Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Matt Jenkins
Introduction
Conflicts are omnipresent in the workplace, and having tools and strategies to diffuse the
conflict is important to individual and organizational success. In the presented hypothetical, Rob
and I must make a recommendation to the Chief of Police whether to reassign all-white officers
from the gang suppression detail. Complicating matters, Rob and I have disliked each other for
many years dating back to the police academy. Jealousy and lack of trust center around many of
the issues, and an internal affairs investigation that encompassed both resulted in visible tension
visible to other officers. Regardless of the tension, Bob and I must work together to provide the
Chief with a recommendation. Using tools from Resolving Conflicts at Work (2011) can help
separate the issues in the conflict and provide an ethical and appropriate recommendation.
With the long-standing conflict between the involved individuals, separating the future
from the past is an essential tool to employ. Past conflicts can influence present and future issues
and create divisiveness among those involved. When the past put in the past, the focus shifts to
creating a dialogue with others involved, and the likelihood of successfully building a mutually
desirable future (Cloke and Goldsmith, 2011, p. 154). In this scenario, Rob and I have let past
Separating the people from the problem becomes another vital tool to use in resolving the
conflict. Many of the incidents between Rob and I are perceptions – that Rob’s initial
assignment was more prestigious, that he is jealous, and that he set me up during the internal
affairs investigation. By separating the people from the problem, energy can be focused solving
the issues rather than the problems that their actions have created, and redeeming qualities about
SEPARATING THE ISSUES IN CONFLICT 3
the person might surface (Cloke and Goldsmith, 2011, pp. 145-146). While Rob’s motivations in
siding with the Chief are questionable, Rob possesses valuable knowledge in departmental
operations and in criminal gang intelligence. Both provide valuable insight into making an
The first two tools presented focus inward to resolving the conflict with Rob. Moving
into dialogue with him two tools will be indispensable – separating positions from interest and
separating criteria from selection. Separating the positions from interest seeks to resolve
disputes collaboratively. Positions are what is desired, whereas interests are why it is wanted.
Focusing on the interest shifts the positional debate to dialogue about the interests. It is assumed
that Bob and I want different outcomes; however, common interests can be found, as evident by
the fact that both vocalized the desire to not let outside influence run the department.
The final tool, separate criteria from selection, builds upon the progress gained by
separating positions from interest. Separating the criteria from the selection provides a
framework to select on the criteria for a successful outcome before deciding on a solution. This
helps create a mutually acceptable solution while building trust with each other (Clock and
Goldsmith, 2011, p. 165). This tool is noted as especially useful in resolving issues about ethical
standards or principles. The goal would be to agree to those principles as criteria for a successful
Conclusion
In the end, the goal is to achieve a moral and ethical decision. By using the tools
presented in Resolving Conflicts at Work, the long-standing conflict with Rob should not stand
References
Cloke, K. and Goldsmith, J. (2011). Resolving Conflicts at Work: Ten Strategies for Everyone