Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Food Sci Technol (May–June 2010) 47(3):358–363 J Food Sci Technol (May–June 2010) 47(3):358–363
DOI: 10.1007/s13197-010-0060-y
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Empowering the Food Professional
123
J Food Sci Technol (May–June 2010) 47(3):358–363 359
Preparation of buffalo meat sausage: The minced meat (sunflower) was cooled to 4°C before adding to the mixture.
and fat were chopped in bowl chopper (Model MTK 662, During chopping the temperature of the emulsion was main-
Maschinenfabrik, Germany). The emulsion was prepared by tained at 10–12°C by the addition of slushed ice. The emul-
adding minced meat buffalo meat (80 g), buffalo fat (5 g), re- sion was then stuffed into 18–20 mm diameter sheep casing
fined sunflower oil (15 g), sodium tripoly phosphate (0.3 g), using a sausage stuffer (Model MWF 591, Maschinenfab-
sodium nitrite (120 ppm), NaCl (2 g), spice mix (1.5 g), green rik, Germany), linked and kept hung in the hot air oven at
condiments (4 g), sugar (1 g), egg powder (1 g), soy protein ~100°C for 60 min to reach the internal core temperature of
isolated (3 g), sodium lactate (2 g) and ice (7 g) in control 72°C as determined by using probe thermometer.
sausage. The BHA (100 ppm) was added for T1, nisin (100 Packaging and storage: The cooked sausages (with cas-
ppm) for T2 and BHA (100 ppm) and nisin (100 ppm) to T3. ings) were vacuum packed using double chamber vacuum
Salt, sodium tripolyphosphate and sodium nitrite were packaging machine (Komet Plus Vac, Germany) in multilay-
premixed and added to the meat mix. Refined vegetable oil er (polyester/ polyethylene pouches of size 6” × 9” with 150
T0 T1 T2 T3
0.9 T0 T1 T2 T3
0.9
0.89
0.89
aw
aw
0.88 0.88
0.87 0.87
0 1 3 5 7 0 1 3 5 7
6.6
52
6.5 51
Moisture (%)
6.4 50
49
pH
6.3
48
6.2 47
6.1 46
6 45
44
0 1 3 5 7
0 1 3 5 7
1.2
48
40
Tyrosine, mg/100g
Shear force, kg/cm2
32
1.15
24
16
1.1 8
0 1 3 5 7 0 1 3 5 7
123
360 J Food Sci Technol (May–June 2010) 47(3):358–363
gauge thickness) at 20 psi in 5 pouches for each treatment. count and anaerobic count (APHA 1984) were determined.
The vacuum packaged sausages were served warm to taste Sensory attributes were evaluated by semi-trained panelists
panelists on day zero. The packed sausages were stored at 35 consisting of 5 members using the 9-point Hedonic scale.
± 2°C and 70–80% RH. The pH, tyrosine values (Strange et Statistical analysis: The experiments were carried out
al. 1977), thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) in six replicates. The significant difference in various
(Tarladgis et al. 1976), moisture (AOAC 1995) and water parameters during different storage periods of sausage were
activity (aw) (Karthikeyan et al. 2000), total viable count, analyzed by multivariate analysis using statistical software
coliform count, staphylococcal count, yeast and mould SPSS 13.0 for windows.
T0 T1 T2 T3
8
2.5
7
2
Total Viable count
Coliforms
1.5
4
3 1
2
0.5
1
0 0
0 1 3 5 7 0 1 3 5 7
6
6
5
5
4
Streptococci
Staphylococci
4
3
3
2 2
1 1
0 0
0 1 3 5 7 0 1 3 5 7
4.5 7
4
6
Yeast and moulds
3.5
3 5
Anaerobes
2.5 4
2 3
1.5
2
1
0.5 1
0 0
0 1 3 5 7 0 1 3 5 7
Fig. 2 Changes in microbiological quality (counts in log cfu/g) of buffalo meat sausages during storage at 35 ± 2ºC and 70–80% RH
(n = 6). T0–T3: As in Fig. 1
123
J Food Sci Technol (May–June 2010) 47(3):358–363 361
Results and discussion sausages noticed lowest tyrosine values when treated with
Physical and chemical characteristics: Highest pH was in both BHA and nisin.
sausages containing BHA alone (T1), while tyrosine and The addition of nisin alone (T2) did not alter the TBARS
TBARS values were lowest in sausages containing both from that of control. The lowest TBARS values recorded in
BHA and nisin (T3) (Fig. 1).The aw, pH, tyrosine value, the sausages containing BHA (T1 and T3) might be due to
moisture content and TBARS values increased whereas the ability of BHA to scavenge the free radical which in turn
the shear force values decreased during storage. Aksu and retarded the oxidative rancidity (David et al. 1993). The re-
Kaya (2005) also noticed highest pH in beef sausage when duction in TBARS value was in accordance with Aksu and
treated with BHA alone and nisin. Raju et al. (2003) in fish Kaya (2005), Biswas et al. (2004) and Rehman and Salaria
T0 T1 T2 T3
10
9
8
Appearance
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
0 1 3 5 7
8
10
8
Texure
Flavour
6 6
4 0
0 1 3 5 7 0 1 3 5 7
9
Overall Acceptability
8
8
7
Juiciness
6
6
5
4
4 0 1 3 5 7
0 1 3 5 7
123
362 J Food Sci Technol (May–June 2010) 47(3):358–363
123
J Food Sci Technol (May–June 2010) 47(3):358–363 363
relative antioxidant effectiveness in pork sausage. Meat Sci 69: medium and chicken frankfurter emulsions. J Food Prot 48:
289–296 234–239
Strange ED, Benedict RC, Smith JC, Swift CE (1977) Evaluation USDA (2000) Code of federal regulations. Chapter III, part 318.7.
of rapid tests for monitoring alterations in meat during storage. Approval of substances for use in the preparation of products,
1. Intact meat. J Food Prot 40:843–847 Washington DC
Tarladgis BG, Younathan BM, Dugan LR (1960) A distillation Watts BM (1962) Meat products. In: Sym Food lipids and their
method for the quantitative determination of malanoldehyde in oxidation, Shultz HW, Day EA, Sinnbubber RO (Eds), AVI
muscle foods. J Am Oil Chem Soc 37:403–406 Publ Co. Inc., Westport, USA, p 202–220
Taylor SL, Somers EB, Krueger LA (1984) Antibotulinal Xiong Y (1996) Impacts of oxidation on muscle protein function-
effectiveness of nisin-nitrate combinations in culture ality. Proc Reciprocal Meat Conf 49:79–86
123