van Gysel, A.: A pullout model for hooked end steel fibres.
High Performance Fiber Reinforced Cement Composites
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Rolf Breitenbücher
(HPFRCC 3), RILEM Publications S.A.R.L., 1999.
Institute for Building Materials
10. Cunha, V. M., Barros, J. A., Sena-Cruz, J. M.: Pullout behav- Ruhr-University Bochum
ior of steel fibers in self-compacting concrete. Journal of Ma- IC 6/117, Universitätsstraße 150
terials in Civil Engineering 22, 2010, pp. 1–9. 44801 Bochum, Germany
11. Laranjeira, F., Molins, C., Aguado, A.: Predicting the pullout Tel.: (+49) 234 32 22649
response of inclined hooked steel fibers. Cement and Con- Fax: (+49) 234 32 14113
crete Research 40, 2010, pp. 1471–1487. Email: rolf.breitenbuecher@rub.de
12. Soetens, T., Van Gysel, A., Matthys, S., Taerwe, L.: A semi-an-
alytical model to predict the pull-out behaviour of inclined
hooked-end steel fibres. Construction and Building Materi-
Prof. Dr. techn. Günther Meschke
als 43, 2013, pp. 253–265.
Institute for Structural Mechanics
13. Breitenbücher, R., Song, F.: Experimentelle Untersuchungen Ruhr-University Bochum
zum Auszugsverhalten von Stahlfasern in höherfesten Beto- IC 6/185, Universitätsstraße 150
nen. Beton und Stahlbetonbau 109, 2014, pp. 43–52 (in Ger- 44801 Bochum, Germany
man). Tel.: (+49) 234 32 29051
14. Banthia, N., Trottier, J.-F.: Concrete reinforced with de- Fax: (+49) 234 32 14149
formed steel fibers, part I: bond-slip mechanisms. ACI Mate- Email: guenther.meschke@rub.de
rials Journal, 1994, pp. 435–445.
15. Markovich, I.: High-performance hybrid-fibre concrete: de-
velopment and utilization. Dissertation, University of Bel-
grade, Serbia, 2006.
16. Li, V. C., Wang, Y., Backer, S.: Effect of inclining angle, M.Sc. Fanbing Song
bundling and surface treatment on synthetic fibre pull-out Institute for Building Materials
from a cement matrix. Composites 21, 1990, pp. 132–140. Ruhr-University Bochum
17. Naaman, A. E.: Evaluation of steel fibers for applications in IC 6/107, Universitätsstraße 150
structural concrete. 6th International RILEM Symposium 44801 Bochum, Germany
on Fibre Reinforced Concretes, 2004, pp. 389–400. Email: fanbing.song@rub.de
18. Lawrence, P.: Some theoretical considerations of fibre pull-
out from an elastic matrix. Journal of Materials Science 7,
1972, pp. 1–6.
19. Budiansky, B., Hutchinson, J.: Matrix fracture in fiber-rein-
forced ceramics. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 34, 1986, pp. 167–189. M.Sc. Yijian Zhan
20. Fantilli, A., Vallini, P.: A cohesive interface model for the Institute for Structural Mechanics
pullout of inclined steel fibers in cementitious matrixes. Jour- Ruhr-University Bochum
nal of Advanced Concrete Technology 5, 2007, pp. 247–258. IC 6/169, Universitätsstraße 150
21. Bowles, J.: Foundation Analysis and Design. The McGraw- 44801 Bochum, Germany
Hill Companies, Inc., 1997. Email: yijian.zhan@rub.de