Professional Documents
Culture Documents
G. S T O O P S
Laboratory for Mineralogy, Petrography and Micropedology, Kr~jgslaan 281, 9000-Gent
(Belgmm)
(Accepted for publication February 17, 1983)
ABSTRACT
Stoops, G., 1983. S E M and hght mmroscopic observations of minerals in bog-ores of the
Belgian Campine. Geoderma, 30: 179--186.
Soft bog-ore deposits are frequently present in alluvial sods of the Nete Valley, Pro-
vince of Antwerp, Belgium. A profile was studmd consisting of four layers of whmh the
upper three were analyzed with the light microscope and SEM (scanning electron mmro-
scope). The top layer consmted mainly of clay and fragmented diatom shells. Isotropic
Fe-oxihydrates and radiating goethite needles were present in the underlying limonitic
layer Siderite and vlvianite were found in the third layer, the former often present in the
wall of root channels, whereas the latter was frequently found within the channels.
Vivianite was also found associated with decaying roots or alone inside root channels
Pyrite frambolds were also found m the lower part of the profile
The presence, close to each other, of different minerals such as goethlte, pyrite, mder-
lte and vivianite cannot be explained by macroenvironmental mineral eqmlibria alone. It
requires the existence of different mmroenvlronments which can vary in hme and place.
The study of such microenvironments, however, requires additional in mtu microchemmal
submicroscopm techniques
INTRODUCTION
A r e s e a r c h p r o j e c t o n s o f t b o g - o r e d e p o s i t s o f t h e B e l g i a n C a m p m e is c u r -
r e n t l y in p r o g r e s s . T h e s e d e p o s i t s a r e f r e q u e n t l y o b s e r v e d in a l l u w a l soils o f
t h e N e t e V a l l e y in t h e P r o v i n c e o f A n t w e r p , B e l g i u m . A t y p m a l p r o f i l e w a s
e x p o s e d m t h e s e d e p o s i t s a n d r e s u l t s o f p r e l i m i n a r y i n v e s t i g a t i o n s a r e re-
p o r t e d h e r e . T h e p r o f i l e h a d a h i g h g r o u n d w a t e r l e v e l a n d all h o r i z o n s w e r e
oversaturated. Four layers could be distinguished: a greyish, clayey topsoil
of 20 cm thmkness with "rust" coated channels; a 20 cm thick hmonite nch
METHODS
Large undisturbed soil blocks were impregnated with polyester resin for
thin section preparation following drying by acetone replacement
(Fltzpatrmk, 1980). These thin sections were studied with the light micro-
scope. Undisturbed clods, which were not hardened, were investigated with a
binocular microscope, which allowed subsamphng for SEM studms. Samples
for SEM study were m o u n t e d with collodion on alummmm stubs, coated
with gold and examined with a Cambndge Stereoscan (Stoops and De Mets,
1970). Mineralogical determinations were confirmed by XRD-analyses, using
a Gandolfi camera.
Results
The clayey surface layer of the bog-ore profile was sampled between 10
and 15 cm depth. It is characterised by a porous microstructure in whmh
rust-coated channels, occasionally containing roots, dominate m the thin sec-
tion. The greyish fine fraction consists mainly of small opaline bodies
(phytoliths and diatoms) and clay. SEM showed that much of the fine frac-
tion comprises fragments of diatoms (Fig. 1).
5~m
Fig. 1. Fragments of diatom shells and clay m the groundmass of the surface horizon
(SEM).
181
The underlying limonitic layer was sampled between 20 and 30 cm. It has
a porous microstructure with many root channels. The sample consists of
alternating greyish and brownish zones. The small greyish zones are similar
to those of the topsoil, whereas the larger brownish zones exhibit dark red-
dish-brown, compact, structureless isotropm domains and yellowish to
brownish bands of goethite.
The browmsh bands consist of weakly birefnngent, length-slow goethite
fibres (first order grey up to yellow) forming a radiating pattern perpendicu-
lar to the walls of voids. Sometimes several layers could be distinguished m
thin sections (Fig. 2). Similar goethite coatings were observed by Eswaran
(1972} in an Ultisol from Nicaragua.
Fig. 2. Fan-like goethite coating on the wall of a pore in the lirnonitic layer. Polarised
light.
Fig .q Amorphous iron oxlhydrates in limomtic layer with shrinkage cracks (SEMI
50 u m
b
Fig 5. Goethlte coatings on the walls of pores in the limonitic layer: a) coating of radiat-
ing goethite needles, b) layered goethite, and c) topography of the surface of a goethite
coating (SEM).
Fig 6 Root remnant m soft bog-ore, partly filled with fine granular vivlanite and partly
surrounded by siderite. Polarlsed light_
-I
:i
lSOurn
I
;l
b . -
b
Fig, 7. Siderite' a) siderite spheres covering the wall of a pore m a hard bog-ore, b) detail
of the central sphere (SEM).
CONCLUSIONS
Fig. 8. Anhedral and elongated granular vivianlte in a root channel; a) and b) (SEM).
layers, vlz. a clayey surface layer, a hmomtic layer, a layer containing vivian-
ite and siderite, and layered alluvlal deposlts below a depth of 70 cm.
Light mmroscopy allowed the identlflcation of phytoliths and diatoms m
the clayey layer. Both goethite fibres and structureless isotropic domains
with Iron oxihydrates were present in the reddish-brown zone of the limon-
Itm layer. Siderite and viviamte were dlstinguished m the third layer. Vivlan-
ire was often assoclated wlth orgamc material, whereas siderite occurred sub-
cutaneously to root channels. Pyrite framboids were also recogmsed in this
layer.
S E M observatlons of the same material in unhardened clods of soil helped
to establish the morphology of various minerals at both lower and hlgher
magnifications. In this manner m situ observations m a d e with the hght
microscope in thin sections could be compared with S E M data on loose
materials.
The above data m d m a t e that goethite, slderite, vivianite and pyrite have
formed m the soft bog-ore. All of these m a y crystallise near to each other
in the lower part of the profile. Such crystallisatlon cannot be explained by
macroenvironmental mineral equilibria alone. This indicates that various
mlcroenvironments with different conditmns must exlst and have existed
beside each other; even in these profiles wlth a hlgh groundwater table. It
also emphasizes that further m situ studies of these micro-envlronments re-
qulre mmrochemical analyses with a number of submicroscopic techmques
such as described by B1sdom (1981), especlally E M A (electron microprobe
analysis) and S E M - W D X R A (scanning electron microscopy-wavelength
dlspersive X-ray analyms).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Dr. F. De Coninck, Dr. E. Van Ranst and Dr. R. Vochten are thanked for
providing the undisturbed samples. Mr. Bohain of the L a b o r a t o r y of Elec-
186
REFERENCES