Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract
The following literature review provides the rationale for my artifact selection in Domain C of
engaging and supporting students in learning. Within this literature review, I will reflect on each
of my artifacts and make a connection between my artifacts and the article “The First Rule of
The article “The First Rule of Engagement” states that “Teacher Clarity is the precursor
to student engagement.” The article also states that although John Hattie, a researcher in the field
of education and the author of Visible Learning, ranked teacher clarity in the top ten influences
on student achievement. Although educators are aware of the importance of teacher clarify and
student engagement, “there is no consensus as to how they are defined” (Corwin Connect, 2018).
This article has provided detailed definitions and examples of teacher clarity and student
engagement and how they correspond to student success. I will be using this article as a resource
students in learning, as outlined in Domain C of the California Standards for the Teaching
Artifact #1: Best Practices that Support Students with Language Needs was selected
because it shows my progress in TPE 7: Teaching English Learners. Within the standard of TPE
7, teachers are expected to “know and … apply pedagogical theories, principles, and
Teacher Credentialing, 2013). When I asked myself the question, “does the artifact support a
performance standard or theme?”, I was able to confidently reply that this artifact is clearly
aligned with TPE 7 (Costantino, 2009, p. 49). I created this artifact during my first year of BTSA
and it helped me learn and reflect on the best practices that I should be using within my
classroom to support students who were learning the English language. At this time, I had eight
English learners in my classroom. This activity helped me understand what I needed to do for
these students and understand the best practices that I was already demonstrating.
Within a portfolio, a teacher is wise to include “one’s best work in the area of assessment
or evaluation” (Costantino, 2009, p. 49). I included Artifact #2: Equity for All Students Needs
DOMAIN C LITERATURE REVIEW 4
BTSA. On this self-assessment, I was asked to rank myself as emerging, exploring, applying,
integrating, or innovating in many areas of best practice within the realm of supporting equity,
diversity, and access to the core curriculum. Although this artifact could be applied to many
standards within Domain C, I feel that is the best example of my progress with TPE 4: Making
Content Accessible (Commission on Teacher Credentialing, 2013). I believe that this self-
assessment shows how I was working towards making content accessible to diverse learners. At
this time, I honestly ranked myself as applying in most areas. This demonstrates that I believed
that I was meeting the expectation, but not progressing beyond it. The next artifact in my
portfolio shows how I planned to move beyond the applying stage in all of the statements on the
self-assessment.
Within Artifact #3: Diversity Action Plan, I identified my needs from my needs
assessment, identified research tools that I could use to improve, summarized and reflected on
the research, applied the research strategies in my classroom, and then reflected on the success
of each new strategy. This process helped me focus on my areas that needed improvement and
develop effective teaching strategies to meet the needs of my diverse students. I chose this
artifact for this domain because I felt that it was a great example of all TPEs that focus on
My final artifact, Artifact #4: February 20, 2017 Performance Evaluation is my best
example of TPE 5: Student Engagement. Within this TPE, the teacher is expected to “clearly
Within my performance evaluation, my Principal stated that, “Mrs. Griffith communicates the
learning expectations she has for her students before each lesson.” Within the article, “The First
DOMAIN C LITERATURE REVIEW 5
Rule of Engagement,” the author states that “There are four critical elements in addition to
clarity of speech.” The four elements are: clarify of organization, clarity of explanation, clarity of
examples and guided practice, and clarity of assessment and student learning (Corwin Connect,
2018). I have been focusing on teacher clarity for the last year and I am working hard to clearly
communicate learning goals and success criteria to my students before, during, and after my
“Educators who had a precise objective or target and were intentional in creating and
executing a plan to hit the target, yielded better student outcomes” (Corwin Connect, 2018).
During my first year of BTSA, I started to learn what the target was with student engagement
and supporting students in learning. During my self-assessment and diversity action plan, I
created a plan to hit my target with student learning and achievement. My performance
evaluation demonstrates that my administrator believes that I have been hitting the target of
being clear in my student expectations for learning. My goal now is to continue progressing in all
of these areas so that I can continue to yield better student outcomes throughout the rest of my
teaching career.
DOMAIN C LITERATURE REVIEW 6
References
Corwin Connect. (2018, September 24). The First Rule of Engagement [PDF]. Corwin Connect.
A Guide for Success (Third ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.