Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CARLOS URQUILLA-DIAZ,
JUDE GILLESPIE, and
BEN WILCOX
Relators,
v. 8:07-cv-669-T-23-TGW
KAPLAN UNIVERSITY
a/k/a Kaplan College
a/k/a Iowa College Acquisition Corp;
KAPLAN HIGHER
EDUCATION CORPORATION,
a division of Kaplan, Inc.,
wholly owned subsidiary of
The Washington Post Company
Defendants.
/
The Plaintiff United States of America hereby files its Motion for Extension of
Time to Respond to the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 21). The United States
seeks a two-week extension--i.e., until May 29, 2008--within which to file any statement
On May 1, 2008, Defendants filed their Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 21), raising
issues of interest to the United States, including some that appear to be issues of first
impression in this Circuit. By Local Rule 3.01(b), any response thereto is due on or
Case 8:07-cv-00669-SDM-TGW Document 23 Filed 05/12/2008 Page 2 of 3
before May 15, 2008.1 The undersigned has been conferring with attorneys from the
statement in response on those issues and, if so, to draft that response. Unfortunately,
because of the complexity of the issues and the two separate offices with which the
undersigned must confer, the determination and drafting cannot be completed by May
As the deadline for filing any response has not yet run, this Motion is made
pursuant to Rule 6(b)(1)(A), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and the granting of same
is a matter wholly within the Court’s discretion. The United States respectfully submits
that permitting the brief extension requested will allow the United States adequate time
Respectfully submitted,
1
The United States is the real party in interest in a qui tam suit, and remains so even after declining to
intervene. See U.S. ex. rel. Timson v. Sampson, 518 F.3d 870, 873 (11th Cir. 2008). Accordingly, the
United States respectfully submits that it is appropriate for the U.S. to respond to the post-declination
filings of other parties when necessary to preserve the interests of the United States. See, e.g., U.S. ex.
rel. McCready v. Columbia/HCA, 251 F.Supp.2d 114, 120 (D.D.C. 2003).
-2-
Case 8:07-cv-00669-SDM-TGW Document 23 Filed 05/12/2008 Page 3 of 3
The undersigned conferred with Susan Eisenberg, counsel for the Defendants,
who stated that Defendants do not oppose the requested extension.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on May 12, 2008, I electronically filed the foregoing with the
Clerk of the Court by using the CM/ECF system which will send a notice of electronic
filing to the following:
and
I further certify that on May 12, 2008, a copy of the foregoing, along with notice of
electronic filing of same, was served by e-mail on the following non-CM/ECF
participants:
-3-