Technical Report BTV 3324

Rubric for Technical Report BTV 3324

Item Assessed Unacceptable Poor Average Good Score
(0) (1) (2) (3)

Abstract  No abstract  No highlight of the  Missing objective and/or  Objective

significant results and/or conclusion.  Summary of the
methodology. methodology
 Summary of the results
 Conclusion

Introduction  No flowchart  Methodology flow is  Methodology flow is correct,  Methodology flow is

incorrect. but not concise. correct and concise.

Material and  No Material and  Methods copied directly  The whole sentences of  The whole sentences of
methods method explained from module event being methods are converted to methods are converted to
referred to took place in past tense but not present the past tense with creativity
the past. actual experimental block/diagram used.
 Some paste some procedure, only based on  Methods are also written
sentences are converted modules based on what actually
to past tense happened in experimental
procedure.
Results  Data sheet with  Results given but  Results given but a few not  Results shown for all the
stamp not provided significant amount not tally with the requirements of scopes of experiments
(x 2) with the report OR tally with the experiment
 Results not requirement/ scopes
compatible with
scopes

Discussion  Only mention the  Attempt to discuss but  Elucidation of result but  Elucidation and supported
results without failed miserably contains some flaws by proper references or
(x 10) meaningful logical explanations.
discussion

Conclusions  No conclusion  Conclusion missing the  Conclusions regarding major  Important/ significant
sections OR important points OR points are drawn, but many results are highlighted
 Conclusions totally  No recommendation are misstated, indicating a which also meets the
not reflecting the given to improve the lack of understanding OR scopes of experiments
scopes experiment  Conclusion is too general. AND
Several recommendations  Several recommendations
have been given but they are have been stated.
too general and not
contributing to the
experiment’s improvement.

References  No references  Only refer to websites  Refer to websites and some  The whole references
related research articles accounted from books,
websites, articles and
human name (personnel
communication)

Appendixes  No appendixes which  Appendixes made on  Appendixes made from  Appendixes made from
it supposed to be copies of actual modules proper and tidy new paper proper paper sheet with
having paper sheet original data from own
experiment
Grammar and  Unreadable and not  Numerous spelling and/or  Occasional spelling and/or  Correct use of words.
Spelling written in scientific grammar errors.. grammar errors.
way

Timeliness  Lab report submitted  Lab report submitted  Lab report submitted 1 day to  Lab report submitted on
more than a weeks more than 3 days late. 3 days late. time.

Total Assessment Marks (60)