You are on page 1of 2

ROSELLER DE GUZMAN V.

CA
Prepared by: Joshua Angelo A. Caringal  Petitioner filed a motion for reconsideration
but it was dismissed by the COMELEC En
FACTS: Banc for having been rendered moot
because private respondent won the election.
 Petitioner De Guzman and private
respondent Angelina DG. Dela Cruz were  Thereafter, the trial court in Election Protest
candidates for vice-mayor of Guimba, rendered a Decision, declaring petitioner as
Nueva Ecija in the May 14, 2007 elections. the winner for the Vice-Mayoralty position.

 April 3, 2007 - Private respondent filed  Petitioner filed the instant petition
against petitioner a petition for for certiorari, alleging that the COMELEC
disqualification alleging that petitioner is not acted with grave abuse of discretion in
a citizen of the Philippines, but an disqualifying him from running as Vice-
immigrant and resident of the United States Mayor because of his failure to renounce his
of America. American citizenship, and in dismissing the
motion for reconsideration for being moot.
 In his answer, petitioner admitted that he
was a naturalized American. However,  Petitioner invokes the rulings in Frivaldo v.
on January 25, 2006, he applied for dual Commission on Elections[ and Mercado v.
citizenship under R.A. No. 9225. Manzano,[ that the filing by a person with
dual citizenship of a certificate of candidacy,
 September 6, 2006 - Upon approval of his containing an oath of allegiance, constituted
application, he took his oath of allegiance to as a renunciation of his foreign
the Republic of the Philippines. citizenship. Moreover, he claims that the
COMELEC En Banc prematurely dismissed
 He argued that, having re-acquired the motion for reconsideration because at
Philippine citizenship, he is entitled to that time, there was a pending election
exercise full civil and political rights protest which was later decided in his favor.
including the right to run as vice-mayor of
Guimba, Nueva Ecija. ISSUE:

 Private respondent won the election so W/N petitioner is disqualified from running for vice-
petitioner filed an election protest on mayor of Guimba, Nueva Ecija in the May 14, 2007
grounds of irregularities and massive elections for having failed to renounce his American
cheating. citizenship in accordance with R.A. No. 9225. – YES

 The COMELEC First Division rendered its HELD:


June 15, 2007 Resolution disqualifying
petitioner, stating that petitioner should have R.A. No. 9225 was enacted to allow re-acquisition
renounced his American citizenship before and retention of Philippine citizenship for:
he can run for any public elective position. 1) natural-born citizens who have lost their
This is pursuant to Section 3 of R.A. No. Philippine citizenship by reason of their
9225, which states that: naturalization as citizens of a foreign
country; and
Retention of Philippine Citizenship.
Natural-born citizens of the 2) natural-born citizens of
Philippines who have lost their the Philippines who, after the effectivity of
Philippine citizenship by reason of the law, become citizens of a foreign
their naturalization as citizens of a country. The law provides that they are
foreign country are hereby deemed deemed to have re-acquired or retained their
to have reacquired Philippine Philippine citizenship upon taking the oath
citizenship upon taking the of allegiance.
following oath of allegiance to the
Republic.
Petitioner falls under the first category, being a
natural-born citizen who lost his Philippine
citizenship upon his naturalization as an American
citizen. It must be emphasized that R.A. No. 9225
imposes an additional requirement on those who wish
to seek elective public office, as follows:

Section 5. Civil and Political Rights and


Liabilities. Those who retain or re-acquire
Philippine Citizenship under this Act shall
enjoy full civil and political rights and be
subject to all attendant liabilities and
responsibilities under existing laws of
the Philippines and the following
conditions:

(2) Those seeking elective public


office in the Philippines shall meet
the qualifications for holding such
public office as required by the
Constitution and existing laws and,
at the time of the filing of the
certificate of candidacy, make a
personal and sworn renunciation of
any and all foreign citizenship
before any public officer
authorized to administer an oath.

In the instant case, petitioners Oath of Allegiance and


Certificate of Candidacy did not comply with Section
5(2) of R.A. No. 9225 which further requires those
seeking elective public office in the Philippines to
make a personal and sworn renunciation of foreign
citizenship. Petitioner failed to renounce his
American citizenship; as such, he is disqualified from
running for vice-mayor of Guimba, Nueva Ecija in
the May 14, 2007 elections.

You might also like