Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract— The Mauddud Formation of central Iraq was interpretation of depositional setting, sequence development
deposited within different shallow and deep marine and, cyclicity of the succession.
subenviroments on a distally steepend ramp setting, Local The second reduction (R2 curve) of the cumu lative
tectonism greatly affected the sequence development where subsidence curve was calculated by subtracting the best fit
the different rates of subsidence of the different tectonic (calculated by least square method) fro m the backstripped
provinces were the major control on the nature of 4 th order curve (R1) in order to remove the accommodation space
cyclicity of the succession ( thickness, symmetry, and facies provided by tectonic subsidence, the net subsidence
stacking pattern ). Subsidence analysis (R2 curves) revealed remain ing reflect changes in acco mmodation generated
the effect of local tectonism, and the vertical and lateral solely by eustasy or local tectonism. R2 curve can be useful
variations in accommodation. The effect o f the eustatic in intrabasinal correlat ion especially passive margin basins
component was clear in the stable area to the West where (Bond et. al. 1988).
there was no or very low rate of subsidence.
Keywords— Sequences stratigraphy, Mauddud Formation, II. PALEOENVIRONMENTS
Central Iraq. On the basis of depositional texture, types of carbonate
grains, and faunal content and diversity; several microfacies
I. INRODUCTION were recognized within the Mauddud succession in the
The Mauddud Formation (Upper Alb ian-Lower studied sections. These microfacies can be grouped into
Ceno manian) of Central Iraq was deposited on a shallow five facies associations reflecting five major
carbonate platform on the northeastern passive margin of the subenvironments.
Arabian Plate. The studied area extends along the stable
shelf and westward to the unstable shelf ( Fig. 1). The Facies Association 1: Nonfossiliferous mudstones,
Mauddud Formation was studied by many workers like Van bioclastic mudstones to wackestones. This association
Bellen et. al. (1959) and Jassim et. al. (1984), A l-Eisa (1997), reflects a shallow restricted marine environ ment where the
and lately Al Yassery (2015), they among others studied the pure micrite represent depositon in quiet bays and ponds
starigraphy and paleontology of the formation but none of within the tidal flat whereas mudstones with few shell
them dealt with the type of depositional setting and basin frag ments and bioclastic wackestones with abundant
development in detail. mo lluscs frag ments reflecte deposition in t idal flat to lo w
The lo wer boundary of the formation is conformable with the energy shallow subtidal environ ment. The mudstones are
underlying Nahr Umr Formation, this boundary can be often dolomitized.
correlated with K110 MFS of Sharland et. al. (2001)
Reflecting the widespread transgression of the Mauddud sea Facies Association 2: Fossiliferous packstones to
during the Late A lbian. The upper boundary on the other grainstones, ooidal peloidal Grainstones. Abundant and
hand is unconformable with the overlying spicular and diverse fauna and numerous bioclasts as well as abundant
Pelagic limestone of the Ahmadi Format ion. Data fro m ooids and peloid characterizes this association indicat ing a
seven subsurface sections were analyzed and studied in high energy environ ment where the shoal facies were
detail where microfacies analysis of co res and cuttings deposited.
provided the necessary information for facies analysis and
pale environ ment interpretation, and this is the first step of Facies Association 3: Mixed fauna wackestones to
determining the different parasequences and sequence packstones, bioclastic wackestones to packstones. This
stratigraphic subdivsions and consequently the final association is typical of mediu m to h igh energy shallow
REFERENCES
[1] Ahr, W.M., 1989, Sedimentary and tectonic controls on
the development of an Early M ississippian carbonate
ramp, Sacramento Mountains area, New Mexico. In:
Controls on Carbonate Platform and Basin
Develop ment (Ed. by P.D. Crevello, Petro.Co.,
Baghdad.
[2] Al-Eisa, M.A.S., 1997, Stratig raphy of Early
Cretaceous subsurface sections fro m middle Iraq,
Unpub. Ph.D., Thesis University of Mosul, 194 p.
[3] Al Yassery, N.H.N., 2015, Biostratigraphy and
Microfacies Analysis of Mauddud Formation in Badra
Oil Field, Eastern Iraq. Unpub. MSc. Thesis, Uiversity
of Baghdad, 94 p.
Fig.2: Stratigraphic cross section showing vertical and lateral facies changes and sequence stratigrapuic subdivisions of the
Mauddud Formation in the study area.
Fig.3: R2 curves of selected sections throughout different settings within the study Area.