Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Michael Leo
Director, Enterprise & Contact Center
Solutions Marketing
How Do Your Children Communicate?
IM / Video
Cellular
Email
FutureNet APKT SIP Trunking May 2010
Agenda
Case studies
Net-Net
Trunks (M)
Revenue (US$B)
$3
SIP Trunking
5
2008-2013 CAGR of 91%
$3
4
$2
3
$2
2
$1
$1 1
$0 0
CY08 CY09 CY10 CY11 CY12 CY13
Revenue Trunks
Adoption
– Under 3% of current trunk installations,
but growth is rapid (300%+/year)
Availability
– Limited pool of providers, but expanding rapidly
Standards
– Service Providers’ offers diverge greatly
Interoperability
– Legacy TDM platform must be converted to SIP
through voice enabled router
Security
– IP communications and UC networks require
security, just like data network
―SIP trunking services have been commercially available since 2005, but
only now are enterprises grasping the business case, which can be very
compelling within certain enterprise segments‖
Brian Partridge, Yankee Group analyst
―There are some technical hurdles to overcome when deploying SIP trunks,
but most of them were related to the fact that most firewalls and other
traditional security cannot handle the bidirectional nature of voice and
other communications— most of which can be overcome through the
use of a session border controller.‖
Zeus Kerravala, The Yankee Group
Control
1. Security
2. Service reach
maximization
3. SLA assurance
4. Revenue & cost optimization
5. Regulatory compliance
5,000 employees
Savings summary
– Access - 4 Ethernet/MPLS vs.
98 T1/PRIs
– Trunk aggregation - From
2,250 voice trunks to 1,500 SIP
trunks
– Flat rate usage - $25/month per
trunk including 1,000 minutes
LD
– Tariff/Rate Reductions - Less
advanced feature costs like
transfers, no intrastate or local
usage charges
Problems overcome
– High costs and inefficient PRIs and FX lines
for 225 individual TruGreen locations
– Protect data center from attacks
Data
– Call routing & load balancing centers
– Need for high VoIP call quality
– Centralized routing table admin IP PBX CC