Burden of Proof and Presumptions another belonged to the latter;
Section 1. Burden of proof. — Burden of (h) That an obligation delivered up proof is the duty of a party to present to the debtor has been paid; evidence on the facts in issue necessary (i) That prior rents or installments to establish his claim or defense by the had been paid when a receipt for amount of evidence required by law. (1a, the later one is produced; 2a) (j) That a person found in Section 2. Conclusive presumptions. — possession of a thing taken in the The following are instances of conclusive doing of a recent wrongful act is presumptions: the taker and the doer of the whole (a) Whenever a party has, by his act; otherwise, that things which a own declaration, act, or omission, person possess, or exercises acts intentionally and deliberately led to of ownership over, are owned by another to believe a particular thing him; true, and to act upon such belief, (k) That a person in possession of he cannot, in any litigation arising an order on himself for the out of such declaration, act or payment of the money, or the omission, be permitted to falsify it: delivery of anything, has paid the (b) The tenant is not permitted to money or delivered the thing deny the title of his landlord at the accordingly; time of commencement of the (l) That a person acting in a public relation of landlord and tenant office was regularly appointed or between them. (3a) elected to it; Section 3. Disputable presumptions. — (m) That official duty has been The following presumptions are regularly performed; satisfactory if uncontradicted, but may be (n) That a court, or judge acting as contradicted and overcome by other such, whether in the Philippines or evidence: elsewhere, was acting in the lawful (a) That a person is innocent of exercise of jurisdiction; crime or wrong; (o) That all the matters within an (b) That an unlawful act was done issue raised in a case were laid with an unlawful intent; before the court and passed upon (c) That a person intends the by it; and in like manner that all ordinary consequences of his matters within an issue raised in a voluntary act; dispute submitted for arbitration (d) That a person takes ordinary were laid before the arbitrators and care of his concerns; passed upon by them; (e) That evidence willfully (p) That private transactions have suppressed would be adverse if been fair and regular; produced; (q) That the ordinary course of (f) That money paid by one to business has been followed; another was due to the latter; (r) That there was a sufficient consideration for a contract; (s) That a negotiable instrument (4) If a married person has was given or indorsed for a been absent for four sufficient consideration; consecutive years, the (t) That an endorsement of spouse present may contract negotiable instrument was made a subsequent marriage if he before the instrument was overdue or she has well-founded and at the place where the belief that the absent spouse instrument is dated; is already death. In case of (u) That a writing is truly dated; disappearance, where there (v) That a letter duly directed and is a danger of death the mailed was received in the regular circumstances hereinabove course of the mail; provided, an absence of only (w) That after an absence of seven two years shall be sufficient years, it being unknown whether or for the purpose of contracting not the absentee still lives, he is a subsequent marriage. considered dead for all purposes, However, in any case, before except for those of succession. marrying again, the spouse The absentee shall not be considered present must institute a dead for the purpose of opening his summary proceedings as succession till after an absence of ten provided in the Family Code years. If he disappeared after the age of and in the rules for seventy-five years, an absence of five declaration of presumptive years shall be sufficient in order that his death of the absentee, succession may be opened. without prejudice to the effect The following shall be considered dead of reappearance of the for all purposes including the division of absent spouse. the estate among the heirs: (x) That acquiescence resulted (1) A person on board a from a belief that the thing vessel lost during a sea acquiesced in was conformable to voyage, or an aircraft with is the law or fact; missing, who has not been (y) That things have happened heard of for four years since according to the ordinary course of the loss of the vessel or nature and ordinary nature habits aircraft; of life; (2) A member of the armed (z) That persons acting as forces who has taken part in copartners have entered into a armed hostilities, and has contract of copartneship; been missing for four years; (aa) That a man and woman (3) A person who has been in deporting themselves as husband danger of death under other and wife have entered into a lawful circumstances and whose contract of marriage; existence has not been (bb) That property acquired by a known for four years; man and a woman who are capacitated to marry each other and who live exclusively with each (ee) That a thing once proved to other as husband and wife without exist continues as long as is usual the benefit of marriage or under with things of the nature; void marriage, has been obtained (ff) That the law has been obeyed; by their joint efforts, work or (gg) That a printed or published industry. book, purporting to be printed or (cc) That in cases of cohabitation published by public authority, was by a man and a woman who are so printed or published; not capacitated to marry each other (hh) That a printed or published and who have acquire properly book, purporting contain reports of through their actual joint cases adjudged in tribunals of the contribution of money, property or country where the book is industry, such contributions and published, contains correct reports their corresponding shares of such cases; including joint deposits of money (ii) That a trustee or other person and evidences of credit are equal. whose duty it was to convey real (dd) That if the marriage is property to a particular person has terminated and the mother actually conveyed it to him when contracted another marriage within such presumption is necessary to three hundred days after such perfect the title of such person or termination of the former marriage, his successor in interest; these rules shall govern in the (jj) That except for purposes of absence of proof to the contrary: succession, when two persons (1) A child born before one perish in the same calamity, such hundred eighty days after the as wreck, battle, or conflagration, solemnization of the and it is not shown who died first, subsequent marriage is and there are no particular considered to have been circumstances from which it can be conceived during such inferred, the survivorship is marriage, even though it be determined from the probabilities born within the three hundred resulting from the strength and the days after the termination of age of the sexes, according to the the former marriage. following rules: (2) A child born after one 1. If both were under the age hundred eighty days following of fifteen years, the older is the celebration of the deemed to have survived; subsequent marriage is 2. If both were above the age considered to have been sixty, the younger is deemed conceived during such to have survived; marriage, even though it be 3. If one is under fifteen and born within the three hundred the other above sixty, the days after the termination of former is deemed to have the former marriage. survived; 4. If both be over fifteen and under sixty, and the sex be different, the male is deemed to have survived, if the sex be the same, the older; 5. If one be under fifteen or over sixty, and the other between those ages, the latter is deemed to have survived. (kk) That if there is a doubt, as between two or more persons who are called to succeed each other, as to which of them died first, whoever alleges the death of one prior to the other, shall prove the same; in the absence of proof, they shall be considered to have died at the same time. (5a) Section 4. No presumption of legitimacy or illegitimacy. — There is no presumption of legitimacy of a child born after three hundred days following the dissolution of the marriage or the separation of the spouses. Whoever alleges the legitimacy or illegitimacy of such child must prove his allegation. (6)