‘THE LITTMAN LIBRARY OF
JEWISH CIVILIZATION
Dedicated tothememaryof
Louis THoseas Stoxey Lertacaw
ho founded the Litman iar forthe lve of Ga
and as act of hay in menor hfaher
JOSEPH AAwoN Lartaase
ramos
(Get wisdom get wnderstandig:
rs hernotandshe sal reser the?
tint fet cn ad ty
Sp >
a a
BROADENING M4
JEWISH HISTORY
Towards a Social History of
Ordinary Jews
TODD M. ENDELMAN
AST) Linkaey oem
FC By Csre Hono
‘oxford - Portland, Oregor
“The Littman Library of Jewish CivilizationCHAPTER ONE
Making Jews Modern
Jewish Self-Identification and
Wesi European Categories of Belonging
Tis atte tro anche see ht ny —
everywhere ad stl ines is fad, fragmento, and contingent. Thi
assumption, whatever ts value laminating Jewish behavior in recent
entries, sno very useful in understanding the experience of ews inex
lee periods n medieval and early moder Europe, Jews canstited wel
defined callectve unit for whom questions of seldentfcation—who ae
‘ead whit sour place here?—rarl arose Preamodern European Jews di
fered rom theirneighbousby virtue oftheir religion, nationaly/ehnciy,
leg status, and in most case Language, costime, employment and soca
sod cultural habits. Mos led in quastautonomous,elEregolating corpo
ratlons (io) chartered bodies with welldefined privileges and bln
tins. With the equent exception oflte medial lian ad Spanish ews
and those in small slated communities elsewhere, ther contacts with
Christians wee largely instrumental Religious tations Jewish and Chis
ian alike), social structures, and lslcategoris defined the borders ofthe
Jesh word, which remained more oe les stable througheut the medieval
and aly moder periods Jewishess’ was not endlessly constructed and
negotiated. The line between Christin ad Jew was Gear and sable, not
fay of indterisinate, for ver one thousund years, Within the Jewish
world the nature of comrect bli and practice (bat dais required) was
rch disputed of course. The rabbis cashed over host best to know and
serve God and how best to interpret the Lave These were not, however,
detates abot the boundary beeen Jews an non Jews o abot he fund
‘mental ofewish self denon suchas origins choses ee redemg")
tion, andthe ike.
"The one exception to this gneralzation—the case o Former New Chit
tans or Converse—is the proverbial exception that proves the proverbial2 Making Jews Modern
rule, The descendants of Tberian Jews who had converted to Catholicism in
the fourrenth and fifeenth centuries under duress, Convers Lived as
rominal Christians before resetting i tolerated Jewish communis in
the Netherlands, Brain, souh-vesten Fence, norther Germany, an the
‘New Worl. Regardless of the extent to which they harboured Sense oF
Jesh descent or maintained remnants of Jewish obserance, they Were
cdvcated and socsied as Christians. In Yosef Verushalmi’s now elssic
| [Ferman hy wee the rst considerbe gop of open Jet
have had thei mot extensive and direct personal experiences completely
outside the organi Jewish community and the spel univers of worms
|v Jewish wadition. Before leaving the Iberian peninsula, and especially
afterwards, they expevienced the tensions that ater beeame characertical
Jee whose identities were mille and fragmented ss the esl of ving
‘mulanenusly i vo oF more ovepping worlds. Convers commun
ties confronted the ak of collective sefefnion,requzing them to bal.
nce. vcore, or negotiate wo clsters of tradons-~one associated wit
the normative, abbinic Judaism of proesing Jewish communities, the
‘her with the values, non, ad behavioural tat of Spin and Porigal!
ormer Conversos, however, were tnrepresetave of the European
Jewish popultion wth ot n northern id ental Europe (Ashen.
‘The Jowshness ofthe Aslkenazim foy which I mean their subjective se
‘understanding and thir objective behavioural and sitstional distinctive
‘ess ater than any essen pinta or biological quali) remained
‘undistirbed until de eighteenth and nineteen centuries. It Decame rob
Jematc or hen, a mate of reflection and debate, only when the state
of sate and society tat had supported it weakened nd then dslved
‘When the anc ge gave way, when tats erased o be constituted as
casters of lal structed corporate ranks and otders, and ews, like
‘thers whose cil status previously derived fom the collective unit to
‘which dey belonged, were incorporated int the emerging Merl order as
Individuals oniy then di ews turn to forging new ef defntons.
‘The transformation ofthe Jews thei movement out ofthe get ose
‘het of fcob Kat's well nown acco) id not follow a unitary. near
trjectory. Iwasa complet, mkidimensionalmesy process, wi a ast
Fords components—emanclpatin,accltuation, secularization, and
(Yess am pn Court talon ht 4 ace sets
(sn Botan HessieNae Dap
Maing Js Modem a
integration which, while inerdependent, were alo distinc rom each ther
‘oth concep and in practic: In western and central Europe te tas
formation othe jovs entailed th acqsition of cizenship andthe rights it
‘ested emancipation the adoption of new soil an cultural alisand
sew mdes of deportment, res, and spech acaltrtion|; the rejection
fr nepect of me honoured religious bei and practices, chang both
‘hose sanctioned by custom and those required by aw secularization); and
the struggle fr social acceptance in no Jewish eles integration) ® Their
twansocmtion lo Incuded fr-eaching changes in ele peeepion, for a
Jes move from exclusion fo inclusion, font periphery fo mainstream,
‘hey found themselves reconsidering and redefining how they sa thers
selves—and how they wanted others ose them. Formerly, they had viewed
‘hemslves—and were viewed by ohers—as a discrete peopl, diferent in
ind from other peoples. I the werds of the Alain peyer the closing
prayer ofthe Jewish tung, Gd had made them difeent rom theater
rations ofthe world and assigned to them a distinct fate. Moreover, they
‘were a people whose national and religous identities were Indssolubly
Tink and whose es othe Chisins arnong whom they lived were more
instrumental han affective. Religion and ethnicity were omnipresent and
inseparable filing the whole oftheir extence, The integration of Jews ino
ste increasingly bitarond indivi ight rather than cole ps
leget made the survival ofthis wndiferentsed sence of self dentication