Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sarah King
ENG 352
Dr. Rahimzadeh
Ben Jonson was a Renaissance playwright and poet, often discussing the troubles of court
along with love and religion. Jonson’s main purpose in his writing is to demonstrate the aspects
and principles that result in a person living a good and fulfilling life. However, Jonson
demonstrates that this ideal life does not always mean the acceptance of love and friendship but
that for a fulfilling life one must experience hardships and loss along the way. Jonson does not
singularly focus on the beautiful and lovely parts of life; rather, he discusses the connection
between immortality and death, using this concept to illustrate the depression and pain of human
nature.
immortality and its relation to death, specifically exploring the idea in his two poems “Song: To
Celia” and “Slow, Slow, Fresh Fount.” While these two poems have seemingly unrelated stories,
the underlying thoughts investigated within them demonstrate how Jonson believed that to reach
immortality, once must experience death and lost beforehand. In “Song: To Celia,” Jonson
discusses this idea through the perspective of an admirer lamenting over a female who has
rejected his advances. In this poem, Jonson treats immortality as a curiosity ready to be studied,
and indeed the speaker performed an experiment by sending the woman a wreath to see if it
would wither after being in her presence. She denies it and sends it back, but the speaker
considers it a success since her breath made it continue to grow and not wither (v 9-16).
King 2
However, the peculiarity with these results is that to create the wreath the speaker would have to
first pluck the flowers and plants, therein killing them. This is significant as it demonstrates
Jonson’s idea towards immortality that to experience the phenomenon a person must first
experience death.
Furthermore, Jonson uses this same ideology in “Slow, Slow, Fresh Flount” to
demonstrate immortality, though in this poem he used a more negative outlook on the concept.
This work is a play on the ancient Roman story of Echo and Narcissus, where Echo, who can
only repeat what is said back to her, falls in love with Narcissus, who only loves himself. The
setting of the poem takes place moments after Echo finds Narcissus turned into a daffodil after
staring at himself for too long in a pond and begins with Echo lamenting over the loss of her
love. Due to Echo’s curse, she cannot express her grief and sorrow as there is no one else around
for her to repeat, which is the reason for the personification in the lines, “Droop herbs and
flowers; / Fall grief in showers” (v 5-6). She wants nature to feel the deep and powerful pain she
is feeling so that she might be able to mourn the loss of her loved one. However, Jonson’s ideas
on immortality become prevalent in the lines, “O, I could still, / Like melting snow upon some
craggy hill, / Drop, drop, drop, drop,” (v 8-10). It is not Narcissus who dies but rather Echo who
is fading away like melting snow, demonstrating Jonson’s views on the connection between
Jonson uses this concept when he demonstrates the depressed and painful side of human
nature in his poems through the fatality of three youth. The first of these poems is “Epitaph on
S.P., a Child of Queen Elizabeth’s Chapel” where he discusses the death of Samuel Pavy, a boy
actor who performed in many of Jonson’s plays. Jonson begins this epitaph by addressing the
audience, proclaiming for them to “Weep with me, all you that read / This little story / And know
King 3
for whom a tear you shed, / Death’s self is sorry” (v 1-4). Jonson not only assumes that the
readers will be grieving the loss of Samuel but that Death itself is regretful it had to take away
the boy. These starting lines are significant as they demonstrate a merging of both a certain
public awareness and intimacy, two contrasting factors not typically placed together, especially
when lamenting the death of a loved one. Jonson continues to discuss Samuel’s death by stating
how “Years he number'd scarce thirteen / When fates turn'd cruel, / Yet three fill'd zodiacs had
he been / The stage's jewel” (v 8-12). These lines are important in that the reader learns many
important facts about Samuel, such as that he was thirteen, had performed three seasons in
theatre, and was an amazing actor before he died. Following this, however, Jonson begins to
demonstrate the powerful emotion that follows the loss of a loved one as he tries to resolve and
justify the boy’s death by using his views on immortality. Jonson explains that an angel mistook
him for an old man ready to pass away due to the boy’s flawless acting and that even after
realizing their mistake, the angels will not return him because he is too great for Earth (v 13-25).
Jonson’s explanation for Samuel’s death completely reflects his views of immortality as now that
Samuel is death, he can live forever in Heaven. Jonson’s explanation also is important as it
exhibits the lengths a person in a depressed state will go to in order to create a glorious reason
for death, even if unrealistic, as a way to cope with immeasurable grief and sadness. In this
poem, Jonson demonstrates his own resolution and justification for death as well as his mask of
Another instance of Jonson demonstrating the relevance of death and pain for human
nature is through his elegy “To My First Daughter.” It is the second elegy about the fatality of
youth and discusses the passing of his six-month-old daughter while demonstrating the grief of
both him and his wife. The structure of the poem reflects Jonson’s feelings over his daughter’s
King 4
death, with a total amount of six rhyming couplets, which could refer to his daughter’s age and
also the short life his daughter was able to live. Additionally, the rhyme scheme doesn’t have any
sudden changes, leaving it uncorrupted and perfect similar to how Jonson says his daughter died
with her innocence intact. In contrast to the previous poem, this work takes a more distanced
approach on the subject of death, as shown in the beginning lines, “Here lies, to each her parents’
ruth, / Mary, the daughter of their youth” (v 1-2). The speaker of the poem keeps the perspective
in third person as though they are an observer of the grief taking place rather than an active
participate. This is troubling as since Mary was the child of Jonson and his wife’s “youth,” he
should be deeply affected by this tragedy; however, Jonson puts on a mask of numbness in
regard to his daughter’s death. Furthermore, in the lines “Yet all heaven’s gifts being heaven’s
due, / It makes the father less to rue,” Jonson is repeating his earlier coping mechanism relating
to his immortality views by explaining that it is easier for him to accept her death by thinking she
was a gift that Heaven decided needed to return, forever living with the angels. Jonson’s
purposeful structure, numb façade, and unrealistic explanation demonstrates in this poem how he
is focused on more than just representing the good parts of life; rather, he was searching for a
way to cope with the death of those he loved and trying to find any means of resolution.
Jonson again demonstrates the importance of the human need for resolution and
justification of death in his most emotional elegy, “To My First Son.” In this work, Jonson is
trying to work through the grief of his son’s death, describing him as “thou child of my right
hand, and joy” (v 1). By giving him this intimate name, Jonson could be hinting at how the late
son was his favorite and the one he felt the strongest connection to. This intimacy and emotional
wreckage is further enhanced when Jonson separates “and joy” with the use of a comma, forcing
the reader to take a slight pause before the words to fully grasp the deep and powerful pain that
King 5
Jonson feels over the loss of his son. After this, Jonson reiterates his coping mechanism from the
previous poems by trying to offer an explanation on why his son had to die, saying that “Seven
years tho' wert lent to me” (v 2). As in his two other elegies about the passing of youth, Jonson
incorporates his views of immortality to offer an explanation on how the children were sent from
Heaven and destined to return at the point Heaven deemed. However, different this time is how
Jonson then continues to try to justify his son’s death, stating that “For why / Will man lament
the state he should envy? / To have so soon 'scap'd world's and flesh's rage, / And if no other
misery, yet age?” (v 5-8). Jonson defends that it is better that his son has moved on to become
immortal in Heaven as now he will not have to face the horrors and struggles that reside on
Earth. It can be slightly disconcerting that a father would apparently be relieved of his son’s
passing but this just demonstrates the sea of grief Jonson is having to wade through with small
dismissals like this his only crutch. Furthermore, Jonson plainly states the significance of this
poem when he states, “Rest in soft peace, and, ask'd, say, ‘Here doth lie / Ben Jonson his best
piece of poetry’” (v 9-10). To defend that Jonson believes only in focusing on the love and
happiness presented in life would be denying his own statement that this elegy is his best work,
Throughout his works, Jonson discusses the connection between immortality and death
and uses that concept to illustrate the depression and pain of human nature. The fact that Jonson
includes experiences such as the search for immortality and the death of children demonstrates
how he was concerned with more than just the beautiful and lovely parts of life. Jonson
incorporated these experiences into his poetry as a public example of one’s inner feelings when
presented with significant elements in the human experience of existentialism and tragedy,