Professional Documents
Culture Documents
V. Kalaiyarasan
Assistant Professor, Mechanical Engineering Department, Ponnaiyah
Ramajayam College of Engineering & Technology, Tamil Nadu, India
M. AbdulGhaniKhan
Associate Professor, Mechanical Engineering Department,
Ponnaiyah Ramajayam College of Engineering & Technology, Tamil Nadu, India
ABSTRACT
The dissimilar metal joints of have been emerged as a structural material for various
industrial applications which provides good combination of mechanical properties like
strength, corrosion resistance with lower cost. Selections of joining process for such a
material are difficult because of their physical and chemical properties. The stainless steel
with dissimilar grade joints are very common structural applications joining is very
critical because of carbon precipitation and loss of chromium leads to increase in porosity
affects the quality of joint leads deteriorate strength. In the present investigation, stainless
steel of grades 202 and 409 were welded by semi auto Tungsten Inert Gas (TIG) welding
processes. Quality of the weld bead is always governed by its geometry and configuration
which, in turn are controlled by various welding process input parameters such as welding
speeds, current, and voltage as well as the type of the welding process. The planned
experiments were conducted in the semi auto TIG welding machine. Experimentally found
satisfied tensile and maximum bending strength were Peak current 140 Amps, Base current
100 amps and welding speed 50 mm/min was the best value and it did not create any major
changes and failures in the testing process. Finally optimized through Taguchi design
optimum parameter value for 4 mm dissimilar stainless steel was Peak current 140 Amps,
Base current 80 amps and welding speed 70 mm/min.
Key word: Face and Root bend, Hardness, optimization, orthogonal array, S/N ratio.
Cite this Article: K. Subbaiyan, V. Kalaiyarasan and M. AbdulGhaniKhan, Experimental
Investigations and Weld Characteristics Analysis of Single Pass Semiautomatic TIG
Welding with Disimilar Stainless Steels, International Journal of Mechanical Engineering
and Technology, 8(5), 2017, pp. 545-555.
http:// http://www.iaeme.com/ijmet/issues.asp?JType=IJMET&VType=8&IType=5
1. INTRODUCTION
Welding is a permanent joining process used to join different materials like metals, alloys or
plastics, together at their contacting surfaces by application of heat and or pressure. During
welding, the work-pieces to be joined are melted at the interface and after solidification a
permanent joint can be achieved. Sometimes a filler material is added to forma weld pool of molten
material which after solidification gives a strong bond between the materials. Weld ability of a
material depends on different factors like the metallurgical changes that occur during welding,
changes in hardness in weld zone due to rapid solidification, extent of oxidation due to reaction of
materials with atmospheric oxygen and tendency of crack formation in the joint position.
2. ARC WELDING
Among all these types of welding processes arc welding is widely used for different types of
materials. Common types of arc welding process are:
b) Gas Metal Arc Welding (GMAW) or Metal inert or active gas welding
(MIG/MAG):
In this type of welding process a continuous and consumable wire electrode is used. A shielding
gas generally argon or sometimes mixture of argon and carbon dioxide are blown through a
welding gun to the weld zone.
Titanium alloy. Like other welding system, TIG welding power sources have also improved from
basic transformer types to the highly electronic controlled power source today.
3. SCOPE OF WORK
The dissimilarity of the metals may arise due to the difference in chemical composition. The
chemical composition of the steel affects weld ability and other mechanical properties. Several
elements are purposefully added in the production of structural steel. The present study would be
beneficial in gaining an understanding about the Mechanical Properties that affect the service
performance of these welded joints made using different heat input combinations. Dissimilar joints
are to be conducted for Mechanical properties tests (tensile, hardness). So, there is a comparison
between the joints i.e. tensile and hardness test values in Low heat input and High heat input.
4. MATERIAL USED
Austenitic is the most widely used type of stainless steel. It has a nickel content of at least of 7%,
which makes the steel structure fully austenitic and gives it ductility, a large scale of service
temperature, non-magnetic properties and good weld ability. The range of applications of
austenitic stainless steel includes house wares, containers, industrial piping and vessels,
architectural facades and constructional structures. When welding stainless steels it is advisable to
follow the general welding guidelines valid for the type of steel, e.g. austenitic Stainless steels
have, due to their chemical compositions, a higher thermal elongation compared to mild steels.
This may increase weld deformation. Dependent of weld metal microstructure they might also be
more sensitive to hot cracking and sensitive to intermetallic precipitations compared to mild steels.
Austenitic grades are those alloys which are commonly in use for stainless applications. The
austenitic grades are not magnetic. The most common austenitic alloys are iron chromium- nickel
steels and are widely known as the 300 series. The austenitic stainless steels, because of their high
chromium and nickel content, are the most corrosion resistant of the stainless group providing
unusually fine mechanical properties. They cannot be hardened by heat treatment, but can be
hardened significantly by cold-working. The special material properties of stainless steels affect
all four mach inability factors: in general, it can be said that the higher the alloy content of a
stainless steel, the more difficult it is to machine. The special properties that make stainless steels
difficult to machine occur to a greater or lesser extent in all grades of stainless steels, but are most
marked in the austenitic grades. They can be summarized in five points: 1. Stainless steels work-
harden considerably 2. Stainless steels have low thermal conductivity 3. Stainless steels have high
toughness 4. Stainless steels tend to be sticky 5. Stainless steels have poor chip-breaking
characteristics
As the stainless steel is classified in different categories like austenitic, ferritic, martens tic etc.,
from this we have chosen austenitic stainless steel (304) because of its low cost, easy availability
in the market. Stainless steel is selected for carrying out the experimental analysis because of its
many advantages and easy availability in the market.
1. As the stainless steel is classified in different categories like austenitic, ferritic, martenstic etc…
from this we have chosen austenitic stainless steel (202 & 409) because of its low cost, easy
availability in the market.
2. Semi auto TIG welding process are chosen to carry out the experimental analysis on austenitic
stainless steel and martens tic stainless steel.
3. Procedure for carrying out the project : We have taken Nine samples plates (9 pieces of AISI
202and 9 pieces AISI 409 of authentic stainless steels, the material specifications are as follows:
Material: Austenitic& Martenstic stainless steel (202 & 409)
Thickness: 3mm
Length: 100mm
No of pieces: 18
4.1. SS 202
AISI 202 stainless steel is widely used in architectural decoration, municipal engineering,
guardrail, hotel facilities, shopping mall, vitreous armrest, public facilities, etc. By high precision
automation system, through our equipment corrosion, folding forming and welding soluble in any
metal filler, filled with gas protection (tube is welded inside and outside), the welding process and
mode for TIG online eddy current testing solution.
4.1.1. Composition
Typical compositional ranges for grade 202 stainless steels are give Table 4.1Composition ranges
for 202 grade stainless steel
4.2. SS409
409 is a martensitic stainless steel that provides good corrosion resistance plus high strength and
hardness. It is magnetic in both the annealed and hardened conditions. A wide range of properties
can be developed with different heat treatments. Applications requiring moderate corrosion
resistance and high mechanical properties are ideal for this alloy. Typical uses include flat springs,
knives, kitchen utensils and hand tools
WELDABILITY
The martensitic class of stainless steels has limited weldability due to its hardenability. Special
consideration is required to avoid cold cracking by preheating to 550°F (260°C). Post-weld heat
treatment should be considered to achieve required properties. This particular alloy is generally
considered to have the best weldability of this stainless class. A major difference is the lower
carbon content for this alloy which eliminates the need for post-weld heat treating. When a weld
filler is needed, AWS E/ER 410, 410 NiMo, and 309L are most often specified. Type 409 is well
known in reference literature and more information can be obtained in this way.
4.2.1. Composition
Typical compositional ranges for grade 409 stainless steels are given
5. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN
5.1. TAGUCHI DESIGN
Basically, experimental design methods were developed original fisher. However experimental
design methods are too complex and not easy to use. Furthermore, a large number of experiments
have to be carried out when the number of the process parameters increases, to solve this problem,
the Taguchi method uses a special design of orthogonal arrays to study the entire parameter space
with a small number of experiments only. The experimental results are then transformed into a
signal – to – noise (S/N) ratio to measure the quality characteristics deviating from the desired
values. Usually, there are three categories of quality characteristics in the analysis of the S/N ratio,
i.e., the – lower – better, the – higher – better, and the – nominal – better. The S/N ratio for each
level of process parameter is compared based on the S/N analysis. Regardless of the category of
the quality characteristic, a greater S/N ratio corresponds to better quality characteristics.
Therefore, the optimal level of the process parameters is the level with the greatest S/N ratio
Furthermore, a statistically significant with the S/N and ANOVA [3] analyses, the optimal
combination of the process parameters can be predicted. Finally, a confirmation experiment is
conducted to verify the optimal process parameters obtained from the parameter design. There are
3 Signal-to-Noise ratios of common interest for optimization of Static Problems. The formulae for
signal to noise ratio are designed so that an experimenter can always select the largest factor level
setting to optimize the quality characteristic of an experiment. Therefore a method of calculating
the Signal-To-Noise ratio we had gone for quality characteristic. They are
• Smaller-The-Better,
• Larger-The-Better,
• Nominal is Best.
1. SMALLER IS BETTER
The signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio is calculated for each factor level combination. The formula for the
smaller-is-better S/N ratio using base 10 log is: S/N = -10*log(S (Y2)/n) Where Y = responses for
the given factor level combination and n = number of responses in the factor level combination.
2. LARGER IS BETTER
The signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio is calculated for each factor level combination. The formula for the
larger-is-better S/N ratio using base 10 log is: S/N = -10*log(S (1/Y2)/n) Where Y = responses for
the given factor level combination and n = number of responses in the factor level combination.
3. NOMINAL IS BEST
The signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio is calculated for each factor level combination. The formula for the
nominal-is-best I S/N ratio using base 10 log is: S/N = -10*log (s2) Where s = standard deviation
4. There are two types of anvils that are used on the Rockwell hardness testers. The flat faceplate
models are used for flat specimens. The “V” type anvils hold round specimens firmly.
5. Test blocks or calibration blocks are flat steel or brass blocks, which have been tested and marked
with the scale and Rockwell number. They should be used to check the accuracy and calibration of
the tester frequently.
Elongation
Deformation in continuum mechanics is the transformation of a body from a reference
configuration to a current configuration. A configuration is a set containing the positions of all
particles of the body. Contrary to the common definition of deformation, which implies distortion
or change in shape, the continuum mechanics definition includes rigid body motions where shape
changes do not take place A deformation may be caused by external loads, body forces (such as
gravity or electromagnetic forces), or temperature changes within the body.
Larger is better
Level BASE PEAK WELDING SPEED
1 51.86 51.59 52.01
2 52.00 52.02 51.91
3 51.98 52.24 51.92
Delta 0.14 0.65 0.10
Rank 2 1 3
52.2
52.1
Mean of SN ratios
52.0
51 .9
51 .8
51 .7
51 .6
51 .5
1 30 1 40 1 50 80 90 1 00 50 60 70
405
Mean of Means
400
395
390
385
380
1 30 1 40 1 50 80 90 1 00 50 60 70
Above mentioned result were obtained from Root and face bend test.
7. CONCLUSION&RESULT
From the investigation on and mechanical property of semi auto TIG butt welding of SS
202&SS409 steel, conclusions were summarized as following TIG welding of stainless steel was
carried out by keeping the constant Gas pressure and varying the other three main welding
parameters, i.e. first peak current Base current asewellas welding speed were varied. Parameter
was selected through design of experiments. Experimentally found the input parameter value Peak
current 140 Amps, Base current 100 amps and welding speed 50 mm/min was the best value and
it did not create any major changes and failures in the testing process and it was comparatively
higher tensile value than other values as well as bending strength value also satisfactory. Finally
optimized value for Tensile strength through Taguchi design for 3 mm dissimilar stainless steel
was Peak current 140 Amps, Base current 80 amps and welding speed 70 mm/min.
REFERENCES
[1] Mr. L. Suresh Kumar1, Dr.S.M.Verma2, P.RadhakrishnaPrasad3, P.Kiran kumar4 Dr.T.Siva
Shanker5Experimental Investigation for Welding Aspects of AISI 304 & 316 by Taguchi
Technique for the Process of TIG & MIG Welding International Journal of Engineering Trends
and Technology- Volume2Issue2- 2011
[2] A. Almazrouee, T. Shehata and S. Oraby Effect of Welding Parameters on the Weld Bead
Geometry of Low Alloy Steel using FCAW –Empirical Modeling Approach International
Journal of Mining, Metallurgy & Mechanical Engineering (IJMMME) Volume 3, Issue 3
(2015) ISSN 2320–4060 (Online)
[3] Sudhakaran. Ra*, Sivasakthivel. P.Sb, Nagaraja.Sc and Eazhil. K.M 12th Global Congress On
Manufacturing and Management, GCMM 2014
[4] T.A.Tabish,,1 T.Abbas,, M.Farhan, S.Atiq,, T.Z.Butt Effect of heat input on microstructure and
mechanical properties of the TIG welded joints of AISI 304 stainless steel, International Journal
of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 7, July-2014 1532 ISSN 2229-5518
[5] Benjamin Joseph1, D. Katherasan1, P. Sathiya1* and C. V. Srinivasa Murthy. Weld metal
characterization of 316L (N) austenitic stainless steel by electron beam welding process.
International Journal of Engineering, Science and Technology 4, (2), 2012, pp. 169-176
[6] S. L. Jeng1;2, H. T. Lee1, T. E. Weirich3 and W. P. Rebach Microstructual Study of the
Dissimilar Joints of Alloy 690and SUS 304L Stainless Steel Materials Transactions, Vol. 48,
No. 3 (2007) pp. 481 to 489 -2007 The Japan Institute of Metals
[7] Jun Yan, Ming Gao, Xiaoyan Zen Study on microstructure and mechanical properties of 304
stainless-steel joints by TIG, laser and laser-TIG hybrid welding Division of Laser Science and
Technology, Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics, School of Optoelectronics
Science and Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei
430074, PR China
[8] Radha Raman Mishra1, Visnu Kumar Tiwari2 and Rajesha S1. A Study of Tensile Strength of
Mig and Tig Welded Dissimilar Joints Of Mild Steel and Stainless Steel International Journal
of Advances in Materials Science and Engineering (IJAMSE) Vol.3, No.2,April 2014 DOI :
10.14810/ijamse.2014.3203 23
[9] K.Monika1, M.Bala Chennaiah 2, Dr.P.Nanda Kumar 3, Dr.K.Prahalada Rao4 V.R.Siddhartha
The Effect of Heat input on the Mechanical Properties of MIG Welded Dissimilar Joints
International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT)ISSN: 2278-0181 Vol. 2
Issue 9, September – 2013.
[10] Kachole Sanket, Mahakal Manish and Bhagwatkar Anurag, 3 Dimensional Welding SPM /
Path Tracer. International Journal of Design and Manufacturing Technology 7(3), 2016, pp.
19–23.
[11] Gaurav Verma, Sandeep Kumar and Bharat Raj Bundel, A Research Paper on the Comparison
of Weld Strength of Friction Welding of Different Materials at two Different RPM.
International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology, 7(6), 2016, pp. 123–127.
[12] Raveendra A1, Dr.B.V.R.Ravi Kumar2, Dr.A.Sivakumar3and V.Pruthvi Kumar Reddy
Influence of Welding Parameters on Weld Characteristics of 5052 Aluminium Alloy sheet
Using TIG Welding International Journal of Application or Innovation in Engineering &
Management (IJAIEM) Volume 3, Issue 3, March 2014 ISSN 2319 – 4847.