Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract— The induction of nodule-like structures referred Keywords— Wheat, paranodulation, 2,4-D, IAA,
to para-nodules was assessed due to 2,4-D, IAA and the cellulase, pectolyase, PEG, Azospirillum, seed priming.
enzyme mixture of cellulase and pectolyase in presence of
PEG treatment of wheat cultivars inoculated with I. INTRODUCTION
Azospirillumbrasilense. In gnotobiotic model experiment; 9- In 1989, the term of para-nodule was introduced by
18 and 6-19 para-nodule plant -1 were produced due to 2,4 [1] to describe chemically and/or enzymatically induced
D and IAA treatments respectively. Less than 7 para- nodule-like knots or outgrowths formed on non-legume root
nodules plant -1 were attributed to Azospirllum alone, systems. These special structures are differed from those
numbers increased to 26 when the diazotroph was known to naturally produced by rhizobia-inoculated
introduced in combination with p-nodule-inducing agents. leguminous plants. Among the chemical compounds that
The cell wall-degrading enzyme mixture with PEG support the production of nodule-like root tumours; 2,4-D
facilitated the crack -entry invasion of the diazotroph in (2,4-dichloro-phenoxyacetate), IAA (indole acetic acid) and
population of > 5x10 5 cfu g -1 root. High rates of C 2 H2 tryptophan are the universally used [2-4]. This opened a
reductions of > 200 nmoles C 2 H4 g -1 root hr-1 were window for microbiologists to search for the possible
estimated for the enzyme mixture-PEG treated plants. The contribution of these nodular structures in the plant -
average glutamine synthetase activities of plant leaves were microbiota interweave and consequently to crop production.
the highest (57.1-86.3 µ mol g -1 Fw hr-1 ) for IAA- Among the strategies adopted to magnify the benefits from
Azospirillum treatment. Wheat plants successfully N2 -fixation by diazotrophs to cereal crops, in particular, are
paranodulated in pot experiment when pre-treated with IAA to induce the formation of tumour-like outgrowths by the
and enzyme mixture and inoculated with Azospirillum in use of the auxin 2,4-D which successfully created a large
presence of 50 % of recommended N, plant biomass and N number of para-nodules on wheat plants [5]. When
yields increased as well. The highest levels of chlorophyll a introduced into the plant-soil system, diazotrophs occupy
(2.10 µg g -1 Dw), chlorophyll b (2.28) and carotenoids the root theater and penetrate the paranodules by migrating
(1.59) were estimated for inoculated plants pre-treated with in between loosely arranged cells which covered their outer
IAA plus enzyme mixture. In the field trial, as high as > 2.0 layers or via invading the spaces at the junction of root and
kg plot -1 total biological yield was produced by plants para-nodules. When wheat plants were treated with 2,4-D
initially primed by soaking in water. The superior grain and inoculated with the cyanobacteriumNostoc sp. and kept
yields of 441.7-571.4 g plot -1 were attributed to to grow in N-deficient medium, the estimated ethylene
Azospirillum inoculation together with IAA and enzyme production levels were 3-folds compared to the auxin-
mixture for 50 % N-supplied plants. Seed priming untreated plants although the root system largely colonized
somewhat raised the grain yield. by the cyanobacterium. In an attempt to study the effect of
Azospirillumbrasilense inoculation on para-nodule
range 48.3-59.1 µ mol g -1 Fw h -1 depending upon the obtained. In absence of inoculation, the effect of IAA and
material and cultivar (Fig. 3). Azospirillum inoculation of enzyme mixture together was not that successful for N
chemical-treated plants raised the enzyme activity up to > accumulation where average content of 22.84 mg plant -1 was
78 %. The average enzyme activities of the chemical- scored.
diazotroph treatments could be arranged in the descending Ear dry weights significantly affected by the applied
order: IAA (74.0 µ mol g -1 Fw h -1 ) > 2,4-D (69.7) > enzyme- treatments, being the lowest for untreated plants (272.5 mg
PEG (67.0). Irrespective of treatments, root systems of cv. plant -1 in average). Plants pre-treated with IAA plus enzyme
Sakha 94 exhibited the highest average glutamine mixture simultaneously inoculated with Azospirillum
synthetase activity (66.4 µ mol g -1 Fw h -1 ) followed by cv. produced the highest ear dry weights of 692 and 666 mg
Giza 168 (63.7) and cv. Gemeza 10 (54.5). plant -1 for cvs. Sakha 94 and Giza 168 respectively.
100
10
200
150
100
50
0
80
60
40
20
Treatments
Fig. 3.Glutamine synthetase activities (µ mol g -1 Fw h -1 ) of wheat leaves of the different chemical and inoculation treatments.
3.5 6
Nitrogen content (mg plant-1 )
3 5
Dry weight (mg plant-1 )
2.5
4
2
3
1.5
y = 0.75x + 0.7233 2 y = 0.49x + 4.0133
1 R² = 0.9012 R² = 0.9657
0.5 1
0 0
1 3 17 1 3 17
-1 p-nodule no. plant-1
p-nodule no. plant
Fig. 4. Linear regression between p-nodule numbers and plant dry weight (A) and nitrogen content (B).
a b c d (A)
I a b c d
II
26.7 24.8
29.6 30.58
16.8 21.3
26.7 23.3
(B)
a b c d a b c d
I II
10.62
13.14
27.82 25.9
Fig. 5. Percentage increases in total biological (A) and protein (B) yields of cvs. Sakha 94 (I) and Giza 168 (II) over untre ated
plants. a) 100 % N, b) 50 % N, c) 50 % N plus Azospirillum and d) 50 % N plus Azospirillum plus IAA and enzyme
mixture.
cv. Giza168
Control 2.0 3.9 11.3 0.35 0.06 0.19
2,4-D 14.0 3.7 11.9 0.31 0.07 0.10
IAA 19.0 5.5 14.2 0.39 0.08 0.21
Enz-PEG 12.0 3.2 10.9 0.29 0.08 0.19
Azospirillum(Az) 7.0 6.3 17.8 0.35 0.11 0.33
2,4-D + Az 19.0 6.4 17.6 0.36 0.10 0.39
IAA + Az 10.0 6.9 20.0 0.35 0.08 0.42
Enz-PEG + Az 23.0 4.8 12.8 0.38 0.06 0.24
cv. Gemeza10
Control 0.0 4.1 12.0 0.34 0.04 0.12
2,4-D 9.0 4.9 10.6 0.46 0.03 0.09
IAA 6.0 5.2 13.9 0.37 0.05 0.16
Enz-PEG 12.0 3.3 9.9 0.33 0.03 0.13
Azospirillum(Az) 4.0 4.9 15.6 0.31 0.09 0.32
2,4-D + Az 18.0 4.8 11.1 0.43 0.08 0.25
IAA + Az 8.0 5.9 16.6 0.36 0.04 0.30
Enz-PEG + Az 16.0 4.9 10.4 0.47 0.05 0.19
Table.3. Para-nodulation and yield parameters of field grown wheat cultivars of the different treatments
Treatments p-nodules TBYa (kg plot-1 ) PYb (g plot-1 ) GYc (g plot-1 )
-1
(no. plant )
I II I II I II I II
Without priming
Control 4.0 6.0 0.96 0.84 19.8 16.8 386.1 323.2
100 % N 2.0 4.0 2.46 2.16 43.6 38.7 466.6 399.7
50 % N 6.0 8.0 1.93 1.88 28.4 26.7 401.4 321.6
50 % N + (Az) 11.0 7.0 2.29 2.02 44.2 37.9 515.5 476.3
50 % N+IAA 26.0 15.0 2.38 2.25 51.4 42.8 566.7 471.2
+Enz. +Az
With priming
Control 0.0 3.0 0.85 0.91 18.4 15.9 349.7 352.5
100 % N 0.0 12.0 2.51 1.99 46.7 48.2 488.8 412.1
50 % N 4.0 8.0 1.86 1.94 29.8 30.3 397.3 387.6
50 % N + (Az) 11.0 18.0 2.66 2.00 46.3 42.6 544.8 479.5
50 % N+IAA 19.0 33.3 2.92 2.47 50.6 48.4 571.4 441.7
+Enz. +Az
LSD (0.05) 2.0 0.36 12.4 89.2
CV (% ) 8.4 18.9 16.5 11.3
a, total biological yield; b, protein yield; c, grain yield.
Table.5. Change percentages in wheat grain yield (g plot -1 ) due to seed water priming prior to cultivation (related to unprimed
ones
Treatments Sakha 94 Giza 168
Control -9.4 +9.1
100 % N +4.8 +3.1
50 % N -1.0 +20.5
50 % N + Azosp +5.7 +0.7
50 % N + Azosp + IAA-Enz +0.8 -6.3