Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Developed by
Prof. Mr. Hemkant Deshpande
On behalf of
Prin. L.N. Welingkar Institute of Management Development & Research
!
Advisory Board
Chairman
Prof. Dr. V.S. Prasad
Former Director (NAAC)
Former Vice-Chancellor
(Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Open University)
Board Members
1. Prof. Dr. Uday Salunkhe
2. Dr. B.P. Sabale
3. Prof. Dr. Vijay Khole
4. Prof. Anuradha Deshmukh
Group Director
Chancellor, D.Y. Patil University, Former Vice-Chancellor
Former Director
Welingkar Institute of Navi Mumbai
(Mumbai University) (YCMOU)
Management Ex Vice-Chancellor (YCMOU)
NOT FOR SALE. FOR PRIVATE CIRCULATION ONLY. 1st Edition, May 2014
CONTENTS
Contents
1 Introduction 4-9
2 Just -in-time (JIT) 10-29
3 5S 30-43
4 Poka-yoke 44-56
5 SMED (Single Minute Exchange of Die) 57-68
6 Kanban 69-80
7 Total Productive Maintenance (TPM) 81-100
8 Benchmarking 101-115
9 Total Quality Management 116-147
10 Kaizen 148-163
11 7 QC Tools 164-187
12 Six Sigma (6σ) 188-224
13 Lean Production System 225-251
14 Quality at Source 252-265
15 Supplier Partnership 266-284
16 Cost of Quality 285-307
! !3
INTRODUCTION
Chapter 1
Introduction
Introduction
! !4
INTRODUCTION
What is WCM?
! !5
INTRODUCTION
Criteria
Principles
4. WCM does not accept losses of any kind. (Goal is always zero:
accident, service and quality defects, inventory, and breakdowns)
! !6
INTRODUCTION
10. World Class companies create the energy of a crisis in the face of
continued success.
Essential Concept
! !7
INTRODUCTION
Keys of WCM
1. Reduce lead times
2. Speed time-to-market
3. Cut operations costs
4. Exceed customer expectations
5. Manage the global enterprise
6. Streamline outsourcing processes
7. Improve business performance visibility
! !8
INTRODUCTION
REFERENCE MATERIAL
Click on the links below to view additional reference material for this
chapter
Summary
PPT
MCQ
Video Lecture
! !9
JUST-IN-TIME (JIT)
Chapter 2
Just-in-Time (JIT)
Objectives
Structure:
2.1 Introduction
2.9 Summary
! !10
JUST-IN-TIME (JIT)
2.1 Introduction
!
Reassuring... but expensive
! !11
JUST-IN-TIME (JIT)
When is the best time to have an inventory part ready for production?
– Just-in-time.
When is the best time to have an item ready for the next step in
production?
– Just-in-time.
When is the best time to have a product ready for delivery to a customer?
– Just-in-time.
– Just-in-case!
If you hold a lot of items in inventory, you’re locking away a huge amount
of cash unnecessarily. These items can be lost, stolen, or damaged, or they
can deteriorate. They occupy space, which could otherwise be devoted to
operations. And they can become obsolete, particularly when products are
improved or changed often. All of these represents financial loss to the
business.
When items are ready just in time, they aren't sitting idle and taking up
space. This means that they aren’t costing you anything to hold onto them,
and they're not becoming obsolete or deteriorating. However, without the
buffer of having items in stock, you must tightly control your
manufacturing process so that parts are ready when you need them.
! !12
JUST-IN-TIME (JIT)
When you do (and JIT helps you do this) you can be very responsive to
customer orders – after all, you have no stake in “forcing” customers to
have one particular product, just because you have a warehouse full of
parts that need to be used up. And you have no stake in trying to persuade
customers to take an obsolete model just because it’s sitting in stock.
! !13
JUST-IN-TIME (JIT)
Visual controls are often used to schedule the production of parts in place
of virtual systems such as MRP. Statistical process control is used to assure
that the outcome of production is consistently met with desired results.
Along with Jidoka (Built-in Quality) and respect for people, JIT forms Lean
manufacturing. Built on a stable foundation of repeatable and predictable
processes, these pillars help you achieve customer satisfaction and thus
business success.
! !14
JUST-IN-TIME (JIT)
One motivated reason for developing JIT and some other better production
techniques was that after World War II, Japanese people had a very strong
incentive to develop a good manufacturing techniques to help them
rebuilding the economy. They also had a strong working ethnic which was
concentrated on work rather than leisure, seek continuous improvement,
life commitment to work, group conscious rather than individualism and
achieved common goal. These kind of motivation had driven Japanese
economy to succeed.
Because of the natural constraints and the economy constraints after World
War II, Japanese manufacturers looked for a way to gain the most efficient
use of limited resources. They worked on “optimal cost/quality
relationship”.
Before the introduction of JIT, there were a lot of manufacturing defects for
the existing system at that time. According to Hirano, this included
inventory problem, product defects, risen cost, large lot production and
delivery delays. The inventory problems included the unused accumulated
inventory that was not only unproductive, but also required a lot of effort
in storing and managing them. Other implied problems were parts storage,
equipment breakdowns, and uneven production levels.
For the product defects, manufacturers knew that only one single product
defects can destroy the producer’s creditability. They must create a
“defect-free” process.
! !15
JUST-IN-TIME (JIT)
Lastly, the existing system did not manage well for fast delivery request.
So, there was a need to have a faster and reliable delivery system in order
to handle customers’ needs.
Many JIT and Kanban systems are very much based around the
supermarket principle; the customer is supplied from a finished goods
supermarket and the factory then works to restock that supermarket. Care
is taken to maintain the stock levels within the supermarket to the
minimum levels.
People Involvement
Plants
System
! !16
JUST-IN-TIME (JIT)
People Involvement
Plants
! !17
JUST-IN-TIME (JIT)
System
This refers to the technology and process that combines the different
processes and activities together. Two major types are MRP (Material
Requirement Planning) and MRP II (Manufacturing Resource Planning).
3. Reducing wasted materials, time and effort. It can help to reduce the
costs.
! !18
JUST-IN-TIME (JIT)
3. Reduce unwanted wastes. Wastes that do not add value to the products
itself should be eliminated.
! !19
JUST-IN-TIME (JIT)
JIT Systems
To facilitate a JIT approach, you need a variety of systems in place. The
most notable is a Kanban. This is a Japanese approach to ensuring a
continuous supply of inventory or product. Kanbans were designed to
support the JIT philosophy.
With JIT, it is necessary that you build strong ties with your supply chain.
This will ensure that you have access to the supplies you need when you
need them.
! !20
JUST-IN-TIME (JIT)
Custom orders are simpler with a JIT system. Instead of the customer's
widget being built six months in advance and waiting on a shelf, it is built
when it’s ordered. By delivering product “just-in-time,” you allow for last-
minute changes.
Essentially, JIT allows your company to get the right products to the right
customers at the right time.
Advantages
! !21
JUST-IN-TIME (JIT)
! !22
JUST-IN-TIME (JIT)
As under this technique, only essential stocks are obtained, less working
capital is required to finance procurement. Here, a minimum re-order
level is set, and only once that mark is reached, fresh stocks are ordered
making this a boon to inventory management too.
Close relationships are fostered along the production chain under a just-
in-time manufacturing system.
! !23
JUST-IN-TIME (JIT)
One of the biggest problems that many businesses face is cash flow. If
they have to wait for their customers to pay, then they do not have cash
to pay for their suppliers to build more products. Many companies have
to spend a huge amount of their time balancing their cash flow and their
production because of this.
Implementing JIT does not just reduce your lead times, it also reduces
the time that is taken from receiving an order to you actually getting the
cash in your hands. This is vital if you want to reinvest that cash back
into your business to satisfy more customers.
! !24
JUST-IN-TIME (JIT)
Disadvantages
Due to there being no buffers for delays, production downtime and line
idling can occur which would bear a detrimental effect on finances and on
the equilibrium of the production process.
Precautions
! !25
JUST-IN-TIME (JIT)
Issues
JIT is often viewed in direct conflict with Material Requirements Planning
(MRP) since JIT uses pull scheduling and MRP uses a push methodology.
JIT is best suited for repetitive production environments. Just like anything
else, Just-in-time is no panacea, nor should it be embraced as a religion. It
is an operational strategy that, if implemented properly, will provide a new
dimension to competing: quickly introducing new customerised high quality
products and delivering them with unprecedented lead times, swift
decisions, and manufacturing products with high velocity.
! !26
JUST-IN-TIME (JIT)
2.9 Summary
In short:
! !27
JUST-IN-TIME (JIT)
References
1. www.Tutorialspoints.com/managementconcept
2. www.rockfordconsulting.com
3. www.mindtools.com
4. www.tejc.tripod.com
5. www.leaqnman.hubpages.com
6. wwww.transtutors.com
7. Wikipedia
! !28
JUST-IN-TIME (JIT)
REFERENCE MATERIAL
Click on the links below to view additional reference material for this
chapter
Summary
PPT
MCQ
! !29
5S
Chapter 3
5s
Objectives
Meaning of 5S
5S methodologies
Implementing 5S
Advantages of 5S
Structure:
3.2 Discovery of 5S
3.3 5S Principles
3.4 5S Methodology/Process
3.5 Implementing 5S
3.6 Advantages of 5S
3.7 Pitfalls of 5S
3.9 Summary
! !30
5S
High Absenteeism
High turnover
Demotivated employees
Disordered/cluttered environment
Mistakes/errors
Housekeeping Technique
Idea behind 5S
In order to achieve high levels of quality, safety, and productivity, workers
must have a conducive working environment.
What is 5S?
Housekeeping system
! !31
5S
3.2 Discovery of 5S
The factories were so well organised that abnormal situations were readily
apparent.
Equipments were so clean and well maintained that any problem such as a
loose bolt or leaking oil could be easily seen.
3.3 Principle of 5S
3.4 5S Methodology/Process
“5S” was invented in Japan, and stands for five (5) Japanese words that
start with the letter ‘S’: Seiri, Seiton, Seiso, Seiketsu, and Shitsuke. Table
3.1 shows what these individual words mean. An equivalent set of five ‘S’
words in English have likewise been adopted by many, to preserve the “5S”
acronym in English usage. These are Sort, Set (in place), Shine,
! !32
5S
Standardise, and Sustain. Some purists do not agree with these English
words.
They argue that these words have lost the essence of the original 5
Japanese words.
Table 3.1: 5S Definitions
Japanese English
Meaning in Japanese Context
Term Equivalent
Seiri Tidiness Throw away all rubbish and unrelated
materials in the workplace
! !33
5S
1. Seiri
The first step of the “5S” process, Seiri, refers to the act of throwing away
all unwanted, unnecessary, and unrelated materials in the workplace.
People involved in Seiri must not feel sorry about having to throw away
things. The idea is to ensure that everything left in the workplace is related
to work. Even the number of necessary items in the workplace must be
kept to its absolute minimum. Because of Seiri, simplification of tasks,
effective use of space, and careful purchase of items follow.
2. Seiton
Seiton, or orderliness, is all about efficiency. This step consists of putting
everything in an assigned place so that it can be accessed or retrieved
quickly, as well as returned in that same place quickly. If everyone has
quick access to an item or materials, work flow becomes efficient, and the
worker becomes productive. The correct place, position, or holder for every
tool, item, or material must be chosen carefully in relation to how the work
will be performed and who will use them. Every single item must be
allocated its own place for safekeeping, and each location must be labelled
for easy identification of what it’s for.
3. Seiso
Seiso, the third step in “5S”, says that ‘everyone is a janitor’. Seiso consists
of cleaning up the workplace and giving it a ‘shine’. Cleaning must be done
by everyone in the organisation, from operators to managers. It would be a
good idea to have every area of the workplace assigned to a person or
group of persons for cleaning. No area should be left uncleaned. Everyone
should see the 'workplace' through the eyes of a visitor - always thinking if
it is clean enough to make a good impression.
! !34
5S
! !35
5S
4. Seiketsu
The fourth step of “5S”, or seiketsu, more or less translates to
‘standardised clean-up’. It consists of defining the standards by which
personnel must measure and maintain ‘cleanliness’. Seiketsu encompasses
both personal and environmental cleanliness. Personnel must therefore
practice ‘seiketsu’ starting with their personal tidiness. Visual management
is an important ingredient of seiketsu. Color coding and standardized
coloration of surroundings are used for easier visual identification of
anomalies in the surroundings. Personnel are trained to detect
abnormalities using their five senses and to correct such abnormalities
immediately.
5. Shitsuke
The last step of “5S”, Shitsuke, means ‘Discipline.’ It denotes commitment
to maintain orderliness and to practice the first 4S as a way of life. The
emphasis of Shitsuke is elimination of bad habits and constant practice of
good ones. Once true shitsuke is achieved, personnel voluntarily observe
cleanliness and orderliness at all times, without having to be reminded by
management.
! !36
5S
3.5 Implementing 5S
! !37
5S
Over five months, one S per month, sections had to turn ideas (e.g.,
planned actions) into reality.
5S Patrol
Some managers, foremen or line leaders were entitled both as responsible
for 5S in their area and and patrolman.
At the end of each audit (patrol), evaluation sheets with notes and remarks
are to be gathered and discussed.
! !38
5S
3.6 Advantages of 5S
Operators spend less time looking for items. This leads to higher
workstation efficiency, a fundamental goal in mass production.
A clean and tidy workplace leads to greater well being and increased
motivation.
No deviation, no problem.
! !39
5S
Managing staff must keep pressure to avoid natural behaviours to ruin the
first achievements.
30 second rule.
! !40
5S
3.9 Summary
5S is for everyone.
Clean up and organise your work area every day so that each new day is
easier and safer than the day before.
2. Smooth Working
3. No Obstruction
4. Safety Increases
5. Productivity Improves
6. Quality Improves
7. Wastage Decrease
8. Machine Maintenance
10.Employees Motivated
! !41
5S
References
1. www.siliconfareast.com
2. www.webcrawler.com
3. www.profsite.um.ac.ir
4. www.tocforme.com/ppt/5s.ppt
! !42
5S
REFERENCE MATERIAL
Click on the links below to view additional reference material for this
chapter
Summary
PPT
MCQ
! !43
POKA-YOKE
Chapter 4
Poka-Yoke
Objectives
What is Poka-Yoke?
Its importance
Its implementation
Structure:
4.8 Summary
! !44
POKA-YOKE
Literally translated:
Yokeru: to avoid
! !45
POKA-YOKE
Processing
1. Omitted Processing – Step in process not carried out, e.g., form not
checked, discount not included, invoice not sent, hole not drilled, part
not cleaned.
Materials
Human Error
Errors (can) lead to defects. Defects are not inevitable and can be
eliminated by the use of simple, low-cost methods – zero defects.
! !46
POKA-YOKE
The old way of dealing with human error was to scold people, retrain them,
and tell them to be more careful … but you can’t do much to change
human nature, and people are going to make mistakes. If you can’t
tolerate them ... you should remove the opportunities for error.
Training and motivation work best when the physical part of the system is
well designed. If you train people to use poorly designed systems, they’ll
be OK for a while. Eventually, they’ll go back to what they’re used to or
what’s easy, instead of what’s safe.
You’re not going to become world class through just training, you have to
improve the system so that the easy way to do a job is also the safe, right
way. The potential for human error can be dramatically reduced.
! !47
POKA-YOKE
2. Simple to install
4. Low-cost.
! !48
POKA-YOKE
3. Electrical plugs that can only be inserted into the correct outlets.
5. A flip-type cover over a button that will prevent the button from being
accidentally pressed.
Mistake-proofing systems.
Does not rely on operators catching mistakes.
Inexpensive Point of Origin inspection.
Quick feedback 100% of the time.
1-10-100 Rule
The 1-10-100 rule states that as a product or service moves through the
production system, the cost of correcting an error multiplies by 10.
Activity Cost
Order entered correctly Rs. 10
Error detected in billing Rs. 1
Error detected by customer Rs. 100
Dissatisfied customer shares the experience
with others
! !49
POKA-YOKE
Rules of Poka-yoke
2. If your POKA-YOKE idea has better than 50% chances to succeed, do it!
3. Do it now….improve later!
! !50
POKA-YOKE
1. Poka-yoke helps people and processes work right the first time.
3. Missing part: Not all parts included in the assembly, welding, or other
processes.
! !51
POKA-YOKE
2. Analyse the 5-whys and understand the ways a process can fail.
3. Decide the right poka-yoke approach, such as using a shut out type
(preventing an error being made), or an attention type (highlighting
that an error has been made) poka-yoke take a more comprehensive
approach instead of merely thinking of poka-yokes as limit switches, or
automatic shutoffs. A poka-yoke can be electrical, mechanical,
procedural, visual, human or any other form that prevents incorrect
execution of a process step.
4. Determine whether a:
! !52
POKA-YOKE
Shingo argued that errors are inevitable in any manufacturing process, but
that if appropriate poka-yokes are implemented, then mistakes can be
caught quickly and prevented from resulting in defects.
! !53
POKA-YOKE
4.8 Summary
It helps people and processes to work right the first time thereby
improving quality and reliability. It is a technique, a tool that can be
applied to any type of process be it in manufacturing or service industry.
1. What is poka-yoke.
! !54
POKA-YOKE
References
3. www.en.wikipedia
4. www.thequalityportal.com
5. www.siliconfareast.com
! !55
POKA-YOKE
REFERENCE MATERIAL
Click on the links below to view additional reference material for this
chapter
Summary
PPT
MCQ
Video Lecture
! !56
SMED (SINGLE MINUTE EXCHANGE OF DIE)
Chapter 5
SMED
(Single Minute Exchange of Die)
Objectives
Purpose of SMED
Structure:
5.6 Implementation
5.8 Benefits
5.9 Summary
! !57
SMED (SINGLE MINUTE EXCHANGE OF DIE)
Single Minute Exchange of Die (SMED) is one of the many lean production
methods for reducing waste in a manufacturing process. It provides a rapid
and efficient way of converting a manufacturing process from running the
current product to running the next product. This rapid changeover is key
to reducing production lot sizes and thereby improving flow (Mura).
The phrase “single minute” does not mean that all changeovers and start-
ups should take only one minute, but that they should take less than 10
minutes (in other words, “single-digit minute”). Closely associated is a yet
more difficult concept, One Touch Exchange of Die (OTED), which says
changeovers can and should take less than 100 seconds.
Single Minute Exchange of Dies helps make those actions that create value
flow without interruption, detours, back flows, waiting or scrap.
! !58
SMED (SINGLE MINUTE EXCHANGE OF DIE)
! !59
SMED (SINGLE MINUTE EXCHANGE OF DIE)
Dr. Shigeo Shingo is known as the father of SMED (developed in the late
1950s) and Poka-yoke, and is also known for developing the Just-in-Time
(JIT) concept. He used SMED to reduce the lot size of Toyota Cars and the
set-up time of Hull Assembly on a 65,000 ton super tanker, setting a record
in shipbuilding in 1956.
Ensure the product Flows through the value stream without delays.
Use Pull scheduling so that product is made only when the customer
wants it (Just- in -time).
Uses of SMED
! !60
SMED (SINGLE MINUTE EXCHANGE OF DIE)
SMED can facilitate the removal of NVA (in set-up) or at least ensure that
necessary NVA activity occurs concurrently with VA activity.
! !61
SMED (SINGLE MINUTE EXCHANGE OF DIE)
There are seven basic steps to reducing changeover using the SMED
system:
3. Convert (where possible) Internal activities into External ones (C) (pre-
heating of tools is a good example of this).
! !62
SMED (SINGLE MINUTE EXCHANGE OF DIE)
6. Document the new procedure, and actions that are yet to be completed.
5.6 Implementation
External set-up can be done without the line being stopped whereas
internal set-up requires that the line be stopped.
A. Ensure that external set-up actions are performed while the machine
is still running,
B. Separate external and internal set-up actions, ensure that the parts
all function and implement efficient ways of transporting the die and
other parts.
! !63
SMED (SINGLE MINUTE EXCHANGE OF DIE)
Stage 1:
Stage 2:
Stage 3:
Preliminary:
Internal and
Internal are Set-up
No differentiation external
converted
operations are
between internal
set-up
to external if streamlined
and external operations
possible (internal first)
are separated
! !64
SMED (SINGLE MINUTE EXCHANGE OF DIE)
5.8 Benefits
Lower inventory levels (smaller lot sizes result in lower inventory levels).
1. Equipment breakdowns
! !65
SMED (SINGLE MINUTE EXCHANGE OF DIE)
5.9 Summary
SMED is an ideal tool which can be used to reduce the changeover time/
set-up time in many industries (including manufacturing, logistics, and
service). It increases the flexibility of the company to produce the right
number of products (hence less inventory, carrying costs, etc.) at the right
time and eliminates or minimises bottlenecks to increase flow.
In short:
SMED enables a more controlled, safer and less arduous set-up process
! !66
SMED (SINGLE MINUTE EXCHANGE OF DIE)
1. What is SMED?
References
1. wikipedia.org
! !67
SMED (SINGLE MINUTE EXCHANGE OF DIE)
REFERENCE MATERIAL
Click on the links below to view additional reference material for this
chapter
Summary
PPT
MCQ
Video Lecture
! !68
KANBAN
Chapter 6
Kanban
Objectives
Meaning of Kanban
History
How it works
Structure:
6.1 Introduction
6.9 Summary
! !69
KANBAN
6.1 Introduction
6.2 Definition
Kanban is a visual signal that’s used to trigger an action. The word Kanban
is Japanese. Roughly translated, it means “card you can see.”
A part is only manufactured (or ordered) if there is a Kanban card for it.
! !70
KANBAN
In the late 1940s, Toyota started studying supermarkets with the idea of
applying store and shelf-stocking techniques to the factory floor. In a
supermarket, customers obtain the required quantity at the required time,
no more and no less. Furthermore, the supermarket stocks only what it
expects to sell within a given time frame, and customers take only what
they need, since future supply is assured. This observation led Toyota to
view a process as being a customer of one or more preceding processes,
and the preceding processes are viewed as a kind of store. The customer
“process” goes to the store to obtain required components which in turn
causes the store to restock. Originally, as in supermarkets, signboards
were used to guide “shopping” processes to specific shopping locations
within the store.
! !71
KANBAN
! !72
KANBAN
Kanban Cards
Kanban cards are a key component of Kanban and signal the need to move
materials within a manufacturing or production facility or move materials
from an outside supplier into the production facility. The Kanban card is, in
effect, a message that signals that there is a depletion of product, parts, or
inventory that, when received, the Kanban will trigger the replenishment of
that product, part, or inventory. Consumption therefore drives demand for
more production, and demand for more product is signalled by the Kanban
card. Kanban cards therefore help create a demand-driven system.
In the last few years, systems sending Kanban signals electronically have
become more widespread. While this trend is leading to a reduction in the
use of Kanban cards in aggregate, it is still common in modern lean
production facilities to find widespread usage of Kanban cards. Kanban is
! !73
KANBAN
Three-bin System
An example of a simple Kanban system implementation might be a “three-
bin system” for the supplied parts, where there is no in-house
manufacturing. One bin is on the factory floor (the initial demand point),
one bin is in the factory store (the inventory control point), and one bin is
at the supplier. The bins usually have a removable card containing the
product details and other relevant information — the classic Kanban card.
When the bin on the factory floor is empty (because the parts in it were
used up in a manufacturing process), the empty bin and its Kanban card
are returned to the factory store (the inventory control point). The factory
store replaces the empty bin on the factory floor with the full bin from the
factory store, which also contains a Kanban card. The factory store sends
the empty bin with its Kanban card to the supplier. The supplier’s full
product bin, with its Kanban card, is delivered to the factory store; the
supplier keeps the empty bin. This is the final step in the process. Thus,
the process will never run out of product, and could be described as a
closed loop in that it provides the exact amount required, with only one
spare bin so there will never be an oversupply. This ‘spare’ bin allows for
the uncertainties in supply, use, and transport that are found in the
inventory system.
! !74
KANBAN
Any other clear visual signal that indicates it is time to get more material.
! !75
KANBAN
2. Lead time is calculated, that is the amount of time it takes for the parts
to be ordered and delivered.
3. The demand for the product over a specific length of time is then
determined.
5. The goal is to order parts at the point when the number of parts on
hand reach the amount that will be used up during the time it takes to
order and get the needed parts delivered. Usually, because of variability
in lead time, the amount of reordered parts occurs is usually a bit more
than the amount of parts needed to cover order lead time. Common
signals used as Kanban include two-bin resupply systems and card
systems.
Work-in-process Kanban
A one piece flow, when products move one at a time from one process step
to another, and where there are no Kanban at all is the ideal production.
However, one piece flow demands a very well balanced manufacturing line,
meaning that each process station uses approximately the same amount of
time to do the necessary work. Since that is often not possible, Kanban are
used to help manage the flow.
! !76
KANBAN
3. Based upon the demand, it is then calculated how many of the product
needs to be made per day.
4. Finished Goods Kanban are set up in the shipping area with the amount
of product that has been determined as required safety stock.
5. When orders are filled by pulling product from the Finished Goods
Kanban, a signal, such as a bin or a card, is sent to the manufacturing
floor. That signal tells production to complete the number of products
needed to replenish the Finished Goods Kanban.
! !77
KANBAN
6.9 Summary
5. How many types of Kanban are there and how they are used?
! !78
KANBAN
References
1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kanban_(development)
2. http://whatis.techtarget.com/definition/kanban
3. www.stoweconsultingcompany.com
4. http://kanbantool.com
! !79
KANBAN
REFERENCE MATERIAL
Click on the links below to view additional reference material for this
chapter
Summary
PPT
MCQ
Video Lecture
! !80
TOTAL PRODUCTIVE MAINTENANCE (TPM)
Chapter 7
Total Productive Maintenance (TPM)
Objectives
Structure:
7.9 Summary
! !81
TOTAL PRODUCTIVE MAINTENANCE (TPM)
• No breakdowns
• Small stops or slow running
• No defects
No accidents
! !82
TOTAL PRODUCTIVE MAINTENANCE (TPM)
The first two losses affect the availability of a piece of equipment, the third
and fourth losses affect equipment efficiency, and the fifth loss results in
reduced quality from output.
TPM is the new direction in production. In this age, when robots produce
robots and 24-hour automated production is a reality, the unmanned
factory has become a realistic possibility. In discussing quality control,
people often say that quality depends on process. Now, with increasing
robotisation and automation, it might be more appropriate to say that
quality depends on equipment. Productivity, cost, inventory, safety and
health, and production output – as well as quality – all depends on
equipment.
! !83
TOTAL PRODUCTIVE MAINTENANCE (TPM)
Increased automation and unmanned production will not do away with the
need for human labour – only operations have been automated;
maintenance still depends heavily on human input. Automated and
technologically advanced equipment, however, requires skills beyond the
competence of the average maintenance supervisor or worker, and to use it
effectively requires an appropriate maintenance organisation. TPM, which
organises all employees from top management to production line workers,
is a companywide equipment maintenance system that can support
sophisticated production facilities.
The primary goals of TPM are zero breakdowns and zero defects. When
breakdowns and defects are eliminated, equipment operation rates
improve, costs are reduced, inventory can be minimised, and as a
consequence, labour productivity increases. One firm reduced the number
of breakdowns to 1/50 of the original number. Some companies show
17-26 per cent increases in equipment operation rates while others show a
90 per cent reduction in process defects. Labour productivity generally
increased by 40-50 per cent.
! !84
TOTAL PRODUCTIVE MAINTENANCE (TPM)
Philosophy
History
The parent of TPM is TQM. TQM was evolved after the quality concerns the
Japan had after the Second World War.
Although there is a story behind the origin on TPM, the origin itself is
disputed by many parties.
! !85
TOTAL PRODUCTIVE MAINTENANCE (TPM)
This was the beginning of TPM in Japan. Since then, TPM has spread
progressively throughout the world and established itself as a renowned
cultural improvement program.
Since the JIPM TPM awards were founded, over 3000 organizations have
won awards, including Unilever, Wrigley, Tetra Pak, Heineken and Arcelor
Mittal.
! !86
TOTAL PRODUCTIVE MAINTENANCE (TPM)
! !87
TOTAL PRODUCTIVE MAINTENANCE (TPM)
1. Self-maintained workplace
2. Elimination of the 6 big losses (refer 7.2)
3. Zero breakdowns
4. Zero defects
5. Optimal life and availability of tools
6. Self-improvement
7. Short production-development time and low machine life cost
8. Productivity in indirect departments
9. Zero accidents
The eight pillars of TPM are mostly focused on proactive and preventative
techniques for improving equipment reliability.
! !88
TOTAL PRODUCTIVE MAINTENANCE (TPM)
! !89
TOTAL PRODUCTIVE MAINTENANCE (TPM)
Safety, Health, Maintain a safe and Eliminates potential health and safety
Environment healthy working risks, resulting in a safer workplace.
environment.
Specifically targets the goal of an
accident-free workplace.
TPM in Apply TPM Extends TPM benefits beyond the plant
Administration techniques to floor by addressing waste in
administrative administrative functions.
functions.
Supports production through improved
administrative operations (e.g., order
processing, procurement, and
scheduling).
! !90
TOTAL PRODUCTIVE MAINTENANCE (TPM)
Which
Pros Cons
Equipment?
Easiest to Best opportunity for a Less payback than improving
Improve “quick win”. constraint equipment.
In this step, the equipment will be cleaned up and otherwise for improved
operation. Two key TPM concepts will be introduced:
5S
Autonomous Maintenance
! !91
TOTAL PRODUCTIVE MAINTENANCE (TPM)
Take photographs that capture the initial state of the equipment and post
them on the project board.
Clear the area of debris, unused tools and components, and any other
items that are not needed.
Take photographs that capture the improved state of the equipment and
post them on the project board.
Create a simple 5S Checklist for the area (creating standardized work for
the 5S process).
Schedule a periodic audit (first daily, then weekly) to verify that the 5S
Checklist is being followed. During the audit, update the checklist as
needed to keep it current and relevant. Keep audits positive and
motivational (treat them as a training exercise).
Identify and document key inspection points (all wear parts should be
included). Consider creating a map of inspection points as a visual aid.
! !92
TOTAL PRODUCTIVE MAINTENANCE (TPM)
Identify and document all set points and their associated settings.
Consider indicating settings directly on the equipment as a visual aid for
inspection and auditing.
Schedule a periodic audit (first daily, then weekly) to verify that the
Autonomous Maintenance Checklist is being followed. During the audit,
update the checklist as needed to keep it current and relevant. Keep
audits positive and motivational (treat them as a training exercise).
In this step, a system is put into place to track OEE (overall equipment
efficiency) for the target equipment. This system can be manual but the
scope of the system must include downtime reason code tracking.
! !93
TOTAL PRODUCTIVE MAINTENANCE (TPM)
In this step, the most significant sources of lost productive time are
addressed. The TPM concept of Focused Improvement (also known as
Kaizen) is introduced.
! !94
TOTAL PRODUCTIVE MAINTENANCE (TPM)
During this step, OEE data should continue to be carefully reviewed each
shift to monitor the status of losses that have already been addressed, as
well as to monitor overall improvements in productivity.
Identify and document all components that undergo wear (these should
have been established as inspection points in Step Two). Consider
replacing wear components with low-wear or no-wear versions.
Identify and document all components that are known to regularly fail.
For wear components, establish the current wear level and a baseline
replacement interval (in some cases replacement may be triggered early
by an Autonomous Maintenance inspection as established in Step Two).
! !95
TOTAL PRODUCTIVE MAINTENANCE (TPM)
A tool for measuring and evaluating the effectiveness of TPM can be found
in "Overall Equipment Effectiveness" (OEE). Measuring the effectiveness of
TPM is a crucial activity in TPM, but also a very time-consuming and costly
process.
! !96
TOTAL PRODUCTIVE MAINTENANCE (TPM)
As can be seen from the above table, OEE is tightly coupled to the TPM
goals of No Breakdowns (measured by Availability), No Small Stops or Slow
Running (measured by Performance), and No Defects (measured by
Quality).
! !97
TOTAL PRODUCTIVE MAINTENANCE (TPM)
7.9 Summary
Today, with increasing competition and tough markets, TPM may decide the
success or the failure of a company. TPM has been a proven program for
many years and organisations, especially into manufacturing, can adopt
this methodology without any risk.
All these first class corporate citizens have reported high rates of
productivity enhancements after implementing TPM. As baseline, almost all
the companies, who have adopted TPM have reported productivity
enhancements close to 50% in many areas.
! !98
TOTAL PRODUCTIVE MAINTENANCE (TPM)
1. What is TPM?
References
3. Wikipedia
! !99
TOTAL PRODUCTIVE MAINTENANCE (TPM)
REFERENCE MATERIAL
Click on the links below to view additional reference material for this
chapter
Summary
PPT
MCQ
! !100
BENCHMARKING
Chapter 8
Benchmarking
Objectives
Meaning of Benchmarking
Purpose and features of Benchmarking
Process and types of benchmarking
Advantages and disadvantages of benchmarking
Structure:
8.9 Summary
! !101
BENCHMARKING
In this way, they learn how well the targets perform and, more importantly,
the business processes that explain why these firms are successful.
! !102
BENCHMARKING
Definition
Benchmarking is the process of being humble enough to admit that
someone else is better at something and wise enough to try and learn how
to match and even surpass them.
Customers’ expectations are highly liquid and are driven by standards set
by best performer. Any product or service just below these standards
may not catch the eyes of customer.
! !103
BENCHMARKING
8.3 Features
3. Incorporate leading firm’s processes into one’s own strategy to fill the
gaps and improve performance.
! !104
BENCHMARKING
! !105
BENCHMARKING
! !106
BENCHMARKING
! !107
BENCHMARKING
! !108
BENCHMARKING
! !109
BENCHMARKING
Software are:
Visit Costs – This includes hotel rooms, travel costs, meals, a token gift,
and lost labor time.
! !110
BENCHMARKING
Advantages
Benchmarking is a systematic method by which organisations can measure
themselves against the best industry practices. It promotes superior
performance by providing an organised framework through which
organisation learn how the “best in class” do things. It helps for continuous
improvement. Benchmarking inspire managers (and organization) to
compete. Through Benchmark process, organisation can borrow ideas,
adopt and refine them to gain competitive advantages.
C. Competitive Strategy
By implementing benchmarking activity, organizations can improve their
operation process
! !111
BENCHMARKING
4. Low-cost leader
Disadvantages
Incorrect comparisons
! !112
BENCHMARKING
8.9 Summary
Now-a days many companies in the world uses this technique for fixing
their target for continuous improvement. For them, it is an important tool.
But to be effective, it must be used properly. It breakdown (waste of
money, time and energy and sometimes morale too) if process owners and
managers feel threatened or do not accept and act on the findings.
! !113
BENCHMARKING
References
1. Wikipedia
! !114
BENCHMARKING
REFERENCE MATERIAL
Click on the links below to view additional reference material for this
chapter
Summary
PPT
MCQ
Video Lecture
! !115
TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT
Chapter 9
Total Quality Management
Objectives
After completing this chapter, you will be able to understand:
Structure:
9.1 Introduction
9.9 Summary
! !116
TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT
9.1 Introduction
TQM is the way of managing for the future, and is far wider in its
application than just assuring product or service quality – it is a way of
managing people and business processes to ensure complete customer
satisfaction at every stage, internally and externally. TQM, combined with
effective leadership, results in an organisation doing the right things right,
first time.
! !117
TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT
! !118
TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT
! !119
TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT
Do not buy products or services on price alone – look at the total cost
Culture Change
! !120
TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT
The only point at which true responsibility for performance and quality can
lie is with the people who actually do the job or carry out the process, each
of which has one or several suppliers and customers.
! !121
TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT
Once the strategic direction for the organisation’s quality journey has been
set, it needs Performance Measures to monitor and control the journey,
and to ensure the desired level of performance is being achieved and
sustained. They can, and should be, established at all levels in the
organisation, ideally being cascaded down and most effectively undertaken
as team activities.
Some of the companies who have implemented TQM include Ford Motor
Company, Phillips Semiconductor, SGL Carbon, Motorola and Toyota Motor
Company.
! !122
TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT
In the late 1970s and early 1980s, the developed countries suffered
economically in the face of stiff competition from Japan's ability to produce
high-quality goods at competitive cost.
For the first time since the start of the Industrial Revolution, the United
Kingdom became a net importer of finished goods.
Firms began re-examining the techniques of control invented over the past
50 years and how those techniques had been so successfully employed by
the Japanese. It was in the midst of this economic turmoil that TQM took
root.
It may have been first coined in the United Kingdom by the Department of
Trade and Industry during its 1983 “National Quality Campaign”. Or it may
have been first coined in the United States by the Naval Air Systems
Command to describe its quality improvement efforts in 1985.
! !123
TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT
TQM Timeline
Today TQM is the name for the philosophy of a broad and systemic approach
to managing organisational quality.
Quality standards such as the ISO 9000 series and quality award
programs such as the Deming Prize and the Malcolm Baldrige National
Quality Award specify principles and processes that comprise TQM.
Further Development
In the spring of 1984, an arm of the United States Navy asked some of its
civilian researchers to assess statistical process control and the work of
several prominent quality consultants and to make recommendations as to
how to apply their approaches to improve the Navy’s operational
effectiveness.
The creation of the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award from the Navy,
TQM spread throughout the US Federal Government, resulting in the
following:
! !124
TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT
The private sector followed suit, flocking to TQM not only as a means to
recapture market share from the Japanese, but also to remain competitive
when bidding for contracts from the Federal Government since “total
quality” requires involving suppliers, not just employees, in process
improvement efforts.
The concept of quality has existed for many years, though its meaning has
changed and evolved over time. In the early twentieth century, quality
management meant inspecting products to ensure that they met
specifications. In the 1940s, during World War II, quality became more
statistical in nature. Statistical sampling techniques were used to evaluate
quality, and quality control charts were used to monitor the production
process.
In the 1960s, with the help of so-called “quality gurus,” the concept took
on a broader meaning. Quality began to be viewed as something that
encompassed the entire organisation, not only the production process.
Since all functions were responsible for product quality and all shared the
costs of poor quality, Quality was seen as a concept that affected the entire
organisation.
! !125
TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT
The term used for today’s new concept of quality is total quality
management or TQM. Figure below presents a timeline of the old and new
concepts of quality. You can see that the old concept is reactive, designed
to correct quality problems after they occur.
The new concept is proactive, designed to build quality into the product
and process design.
! !126
TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT
Quality Gurus
To fully understand the TQM movement, we need to look at the
philosophies of notable individuals who have shaped the evolution of TQM.
Management Commitment
Check (review)
! !127
TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT
Employee Empowerment
Training
Suggestion scheme
Measurement and recognition
Excellence teams
! !128
TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT
Continuous Improvement
Systematic measurement
Excellence teams
Cross-functional process management
Attain, maintain, improve standards
Customer Focus
Supplier partnership
Service relationship with internal customers
Never compromise quality
Customer-driven standards
Continuous improvement must deal not only with improving results, but
more importantly with improving capabilities to produce better results in
the future. The five major areas of focus for capability improvement are
demand generation, supply generation, technology, operations and people
capability.
! !129
TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT
1. Ethics
2. Integrity
3. Trust
4. Training
5. Teamwork
6. Leadership
7. Recognition
8. Communication
! !130
TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT
Key Elements
TQM has been coined to describe a philosophy that makes quality the
driving force behind leadership, design, planning, and improvement
initiatives. For this, TQM requires the help of those eight key elements.
These elements can be divided into four groups according to their
functions. The groups are:
! !131
TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT
!
TQM is built on a foundation of ethics, integrity and trust. It fosters
openness, fairness and sincerity and allows involvement by everyone. This
is the key to unlocking the ultimate potential of TQM. These three elements
move together, however, each element offers something different to the
TQM concept.
1. Ethics – Ethics is the discipline concerned with good and bad in any
situation. It is a two-faceted subject represented by organisational and
individual ethics. Organisational ethics establish a business code of
ethics that outlines guidelines that all employees are to adhere to in the
performance of their work. Individual ethics include personal rights or
wrongs.
! !132
TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT
!
! !133
TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT
Basing on the strong foundation of trust, ethics and integrity, bricks are
placed to reach the roof of recognition. It includes:
! !134
TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT
! !135
TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT
! !136
TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT
IV.Roof (Recognition)
!
! !137
TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT
Time – Recognition can be given at any time like in staff meeting, annual
award banquets, etc.
It is very clear from the above discussion that TQM without involving
integrity, ethics and trust would be a great remiss, in fact it would be
incomplete. Training is the key by which the organization creates a TQM
environment. Leadership and teamwork go hand in hand. Lack of
communication between departments, supervisors and employees create a
burden on the whole TQM process. Last but not the least, recognition
should be given to people who contributed to the overall completed task.
Hence, lead by example, train employees to provide a quality product,
create an environment where there is no fear to share knowledge, and give
credit where credit is due is the motto of a successful TQM organisation.
! !138
TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT
A good way to accomplish this is to take top management off site for a day
or two for a brainstorming session. Until management shares the same
answers to these questions and has communicated them to the workforce,
there can be no guarantee that the changes made will propel the
organisation in the right direction.
Methodology
There are a number of approaches to take towards adopting the TQM
philosophy. The teachings of Deming, Juan, Taguchi, Ishikawa, Imai,
Oakland etc can all help an organisation realign itself and embrace the TQM
philosophy. However, there is no single methodology, only a bundle of tools
and techniques.
! !139
TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT
Measurements
After using the tools and techniques, an organisation needs to establish the
degree of improvement. Any number of techniques can be used for this
including self-assessment, audits and SPC.
Pitfalls
TQM initiatives have been prone to failure because of common mistakes.
These include:
! !140
TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT
11.Eliminate numerical quotas for the workforce and numerical goals for
management.
! !141
TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT
! !142
TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT
9.9 Summary
! !143
TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT
Deming has rolled out set of management practices (14 points) to help
organisation increase their quality and productivity.
! !144
TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT
1. What is TQM?
! !145
TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT
! !146
TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT
REFERENCE MATERIAL
Click on the links below to view additional reference material for this
chapter
Summary
PPT
MCQ
Video Lecture
! !147
KAIZEN
Chapter 10
Kaizen
Objectives
Meaning of Kaizen
History and evolution of Kaizen
Purpose and need of Kaizen.
Levels and characteristics of Kaizen
Prerequisites and implementation of Kaizen
Structure:
10.1 Introduction
10.9 Summary
! !148
KAIZEN
10.1 Introduction
Kaizen ( ?), Japanese for “improvement” or “change for the best”, refers
to philosophy or practices that focus upon continuous improvement of
processes in manufacturing, engineering, and business management.
When used in the business sense and applied to the workplace, kaizen
refers to activities that continually improve all functions, and involves all
employees from the CEO to the assembly line workers.
What is KAIZEN?
! !149
KAIZEN
While kaizen (at Toyota) usually delivers small improvements, the culture
of continual aligned small improvements and standardisation yields large
results in the form of compound productivity improvement.
! !150
KAIZEN
After World War II, to help restore Japan, American occupation forces
brought in American experts to help with the rebuilding of Japanese
industry while The Civil Communications Section (CCS) developed a
Management Training Program that taught statistical control methods as
part of the overall material.
This course was developed and taught by Homer Sarasohn and Charles
Protzman in 1949-50. Sarasohn recommended W. Edwards Deming for
further training in Statistical Methods.
The Economic and Scientific Section (ESS) group was also tasked with
improving Japanese management skills and Edgar McVoy was instrumental
in bringing Lowell Mellen to Japan to properly install the Training Within
Industry (TWI) programs in 1951.
! !151
KAIZEN
Prior to the arrival of Mellen in 1951, the ESS group had a training film to
introduce the three “J” programs (Job Instruction, Job Methods and Job
Relations) — the film was titled "Improvement in 4 Steps” (Kaizen eno Yon
Dankai). Thus, the original introduction of “Kaizen” to Japan.
On October 18, 1989, JUSE awarded the Deming Prize to Florida Power &
Light Co. (FPL), based in the US, for its exceptional accomplishments in
process and quality control management. FPL was the first company
outside Japan to win the Deming Prize.
Because people can easily accept the idea and suggest for improvement,
as a result the Kaizen mode of production will improve company’s
productivity through:
1. Quality improvement
2. Cost reduction
3. Shortened delivery
4. Reduced lead time
5. Inventory control improvement
6. Safety improvement
Kaizen techniques are not capital intensive and their implementation is not
difficult.
! !152
KAIZEN
! !153
KAIZEN
!
Out of these elements,the following are three key factors.
! !154
KAIZEN
Seiri – Tidiness
Seiton – Orderliness
Seiso – Cleanliness
Seiketsu – Standardised Clean-up
Shitsuke – Discipline
Standardisation
Standards are set by management, but they must be able to change when
the environment changes. Companies can achieve dramatic improvement
as reviewing the standards periodically, collecting and analysing data on
defects, and encouraging teams to conduct problem-solving activities.
Once the standards are in place and are being followed, then if there are
deviations, the workers know that there is a problem. Then employees will
review the standards and either correct the deviation or advise
management on changing and improving the standard. It is a never-ending
process and is better explained and presented by the PDCA cycle (plan-do-
check-act), known as Demasing cycle, in shown the following figure.
! !155
KAIZEN
Aspects of Kaizen
Gembakaizen
GEMBA means the place where the products are made, so GEMBAKAIZEN
is KAIZEN activities that take place in GEMBA.
Kaizen Blitz
Kaizen Blitz, or rapid improvement, is a focused activity on a particular
process or activity. The basic concept is to identify and quickly remove
waste.
Mini Kaizen
It is part of corporate culture. It requires both conscious and sub-conscious
thinking about improvements day by day and minute by minute on the part
of all employees.
It also requires that these same employees possess the skills for this type
of thinking.
! !156
KAIZEN
It looks like support for soccer which is source of power for the team.
7. Shift in Mindset
! !157
KAIZEN
! !158
KAIZEN
It is characterised by:
1. Continuity
2. Participatory approach
3. Accumulation of small improvements
4. Improvements come up to with minimum investment
Steps of Implementation:
! !159
KAIZEN
1. Think, rethink and then attempt kaizen, with 100% clarity and
understanding.
2. Collect all relevant data, analyse and then only think of solution.
! !160
KAIZEN
10.9 Summary
Kaizen ( ?), Japanese for “improvement” or “change for the best”, refers
to philosophy or practices that focus upon continuous improvement of
processes in manufacturing, engineering, and business management.
Kaizen methodology includes making changes and monitoring results, then
adjusting. Large-scale pre-planning and extensive project scheduling are
replaced by smaller experiments, which can be rapidly adapted as new
improvements are suggested.
! !161
KAIZEN
References
1. Kaizen — Wikipedia.
4. www.michilolidis.gr.
! !162
KAIZEN
REFERENCE MATERIAL
Click on the links below to view additional reference material for this
chapter
Summary
PPT
MCQ
Video Lecture
! !163
7 QC TOOLS
Chapter 11
7 QC Tools
Objectives
Procedure of using it
Structure:
11.1 Introduction
11.4 Histogram
11.7 Graphs
11.9 Summary
! !164
7 QC TOOLS
11.1 Introduction
The 7 QC Tools are simple statistical tools used for problem solving. These
tools were either developed in Japan or introduced to Japan by the Quality
Gurus such as Deming and Juran. In terms of importance, these are the
most useful. Kaoru Ishikawa has stated that these 7 tools can be used to
solve 95% of all problems.
1. Pareto Diagram
3. Histogram
4. Control Charts
5. Scatter Diagrams
6. Graphs
They are called basic because they are suitable for people with little formal
training in statistics and because they can be used to solve the vast
majority of quality-related issues.
Good Visual Aids make statistical and quality control more comprehendible.
! !165
7 QC TOOLS
Pareto Diagram is a tool that arranges items in the order of the magnitude
of their contribution, thereby identifying a few items exerting maximum
influence.
This tool is used in SPC and quality improvement for prioritising projects
for improvement, prioritising setting up of corrective action teams to solve
problems, identifying products on which most complaints are received,
identifying the nature of complaints occurring most often, identifying most
frequent causes for rejections or for other similar purposes.
20% of the items purchased by a company account for 80% of the value.
These constitute the A items on which maximum attention are paid.
Dr. Juran suggested the use of this principle to quality control for
separating the “vital few” problems from the “trivial many” now called the
“useful many”.
In short, it is: bar chart arranged in descending order of height from left to
right.
! !166
7 QC TOOLS
! !167
7 QC TOOLS
Procedure:
4. Draw X and Y axes. Various items are represented on the X-axis. Unlike
other graphs, Pareto Diagrams have two Y-axes — one on the left
representing numbers and the one on right representing the per cent
contributions. The scale for X-axis is selected in such a manner that all
the items including others are accommodated between the two Y-axes.
The scales for the Y-axes are so selected that the total number of items
on the left side and 100% on the right side occupy the same height.
! !168
7 QC TOOLS
8. The chart is now ready for interpretation. The slope of the chart
suddenly changes at some point. This point separates the ‘vital few’
from the ‘useful many’ like the A, B and C class items in materials
management.
This tool was devised by Dr. Kouro Ishikawa and as mentioned earlier is
also known as Ishikawa Diagram.
A graphic tool that helps identify, sort, and display possible causes of a
problem or quality characteristic.
To obtain a good work result, we must identify the effects of various factors
and develop measures to improve the results accordingly.
A cause and effect diagram is mainly used to study the cause of a certain
matter.
! !169
7 QC TOOLS
Structure
Another name for the tool, as we have seen earlier, is Fish-bone Diagram
due to the shape of the completed structure.
The symptom or result or effect for which one wants to find causes is put in
the dark box on the right. The lighter boxes at the end of the large bones
are main groups in which the ideas are classified. Usually four to six such
groups are identified.
! !170
7 QC TOOLS
Cause and Effect diagram is a tool that provides best results if used by a
group or team. Each individual may have a few ideas for the causes and his
thinking is restricted to those theories. More heads are needed to make a
comprehensive list of the causes. Brainstorming technique is therefore very
useful in identifying maximum number of causes.
!
! !171
7 QC TOOLS
Procedure
! !172
7 QC TOOLS
11.4 Histogram
! !173
7 QC TOOLS
5. Draw X-axis and Y-axis and decide appropriate scales for the groups on
X-axis and the number of observations or the frequency on Y-axis.
! !174
7 QC TOOLS
! !175
7 QC TOOLS
Basic Concepts
! !176
7 QC TOOLS
If more than one set of values are identical, requiring more points at the
same spot, a small circle is drawn around the original dot to indicate
second point with the same values.
The way the points lie scattered in the quadrant gives a good indication of
the relationship between the two variables.
Variable 2
! Variable 1
! !177
7 QC TOOLS
1. Collect two pieces of data and create a summary table of the data.
3. It is common that the “cause” variable be labelled on the X-axis and the
“effect” variable be labelled on the Y-axis.
Let us see some common patterns seen in Scatter Diagrams and the
conclusions one can draw based on these patterns.
! !178
7 QC TOOLS
Diagram 3, in which the points are scattered closely around a line sloping
in Northwest to Southeast direction, indicates a strong negative
relationship. A negative relationship means that the variable on Y-axis goes
down as the variable on X-axis goes up.
! !179
7 QC TOOLS
Weak relationship means that the variables are related but there are
possibly other factors besides the variable on X-axis also affecting the
variable on Y-axis. If other factors are kept constant in a controlled
experiment and the data is again plotted, it would result in a scatter
showing a strong relationship.
Diagram 6
! !180
7 QC TOOLS
11.7 Graphs
What is Graph?
A graph is “a graphical representation of data, which allows a person to
understand the meaning of these data at a glance.” Unprocessed data
simply represent a list of numbers, and finding certain tendencies or
magnitude of situation from these numbers is difficult, sometimes resulting
in an interpretational error. A graph is a effective means to monitor or
judge the situation, allowing quick and precise understanding of the
current or actual situation.
! !181
7 QC TOOLS
Sr.
Type of Graph Purpose
No.
As measurement and collection of data forms the basis for any analysis,
this activity needs to be planned in such a way that the information
collected is both relevant and comprehensive.
Check sheets are tools for collecting data. They are designed specific to the
type of data to be collected. Check sheets aid in systematic collection of
data. Some examples of check sheets are daily maintenance check sheets,
attendance records, production log books, etc.
Stratification
! !182
7 QC TOOLS
Check Sheet
Method Usage Result
!
! !183
7 QC TOOLS
Stratification
! !184
7 QC TOOLS
11.9 Summary
! !185
7 QC TOOLS
References
1. http://www3.ha.org.hk/qeh/wiser/doc/7bqt.pdf
2. http://www.slideshare.net/gurmukhsingh7/7-qc-tools-training-material1
3. http://www.productivity.in/knowledgebase/TQM/c.%20Tools%20and
%20Techniques/3.1.%207QC%20Tools/7%20QC%20TOOLS.pdf
! !186
7 QC TOOLS
REFERENCE MATERIAL
Click on the links below to view additional reference material for this
chapter
Summary
PPT
MCQ
Video Lecture
! !187
SIX SIGMA
Chapter 12
Six Sigma (6σ)
Objectives
Structure:
12.9 Summary
! !188
SIX SIGMA
Why “Sigma”? The word is a statistical term that measures how far a given
process deviates from perfection. The central idea behind Six Sigma is that
if you can measure how many “defects" you have in a process, you can
systematically figure out how to eliminate them and get as close to “zero
defects” as possible.
To achieve Six Sigma Quality, a process must produce no more than 3.4
defects per million opportunities. An “opportunity” is defined as a chance
for non-conformance, or not meeting the required specifications. This
means we need to be nearly flawless in executing our key processes.
Six sigma is a set of techniques and tools for process improvement. It was
developed by Motorola in 1986 when Jack Welch made it central to his
successful business strategy at General Electric in 1995. Today, it is used in
many industrial sectors.
! !189
SIX SIGMA
Each Six Sigma project carried out within an organisation follows a defined
sequence of steps and has quantified value targets, for example: reduce
process cycle time, reduce costs, increase customer satisfaction, and
increase profits.
Motorola set a goal of “six sigma” for all of its manufacturing operations,
and this goal became a by-word for the management and engineering
practices used to achieve it.
! !190
SIX SIGMA
First, Six Sigma is arguably a very clever way of branding and packaging
many aspects of Total Quality Management that exist in their own right,
regardless of the development of Six Sigma.
Six Sigma is lots of different things because it had different meanings over
time, and also because it is now interpreted in increasingly different ways.
And Six Sigma is still evolving.
Motorola Inc., who first developed the methodology in the mid-late 1980's
and who provide extensive Six Sigma training and consultancy services,
provide the following definitions:
Six Sigma has evolved over the last two decades and so has its definition.
Six Sigma has literal, conceptual, and practical definitions. At Motorola
University (Motorola's Six Sigma Training and Consultancy Division), we
think about Six Sigma at three different levels:
As a metric
As a methodology
As a management system
! !191
SIX SIGMA
Define opportunity
Measure performance
Analyse opportunity
Improve performance
Control performance.
! !192
SIX SIGMA
The Six Sigma Management System drives clarity around the business
strategy and the metrics that most reflect success with that strategy. It
provides the framework to prioritise resources for projects that will improve
the metrics, and it leverages leaders who will manage the efforts for rapid,
sustainable, and improved business results
General Electric (GE), the first large-scale adopters and advocates of Six
Sigma after Motorola, and considered by most experts to have been
responsible for Six Sigma's rapidly achieved high profile, provide the
following definitions of Six Sigma:
Why ‘Sigma’? The word is a statistical term that measures how far a given
process deviates from perfection. The central idea behind Six Sigma is that
if you can measure how many ‘defects’ you have in a process, you can
systematically figure out how to eliminate them and get as close to ‘zero
defects’ as possible.
To achieve Six Sigma Quality, a process must produce no more than 3.4
defects per million opportunities. An ‘opportunity’ is defined as a chance for
non-conformance, or not meeting the required specifications. This means
we need to be nearly flawless in executing our key processes.
Here’s a brief history of Six Sigma, and the Six Sigma name.
Since the 1920s the word ‘sigma’ has been used by mathematicians and
engineers as a symbol for a unit of measurement in product quality
variation. (Note it’s sigma with a small ‘s’ because in this context sigma is
a generic unit of measurement.)
In the mid-1980s engineers in Motorola Inc, in the USA used ‘Six Sigma’ as
an informal name for an in-house initiative for reducing defects in
production processes, because it represented a suitably high level of
quality. (Note here it'' Sigma with a big ‘S’ because in this context Six
Sigma is a 'branded' name for Motorola's initiative.)
! !193
SIX SIGMA
(Certain engineers – there are varying opinions as to whether the very first
was Bill Smith or Mikal Harry – felt that measuring defects in terms of
thousands was an insufficiently rigorous standard. Hence, they increased
the measurement scale to parts per million, described as 'defects per
million', which prompted of use the the ‘six sigma’ terminology and
adoption of the capitalised ‘Six Sigma’ branded name, given that six sigma
was deemed to equate to 3.4 parts – or defects – per million.)
In the late – 1980s, following the success of the above initiative, Motorola
extended the Six Sigma methods to its critical business processes, and
significantly Six Sigma became a formalised in-house ‘branded’ name for a
performance improvement methodology, ie., beyond purely ‘defect
reduction’, in Motorola Inc.
In 1991, Motorola certified its first ‘Black Belt’ Six Sigma experts, which
indicates the beginnings of the formalisation of the accredited training of
Six Sigma methods.
In 1991 also, Allied Signal, (a large avionics company which merged with
Honeywell in 1999), adopted the Six Sigma methods, and claimed
significant improvements and cost savings within six months.
That is to say, in a little over ten years, Six Sigma quickly became not only
a hugely popular methodology used by many corporations for quality and
process improvement.
! !194
SIX SIGMA
General Electric (GE), the first large-scale adopters and advocates of Six
Sigma after Motorola, and considered by most experts to have been
responsible for Six Sigmas rapidly achieved high profile.
Teams and team leaders are an essential part of the Six Sigma
methodology.
Six Sigma teams and notably Six Sigma team leaders (‘Black Belts’) use a
vast array of tools at each stage of Six Sigma implementation to define,
measure, analyse and control variation in process quality, and to manage
people, teams and communications.
! !195
SIX SIGMA
The theory is entirely logical: understanding and then improving the most
important ‘delivery-chain’ processes will naturally increase efficiency,
customer satisfaction, competitive advantage, and profitability.
Concept
The Goal:
The Vision
Drive industries to design and produce products/services to Six Sigma
standards.
The Strategy
Use a data-driven structured approach to attack defects to improve the
sigma level of goods and services.
! !196
SIX SIGMA
Application
Useful in any enterprise that provides products or services for companies.
!
Key Elements
The Customer
Customers define quality. They expect performance, reliability, competitive
prices, on-time delivery, service, clear and correct transaction processing
and more.
! !197
SIX SIGMA
The Processes
Defining Processes and defining Metrics and Measures for Processes is the
key element of Six Sigma.
By understanding the transaction life cycle from the customer’s needs and
processes, we can discover what they are seeing and feeling. This will give
a chance to identify weak area within a process and then we can improve
them.
The Employees
The company must involve all employees in Six Sigma program. The
company must provide opportunities and incentives for employees to focus
their talents and ability to satisfy customers.
This is important to six sigma that all team members should have a well-
defined role with measurable objectives.
! !198
SIX SIGMA
DMAIC
Refers to a data-driven quality strategy for improving processes. This
methodology is used to improve an existing business process.
DMADV
Refers to a data-driven quality strategy for designing products and
processes. This methodology is used to create new product designs or
process designs in such a way that it results in a more predictable, mature
and defect-free performance.
There is one more methodology called DFSS – Design For Six Sigma. DFSS
is a data-driven quality strategy for designing design or re-design a
product or service from the ground up.
! !199
SIX SIGMA
Sometimes, a DMAIC project may turn into a DFSS project because the
process in question requires complete redesign to bring about the desired
degree of improvement.
DMAIC
Define
There are five high-level steps in the application of Six Sigma to improve
the quality of output. The first step is Define.
! !200
SIX SIGMA
Project Name
Business Case
Project Scope
Project Goals
Milestones
Special Requirements
Special Assumptions
Roles and responsibilities of the project team
! !201
SIX SIGMA
Conclusion
At the conclusion of the design phase, you should know who the customer
or end-user is, their resistance issues, and requirements. You should also
have a clear understanding of goals and the scope of the project including
budget, time constraints, and deadlines.
Measure
You collect data from three primary sources: input, process, and output.
! !202
SIX SIGMA
2. Data evaluation
At this stage, collected data is evaluated and sigma is calculated. This gives
approximate number of defects.
As stated above, here Number for defects is total number of defects found,
Number of Units is the number of units produced and number of
opportunities means the number of ways to generate defects.
! !203
SIX SIGMA
You may use a rating scale. For example, rate each of these three areas
from 1 to 10, with 1 being the lowest FMEA level and 10 being the highest.
The higher the level, the more severe the rating. So, a high FMEA would
indicate the need to devise and implement improved measuring steps
within the overall process. This would have the effect of preventing defects.
Analyse
Six Sigma aims to define the causes of defects, measure those defects,
and analyse them so that they can be reduced.
We will consider five specific types of analysis that will help to promote the
goals of the project.
! !204
SIX SIGMA
1. Source Analysis
This is also called root cause analysis and attempts to find defects that are
derived from the sources of information or work generation. After finding
the root cause of the problem, attempts are made to resolve the problem
before we expect to eliminate defects from the product.
The open step: During this phase of root cause analysis, the project
team brainstorms all the possible explanations for current sigma
performance.
The narrow step: During this phase, the project team narrows the list
of possible explanations for current sigma performance.
The close step: During this phase, the project team validates the
narrowed list of explanations that explain sigma performance.
2. Process Analysis
Analyse the numbers to find out how well or poorly the processes are
working, compared to what’s possible and what the competition is doing.
3. Data Analysis
Use of measures and data (those already collected or new data gathered in
the analyse phase) to discern patterns, tendencies or other factors about
the problem that either suggest or prove/disprove possible cause of the
problem.
The data itself may have defect. There may be a case when product or
deliverable do not provide all the needed information. So, data is analysed
to find out the defects and attempts are made to resolve the problem
before we expect to eliminate defects from the product.
! !205
SIX SIGMA
4. Resource Analysis
We also need to ensure that employees are properly trained in all
departments that affect the process. If training is inadequate, you want to
identify that as a cause of defects.
5. Communication analysis
One problem common to most processes high in defects, is poor
communication. The classic interaction between a customer and a retail
store is worthy of study because many of the common communication
problems are apparent in this case.
The same type of problems occur with the internal customer as well, even
though we may not recognise the sequence of events as a customer
service problem.
Conclusion
Analysis can take several forms. Some Six Sigma programs like to use a lot
of diagrams and worksheets, and others prefer discussion and list making.
There are many tools which can be used to perform analysis like Box Plot,
Cause and Effect Diagram, Progressive Analysis, Ranking, Pareto Analysis,
Prioritisation Matrix, Value Analysis etc. The proper procedure is the one
that works best for your team, provided that the end result is successful.
Improve
! !206
SIX SIGMA
If the project team does a thorough job in the root causation phase of
Analysis, the Improve phase of DMAIC can be quick, easy, and satisfying
work.
Solution alternatives
Experiments with solution alternatives
Planning for future change
! !207
SIX SIGMA
Control
The last phase of DMAIC is control, which is the phase in which we ensure
that the processes continue to work well, produce desired output results,
and maintain quality levels. You will be concerned with four specific aspects
of control, which are:
1. Quality Control
Quality is at the heart of the Six Sigma philosophy. Reducing defects has
everything to do with striving for perfection. Whether we reach perfection
or not, the effort defines our attitude toward quality itself.
2. Standardisation
! !208
SIX SIGMA
The final step in a control process is knowing how to respond once a defect
is discovered.
The weak links in the procedure, where defects are most likely to occur,
can and should be monitored carefully so that defects can be spotted and
fixed before the process continues.
Conclusion
The project team determines how to technically control the newly improved
process and creates a response plan to ensure the new process maintains
the improved sigma performance.
DMADV
Define
Company must identify the customer and which type of a product and hope
from it. These are analyse by using flow causes and effect diagrams, check
sheets and pareto analysis.
Measure
Company will collect the baseline data to determine where the process
stands as compared to where it needs to be. And also see the critical to
! !209
SIX SIGMA
Analyse
Design
Design details, optimise the design, and plan for design verification. This
phase may require simulations.
Verify
Verify the design, set up pilot runs, implement the production process and
hand it over to the process owner(s).
This section will give an overview of the ten most important technical tools
which a Six Sigma team member needs to master as they progress
through the DMAIC methodology.
While these tools are considered technical in nature, most of them are
relatively easy to learn and apply. They are covered in the order they are
used in the DMAIC methodology.
! !210
SIX SIGMA
The critical to quality tree is used during the Design Phase of DMAIC. It is
used to brainstorm and validate the needs and requirements of the
customer of the process targeted for improvement.
Identify the first level of requirements of the need, that is, some
characteristics of the need that determines whether the customer is
happy with the need.
During the Define phase, the project team creates the first of several
process maps. A process map is a picture of the current steps in the
process targeted for improvement.
A process map has five major categories of work from the identification of
the suppliers of the process, the inputs the suppliers provide, the name of
the process, the output of the process, and the customers of the process.
Each of these steps is summarised as SIPOC to indicate to the team the
steps that must be conducted to complete a process map.
This tool will be used during the Analysis stage of DMAIC. The project team
will review data collected during the Measure stage of DMAIC.
Data is of two types – Discrete data (go/no go, fail or pass) and continuous
data (time, hight etc.).
! !211
SIX SIGMA
Histogram is useful for continuous data same way when the data is
discrete, most teams create a Pareto chart. Discrete data is counted data -
go/no-go, off/on, yes/no, and defect/no defect type data.
When dealing with discrete data, the project team should create reason
codes for why a defect occurs and count and categorize the data into these
reason codes and a pareto chart should be prepared.
The most important tool to assist the project team in determining root
causation is the cause-effect diagram. This tool captures all the ideas of
the project team relative to what they feel are the root causes behind the
current sigma performance and finally help in finding a root cause of the
problem.
Once ideas have been prioritised after use of the causes and effect
diagram, the most important thing the project team does is validate the
remaining ideas with fact and data.
! !212
SIX SIGMA
The scatter diagram takes an idea about root causation and tracks
corresponding data in the response the team is trying to improve. The
team can validate an idea about root causation through one of three
methods – using basic data collection, a designed experiment, or through
the scatter diagram.
Have each team member write one idea per Post-it note and post on a
wall randomly.
As ideas are read off for clarification, sort ideas into similar groups.
Create a ‘header’ card for each general category of ideas below it.
Conclusion
We saw 10 major technical tools a project team member uses during the
time they are on a Six Sigma team. These are not the only tools a Six
Sigma team may use. However, the tools covered here are those that are
most common for every team member to be aware of and knowledgeable
about.
! !213
SIX SIGMA
There are generally four classes of software used to support Six Sigma:
DMAIC and Lean online project collaboration tools for local and global
teams
Data Collection tools that feed information directly into the analysis tools
and significantly reduce the time spent gathering data.
! !214
SIX SIGMA
The probability of getting ‘r’ defects in a sample having a given DPU rate
can be predicted with the Poisson Distribution.
! !215
SIX SIGMA
99.9995 5.92 5
99.9992 5.81 8
99.9990 5.76 10
99.9980 5.61 20
99.9970 5.51 30
99.9960 5.44 40
99.9930 5.31 70
! !216
SIX SIGMA
! !217
SIX SIGMA
3 levels (3 belts)
! !218
SIX SIGMA
Actual definitions and competencies for each belt can vary by organisation
and training institutions.
Benefits
Difficulties
3. Six sigma is about getting right answer, not just any answer.
! !219
SIX SIGMA
Criticism
1. There is nothing new. It only proves defects and defectives counts offer
tangible, measurable results.
4. Critics have suggested that Six Sigma did not bring quality improvement
in all the organisations where it was implemented.
! !220
SIX SIGMA
12.9 Summary
Six Sigma generic cycles includes Define, Measure, Analyse, Improve and
Control Phases.
! !221
SIX SIGMA
7. Describe DMADV.
! !222
SIX SIGMA
References
1. Six Sigma — GE
2. Six Sigma — Wikipedia
3. Six Sigma
4. Six Sigma Tutorial
5. Extracts Courtesy of Six Sigma Quality Group
6. Six Sigma System Principle by Joel Cutcher Greshenfeld
7. Six Sigma — business ball.com.
! !223
SIX SIGMA
REFERENCE MATERIAL
Click on the links below to view additional reference material for this
chapter
Summary
PPT
MCQ
! !224
LEAN PRODUCTION SYSTEM
Chapter 13
Lean Production System
Objectives
Structure:
13.1 Introduction
13.3 Concept
13.9 Summary
! !225
LEAN PRODUCTION SYSTEM
13.1 Introduction
TPS is renowned for its focus on reduction of the original Toyota seven
wastes to improve overall customer value, but there are varying
perspectives on how this is best achieved.
The steady growth of Toyota, from a small company to the world’s largest
automaker, has focused attention on how it has achieved this success.
! !226
LEAN PRODUCTION SYSTEM
Lean production system is the western term for Toyota Production System.
This production philosophy is now widely used in auto industry around the
world.
This system has been modified everywhere in the auto industry, adapted to
some extent on the local industrial situation or practices, however its core
principles remain the same.
This system is not only used in auto industry but also in other non-auto
industries involved in assembling process.
Overview
! !227
LEAN PRODUCTION SYSTEM
!
Lean principles are derived from the Japanese manufacturing industry. The
term was first coined by John Krafcik in his 1988 article, “Triumph of the
Lean Production System,” based on his master's thesis at the MIT Sloan
School of Management.
Krafcik had been a quality engineer in the Toyota-GM NUMMI joint venture
in California before coming to MIT for MBA studies. Krafcik’s research was
continued by the International Motor Vehicle Program (IMVP) at MIT.
For many, lean is the set of "tools" that assist in the identification and
steady elimination of waste (muda). As waste is eliminated, quality
improves while production time and cost are reduced.
! !228
LEAN PRODUCTION SYSTEM
The difference between these two approaches is not the goal itself, but
rather the prime approach to achieving it. The implementation of smooth
flow exposes quality problems that already existed, and thus waste
reduction naturally happens as a consequence. The advantage claimed for
this approach is that it naturally takes a system-wide perspective, whereas
a waste focus sometimes wrongly assumes this perspective.
Both lean and TPS can be seen as a loosely connected set of potentially
competing principles whose goal is cost reduction by the elimination of
waste.
Toyota's view is that the main method of lean is not the tools, but the
reduction of three types of waste: muda (“non-value-adding work”), muri
(“overburden”), and mura (“unevenness”), to expose problems
systematically and to use the tools where the ideal cannot be achieved.
From this perspective, the tools are workarounds adapted to different
situations, which explains any apparent incoherence of the principles
above.
! !229
LEAN PRODUCTION SYSTEM
Purpose of Lean
The purpose of lean is to remove all forms of waste from the value stream.
The chief obstacle is the fact that waste often hides in plain sight, or is
built into activities.
13.3 Concept
! !230
LEAN PRODUCTION SYSTEM
The other of the two TPS pillars is the very human aspect of autorotation,
whereby automation is achieved with a human touch. In this instance, the
“human touch” means to automate so that the machines/systems are
designed to aid humans in focusing on what the humans do best.
! !231
LEAN PRODUCTION SYSTEM
The flexibility and ability to change are within bounds and not open-ended,
and therefore often not expensive capability requirements. More
importantly, all of these concepts have to be understood, appreciated, and
embraced by the actual employees who build the products and therefore
own the processes that deliver the value.
The cultural and managerial aspects of lean are possibly more important
than the actual tools or methodologies of production itself.
Any process that the customer would be prepared to pay for that adds
value to the product.
2. Identify all the steps in the value stream for each product
family, eliminating whenever possible those steps that do not
create value.
! !232
LEAN PRODUCTION SYSTEM
a. Using one piece flow by linking of all the activities and processes into
the most efficient combinations to maximize value-added content
while minimizing waste.
!
4. As flow is introduced, let customers pull value from the next
upstream activity.
! !233
LEAN PRODUCTION SYSTEM
P
E
R
F
E
C
T
!
! !234
LEAN PRODUCTION SYSTEM
! !235
LEAN PRODUCTION SYSTEM
There are many tools and concepts that lean companies employ to support
the above principles.
1. Takt Time
The heartbeat of the customer; the average rate at which a company must
produce product or execute transactions based on customer requirements
and available working time.
2. Standardised Work
A description of methods, materials, tools, and processing times required
to meet takt time for any given job.
5. Five Why’s
A thought process by which the question “why” is asked repeatedly to get
to the root cause of a problem.
6. Quick Changeover/SMED
A 3-stage methodology developed by Shigeo Shingo that reduces the time
to changeover a machine by externalizing and streamlining steps. Shorter
changeover times are used to reduce batch sizes and produce just-in-time.
7. Mistake-Proofing/Poka yoke
A methodology that prevents an operator from making an error.
! !236
LEAN PRODUCTION SYSTEM
10.Five S
5S is a five step methodology aimed at creating and maintaining an
organised visual workplace.
! !237
LEAN PRODUCTION SYSTEM
Tighter coordination along the supply chain. Goods are pulled along
!
Just-in-time means PRODUCING
1. Levelled Production
Levelled production means producing various models on the same
production line to cater the customer demand. See the following diagram.
The various products are shown in the form of different geometrical
shapes. Assume they are different models of vehicles being produced on
the same production line.
! !238
LEAN PRODUCTION SYSTEM
!
Levelled Production—Flexible Production Line
! !239
LEAN PRODUCTION SYSTEM
6. 3Ms
Let’s understand it with the help of an illustration. Assume that you have to
carry 12 tons of load in a truck having capacity of 4 tons maximum. You
can take this load in either of the following ways:
! !240
LEAN PRODUCTION SYSTEM
! !241
LEAN PRODUCTION SYSTEM
7. 5S
Stages
4. Implementation stage
3. The pathway for every product and service must be simple and direct.
! !242
LEAN PRODUCTION SYSTEM
Action Plan
While every individual or company embarking on a lean journey will have
different challenges based on their particular set of circumstances, there
are several crucial steps that can help reduce resistance, spread the right
learning, and engender the type of commitment necessary for lean
enterprise.
Getting Started
Find a change agent, a leader who will take personal responsibility for
the lean transformation.
Get the lean knowledge, via a sensei or consultant, who can teach lean
techniques and how to implement them as part of a system, not as
isolated programs.
! !243
LEAN PRODUCTION SYSTEM
Map the value streams, beginning with the current state of how material
and information flow now, then drawing a leaner future state of how they
should flow and creating an implementation plan with timetable.
Deal with excess people at the outset, and then promise that no one will
lose their job in the future due to the introduction of lean techniques.
“Two steps forward and one step backward is O.K.; no steps forward is
not O.K.”
! !244
LEAN PRODUCTION SYSTEM
Convince your suppliers and customers to take the steps just described.
Advantages:
1. Productivity Improvement
2. Total manufacturing time saved
3. Less scrap
4. Low inventory
5. Quality improvement
6. Plant space saved
7. Better labour utilisation
8. Safety of operations
! !245
LEAN PRODUCTION SYSTEM
Economics
Reduction of Inventory
! !246
LEAN PRODUCTION SYSTEM
Reduced Waste
- Lower cost
- Higher quality
Disadvantages
Very risky process — expect supply chain issues while changing over to
lean
! !247
LEAN PRODUCTION SYSTEM
13.9 Summary
Utilises 5S methodologies.
! !248
LEAN PRODUCTION SYSTEM
! !249
LEAN PRODUCTION SYSTEM
References
1. Wikipedia
4. Business dictionary.com
! !250
LEAN PRODUCTION SYSTEM
REFERENCE MATERIAL
Click on the links below to view additional reference material for this
chapter
Summary
PPT
MCQ
Video Lecture
! !251
QUALITY AT SOURCE
CHAPTER 14
Quality at Source
Objectives
Structure:
14.1 Introduction
14.9 Summary
! !252
QUALITY AT SOURCE
14.1 Introduction
Pull systems, one-piece flow, elimination of waste – these are the concepts
most often discussed when lean is the topic. Quality at the Source, on the
other hand, is rarely front and center when lean improvement efforts are
presented.
Quality at the Source can quickly improve quality by providing simple yet
powerful tools for employees to use to identify and reduce the waste of
defects throughout the value stream. And like many other lean concepts,
QATS depends on other lean tools for successful implementation.
Since inspection is done immediately after a job is done, the cause of the
error with clarity and aids in faster rectification.
Many times, some fundamental processing mistakes get identified and their
analyses improves the quality in the long run.
! !253
QUALITY AT SOURCE
Every worker has the authority to stop production, if he finds some serious
defect. This puts responsibility for quality on the workers and gives them
pride in their work.
Help should always be available from the Quality Control personnel to help
workers understand the implications of the above actions. This brings in
cooperation and improves the achievement of quality.
Quality at the Source is predicated on the idea that you don’t want to
produce bad product at any work centre. Although this idea sounds
obvious, we all know of situations where bad product is manufactured at a
work centre and the problem is either swept under the rug, or ignored with
a volume of production. The solution to this situation can be surprisingly
simple. If we want to improve the product quality, we can employ the
techniques of Quality at the Source.
Quality is not just the responsibility of the quality control department. The
process in which the product is manufactured must be set up to allow
production line workers to recognise errors before they become defects.
The development of a proactive culture is needed in quality at the source,
and a mind-set of error prevention rather than reaction to problems should
be taught.
Work stops at the work center and a team of workers and engineers rushes
to the light and begins to address the problem to eliminate the cause of
the bad production.
! !254
QUALITY AT SOURCE
There are many production managers who would have apoplexy if a worker
stopped production because of a bad product. After all, production quotas
and deadlines must be met. We can’t stop the wheels because of a single
bad product!
However, let’s understand the five key factors of Quality at the Source:
Standardised Work
To eliminate variation in production quality, first make sure everyone is
making the product in the same manner. Document the work methods,
materials, tools, machinery settings and training of each worker and work
station. Focus on the methods, not on the output. If the methods are
consistent, the output will be consistent.
Self-checks
Design simple gauges to measure the key parameters of the production
output at the work station. Enable the workers to measure the output
themselves and if it is not to spec, raise the flag for help.
Successive Checks
Make regular checks of the output to ensure the work quality is consistent.
Then have the next downstream work station measure the input coming to
it to see if everything is to spec to continue the production stream.
! !255
QUALITY AT SOURCE
Continuous Improvement
This is probably the hardest technique for management to understand. It
incorporates a change in management style. As you introduce
improvements to the process and quality improves, you can’t rest on your
laurels.
You must have a system to continuously evaluate the quality and make
further improvements. In reality, you are always seeing production
stoppages, but they will be of shorter duration than you saw at the start of
this improvement process. You will see a constant improvement in quality
and output.
Quality at the Source can be a powerful tool, even without the Andon
lights, and should not be overlooked because you can’t stop to fix
problems.
While this concept may sound simple on the surface, it can be difficult if an
organisation consists of multi-skilled employees who are cross-trained for
numerous positions. And it becomes even more difficult if these multi-
skilled employees rotate through positions on short regular cycles.
The reason for this difficulty is largely due to the amount of knowledge that
may need to be transferred to each employee.
If there are 10 process steps, then there could be 100 or more different
quality points to examine in search of defects in a single value stream.
! !256
QUALITY AT SOURCE
Training
Additionally, they must be taught how to quickly inspect each item for
these quality points. Because lean is intended to increase throughput,
QATS inspections must be done quickly and then value-added activity can
be conducted.
The QATS inspection should be visual and fast, with the employee looking
for each quality point quickly and then moving on to the next point.
After all quality points have been inspected, any corrective action
necessary can then be initiated.
Visual Aids
The more common types of visual aids are simple tools used to show such
things as standards, examples of good and bad, and methods for
inspection.
These visual aids come in many different forms, and can be as creative as
necessary to produce the desired results.
! !257
QUALITY AT SOURCE
One point lessons, or short visual presentations on a single point, also are
commonly used with QATS as visual aids designed to show what should be
inspected and how to perform the inspection.
One point lessons are often created on paper or card stock from 8½ inches
by 11 inches up to poster board size. They rely heavily on photos with very
little writing. The concept is to use the visual picture to guide the employee
through the process.
The concept behind these visual aids is to make it easier for employees to
identify defects before value is added.
Documentation
This is not intended to suggest that these other very necessary documents
should be eliminated. In fact, each and every one of these documentation
tools relies on each other for success.
! !258
QUALITY AT SOURCE
SOPs, which reside in the quality manual, can be used as a starting point
from which work instructions can be developed that provide the basic steps
associated with a task. Then from these work instructions, a simple quality
checklist can be created to quickly guide the employee through the quality
aspects of the task and into the value-added activities.
Additionally, QATS brings not just the quality team another tool, but all
employees receive a way to contribute to the quality movement of the
company. Employees gain ownership through this empowerment and the
number of quality contributors can then equal the number of employees in
the organisation.
These are:
Having a “stop and fix it” mentality. Much like an assembly line, by
pausing the process to make the necessary preventative changes when an
error is identified, we can prevent the same mistake being made
repeatedly. Sometimes, this “fix” can be as simple as correcting packaging
information on a part or as complex as reconsidering the way a route is
running.
! !259
QUALITY AT SOURCE
b. Item number
c. Part number
! !260
QUALITY AT SOURCE
Required tools and technology to identify quality flaws and rectify them
in an efficient manner.
! !261
QUALITY AT SOURCE
! !262
QUALITY AT SOURCE
14.9 Summary
Quality at the Source can quickly improve quality by providing simple yet
powerful tools for employees to use to identify and reduce the waste of
defects throughout the value stream.
In a practical sense, it would involve each operator checking his or her own
work before the part/component or product is sent to the next step in the
process.
Quality is not just the responsibility of the quality control department. The
process in which the product is manufactured must be set up to allow
production line workers to recognise errors before they become defects.
The development of a proactive culture is needed in quality at the source,
and a mind-set of error prevention rather than reaction to problems should
be taught.
! !263
QUALITY AT SOURCE
References
1. Wikipedia
2. Leanmanufacture.net
! !264
QUALITY AT SOURCE
REFERENCE MATERIAL
Click on the links below to view additional reference material for this
chapter
Summary
PPT
MCQ
Video Lecture
! !265
SUPPLIER PARTNERSHIP
Chapter 15
Supplier Partnership
Objectives
Structure:
15.1 Introduction
15.9 Summary
! !266
SUPPLIER PARTNERSHIP
15.1 Introduction
A partnership can give suppliers greater visibility into how you operate,
enabling you and your suppliers to collaborate by reducing costs, improving
service and quality, and even innovating.
Organisation and suppliers have the same goal – to satisfy the end-user.
! !267
SUPPLIER PARTNERSHIP
! !268
SUPPLIER PARTNERSHIP
Vision
The Suppliers Partnership helps in providing economic value to the supply
chain through strategic action and engagement.
Mission
SP’s members work together to improve value throughout the supply
chain. SP provides a forum for small, mid-sized and large suppliers to work
to learn from each other and share best practices while also providing
economic value..
Goals
! !269
SUPPLIER PARTNERSHIP
1. Compliance
2. Conduct
3. Strategic financing.
That doesn’t mean “driving for the lowest possible price with no regard for
the true expense incurred,” “but rather recognising that the success of one
partner helps the success of the other.
Compliance
It’s important that you know with whom you are conducting business, and
that means knowing your customer, your supplier, and their suppliers and
customers.
! !270
SUPPLIER PARTNERSHIP
Many importers are adopting the best practice of screening all their
suppliers, both domestically and internationally.
In the past years, global and regional legislative bodies and governments
have introduced numerous changes to trade regulations that impact supply
chain operations: revised classification standards, tighter export controls
and new environmental packaging requirements. Safeguarding the
environment is now a global concern.
Conduct
Suppliers for larger organisations are subject to more rigorous review than
ever.
! !271
SUPPLIER PARTNERSHIP
The chosen supplier could then be placed on probation for a given time
frame until they have proven themselves to be an ethical, conscientious
and compliant member of the organization’s global supply chain.
Strategic Finance
While the buyer is looking to get a fair (not always lowest) price, the
supplier has to ensure he is covering costs and, of course, making a profit.
It is not always in the buyer’s interest to negotiate down to the very lowest
price; the result can be less trust or loyalty from the vendor.
Many buyers and importers report that price is just one factor in the
negotiation; quality is huge, and they appreciate knowing they can demand
a lot from their supplier and it will be delivered.
Especially in retail, the payment terms are often very favourable to the
suppliers. These may include payment at sight of documents, payment at
FOB port, or sight plus 15 days.
For an international shipment, the goods are typically paid for well before
they arrive at the final destination. Days are tied up in international
transportation, as well as the journey through the inland transport, the
distribution center and the retail stockroom before finally getting to the
shelf and being purchased by the end consumer. Consequently, the
importer may have weeks or even months of cash outlay prior to selling
! !272
SUPPLIER PARTNERSHIP
the goods, leading more importers to look for payment alternatives and
extended terms.
There are typically many options available for a business with good credit
and also for those with less-than-ideal credit. This is a conversation for the
treasury department to have with the company’s financial service
providers.
An additional benefit is it gives the importer more control over their capital
and allows currency risk to be built into the product from the start, instead
of seeing the costs gradually creep up over subsequent seasons while the
supplier is trying to hedge risk.
! !273
SUPPLIER PARTNERSHIP
a. Long-term commitment.
b. Trust
c. Shared Vision
! !274
SUPPLIER PARTNERSHIP
Long-term Commitment
Trust
Shared Vision
! !275
SUPPLIER PARTNERSHIP
By sharing a vision with each other, both buyer and supplier are benefitted.
Following are the requirements for sharing:
1. Both the customer and the supplier are fully responsible for the control
of the quality.
2. Both the customer and the supplier should be independent of each other
and respect each other’s independence.
3. The customer is responsible for providing the supplier with clear and
sufficient requirements so that the supplier can know exactly what to
produce.
4. Both the customer and the supplier should enter a contract with respect
to quality, quantity, price, delivery method, and terms of payments.
5. The supplier is responsible for providing the quality that will satisfy the
customer and submitting necessary related with customer’s needs.
! !276
SUPPLIER PARTNERSHIP
11.When these principles are followed in right sprit, it develops very strong
emotional bond between customer and supplier that is essential for
growth.
Sourcing
Sole sourcing
Multiple sourcing
- Competition will result in better quality, lower costs and better service.
! !277
SUPPLIER PARTNERSHIP
Single sourcing
- Advantages for the supplier include new business from the customer,
reduced cost of the business and production processes.
Supplier Selection
Following are the conditions for the selection and evaluation of suppliers:
9. The supplier has an effective quality system (like ISO 9000) and
improvement program.
! !278
SUPPLIER PARTNERSHIP
Supplier Rating
Supplier Certification
! !279
SUPPLIER PARTNERSHIP
7. Supplier must make inspections and tests (laboratory results and SPC
are used).
8. Supplier shall have the ability to timely provide inspection and test data.
1. Customer/supplier partnership
Potential Pitfalls
! !280
SUPPLIER PARTNERSHIP
Benefits of Partnership
! !281
SUPPLIER PARTNERSHIP
15.9 Summary
A partnership can give suppliers greater visibility into how you operate,
enabling you and your suppliers to collaborate by reducing costs, improving
service and quality, and even innovating.
There are various reasons of partnership, however key elements are: (a)
Long-term commitment, (b)Trust and (c) Shared vision.
! !282
SUPPLIER PARTNERSHIP
3. Describe the various reasons for partnership and its key elements.
References
1. Info@supplierpartnership.org
! !283
SUPPLIER PARTNERSHIP
REFERENCE MATERIAL
Click on the links below to view additional reference material for this
chapter
Summary
PPT
MCQ
Video Lecture
! !284
COST OF QUALITY
Chapter 16
Cost of Quality
Objectives
Structure:
16.1 Introduction
16.9 Summary
! !285
COST OF QUALITY
16.1 Introduction
Prior to its introduction, the general perception was that higher quality
requires higher costs, either by buying better materials or machines or by
hiring more labour.
The “cost of quality” isn’t the price of creating a quality product or service.
It’s the cost of NOT creating a quality product or service.
Every time work is redone, the cost of quality increases. Obvious examples
include:
! !286
COST OF QUALITY
There are many different definitions of the Cost of Quality available, and
many are lacking in scope or precision. One of the definitions is as follows:
At the highest level, there are two different terms in the Cost of Quality
equation: the Cost of Good Quality (CoGQ) and the Cost of Poor Quality
(CoPQ). This can be understood in the formula below :
Let's start with the Cost of Poor Quality. These are the traditional quality
costs companies measure. Examples would include scrap, rework, and
returned materials. To give this part of the equation more structure, we
think of Poor Quality costs as having two different terms: Internal Failure
Costs (IFC) and External Failure Costs (EFC). This can be understood by
the following equation:
When it comes to the Cost of Good Quality, these are the costs that are
much less likely to be measured by a company.
Generally, these are the costs companies incur to ensure they are
producing quality products.
Again, we break the Cost of Good Quality calculation into two different
terms: Appraisal Costs (AC) and Prevention Costs (PC).
! !287
COST OF QUALITY
In 1979, Crosby introduced the new popular concept that “quality is free”.
Today view of quality cost among practitioners seems fall into three
categories:
Quality costs are those incurred in excess of those that would have
been incurred if product were built or service performed exactly
right the first time: This view is held by adherents of the TQM
philosophy. Costs include not only those that are direct, but also those
resulting from lost customers, lost market share, and many hidden costs
! !288
COST OF QUALITY
The history of quality costs dates back to the first edition of Juran’s QC
Handbook in 1951.
Today, quality cost accounting systems are part of the quality improvement
strategy of every modern organisation. Indeed, quality cost accounting and
reporting are part of many quality standards.
The quality equation states that quality consists of doing the right things
and not doing the wrong things.
Doing the right things means including product and service features that
satisfy or delight the customer.
Not doing the wrong things means avoiding defects and other behaviours
that cause customer dissatisfaction.
Quality costs address only the latter aspect of quality. It is conceivable that
a firm could drive quality costs to zero and still go out of business.
Quality represents a driver that produces higher profits through lower costs
and the ability to command a premium price in the marketplace.
The fundamental principle of the cost of quality is that any cost that would
not have been expended if quality were perfect is a cost of quality.
! !289
COST OF QUALITY
This includes such obvious costs as scrap and rework, but it also includes
many costs that are far less obvious, such as the cost of reordering to
replace defective material.
Service businesses also incur quality costs; for example, a hotel incurs a
quality cost when room service delivers a missing item to a guest.
More specifically, quality costs are the total of the cost incurred by
Prevention Costs
! !290
COST OF QUALITY
! !291
COST OF QUALITY
Appraisal Costs
!
The costs associated with measuring, evaluating or auditing products or
services to assure conformance to quality standards and performance
requirements.
! !292
COST OF QUALITY
! !293
COST OF QUALITY
Internal failure costs occurs when results of work fail to reach designated
quality standards, and are detected before transfer to the customer takes
place.
! !294
COST OF QUALITY
External failure costs occur when the product or service from a process
fails to reach designated quality standards, and is not detected until after
transfer to the customer.
What?
COQ is financial measure of the quality performance of an organisation.
It is essentially measure of lack of quality and can be termed as cost of bad
quality.
Why?
Understanding cost of quality helps organisations to develop quality
conformance as a useful strategic business tool that improves their
product, services and brand image.
! !295
COST OF QUALITY
How?
Prevention cost and appraisal cost are associated with cost of improving
quality, while failure cost results from poor quality
! !296
COST OF QUALITY
1-10-100 Rule
! !297
COST OF QUALITY
The goal of any quality cost system is to reduce quality costs to the lowest
practical level.
This level is determined by the total of the costs of failure and the cost of
appraisal and prevention.
Juran and Gryna (1988) present these costs graphically as shown in Figure
below.
! !298
COST OF QUALITY
There is some optimum target quality level where the sum of prevention,
appraisal, and failure costs is at a minimum.
Efforts to improve quality to better than the optimum level will result in
increasing the total quality costs.
! !299
COST OF QUALITY
The classical model created a mind-set that resisted the idea that
perfection was a possibility.
The principal use of quality cost data is to justify and support quality
performance improvement.
Quality cost data help identify problem areas and direct resources to these
areas. To be effective, the cost of quality system has to be integrated with
other quality information systems to assure that root causes will be
! !300
COST OF QUALITY
Assist the other functions to ensure that costs related to quality are
included in their analyses for setting objectives.
! !301
COST OF QUALITY
The time lag between production and field failure makes it very difficult to
trace the occurrence back to the process state that produced it.
Accounting Support
We have said it before, but it bears repeating, that the support of the
accounting department is vital whenever financial and accounting matters
are involved.
The cost of quality system must be integrated into the larger cost
accounting system. It is, in fact, merely a subsystem.
Ideally, the cost of quality will be so fully integrated into the cost
accounting system that it will not be viewed as a separate accounting
system at all; it will be a routine part of cost reporting and reduction.
The ideal cost of quality accounting system will simply aggregate quality
costs to enhance their visibility to management and facilitate efforts to
reduce them. For most companies, this task falls under the jurisdiction of
the office of the controller.
! !302
COST OF QUALITY
Since these costs are often huge, these estimates must be obtained.
However, they need not be obtained every month. Annual studies are
usually sufficient to indicate trends in these measures.
16.8 Advantages
Reducing the cost of poor quality is one of the best ways to increase a
company's profit.
! !303
COST OF QUALITY
16.9 Summary
The “cost of quality” isn’t the price of creating a quality product or service.
It’s the cost of NOT creating a quality product or service. At the highest
level, there are two different terms in the Cost of Quality equation: the
Cost of Good Quality (CoGQ) and the Cost of Poor Quality (CoPQ).
The fundamental principle of the cost of quality is that any cost that would
not have been expended if quality were perfect is a cost of quality. This
includes such obvious costs as scrap and rework, but it also includes many
costs that are far less obvious, such as the cost of reordering to replace
defective material.
There are additional costs of quality which are hidden and do not appear in
the account books of the company, as they are intangible and difficult to
measure. These additional costs could be as high as 20-25% of sales.
! !304
COST OF QUALITY
The goal of any quality cost system is to reduce quality costs to the lowest
practical level. This level is determined by the total of the costs of failure
and the cost of appraisal and prevention. There is some optimum target
quality level where the sum of prevention, appraisal, and failure costs is at
a minimum.
The principal use of quality cost data is to justify and support quality
performance improvement. Quality cost data help identify problem areas
and direct resources to these areas. To be effective, the cost of quality
system has to be integrated with other quality information systems to
assure that root causes will be addressed. Statistical analysis can be used
to correlate quality cost trends with other quality data to help direct
attention to problem causes.
! !305
COST OF QUALITY
References
1. Wikipedia
7. www.slideshare.net/mohitsingla
! !306
COST OF QUALITY
REFERENCE MATERIAL
Click on the links below to view additional reference material for this
chapter
Summary
PPT
MCQ
! !307