Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1
University of Kansas Engineering Conference
March 1, 2018 Crane Girder Design
2
University of Kansas Engineering Conference
March 1, 2018 Crane Girder Design
3
University of Kansas Engineering Conference
March 1, 2018 Crane Girder Design
Girder Lacing
Using a truss to stabilize the top
and bottom flange for lateral loads
4
University of Kansas Engineering Conference
March 1, 2018 Crane Girder Design
Cross Section
T/roof 60’
120’
10
5
University of Kansas Engineering Conference
March 1, 2018 Crane Girder Design
Building Footprint
11
60 ft Runway Girder:
Center Condition:
CRANE GIRDER
CRANE GIRDER
12
6
University of Kansas Engineering Conference
March 1, 2018 Crane Girder Design
7
University of Kansas Engineering Conference
March 1, 2018 Crane Girder Design
Performance Requirements
Service Life
-500,000 cycles
CMAA Class D:
15
Load Combinations
Strength Design Loads: ASCE 7-10
Chapter 2 Section 2.3 Basic Load Combinations
2) 1.2D + 1.6L
Chapter 12 Section 12.4 Seismic Load Effects, Combinations
5a) (1.2 + 0.2SDS)D + ρQE + L+.2S
5a) (1.2 + 0.2SDS)(D+Cd)+ ρQE
Serviceability
Vertical wheel loads without impact & 100% lateral load
Fatigue Life Design Load
wheel loads without impact (one crane)
50% of maximum lateral load (one crane) 16
8
University of Kansas Engineering Conference
March 1, 2018 Crane Girder Design
Seismic Loads
– Spectral Acceleration, Ss: 1.054 G
– Spectral Acceleration, S1: 0.400 G
– Occupancy Category: II
– Site Class: D
– Importance Factor, I: 1.0
S D1 = S M 1 = (0.64 ) = 0.43 g
2 2
S DS = S MS = (1.16 ) = 0.77 g
2 2
3 3 3 3
17
18
9
University of Kansas Engineering Conference
March 1, 2018 Crane Girder Design
19
78 294 2 2
39849
Δ] ^ = 3 720 − 4 294 =
24 29000
39849 39849
deHfL = = = 44277 740d593 d = 50,400Ch4
Δ] ^ .9
20
10
University of Kansas Engineering Conference
March 1, 2018 Crane Girder Design
21
22
11
University of Kansas Engineering Conference
March 1, 2018 Crane Girder Design
24
12
University of Kansas Engineering Conference
March 1, 2018 Crane Girder Design
26
13
University of Kansas Engineering Conference
March 1, 2018 Crane Girder Design
T.O.R
Top of Flange
6”
lb = 12”
27
T.O.R
Top of Flange
6”
lb = 12”
28
14
University of Kansas Engineering Conference
March 1, 2018 Crane Girder Design
φRn=4184 ≥ 156 k. OK
29
30
15
University of Kansas Engineering Conference
March 1, 2018 Crane Girder Design
31
Rend=17.1(2)(52.5+41.5)/60=53.6 kips
32
16
University of Kansas Engineering Conference
March 1, 2018 Crane Girder Design
33
34
17
University of Kansas Engineering Conference
March 1, 2018 Crane Girder Design
Rend=3.3(52.5+41.5)/60=5.2 kips
36
18
University of Kansas Engineering Conference
March 1, 2018 Crane Girder Design
Fatigue Evaluation
Check Connection at the bolt:
• Base Metal at net section of high strength
bolted joints designed Rbearing
resistance, but fabricated and installed to
all requirements for slip critical
connections.
Section 2: Stress Category B Cf=12 Fth=16 Ksi
˜
— = 1000( ” ).NNN ≥ ›œ nsr=500,000 cycles
}™v
s-
— = 1000( ).NNN =28.9 ksi
.66,666
37
Fatigue Evaluation
Check Connection PL. at the bolt:
Anet=.625(6-1.375)=2.89
38
19
University of Kansas Engineering Conference
March 1, 2018 Crane Girder Design
Fatigue Evaluation
Check connection at the gusset weld:
Section 5.7 Base Metal and weld metal at
transverse end connections of tension-
loaded plate elements....
39
Fatigue Evaluation
Check connection at the gusset weld (continued):
. .NNN 06+.72(w/tp)
—= 1000 xCI(
}—
) Rfil=. ’
.
s5/ Fth=N/A
40
20
University of Kansas Engineering Conference
March 1, 2018 Crane Girder Design
Fatigue Evaluation
Check connection at the web weld (continued):
41
Fatigue Evaluation
Check fatigue at the welded plate to
the girder web and tension flange.
• Impact of the stress riser on the
strong axis bending strength.
42
21
University of Kansas Engineering Conference
March 1, 2018 Crane Girder Design
Fatigue Evaluation
43
Fatigue Evaluation
44
22
University of Kansas Engineering Conference
March 1, 2018 Crane Girder Design
GIRDER DESIGN
CONCLUSION
1. Follow Good Detailing Practices
2. Design for serviceability then strength
3. Evaluate fatigue life per AISC Appendix 3
45
23