Professional Documents
Culture Documents
129-132 2015
An International Quarterly Scientific Journal
ABSTRACT
Nat. Env. & Poll. Tech.
Website: www.neptjournal.com Water quality model is an effective tool for environmental pollution control, water quality planning and
environmental management. Using systems analysis techniques to plan water pollution control is the
Received: 25-3-2014
foundation for water quality management. It plays a vital role for the entire planning process. In this paper,
Accepted: 22-5-2014
Matlab is used to simulate the water quality in river. The results show that the simulation is well with the
Key Words: observation.
Water quality simulation
Water quality management
Systems analysis
0 0 33 0.29 37 0 92 0.18
3 0.23 36 0.23 42 0.08 97 0.12
6 0.58 39 0.18 47 0.24 102 0.08
9 0.83 42 0.14 52 0.44 107 0.06
12 0.96 45 0.12 57 0.60 112 0.03
15 0.96 48 0.09 62 0.65 117 0.02
18 0.87 51 0.06 67 0.61 122 0.02
21 0.76 54 0.04 72 0.53 127 0.02
24 0.63 57 0.03 77 0.43 132 0.01
27 0.51 60 0.02 82 0.33 137 0.01
30 0.39 63 0 87 0.24 142 0
328.25
1
t 2
= = 69.840 min
t1m C1 4 .7
0.9 C2
N
0.8
∑ C (t i i − t1 ) 2
1007 .49
σt =
2
0.7
i =1
N
= = 127 .208 min 2
∑C
1 7.92
t2m i
0.6 i =1
C/m g/l
0.5
u 2 σ t22 − σ t21
Ed = = 2.446km 2 / d
0.4
2 t 2 − t1
0.3
K1 and K2: Solving the degradation factor coefficients K 1
0.2 and reoxygenation coefficient K 2, SP model can be adopted
0.1
as following:
k1 x Kx
0
0 50 100 150 L = L0 exp(− ) → LnL = LnL0 − 1
t/min u u
k2 x kL
O = Os − (Os − Oo ) exp( − ) + 1 0 [exp(
u k1 − k2
Fig. 1: Tracer concentration curve with time.
k1 x k x
[exp(− ) − exp(− 2 )]
0.4uB 2 0.4 × 0.58 × 20 2
u u
L= = =1432 m
E y 0.0648
k1 x kx
The distance is less than the distance of the tracer into L = L0 exp(− ) → LnL = LnL0 − 1
the first section of the station’s 2300m, it can be determined u u
that the two stations are in a one-dimensional vertical dis- K1/u = -0.0498
persion of the river; longitudinal dispersion coefficient is K1= 0.0498u = 0.0498×20 1/d = 0.996 1/d
calculated to meet the following requirements.
Cs =12.5134mg/L
Thus, average time and variance of the tracer flowing
through the first and second line concentration process sta- K2 x KL
O = Os − (Os − O0 ) exp(− )+ 1 0
tions are: u K1 − K2
N
∑C t i i
158.37 K1x K2 x
= = 19.996 min exp(− u ) − exp(− u )
t = i =1
i
∑C
N
i
t 1
7.92
i =1
30 16
1-2 1-2
2-3 14 2-3
25 3-4 3-4
12
20
10
C /m g/l
C /m g/l
15 8
6
10
5
2
0 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
x/km x/km
January February
18 25
1-2 0-1
16 2-3 1-2
3-4 2-3
20
14 3-4
4-5
12
15
10
C/m g/l
C /m g/ l
8
10
6
4
5
0 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5
x/km x/km
March August
1-2 1-2
12 2-3
2-3
3-4 10
3-4
10
8
8
C /m g /l
C /m g/l
6
6
4
4
2
2
0 0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5
x/km
x/km
October December
Fig. 2: Concentration of BOD 5 with the distance.
The above figure shows that BOD 5 concentration decreases with the distance x increasing.