Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Membaca & Kritisi Laporan Penelitian: (Critical Appraisal)

    Uploaded by

    Hadira YuriGagarin
    19 views19 pages
    This document discusses critical appraisal of research reports and provides guidance on assessing the validity, reliability, and applicability of quantitative research studies. It explains that critical appraisal helps clinicians interpret research and determine if findings can be applied to their patients. Key aspects of appraisal include evaluating a study's focus, methods, statistical analysis, and whether the sample and setting are relevant to the clinician's practice. Appraisal determines if a study's results are likely to be true and impactful enough to outweigh potential harms of applying the findings.

    Original Description:

    journal

    Original Title

    Lecture Note_Reading & Critiquing Journals

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document discusses critical appraisal of research reports and provides guidance on assessing the validity, reliability, and applicability of quantitative research studies. It explains that critical appraisal helps clinicians interpret research and determine if findings can be applied to their patients. Key aspects of appraisal include evaluating a study's focus, methods, statistical analysis, and whether the sample and setting are relevant to the clinician's practice. Appraisal determines if a study's results are likely to be true and impactful enough to outweigh potential harms of applying the findings.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    19 views19 pages

    Membaca & Kritisi Laporan Penelitian: (Critical Appraisal)

    Uploaded by

    Hadira YuriGagarin
    This document discusses critical appraisal of research reports and provides guidance on assessing the validity, reliability, and applicability of quantitative research studies. It explains that critical appraisal helps clinicians interpret research and determine if findings can be applied to their patients. Key aspects of appraisal include evaluating a study's focus, methods, statistical analysis, and whether the sample and setting are relevant to the clinician's practice. Appraisal determines if a study's results are likely to be true and impactful enough to outweigh potential harms of applying the findings.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 19

    Membaca & Kritisi Laporan

    Penelitian
    (Critical Appraisal)

    Moh. Syafar Sangkala


    Critical Appraisal
    • Menilai kualitas penelitian yang akan
    digunakan untuk referensi penelitian atau
    aplikasi EBP.

    • Proses kritis jurnal membantu klinisi


    menginterpretasi & menentukan aplikabilitas
    penelitian terhadap pasien mereka.
    For every clinical question there is an
    appropriate research design
    Clinical Question Research Design
    Effectiveness of an Systematic review, RCT,
    intervention Cohort
    Diagnostic Cross-sectional

    Prognostic Cohort

    Harm, causation Case-control, Cohort


    Tipe Laporan Penelitian
    1. Presentations at Professional Conferences
    – Oral presentations
    – In poster sessions

    2. Research Journal Articles


    Why Are Research Articles So Hard to Read?

    1.Compactness
    2.Jargon
    3.Objectivity (Passive & Active Sentences)
    4.Statistical Information

    (Polit & Beck, 2010, page 94)


    Critical Appraisal & Research design
    • Walaupun prinsip-prinsip dasar kritisi jurnal penelitian
    sama ….. Terdapat pertanyaan-pertanyaan yang berbeda
    untuk menilai desain-desain penelitian berbeda:
    – RCT atau Quasy CT
    – Cohort
    – Case control
    – Case series / Case study
    – Survey
    – Penelitian kualitatif
    Umumnya sebagian besar artikel penelitian terdiri dari 4
    bagian/sections setelah Judul & Abstrak:
    • Introduction or background
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    Plus Keywords, abstract & reference list

    (Polit & Beck, 2012, Page 99)


    Critical Appraisal of Quantitative Research

    A. Are the results of the study valid?  VALIDITAS

    B. What were the results?  RELIABILITY

    C. Will the results help me in caring for my patients?


     APPLICABILITY
    A. Validitas

    1. Clearly Focused Issue (PICOT)


    2. Metode sampling
    3. Follow Up & Analysis (Consort Statement)
    4. Blinding
    5. Homogenitas
    6. Perlakuan selain intervensi apakah sama
    B. Reliabilitas

    Inferential statistic

    • Signifikansi
    • Presisi
    C. Applicability
    • Is the sample similar to your own patients/clients?
    • Does the setting resemble your own setting?
    • Can you provide the same treatment in your setting?
    • Consider the size of the effect and its clinical significance
    • Consider the overall quality of the study to decide whether
    the findings are likely to be true
    • Are the likely treatment benefits worth the potential harm &
    costs?
    QUESTION???
    References
    • Coughlan, M., Cronin, P., & Ryan, F. (2007). Step-by-step guide to critiquing research. Part 1: quantitative research.
    British Journal of Nursing, 16(11), 658-663. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2007.16.11.23681
    • Guyatt, G. H., Sackett, D. L., & Cook, D. J. (1993). Users' guides to the medical literature: II. How to use an article
    about therapy or prevention: A. Are the results of the study valid? . Jama, 270(21), 2598-2601.
    • Guyatt, G. H., Sackett, D. L., & Cook, D. J. (1994). Users' guides to the medical literature: II. How to use an article
    about therapy or prevention: A. What were the results and will they help me in caring my patients? . Jama, 271(1),
    59-64.
    • Lecture Note of Evidence-Based Nursing Subject, (2010), School of Health Science, University of Melbourne
    • Lecture note of Preparing Clinician fo EBP Subject, (2011), School of Health Science, University of Melbourne
    • Melynyk, B. & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2005). Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing & Healthcare. Philadelphia:
    Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
    • Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2012). Nursing Research: Generating and Assessing Evidence for Nursing Practice (9th
    ed.). New York, NY: Wolters Kluwer Health, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.
    • Ryan, F., Coughlan, M., & Cronin, P. (2007). Step-by-step guide to critiquing research. Part 2: qualitative research.
    British Journal of Nursing, 16(12), 738-744. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2007.16.12.23726
    • http://www.casp-uk.net/
    • http://www.cebm.net/critical-appraisal/

    You might also like