You are on page 1of 53

Curiculum Vitae

MANAGEMENT OF
THROMBOSIS IN CANCER
Anticoagulant and Laboratory Tests

Usi Sukorini
INTRODUCTION

• Cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) is


a well-recognized complication associated with
significant patient morbidity and mortality

• Malignancy is a strong risk factor for venous


thromboembolism (VTE)
• 20%-30% of incident VTE in population studies

Timp JF, Braekkan SK, Versteeg HH, Cannegieter SC. Epidemiology of cancer-associated venous thrombosis. Blood.
2013;122:1712–23
Cancer  Virchow’s triad
Direct mechanisms involved in
cancer‐associated thrombosis.

Razak et al., Cancer-Associated Thrombosis: An Overview of Mechanisms, Risk Factors, and Treatment Cancers 2018, 10, 380;
doi:10.3390/cancers10100380
Indirect mechanisms promoting thrombosis
in cancer

Razak et al., Cancer-Associated Thrombosis: An Overview of Mechanisms, Risk Factors, and Treatment Cancers 2018, 10,
380; doi:10.3390/cancers10100380
Unique Challenges in Cancer-associated
Thrombosis

 These patient have both a higher risk of recurrent VTE and a


higher risk of bleeding than patients without cancer
 Patients with malignant diseases can benefit from
anticoagulant therapy and its monitoring
  prevents & reduces recurrent risk of thromboembolic
events & subsequent bleeding
Anticoagulant
and
Laboratory Tests
Anticoagulant therapy

Indirect: Fondaparinux
Unfractionated FXa Direct: Rivaroxaban
Heparin (UFH) inhibitors Apixaban
Edoxaban
Low-Molecular-
Weight Direct
Heparin Thrombin Hirudin
(LMWH) Inhibitors Dabigatran
(DTI)

Vitamin K
Antagonists
Laboratory monitoring for anticoagulants

No Anticoagulants Tests
1 Vitamin K antagonists PT (less sensitive)
INR
2 UFH, LMWH APTT (less sensitive)
Chromogenic anti FXa assay
3 FXa inhibitor APTT
(Rivaroxaban, Apixaban, Edoxaban) Chromogenic anti FXa assay
4 Direct Thrombin Inhibitor (DTI): APTT, TT
(Hirudin, Dabigatran etexilate) Diluted thrombin time (dTT)
Ecarin clotting time (ECT)
Ecarin chromogenic assay (ECA)
Chromogenic anti IIa assay
• Traditional oral anticoagulant (warfarin)
• Vitamin K dependent, interfere with normal synthesis of factors
II, VII, IX and X, and protein C and S
• Warfarin cause incomplete coagulation due to lacking calcium
binding site and cannot form enzyme substrate complexes
• The onset of action: 8 – 12 hours, maximum effect: 36 hours
• Duration of action:
72 hours

Kaushansky et al., 2010; Turgeon, 2012


Laboratory monitoring for VKA

 Prothrombin time (PT): less sensitive


 Standardized  International sensitivity index (ISI)  ≈ 1.0
 International normalized Ratio (INR)

ISI
PT patient (sec)
INR =
mean normal PT (sec)
Therapeutic INR range recommended for standard
oral anticoagulant therapy (VKA)

INR Indication
• optimal level for anticoagulant therapy
• post myocardial infarction therapy & prophylaxis
• atrial fibrillation
2–3
• treatment of VTE, PE
• prevention of systemic embolism
• tissue heart valves
• high risk of clot formation
2.5 – 3.5 • mechanical prosthetic heart valves
• recurrence embolism

<2 • may not provide adequate protection from clotting

>4 • uncontrolled bleeding risk caused by slow blood clotting

Chest, 2001; 119 (Suppl): 85-215


• Heparin is a heterogeneous mixture of highly negatively
charged, sulfated mucopolysaccharides (polysugars) also known
as glycosaminoglycans
• MW of heparin: 15,000 to 18,000 Daltons, injectable anticoag.
• Heparin:
• Unfractionated Heparin (UFH), can cause: bleeding,
thrombocytopenia, osteopenia
• Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH)
• Reduces mortality vs UH, no increase major bleeding
complications, highly cost effective
• Synthetic pentasacharide (fondaparinux)
• Inhibitor of factor Xa
Heparin: mode of action
APTT and Anti-FXa assay: heparin

 APTT  less sensitive


 The anti–FXa assay is designed to measure plasma heparin
UFH and LMWH levels and to monitor anticoagulant therapy
 Principle:
 The activity of both UFH and LMWHs is dependent upon
binding to antithrombin (AT)
 Binding induces a conformational change in the molecule
which accelerates its inhibitory activity
 LMWHs have primarily anti-Xa activity
 UFH has both anti-Xa and anti-IIa activity
Anti-FXa assay: heparin

• Anti-FXa assay: clotting-based or chromogenic assay


• A standard curve
• This results in the formation of an inactive AT-Xa complex and
residual Xa is measured
• The residual Xa activity is inversely proportional to the
concentration of heparin in the sample and may be
quantitated from a calibration curve
Chromogenic anti-FXa assay: heparin assay

Ikeda & Tachibana, 2016. Clinical implication of monitoring rivaroxaban and apixaban by using anti-factor Xa assay in patients with non-valvular atrial
fibrillation, Journal of Arrhythmia 32: 42–50
Direct Oral Anticoagulant
(DOACs)/
New Oral Anticoagulant (NOACs)

Usi Sukorini
Direct oral anticoagulants

• Rivaroxaban • Dabigatran
• Apixaban
• Edoxaban
in Debate

Laboratory test monitoring


during DOACs?
• frequent
International
Normalized Ratio
(INR) monitoring
• labile INR in many
studies
• numerous drug and • Anti-FXa
food interactions inhibitor
• risk of bleeding
• Direct thrombin
inhibitor (DTI)
2013
2013
2018

Real life case


A patient with changes in renal function
while on DOAC (real life case)

• An 78-yo woman, history of chronic renal insufficiency, peripheral artery


disease, and microcytic anemia due to blood loss from gastritis

• She developed AF: apixaban 5 mg bd was started at GFR 36 mL/min


• A few months later: microcytic anemia (again) ~ TGI blood loss
• eGFR had deteriorated to 21 mL/min, PT & aPTT normal
• Anti-Xa activity of 832 μg/L at Ctrough , elevated
(on-therapy trough apixaban levels 41-230 μg/L)

• Apixaban dose of 2.5 mg bd


• Ctrough : a persistently elevated level of 376 μg/L
• As she experienced new episodes of TGI bleeding, anticoagulation had to be
stopped completely, eventually
Mechanism of action: DOACs
DOACs: mode of action

Rivaroxaban
Apixaban
Ieko et al. Journal of Intensive Care (2016) 4:19 Edoxaban Dabigatran
Direct oral anticoagulants

http://www.islh.org/speaker-portal/files/handouts/HANDOUT-34-1525520837.pdf
Expected plasma concentration of dabigatran or
rivaroxaban after treatment

Tripodi, The laboratory and the direct oral anticoagulants, Blood, 2013;121(20):4032-4035

Timing of Testing
Drugs Cpeak (hours) Ctrough (hours)
Dabigatran 2 or 3 12
RIvaroxaban 2 or 3 24

Important: communication with clinician


Tripodi A, 2013. The Laboratory and the New Oral Anticoagulants, Clinical Chemistry 59:2
Douxfils et al., 2018. Laboratory testing in patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants: a practical guide for clinicians, J Thromb Haemost; 16: 209–19.
FXa inhibitor: Global assays

Rivaroxaban
• PT & APTT :
• Available, easy, little expertise
• Prolong PT & APTT:
• linearly and dose-dependently to the [rivaroxaban]
• responsiveness is adequate
• Standardization: concern
• PT more sensitive than APTT, but not specific
• PT is not sensitive to dabigatran

Tripodi A, 2013. The Laboratory and the New Oral Anticoagulants, Clinical Chemistry 59:2
FXa inhibitor: Global assays

• PT are adequate to detect rivaroxaban activity within the range


of concentration observed in treated patients
• On average PT > 1.5 x (215 ng/ml rivaroxaban – 20 mg OD)
• CV interlaboratory < anti-FXa for rivaroxaban
• Strongest effect on PT:  rivaroxaban, then edoxaban and
apixaban
• PT  for screening for rivaroxaban

Tripodi A, 2013. The Laboratory and the New Oral Anticoagulants, Clinical Chemistry 59:2
Anti-FXa chromogenic assay: rivaroxaban measurement

 FXa is the target of rivaroxaban  the anti-FXa assay should


be the test of choice for this drug
 This test is based on measuring residual FXa with a synthetic
chromogenic peptide upon addition of excess FXa to the
patient’s plasma sample
 The standardization of results across reagents is a matter of
concern
 Anti-Fxa chromogenic assay: is not readily in most lab

Tripodi A, 2013. The Laboratory and the New Oral Anticoagulants, Clinical Chemistry 59:2
Chromogenic Anti-FXa assay: FXa inhibitor measurement

Ikeda & Tachibana, 2016. Clinical implication of monitoring rivaroxaban and apixaban by using anti-factor Xa assay in patients with non-valvular atrial
fibrillation, Journal of Arrhythmia 32: 42–50
Anti-FXa clotting-based assay

• This is similar to the chromogenic assay but the anti-Xa activity is


measured by performing an APTT-based factor X assay on each
dilution rather than using a chromogenic substrate
• Standard curve
Direct thrombin inhibitor: Laboratory tests
PT andGlobal
APTT: assays & Dabigatran
Dabigatran

• PT is an excellent test: • APTT is readily available, easy


• readily available in clinical to run
laboratories, easiy, little • APTT Prolongation 
expertise • dose-dependently
• Prolongation of the PT: • not linearly to the dabigatran
• is related linearly and dose- concentration
dependently to the plasma • The responsivenessis adequate:
dabigatran concentration
• a plasma dabigatran
• responsiveness is not very high: concentration of 200g/L
• Plasma concentration 200 prolongs the APTT by about
g/L (post 150 mg 2.5 times the basal value
dabigatran BD)  prolongs • Standardization across reagents
the PT 1.2 x basal value will be an issue
• Less sensitive
• Standardization: is a matter of concern Tripodi A., 2013. The Laboratory and the New Oral Anticoagulants, Clinical Chemistry 59:2
APTT & Dabigatran
APTT & Dabigatran

 The peak plasma concentration (Cmax) and maximal anticoagulant effect


of dabigatran is achieved: within 3 h after oral dosing
 APTT  can provide a qualitative assessment of dabigatran activity, but
the sensitivity depends on the reagent and the coagulometer

 Most patients treated with dabigatran etexilate will present with a


prolonged APTT (ratio > 1.2)
 A normal APTT excludes above on-therapy levels of dabigatran but does
not exclude the presence of dabigatran in the on-therapy range
 APTT is not recommended for low concentration of dabigatran  dTT

Douxfils et al, 2018. Laboratory testing in patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants: a practical guide for clinicians, Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 16:
Thrombin Time (TT) & Dabigatran

 The TT is prolonged due to:


 low fibrinogen concentration
 thrombin inhibitors, such as dabigatran
• TT prolongation:
• Linearly & dose dependently to dabigatran
• High responsiveness: 175 ng/ml  TT >> 10–15 x
• The degree of prolongation poor reflects drug concentration

• a normal thrombin time (TT) excludes the presence of dabigatran


with a high negative predictive value
• Modification of TT  dilute Thrombin Time
• Choice for dabigatran: dTT or ECT
Dilute Thrombin
Dilute ThrombinTime
Time(dTT)
(dTT)

Modifications of TT: diluting plasma samples before testing make


the TT test adequately responsive (TT is prolonged 3 x the basal
value by 200g/L dabigatran)
Ecarin Clotting Time (ECT)

• Clot formation is obtained by a venom extract (ecarin) from the


snake Echis carinatus
• Ecarin converts FII into meizothrombin
Ecarin Clotting Time (ECT)

• not yet widely used in clinical laboratories


• ecarin is commercially available
• could be easily run in an ordinary coagulometer
• ECT prolongations are related linearly and dose-dependently to the
dabigatran concentration
• Responsiveness: adequate (i.e., 200 g/L dabigatran prolongs the ECT by
about 3 times the basal value)
• ECT (or dTT): choice for dabigatran
• ECT: not readily available, useful in the absence of specific kit & standard
•  is not approved by FDA  not recommended

Tripodi A., 2013. The Laboratory and the New Oral Anticoagulants, Clinical Chemistry 59:2
Ecarin Chromogenic Assay (ECA)

• Clot formation is obtained by a venom extract (ecarin) from the snake Echis
carinatus.
• Ecarin converts FII into meizothrombin, which is then measured with a specific
synthetic chromogenic substrate

• ECA can accuracy assess


dabigatran plasma
concentration in the low
concentration (<50 ng/ml)
and normal (50-150 ng/ml)
• ECA not sensitive to heparin

http://www.viapath.co.uk/news-and-press/measurement-of-direct-oral-anticoagulants

Tripodi A., 2013. The Laboratory and the New Oral Anticoagulants, Clinical Chemistry 59:2
Ecarin Chromogenic Assay (ECA)

ECA is improved by:


 availability of liquid presentations
 Methods can be calibrated
 Without requiring skilled personnel
 Control is sufficient for validating
ECA and ECT
Choice for Rivaroxaban & Dabigatran

Rivaroxaban Dabigatran
• Screening: • Screening:
• PT • APTT or TT
• Quantification: • Quantification:
• Anti-Fxa assay • dTT or ECT

Tripodi A., 2013. The Laboratory and the New Oral Anticoagulants, Clinical Chemistry 59:2
Absorption and metabolism of the different
new anticoagulant drugs

http://www.islh.org/speaker-portal/files/handouts/HANDOUT-34-1525520837.pdf
Other laboratory tests

• Excluding an underlying bleeding tendency


• Renal insufficiency
• Drug effect
• Dabigatran !
• Discontinuation dabigatran: Creatinin Clearance (CrCl)
Coagulation & fibrinolysis markers

• Prothrombin fragment 1.2 (F1 + 2,


• Thrombin-antithrombin complex (TAT)
• A2-antiplasmin
• Plasmin-antiplasmin complex (PAP)
• Fibrinopeptide A (FPA)
• D-dimer

Blood activation markers


• The presence of pro-coagulant activity induces release of blood activation
markers in the circulation
• Extracelullar vesicles (EVs)
• Platelet Factor 4 or beta-thromboglobulin
(Amiral & Seghatchian, 2017)
Conclusion

• Assessment of the anticoagulant effect may be useful in many


circumstances
• Anticoagulation is important issue dealing with conventional
and new regimen of anticoagulant
• Varied laboratory tests are offer to assess the exposure and
effect of the anticoagulant
• The better understanding of pre- (time to testing), analytical
and post analytical problem will provide a better information
to minimize morbidity and mortality of cancer-associated
thrombosis patients, especially

You might also like