Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Peninjauan arahan Dokumen : PERIKSA Yang terkait dengan infrastruktur Water, solid waste water
supply dan sanitation
1. TOR
2. Baseline Borobudur-Prambanan- Yogyakarta
3. Indonesia -Tourism PAD
4. ESMF
5. ITMP Proposal
Analyses and evaluation of the current situation of the water supply and sanitation within the service
areas of the water, waste water and Solid waste utilities of Borobudur-Yogyakarta- Prambanan area
Each section contains information pertaining to the subject topic, as well as graphic support as
appropriate. Also included is identification of other issues that should also be addressed in the
formulation of the Plan. The Baseline Analysis report provides the information which is the initial basis of
the comprehensive planning process in ITMP, It presents an overview of the key tourism area type 's
infrastructure Water, Wastewater and solid waste management characteristics.
The primary objective of the Baseline Analysis report is to document current conditions in Key Tourism
area and to define the opportunities and constraints the community must consider in addressing and
shaping its future form and character for Tourism Destination area. The secondary objective is to ensure
that the information being used in the planning process accurately portrays Water-Sanitation and Solid
Waste management for Borobudur -Yogyakarta-Prambanan Tourism destination area.
INDICATOR
Indicators are measures of the existence or severity of current issues, signals of upcoming situations
problems, measures of risk and potential need for action, and means to identify and measure the results
of actions, Indicators are information sets which are formally selected to be used on a regular basis to
measure changes that are of importance for tourism development and management, there are indicator
should be consider among others are Population, Water Supply, Wastewater Sanitation, Solid Waste
A. Population
From the baseline supply and demand data, market demand forecasts and investment needs use the 2015
base year that requires data updating, collected reasonably close to the project start, with “reasonable”
being defined by the rapidity of change in the context. The greater the time lag between the delivery of
project activities and the baseline study, the more likely it will have a measurable effect on the indicators;
this can lead to an underestimation of the project’s overall impact