Professional Documents
Culture Documents
5 Mechanical
14. 5 Release
Material Enhancements
John Doyle - ANSYS Technical Support
14. 5 Release
If plotted in 3D principal stress space, the von Mises yield surface is cylinder.
σ1 σ
Plastic σy
Elastic ε
No stress state can exist outside of the cylinder. Instead, hardening rules will
describe how the cylinder changes with respect to yielding.
July 19, 2013 5 Release 14.5
Curve Fitting for Combined Hardening
... Review Hardening Rules
• There are two basic hardening rules to prescribe the modification of the yield
surface:
Subsequent Yield
σ2 Surface
– Kinematic hardening.
Initial Yield
• The yield surface remains constant
Surface
in size and translates in the
direction of yielding. σ1
Subsequent Yield
σ2 Surface
– Isotropic hardening.
Initial Yield
• The yield surface expands uniformly Surface
in all directions with plastic flow. σ1
• The elastic region is equal to twice the initial yield stress. This is called the
Bauschinger effect.
σ1 σ
Subsequent
Yield Surface
σ'
σy
2σy
α
Initial Yield
Surface ε
σ2 σ3
July 19, 2013 7 Release 14.5
Curve Fitting for Combined Hardening
... Review Nonlinear Kinematic Hardening
The Chaboche Kinematic Hardening is a nonlinear kinematic hardening model.
The evolution law which defines the shifting of the yield surface has a
nonlinear term:
2
∆α i = Ci ∆ε pl − γ i α i λ
3 Where: εpl is equivalent plastic strain
C/γγ
α
Limiting ε
value of
α}
{α}
σ2 σ3
Current
Yield
Surface
• The Curve fitting tool can be used to calculate Ci and γi values from a set of stress-
strain test data.
July 19, 2013 9 Release 14.5
Curve Fitting for Combined Hardening
... Review Nonlinear Kinematic Hardening
This figure breaks down the Chaboche model parameters and how they are
related to each other:
• n is 3, the number of kinematic models combined together.
• R is the yield stress (constant value)
• Values α1 – α3 are the back α+R
3
F= (s − α ) : (s − α ) − R = 0
Where:
2
s = deviatoric stress tensor
α = the back stress tensor (location of the center of the yield surface)
R = elastic domain radius
σy) or as an isotropic hardening
R can be defined either as a constant (σ
variable (BISO, MISO, or NLISO), resulting in Combined Hardening (the
translation AND expansion of the yield surface).
Combined Hardening is only available via APDL commands in WB-Mechanical.
Curve fitting routine supports both nonlinear kinematic hardening and
combined hardening
Stress (MPa)
0.04 γ1 = 400
500
0.03
0
0.02
0.01
-500
σ
-1000
0.00
-1500
0 2 4 6 8 10 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07
Stress (MPa)
Unsymmetry
500
0.004
0
0.002
-500 Shakedown modeled with
-1000
Chaboche using:
n=2
0.000 -1500
0 2 4 6 8 10 0.000 0.002 0.004 0.006 R=980
0.008
5.00E+02
0.00E+00 Series1
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25
-5.00E+02
-1.00E+03
-1.50E+03
For multiple temperatures, a separate text file is necessary for each discrete
temperature.
Reference: Rezaiee-Pajand, M.,Sinaie,S.; “On the calibration of the Chaboche hardening model
and a modified hardening rule for uniaxial ratcheting prediction”, International Journal of Solids
and Structures Vol. 46 ,pp. 3009–3017, 2009
14. 5 Release
14. 5 Release
WB-Mechanical
Material Enhancements
www.jmmedical.com
• Martensite “plates” are formed within the austenite phase. The formation of these
martensite plates generally do not involve dislocation motion or diffusional flow.
• Consider the case of an elevated temperature where only austenite exists at the stress-
free state. If a material is loaded, the higher stress induces a phase change to
martensite (path ABC). Unloading will result in a reverse transformation from
martensite back to austenite with hysteresis (path CDA). This is the superelastic effect.
• Accounts for austenite to martensite (A→S) and martensite to austenite (S→A) phase
transformations.
F − σ fAS (1 + α )
for A→S transformaƟon with HAS defined as:
σ sAS (1 + α ) < F < σ fAS (1 + α )
1 if
H AS = F& > 0
0 otherwise
Where:
D = Material elastic stiffness tensor β = Material Parameter
ε = Total Strain T = Temperature
εtr = Total Transformation Strain To = Temperature which no twinning martensite
εtr' = Deviatoric Transformation Strain is observed
τM(T) = < β (T - To) >, a postive montonical ly h = material parameter related to the hardening
increasing function of the temperatu re of the material during phase transformation
Iεtr' (εtr' ) = indicator function introduced to satisfy
the constraint on transformation norm
Where:
h
To
R
β
εL
Em
m
SMA cannot be combined with other materials for the same material.
WB-Mechanical
Material Enhancements
* The virgin material is modeled using one of the available hyperelastic potentials, and
the Mullins effect modifications to the constitutive response are proportional to the
maximum load in the material history.
The arbitrary limits 0 < η < 1.0 are imposed with η = 1 defined as the
state of the material without any changes due to the Mullins effect.
φ (1) = 0
φ ′(η ) = −WO( Fij )
Which implicitly defines the Ogden Roxburgh parameterη
∂W ∂WO
Sij = 2 =η2
∂Cij ∂Cij
The modified Ogden-Roxburgh damage function has the following functional
form of the damage variable
1 Wm − WO
η = 1 − erf
r m + β L m
Where: r, m and β are user defined material damage parameters
Wm = max[Wo(t )] is the maximum virgin potential over the
time interval t ∈ [0, t 0 ]
LS07
LS05
LS03
LS01 LS08
LS02 LS06
LS04
i =1 α i i =1 α i β i
∑µα i i N
1
µo = i =1
κ o = ∑ µ iα i + β i
2 i =1 3
However, unlike the regular Ogden model, in the Ogden compressible foam
model, the volumetric and deviatoric terms are tightly coupled. Hence, this
model is meant to model highly compressible rubber behavior.