Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Contents
Original Lesson Plan………………………………………………………………….2
Lesson Plan Analysis………………………………………………………………….5
Modified Lesson Plan………………………………………………………………..8
Academic Justification………………………………………………………….….11
References…………………………………………………………………..............14
Learning Portfolio Web Link…………………………………………………….16
1
17433583- Rachel Heaslip
2
17433583- Rachel Heaslip
3
17433583- Rachel Heaslip
4
17433583- Rachel Heaslip
Evaluate the lesson plan according to the following Australian Professional Standards for Teachers. Only
standards directly addressed in Designing Teaching & Learning that are relevant to this assignment have
been included. However, this does not mean the other standards are irrelevant to lesson planning and
evaluation more generally.
5
17433583- Rachel Heaslip
1–2–3–4–5 Comments: Little mention of how the classroom will be managed, only mentions group work
as a possibility.
4.3 Manage challenging behaviour
1–2–3–4–5 Comments: No specific mention of managing behaviour. No expectations for the classroom
are given.
4.4 Maintain student safety
1–2–3–4–5 Comments: Tasks involves students remaining at their desks with the teacher watching them.
No safety risks seem present in the lesson.
4.5 Use ICT safely, responsibly and ethically
1–2–3–4–5 Comments: No mention of ICT being used in the lesson.
5 Assess, provide feedback and report on student learning
5.1 Assess student learning
1–2–3–4–5 Comments: There is no mention of assessing the students in the lesson plan. Could be
possible in the recap of prior knowledge, but not made clear.
5.2 Provide feedback to students on their learning
1–2–3–4–5 Comments: Feedback could possibly be provided during discussion of answers, but not clear
on the lesson plan.
Evaluate the lesson plan according to the following NSW Quality Teaching model elements.
Evaluation score – refer to NSW QTM Classroom Practice Guide for each element
Comments incl. evidence for evaluation score (2 sentences)
1 Intellectual quality
1.1 Deep knowledge
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 Comments: The topic of drug use is addressed as the focus of the lesson, and in general, they
key concepts and ideas are sustained throughout the lesson.
1.2 Deep understanding
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 Comments: There is scope for students to demonstrate understanding of the key concepts
during class discussion.
1.3 Problematic knowledge
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 Comments: The lesson plan involves summarising a text, which does not allow for various
perspectives to be present. Possible perspectives may arise during class discussion.
1.4 Higher-order thinking
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 Comments: Potentially some higher order thinking may be present during class discussions,
but the lesson is set out to leave all students with the same thoughts.
1.5 Metalanguage
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 Comments: Little use of metalanguage in the lesson plan, may be used during class
discussion and from the textbook.
1.6 Substantive communication
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 Comments: Group work needs communication, so the lesson is set up well for that. More
communication from the teacher could be beneficial for students.
Quality learning environment
2.1 Explicit quality criteria
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 Comments: lesson plan does not explicitly talk about the expected outcomes of the lesson.
2.2 Engagement
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 Comments: Lesson plan does not mention teacher involvement in most of the tasks, which
may cause the class to be disengaged.
2.3 High expectations
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 Comments: No expectations are mentioned in the lesson plan.
2.4 Social support
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 Comments: Possible group work, and class discussions which may be supportive towards
students.
2.5 Students’ self-regulation
6
17433583- Rachel Heaslip
1–2–3–4–5 Comments: Lesson is simple, allowing for students to regulate themselves. There are no risks
involved in the plan, which should lead to a smoothly run lesson.
2.6 Student direction
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 Comments: There are opportunities for students to direct their learning as the lesson is
highly student centred.
3 Significance
3.1 Background knowledge
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 Comments: Students’ background knowledge is mentioned at the start of the lesson and is
connected to the substance of the lesson, and the content relates to out-of-school
background knowledge.
3.2 Cultural knowledge
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 Comments: There is no mention of cultural knowledge in the lesson.
3.3 Knowledge integration
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 Comments: There is no mention or direction of cross- curricular subject integration.
3.4 Inclusivity
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 Comments: The lesson is set up to be inclusive of all students, but is not specifically
mentioned at all.
3.5 Connectedness
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 Comments: The lesson involves some elements to encourage connectedness to the outside
world.
3.6 Narrative
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 Comments: No mention of personal stories, case studies, or other narrative techniques.
Identify the two APST standards and two NSW QT model elements you are targeting for improvement.
APST
1) 2.6 Information and Communication Technology (ICT) 2) 5.1 Assess student learning
QT model
1) 3.2 Cultural Knowledge 2) 3.6 Narrative
7
17433583- Rachel Heaslip
8
17433583- Rachel Heaslip
9. Is drug use more dangerous during
teenage years or older?
10. True or false, being around drug users
but not actually using drugs is safe?
Teacher-
Review of quiz questions. review of the
5 minutes quiz
Body Teacher:
2 minutes Introduce todays lesson: Drug Use Organise the class Teacher
Inform students on what they will be Identify expectations for the
learning about and their tasks for the lesson. lesson including:
What they will learn: quiet group work
Short and long term effects of drug raising hands to answer
use questions
Different types of drugs and the safe and focused
effects they have on the body computer work
Tasks in pairs:
Researching drug types Student:
Researching short and long term Organise their workspace
effects and find a partner to work
Revision game at the end of the with.
lesson
Resources:
Computers, websites
Task One Teacher:
5 minutes Brainstorming activity. Write the students’ answers Teacher to
Ask the students to identify the names and on the board. introduce the
types of drugs that they know of without task
using the computers. Student: N/A
Student-
At minimum- alcohol, cocaine, ecstasy, Resources: during the
heroin, LSD, magic mushrooms, medication, markers task
tobacco, cannabis, methamphetamine,
inhalants, ketamine
9
17433583- Rachel Heaslip
Reflection
What have I learned about the teaching and learning process when preparing this lesson?
Whilst preparing this lesson plan, I have learnt that each lesson I prepare will need to be
adapted to accommodate for the students that are in the class and the content that needs be
taught. I have learnt that each lesson needs time to be planned to ensure students are given
the best chance to learn. I have learnt that some content may be confronting to teach and for
students to learn, and I know that I need be careful in the ways that I teach and how I control
the classroom during these lessons. I have learnt the importance of the APST standards and
the QT model in my planning and will make sure that I am always referring to these in the
future. I found it valuable to incorporate ICT into the lesson, to expand students’ knowledge
and use of resources. Adding informal quizzes to the lesson plan allows me to assess student
knowledge and gain feedback on my teaching methods.
WHS
What are the key risk issues that may appear for and need to be reduced/eliminated in this
lesson? Using your syllabus and support documents as well as other WHS policy- Outline the
key WHS considerations that are to be applied in this lesson?
They key risk issues in the lesson include ICT risks and ensuring students know how to use
the computers correctly and that they stay on task.
10
17433583- Rachel Heaslip
Academic Justification
The lesson plan meets the syllabus outcomes, but is quite simple. There is much room
(Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership [AITSL], 2014) for Information
Standards 2.6 and 4.5 are addressed by integrating ICT into the lesson plan and by
moving the lesson to the computer rooms to accommodate for students so they can
perform research using the computers. ICT was not used in the original lesson plan,
2017), so it was considered as an important factor to include. ICT has been shown to
positively affect student learning when used correctly and safely. The modification to
include ICT in the new lesson plan will increase student’ understanding of the
importance of ICT and will provide them with the chance to gain a deeper
understanding of the topic of drug use by being provided with a new domain of
information (Skryabin, Zhang, Liu, & Zhang, 2015). In regards to using ICT safely,
responsibly and ethically, students will be informed of their expectations when using
ICT at the beginning of the lesson and will be reminded of these expectations if
needed. By having the students work in pairs, students with disabilities or who need
differentiation in their learning may be supported by their partner and by using the
computers (Skyrabin et al., 2015 & Marsh, Clarke, & Pittaway, 2014).
11
17433583- Rachel Heaslip
Standards 2.3 and 5.1 are addressed by introducing informal assessments to the lesson
plan. Informal assessments usually involve testing the students in the standard
how each student is progressing in their learning, without placing them in exam like
conditions (Marsh et al., 2014, & Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting
Authority [ACARA], 2016). The addition of an informal exam at both the beginning and
the end of the lesson will allow the teacher to know where students are before
teaching the lesson and to assess how much information they retained during the
lesson. Assessments are an important part of teaching as they provide teachers with
information about their students’ learning abilities, and they can also gather feedback
on their own teaching strategies, allowing them to develop into a greater teacher
(ACARA, 2016).
Working with the NSW Quality Teaching Model (Department of Education and
Training, 2003), modifications have been made to the lesson to include cultural
knowledge and narrative, which were both non-existent in the original lesson plan.
To incorporate element 3.6- narrative, the task of finding a case study or personal
story of someone who experienced drug use was added. The addition of this task will
push students to research for an interesting story and to have an open mind when
reading about the personal issues these people have experienced (Shulman, &
Shulman, 2009). Getting the students to share these stories will link them to these
people outside of the classroom, therefore increasing the students’ use of narrative in
the classroom (Shulman & Shulman, 2009 & Department of Education and Training,
2003).
12
17433583- Rachel Heaslip
Element 3.2- Cultural knowledge will be expanded through student’ research by adding
the task of finding the cultural background that most commonly use each drug, and by
asking students to share any stories they have of people who have experienced drug
problems. Students will be encouraged to use statistics to answer this task, which will
improve their overall understanding of drug use in specific cultures and are
encouraged to share their stories to the class, allowing students to learn from each
Every modification that was made to the original lesson plan was done so in
accordance to the APST and the NSW Quality Teaching Framework. The decision to
basically rewrite the entire lesson was done so to improve the learning environment
and quality of work for the students. The lesson plan is suitable for any teacher to pick
up and use which was also a big factor that was taken into consideration when
13
17433583- Rachel Heaslip
Reference List
Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (2016). Curriculum.
Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership (2014). Australian professional
professional-standards-for-teachers
http://www.darcymoore.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/qt_EPSColor.pdf
Marsh, C. J., Clarke, M., & Pittaway, S. (2014). Marsh’s becoming a teacher (6th ed.).
http://educationstandards.nsw.edu.au/wps/portal/nesa/k-10/learning-
areas/pdhpe/pdhpe-7-10
Shulman, L., & Shulman, J. (2009). How and what teachers learn: A shifting
14
17433583- Rachel Heaslip
Skryabin, M., Zhang, J., Liu, L., & Zhang, D. (2015). How the ICT development level and
Teaching Australia (2008). The case for establishing a national centre for pedagogy.
library/the_case_for_establishing_a_national_centre_for_pedagogy.pdf?sfvrsn=8
15
17433583- Rachel Heaslip
http://raheaslip.weebly.com/
16