You are on page 1of 17

GEOMETRY:

MEASURING
THE EARTH
A pilot and engineer’s handbook to
flat earth truth.

1st edition

G P Saint-Denis
The Earth Is
flat
I have been thinking about writing
a flat earth book for a couple years
now. I wasn’t sure how to approach
such a hated and controversial
topic. I started writing a book with
a boring textbook-like feel to it. I
came across this poster that made
it much more fun to dive into the
topic. The poster may be
copyrighted but I am not writing
this book for monetization. I’m
writing this book for non-profit
educational purposes, which falls
under fair use, just like all the
YouTube videos.
Most people believe the earth to be a spinning globe because
that’s what they’ve been told to believe since they were born.
Mass programming has led the whole world to believe in a new
world order religion that they call “science,” where the false
prophets are none other than the likes of Albert Einstein, Isaac
Newton, Charles Darwin, Georges Lemaitre, men that have led
you down the left path of ignorance.

Most of you have it on faith that outer space is real and that
we’ve landed on the moon. Yet you have no proof for any of it
except our overlords’ word for it. Images can be manipulated
and constitute no proof either.

This book looks to encourage anyone who dares question what


they’ve been told to believe. People have been programmed to shun
away from discomfort and shining a light on this matter makes many
people very uncomfortable, as it shakes the very foundations of their
core beliefs, ingrained by years upon years of television,
“educational” and generational programming. It is not an easy task
but it needn’t be so difficult, nor frightening. This book seeks to
introduce the reader to the paradigm shifting reality that is flat earth.
1. Time lapse photography &
simple night sky observations
We are told to believe:
- Earth’s rotational speed: 1,000 mph (equator)
- Earth’s revolution speed: 70,000 mph
- Sun’s speed around the Milky Way Galaxy: 450,000 mph
- Milky Way Galaxy moving at an astounding 1.3 million mph

Figure 2 is a time-lapse photograph showing how the stars in


the night sky trace perfect circles or perfect arcs.
Figure 1.1
The model we are presented with above in figure 1 is not
compatible with our observations as recorded by the time lapse
photography.

Taking into account the different orbital, revolution, and


rotational speeds, the pattern of the stars’ trajectory in the night
sky would be much more complex as opposed to the simple,
predictable, perfect circles, or perfect arcs, that we observe and
record in real life.

Figure 1.2
Wernher Von Braun was an aerospace engineer and the leading
figure in the development of rocket technology in Nazi
Germany. He was recruited by the US during Operation
Paperclip and was recognized as the "father of rocket
technology and space science." All throughout his life Von
Braun has advocated for a human mission to Mars. Yet, he
wished to imprint a testament to God's handiwork on his
tombstone: "The heavens declare the glory of God; and the
firmament sheweth his handywork.” PSALMS 19:1

In other words, the night sky is like a fingerprint, proof of a


grand architect.

Another point to make is that the constellations haven’t


Figure 1.3 changed in millennia. A constellation is defined according to
wikipedia as a “group of stars forming a recognizable pattern
that is traditionally named after its apparent form identified
with a mythological figure. The Western-traditional
constellations are the forty-eight Greek classical patterns dating
as far back as the 5th century BC.”

None of these constellations, or star patterns, have changed in


the slightest despite the rotation, revolution, and orbital speeds
that would make for ever changing complex patterns in the
night sky.

Imagine if you will, if the earth were holding a pencil over a


giant sheet of paper that underlays our galaxy. What pattern
would the pencil be tracing as the spinning, revolving globular
Figure 1.4 earth made its way across the galaxy?
2. Does water stick to a
spinning ball?
Centrifugal force is “the apparent force, equal and opposite to the centripetal
force, drawing a rotating body away from the center of rotation, caused by the
inertia of the body,” as defined by the American Heritage Dictionary.

The centripetal force is an actual force. In other words, when spinning an


object on a string, the string exerts an inward centripetal force on the object,
while the object exerts an apparent outward force on the string that results
from the effect of inertia during a turn.

Inertia is a property of matter by which an object continues in its state of rest Figure 2.1
or uniform motion in a straight line, unless that state is changed by an external
force.

In other words, the rotating mass experiences an apparent centrifugal force


pushing it away from the center of its circular path, even though what it is
actually experiencing is the inward centripetal force that keeps it from literally
going off on a tangent, due to its inertia.

Thus, when spinning a wet tennis ball, water droplets will be ejected, going off
on a tangent as it leaves the surface of the tennis ball.

This of course begs the question as to why gravity doesn’t allow for the water
to stick to the spinning ball as it does for the spinning globe. Not a single
disturbance can be observed nor recorded on a lake surface or puddle of water
that is at rest on the surface of our so-called spinning globe. The lake remains
placid, the puddle of water remains unperturbed, despite the assumed rotation Figure 2.2
of the earth. This allows for one piece of evidence that the earth does not spin.
Yet, “experts” will have us believe that “gravity" is
what allows for the bodies of water to remain at
rest and unperturbed on the earth’s surface.
Gravity is what keeps the oceans from flying into
outer space. Gravity is what allows Australia and
everyone there not to fall off the map. Gravity is
what makes an airplane fly straight and level
around the so-called “globe.” Gravity is why objects
fall.

Yet the hot air balloon rises; a butterfly will spread


its wings and defy the all-powerful, magical, mighty
force of gravity. Not even the vacuum of outer
space is strong enough to suck out earth’s
atmosphere and deplete it of oxygen.

Figure 2.3
3. Laws of buoyancy and density: Archimedes Principle
The laws of buoyancy and density are also known as Archimedes principle. More specifically, Archimedes Principle states that the
buoyant force on a submerged object is equal to the weight (or density) of the fluid that is displaced by the object.

In NASA’s own words, “hot air balloons rise into the air because the density of the air (warmer air) inside the balloon is less dense
than the air outside the balloon (cooler air). The balloon displaces a fluid that is heavier than it is, so it has a buoyant force acting
on the system. Balloons tend to fly better in the morning, when the surrounding air is cool.”

Notice how NASA uses the term fluid. This is a key word. Air, just like water, is defined as a fluid in physics. An object submerged
in water will behave according to the same set of laws as an object submerged in air. Hence, an object rises or falls not because
of gravity, but because of its relative density compared to its surrounding environment.

Figure 3
4. Does the atmosphere
rotate with the earth
Imagine if you will a building large and tall
enough to house a floating hot air balloon, that
way it cannot be affected by the wind. What do
you think would happen to the ballon after
enough time has passed for the earth to rotate
beneath it? Would it still be floating in the same
spot? Or, would it have moved horizontally,
hitting the building wall?

People have thought of using balloons as a really


cheap way of traveling. The idea held that you
should be able to land in a different place after
some time because the earth rotates below. As we
all know, this does not happen. We are told to
believe that it is because the atmosphere (air,
clouds etc) also rotate with the same angular
velocity as the earth with a 1:1 ratio. This is
simply another misdirection.

Figure 4.1 is what we actually observe, where


the balloon floats in the same spot because the
earth does not rotate. If earth were to rotate
figure 4.2 is what we would experience.
5. Geometry: Measurement of the shape of the Earth
The etymology of geometry is literally the measurement of the Earth. Simple geometry is all that is required to determine its shape.
With the proper geometric instruments and mindset, one can extrapolate the shape of the earth.

Rough topography might make it more challenging to the determine the flatness or degree of curvature a terrain might have.
However, sea level is the universal reference point from which all elevation is measured.

There are certain places on earth where the absence of physical features make it very easy to determine on a large scale whether
the land naturally curves or remains straight throughout.

A good example of this is the Bolivian salt flat, Salar de Uyuni, with more than 10,500 square kilometers of “exceptional
flatness,” as wikipedia puts it. Huffington Post describes it as an “endless plane of blindingly bright salt.”

The mainstream media seems to agree on the flatness of this section of the world. But they don’t agree on the flatness of the
oceans (that would be because of the waves.) What makes a surface flat?

Adrian Borsa, a geophysicist at the US Geological Survey in Pasadena, California, described the flats “as if you’re on a white
ocean with no waves,” seemingly comparing the flatness of Salar de Uyuni to the flatness of oceans. He follows up, sadly, with
“you see the horizon, you see the curvature of the earth. It’s absolutely featureless.” Another example of truth mixed with lies.

mathforum.org states that although geometry gradually grew more abstract, people assumed until the beginning of the
19th century that the axioms and postulates of geometry naturally corresponded to the physical world as they knew it
on earth. In modern terms, however, geometry need have no physical reference at all.”
6. Planes fly straight and level
We live in a 1984 Orwellian society where everything has lost
its meaning by taking on multiple meanings and where 2 + 2 =
5 (many examples online that argue 2 + 2 = 5).

As thoughtco.com writes “you hear about parallel lines that by


definition never meet each other — except they do in some
warped reality dreamt up by Albert Einstein. The concept you
have always known as the line has been renamed ‘line
segment.’”

Parallel means they cross. Line means curve and curve means
line.

As a pilot, you have onboard instruments that help you


determine your trajectory and whether you are flying level
(horizontally level) and straight (laterally level, i.e. straight
line).
Figure 6.1
The main one however remains the attitude indicator,
otherwise known as the artificial horizon. When your airplane
is stable and flying straight and level, your attitude indicator
will remain on its artificial horizon with no up or down
pitching motion.

This is another measurement and indication that we are flying


over a plane, not a curve, as flying over a curve would require
constant pitch correction.
Nose High - Right Wing Low

Straight and Level

Nose Low - Left Wing Low


7. Water seeks its own level:
I kept this one for last. If the evidence so far hasn’t convinced you that the
earth is not a spinning globe, this one should seal the deal for you. Simply
put, water always seeks its own level. Wikipedia defines Fluid
statics or hydrostatics as,
“the branch of fluid mechanics that studies fluids at rest. It encompasses
the study of the conditions under which fluids are at rest
in stable equilibrium as opposed to fluid dynamics, the study of fluids Figure 7.1
in motion. Hydrostatics are categorized as a part of the fluid statics, which
is the study of all fluids, incompressible or not, at rest.”

A physical property of any fluid at rest is that its surface is always level. This
is why we use a spirit level to measure whether a construction is level and
not tilted.
Google defines spirit level as a device consisting of a sealed glass tube Figure 7.2
partially filled with alcohol or other liquid, containing an air bubble whose
position reveals whether a surface is perfectly level. The ocean’s water level is called sea level and remains
Incompressible fluids, like water, will fill up a space up to a certain point the standard reference point for all elevation
where it reaches equilibrium and finds its level. Water, lakes, oceans, are measurement.
level from shore to shore. There is not one side of the lake or ocean that is
Hence, if 70% of the earth is covered in water, which
at higher elevation than the other. This happens with rivers as water trickles
has the physical property of seeking (and finding) its
down to seek and eventually find its level, in lakes or oceans.
own level and equilibrium state, then by deduction we
The world’s greatest rivers, such as the Nile, the Tigris, the Amazon, or the must draw the logical conclusion that we live on a
Mississippi rivers all find their way to the ocean because that is where plane.
about 96% of all of earth’s water is held which covers 70% of the earth’s
FLAT WATER = FLAT EARTH
surface.
Figure 7.3 Great Lakes System Profile

USA Europe

Water is always level.


Rivers on the globe go up the Ocean
curve before reaching sea
GLOBE level, in defiance of “gravity”
USA Europe

Water never curves. Ocean

PLANE Rivers on the plane are simply doing what


Figure 7.4 Figure 7.5
hydrostatics tell us; they simply go down Figure 7.3
towards sea level, seeking its equilibrium state.
Observable

Measurable

Reproducible at any scale

Figure 7.6

Observable

Measurable

Reproducible at any scale

Figure 7.7
8. round earth curvature
drop off
Simple globe earth math. You be the judge.
Credentials

The University of 8ath

We hereby certify that

GREGORY PIERRE SAINT-DENIS

Vice-Chancellor
has been awarded the degree of

MASTER OF ENGINEERING f/liscm 8. \T- p~


IN AEROSPACE ENGINEERING
Academic Registrar

with second-class honours second division

Dean of Faculty of
Engineering & Design

By authority of the Senate

28 June 2011

You might also like