Professional Documents
Culture Documents
University of Leeds
School of Earth and Environment
May 2017
1 Introduction
This paper discusses the analysis of the debt-free money system for a steady-state
economy. Within this paper, I explain the details of debt-free money system,
discuss the relationship between debt-free money and steady-state economy,
discuss the obstacles to implementing this proposal, and look at the examples of
implementing debt-free money system.
In the UK, 97% of money in circulation is created by private banks in the form
of loans, while 3% of debt-free money is created by the Bank of England and the
Royal Mint in the form of notes and coins (Robertson and Bunzl, 2003). To make
changes to current situation, private bank must not issue money from depositors
as loans. In other words, full-reserve banking system (100% reserve requirement)
has to be implemented to prevent private banks create new money and make the
money debt-free (Dietz and O'Neill, 2013).
Firstly, central bank controls the issue of money. The right to create money is
limited to central bank (Zarlenga, 2002; Zarlenga, 2009). The central bank
decides the amount of money to be issued (Dietz and O'Neill, 2013). There are
several ways to control money supply and hence inflation. For example, taxes
applied when prices rise and government spending applied when prices fall (Dietz
and O'Neill, 2013). Moreover, the quantity of money produced can be limited by
the production of gold or commodity money (Yamaguchi, 2017).
Secondly, the bookkeeping would be simplified. The money can be brought back
to its proper function under debt-free money system as only the central bank
creates money. The money would reflect the exact value of products, making a
simple bookkeeping (Pilote, 2016). New money is issued when new products are
made, money would be withdrawn when products are consumed (Even, 2016).
The value of money would not exceed the value of products to prohibit inflation
and hence achieve steady-state economy (Pilote, 2016).
Thirdly, there would be no more financial problems. Since the government issues
money according to the society’s needs, the money would be able to pay all
products in the country. In other words, all that is physically feasible would be
financially possible (Pilote, 2016). In turn, under the present system, money
would be eliminated when debts were paid off which will cause depression (Pilote,
2016).
Firstly, the debt-free money may be a misnomer (Dixhoorn, 2013). The central
bank is authorized to issue money but it accepts back these money as exchange
of bonds and bills or taxes payment (Fontana and Sawyer, 2015). Bonds and bills
are like debts in the market. It would be complicated if bonds and bills are to be
distinguished in the market. Hence, with the existence of bonds and bills, the
central bank is accepting money in the form of its own debt. The bookkeeping
would be complicated to record these transactions (Fontana and Sawyer, 2015).
Second, the availability of credit will be limited. Since the private banks are not
allowed to create loans, when the loan’s demand exceeds supply in market, the
central bank would extend loans directly to the public or through banks (Dixhoorn,
2013). In other words, when the money supply exceeds country’s production, it
would become additional money and central bank is forced to provide reserves
for public or banks to avoid credit crunch (Dixhoorn, 2013). Additionally,
unregulated high-yield debt issuers may take over the bank’s role as debt issuers
in the market (Wikipedia, 2017), hence destabilizing economy and causing
financial crises.
Thirdly, with 100 percent reserve requirement, the money is not invested, hence
no return can be obtained by depositors. If there is inflation, depositors are
exposing risk of losing money. However, there would not be a problem if there
is no inflation (Dixhoorn, 2013).
2.4 Examples
The debt-free money system can be found in the Positive Money and the New
Economics Foundation (NEF) Reform Proposal (Jackson and Dyson, 2012). In
reality, the closest example of the implementation of debt-free money system is
by Guernsey, an island in the English Channel off the coast of Normandy. In
Guernsey, the government issues their own currency for nearly 200 years. The
government issues money when it needs to pay for a work. It is not simply created
by loans. The government calculate the money supply transparently and watch
inflation closely. The calculation is open to public on their website (Guernsey,
2017).
3 Conclusion
The starting point of this study is that the idea of continuing economic growth
would no longer sustainable and desirable as it fails to improve people’s quality
of life. Hence, the idea of steady-state economy emerged (mostly in wealthy
countries) which proposes three features: constant stocks, constant flows and
sustainable scale (O’Neill, 2012). There are different ways to achieve a steady-
state economy. For example, limit resource use, reduce inequality, full-reserve
banking, and new progress indicators etc. This paper aims to analyze the debt-
free money system, which is one of the proposals of full-reserve banking, discuss
how this system helps to achieve a steady-state economy, state the obstacles or
concerns when implementing this system and show real-life examples.
The debt-free money system has three main features: money issued only by
central bank, prohibition of loans created by banks (which means 100% reserve
requirement) and constant inflow of money (section 2.1). This system is proposed
as it would help to achieve a steady-state economy which mainly controls
inflation and financial problems section 2.2). However, we have to concern about
what is meant by debt-free money when money itself is a debt which I have stated
in section 2.3. Lastly, the closest example to the debt-free money system I found
is the Guernsey banking system (section 2.4).
(1499 words)
References
1. Robertson, J. and Bunzl, J. (2003). Monetary reform. 1st ed. London: International
Simultaneous Policy Organization.
4. Benes, J. and Kumhof, M. (2013). The Chicago Plan Revisited. 1st ed. [Washington,
DC]: International monetary fund (IMF).
5. Kay, J. (2009). “Narrow Banking: The Reform of Banking Regulation”. Centre for
the Study of Financial Innovation.
7. Dow, S., Johnsen, G. and Montagnoli, A. (2015). A critique of full reserve banking.
Sheffield Economic Research Paper Series, ISSN 1749-8368 (SERPS no. 2015008).
8. Zarlenga, S. (2002). The Lost Science of Money: The Mythology of Money - the
Story of Power. American Monetary Institute, New York.
11. Victor, P.A., (2009). Herman Daly Festschrift: Herman Daly and the Steady State
Economy. Encyclopedia of Earth, Environmental Information Coalition, National
Council for Science and the Environment, Washington, D.C. Available at:
http://www.eoearth.org/article/Herman_Daly_Festschrift:_Herman_Daly_and_the_St
eady_State_Economy.
12. Pilote, A. (2016). The solution: debt-free money issued by society. [online] Michael
Journal. Available at: http://www.michaeljournal.org/articles/social-credit/item/the-
solution-debt-free-money-issued-by-society.
13. Fontana, G. and Sawyer, M. (2015). Full Reserve Banking: More ‘Cranks’ Than
‘Brave Heretics’. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 40(5), pp.1333-1350.
14. Even, L. (2016). A Sound and Efficient Financial System. [online] Michael Journal.
Available at: http://www.michaeljournal.org/articles/social-credit/category/a-sound-
and-effective-financial-system.
15. Dixhoorn, C. (2013). Full Reserve Banking: An analysis of Four Monetary Reform
Plans. The Sustainable Finance Lab Utrecht, The Netherlands.
16. Jackson, A. and B. Dyson (2012). Modernizing Money: Why our Monetary System is
Broken and How it can be Fixed. London: Positive Money.
17. Guernsey. (2017). Retail Price Index Inflation (RPI and RPIX) - States of Guernsey.
[online] Available at: https://www.gov.gg/rpi.
18. Voss, J. (2016). Switzerland might be ending banking as we know it. [online]
Business Insider. Available at: http://uk.businessinsider.com/switzerland-might-end-
fractional-reserve-banking-2016-1?r=US&IR=T.
19. O'Neill, Daniel W. (2012). Measuring progress towards a socially sustainable steady
state economy. PhD thesis, University of Leeds.