Professional Documents
Culture Documents
-
Load
Fig. 1. An illustration of the predictorarrector scheme
used in the continuation power flow
0885-8950/92$03.0001992 IEEE
Authorized licensed use limited to: UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE JUIZ DE FORA. Downloaded on October 1, 2009 at 16:39 from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
417
Thus,
PLi = P L +
~ A(kL, S- COS Jr,
Factomg;
Qu = QLb + A(kL, S- sin*,)
where the following deftnitions are made:
PLb, QLb - original load at bus i t active and reactive
respectively On the left side of this equation is a matrix of partial
derivatives multiplied by a vector of differentials. The
kLi - multiplier to designate the rate of load change at former is the conventional load flow Jacobian augmented by
bus i as A changes one column @A), while the latter is the tangent vector being
sought. There is, however, an important barrier to overcome
dr, - power factor angle of load change at bus i before a unique solution can be found for the tangent vector.
S- - a given quantity of apparent power which is The problem arises from the fact that one additional unknown
chosen to provide appropriate scaling of A was added when A was inserted into the power flow equations,
but the number of equations remained unchanged. Thus, one
In addition, the active power generation term can be more equation is needed.
modified to
This problem can be solved by choosing a non-zero
PGi = PGb (1 + X k G i ) magnitude (say one) for one of the components of the tangent
where PGb is the active generation at bus i in the base case vector. In other words, i f t is used to denote the tangent
vector;
and k,, is a constant used to specify the rate of change in
generation as A varies.
If these new expressions are substituted into the power
flow equations, the result is
o=PGb(1 +kkGi)-pLb -A(kuSAe m@i)-PTf
Authorized licensed use limited to: UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE JUIZ DE FORA. Downloaded on October 1, 2009 at 16:39 from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
418
where& is an appropriately dimensioned row vector with all Now, once a suitable index k and value of r) are chosen, a
elements equal to zero except the kth,which equals one. If the slightly modified Newton-Raphson power flow method
index k is chosen correctly, letting t k = f 1 imposes a non-zero (altered only in that one additional equation and one
norm on the tangent vector and guarantees that the aditiosal state variable are involved) can be used to solve the
augmented Jacobian will be nonsingular at the critical point set of equations. This provides the corrector needed to modify
1151. Whether +1 or -1 is used depends on how the t" state the predicted solution found in the previous section.
variable is changing as the solution path is being traced. If it Actually, the index k used in the corrector is the same as
is increasing a +1 should be used and if it is decreasing a -1 that used in the predictor and r ) will be equal to x k * , the
should be used. A method for choosing k and the sign of t k predicted value of x k . Thus, the state variable xk is called the
will be presented later in the paper. continuation parameter. In the predictor it is made to have a
Once the tangent vector has been found by solving (11, non-zero differential change (dxk=tk= f 1) and in the
the prediction can be made as follows: corrector its value is specified so that the values of other state
variables can be found. How then does one know which state
variable should be used as the continuation parameter?
Authorized licensed use limited to: UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE JUIZ DE FORA. Downloaded on October 1, 2009 at 16:39 from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
419
Power Flow
on Base Case
El erential change in voltage to diferential change in load
- . But here it is important to think about which load is
changing and which load change will affect the stability of the
bus. If bus i was affected only by its own load change, then
the ratio dV,/dP, would be a good indicator of relative
weakness. However, one must concede that load changes at
other buses in the system will also play a key role. For this
Parameter reason,the best method of deciding which bus is nearest to its
voltage stability limit is to find the bus with the largest
dV,/dPmTu, where d P m T u is the differential change in
active load for the whole system.
Calculate The differential change in voltage at each bus for a given
Tangent Vector. differential change in system load is available from the
tangent vector. Using the reformulated power flow equations,
the differential change in active system load is
=[ n
Thus, in light of the previous discussion, the weakest bus
would be
Parameter for
Next Step.
busj: - 1
Solution.
Since the value of CdX is the same for each dV element in a
given tangent vector, choosing the weakest bus is as easy as
choosing the bus with the largest dV component. Note,
though, that the location of the weakest bus may change as
the load shifts in intensity, characteristic,and location.
Correction.
Equation (3) When the weakest bus, j , reaches its steady state voltage
stability limit, the ratio of -dV, /dPmu will become infinite,
Fig. 2. A flow chart of the continuation power flow or equivalently, the ratio of -dPmTM/dVI would be zero.
This latter ratio, being easier to handle numerically, makes a
SlTJYITY INFORMATION FROM THE TANGENT good voltage stability index for the entire system. This index
llE€l%B will be high when the weakest bus is far from instability but
Up until now, the discussion has been focused on Snding will be zero when the weakest bus experiences voltage
a continuum of power flow solutions up to and just past the collapse. (The negative sign is used so that the index will be
critical point. Although the accomplishment of this primary positive before the critical point is encountered and negative
task is welcome, even more information is available from afterwards.)
intermediate results. In fact, both a voltage stability index Alternatively, a ratio of -dvi/dQmru could also be
and an indicator of “weak” buses are available at almost no used to compare weak buses and -dQmu/dV, would
extra calculation cost by analyzing the tangent vector at each accompany this as a voltage stability index. In this case,
step. d Q m a would be expressed as a constant multiplied by d h as
In the continuation process, the tangent vector proves was done for dPma. The use of dQmTu is, of course,
useful because it describes the direction of the solution path at required if a scenario involves a change in reactive load only,
a corrected solution point. A step in the tangent direction is as do some of those used in the following examples.
used to estimate the next solution. However, if one looks at
the elements of the tangent vector as differential changes in A & ?
the state variables ( dV, or d 8,) in response to a differential The continuation power flow just described was coded in
change in system load (Cd h, where C is some constant), the FORTRAN (single precision) and tested using the 30 bus New
potential for a meaningful sensitivity analysis becomes England System. Since this system is popular for voltage
apparent. Not so apparent, though, are the details of exactly stability research. various load increasq scenarios have already
how this analysis should be performed so that a stability been described in [31,[81, and h11. In this paper, two of these
index and identification of weak buses are obtained. scenarios will be used as test cases and two extra test cases
First of all, in discussing weak buses, the term “weak” will be presented because they help to further demonstrate
must be defined. In the context of this paper, the weakest bus the capabilities of the continuation power flow. Each case
is the one that is nearest to experiencing voltage collapse. If begins with the same base load shown in [31 and 1111, and
one were to think of this in terms of a received power versus entails increasing various loads until voltage collapse occurs.
bus voltage (P-V) curve, the weak bus would be the one that A graph of the voltage stability index obtained via the
continuation power flow will be shown for each case.
Authorized licensed use limited to: UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE JUIZ DE FORA. Downloaded on October 1, 2009 at 16:39 from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
420
QsLl
Case 1, which has been used in [31, [81, and [111, is well 300 1
suited for testing the basic performance of a voltage stability
index. It involves starting with a given system load, and
subjecting bus 11 to an increasing reactive load until voltage
collapse occurs. Five cumulative contingencies accompany
this basic scenario so that the trajectory of the -dQma / dVJ
index can be &monstrated for each of the following:
8 150-
A. No contingencies 100 -
B. Remove Generator 6
50 -
C. Remove Generator 10
D. Increase generation at Buses 2, 25, and 29 by 200 M w 01
1
I
1.5
I
2 25
I I
3
I
3.5 4
I I
45
1
5
each MuLnw OF ORIGINAL LOAD
E. Remove line (9,301 Fig. 4. -dQma /dV, index for Case 2
F. Install a 500 WAR capacitor bank at Bus 11
The results. shown in Fig. 3,are very interesting when !&&%e3
compared to those submitted in [3] and 181. The basic result The robustness of the continuation power flow can be
(curve A) is very similar to the response of the VIP1 shown in demonstrated by slightly modifying Case 2. Here the relaxed
131. This includes a profound impact on the index when reactive power output constraints will be removed so that the
generator reactive power output limits are met. The lower usual constant constraints are imposed.
portion of the graph, where the index is below approximately As Fig. 5 shows, this more realistic constraint had no
180, corresponds to the operating range shown in [8] where an visible impact on the numerical stability of the continuation
energy based method is demonstrated. power flow. The implications of these constraints are
manifested in the index as it takes noticeable dives when the
reactive power output limits of various generators are
reached. In addition, the stability limit for this case occurred
at less than half of the load of Case 2.
LEGEND
-
A NO CONTINGENUS
300
250
1
E - RDlovE G E N F J t " 6
\
300
-
C REMOVE -TOR 10
250 -
D WCR GEN. A T W & 29 BYZOOYW
-
E REMOVE LINE (9.30)
F-K(STUL500UVAR09*Cm)RATll
8- 150
2
\
4 6
\
8
REACTM LOAD ON BUS 11 (WAR)
10 U
50
loo\
O 1 1.1 1.2
i
1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7
MULllPCE OF ORIGINAL UMD
l.8 1.9 2 2J1
Fig. 3. Trace Of the - d Q m a / d V J index as reactive Fig. 5. -dQTOTAL/dVJ index for Case 3
power load is added to bus 11
S i n e this case is fairly realistic, a meaningful
demonstration of the weakest buses identified via the tangent
vector can be made. Fig. 6 shows the five weakest buses
In contrast to Case 1, Case 2 bvolves increasing load on identified at five different load levels. In each case, diamond
several buses as opposed to just one. In this case, any active shapes are used to denote weak buses and the circle
and reactive load that existed in the base case is simply representing a generator is filled in when the generator reaches
multiplied. Similarly, active power generation is increased by its reactive power output limits.
the same multiple as load, but a relaxed constraint is imposed
on the reactive power output of each generator. Instead of When the loads are 1.31 times their original value, only
using a constant limit as is usually done in power flow generator 2 has reached its limit and the weakest buses are
studies,the reactive power output is allowed to go as high as concentrated in the top center of the diagram. Next, the
.8 of the constantly increasing active p ~ w e routput. While weakest buses begin to move toward the lower left-hand
thi$ case may not be realistic, the relaxed constraint was used corner of the system when generator 6 reaches its limit. This
in 131 because it mitigates the instability encowhred in using move is completed with the change in generator 10 when the
a donventional Newton-Raphson power flow for calculation load multiple is 1.83. When the load is 2.01 times its original
near the critical point. A more realistic cbn$traint will be value and yet another two generators reach their limits, the
used in the next case. location of the five weakest buses remains unchanged. But
this situation'is altered drastically as generators 20 and 23 can
The -dQ*a/dVJ index for 2 is shown in Fig. 4. no longer supply unlimited reactive power. The stability
Again, the result is very similar to, although a little less limit is q c h e d at 2.05 times the original load with the
curved than that of VIP1 in [31. weakest busq found on the right-ha,pd si& of the diagram.
Authorized licensed use limited to: UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE JUIZ DE FORA. Downloaded on October 1, 2009 at 16:39 from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
42 1
30
30
I Kev I
o = Generator
0 = Generator at Maximum
Reactive Power Output
1
d) 2.01 times original load. e) 2.05 times original load.
Fig. 6: Weakest buses identified via the tangent vector as the load is increased in Case 3
6ooK
500
6ooh
500
400 -
300-
-
200 -
100-
0 I I , I I I I I
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 U0 160 2 4 6 8 10 12 U 16 1 8 2 0 2 2 2 4
REACTlVE POWER WAD INCREASE (MVAR) REAcTlvE POWER LOA0 INCREASE (MVAR)
Fig. 7. The 4QmuldVj index for Case 4 when Fig. 8. The -dQmfildV’ index for Case 4 when
generator reactive power output limits are not generator reactive power output limits are
imposed (JI in degrees) imposed (JI in degrees)
Authorized licensed use limited to: UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE JUIZ DE FORA. Downloaded on October 1, 2009 at 16:39 from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
422
CWA
Case 4 is a slightly different scenario than Case 3.
Although the same base load is used, the load multiplication 3000h
2500
2ooo
constants (ku’s) are now set proportional to the original
active power load at each bus. In addition, the load added to
each bus during continuation is made to have the same power
factor. In terms of the reformulated power flow equations,
this latter item is accomplished by using the same value of Jlt
8 1500
at each bus. Although this type of load change would not be 1000
=10
Seen in an actual power system, the scenario is useful for - $30
observing the response of the index when various power
500 -
factors are used.
y e80 o
Since the generator reactive power output limits
introduce extra nonlinearities into an already nonlinear 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
system, this example is started by showing the response of the A C T M POWER LOA0 INCREASE (MW)
-dQmTfi/dVJ index for various power factors when the Fig. 10. The -dPmM/dVJ index for Case 4 when
limits are not imposed. As can be seen from Fig. 7, the index generator reactive power output limits are
is not linear in its response, but its basic shape is almost the
same for the higher values of power factor angles. When the imposed ($ in degrees)
reactive power output limits are again imposed (Fig. 81, the CONCLUSIONS
trace of the index maintains a fairly similar shape over the
range of power factor angles. The examples presented in this paper have demonstrated
both the capability and usefulness of the continuation power
So far, each case has been viewed in terms of reactive flow. Solution paths that went up to and beyond the critical
power by using the -dQTOTAL/dVJindex. As can be seen point were found for various load change s ~ e n a r i ~In~ each
.
from Fig. 9 and Fig. 10, an active power perspective can also case divergence was not a problem as it would have been in a
be used. These graphs show the response of the qmventional Newton-Raphson power flow. As an additional
- d P m T a / d V J index to Case 4. The same basic observations benefit, intermediate results from the tangent predictor of the
can be made of these two graphs as were made of the previous continuation process proved useful in analyzing the voltage
two except that the -dPmTU/dVI index has a more uniform stability of the system. Both a stability index and a method
response at the lower power factor angles instead of at the of identifying the weakest buses in the system were readily
higher ones seen with the -dQmTU/dV, index. However, obtained. Although the indexes used were effective and
now it is important to consider perspective. As seen from meaningful, there’ is great potential for developing more
-
these results, a case that seems relatively severe in terms of
active power (9 W ,for example) would appear to be
moderate in terms of reactive power. This is, of course, due to
sophisticated indexes from the same tangent vector
information.
As a next step in developing this method, nonlinear load
the fact that a large power factor angle signifies much larger models are being incorporated into the process so that a more
changes in reactive load than in active load. Since this may accurate assessment of voltage stability performance can be
precipitate confusion, one or the other index should be used made. In addition, it is recognized that the same algorithm
when comparing cas%, the choice depending upon which employed by the continuation power flow can also be used in
perspective is desired. an optimal power flow (OPF). In fact, the locally
parameterized continuaUon approach might overcome the ill-
conditioning encountered in the OPF proposed in [171.
2000
2500 1, [21 Proceedings: Bulk Power System Voltage Phenomena-
Voltage Stability and Security, EPRI EL-6183, Project
2473-21, Electric Power Research Institute, January
1989.
r31 Y. Tamura, K. Sakamoto. Y. Tayama, “Voltage
Instability Proximity Index (VIPI) Based on Multiple
Load Flow Solutions in 111cOnditioned Power
Systems,” Proceedings of the 27th EEE Conference on
Decision and Control, Austin, Texas, December 1988.
I I -
[41 J. Carpentier, R. Girard, and E. Scano, “Voltage Collapse
o 20 4b w
I
80 100 120 U0 1fio 180 200 220 Proximity Indicators Computed from an Optimal Power
ACTIVE POWER WAD INCREASE (MW) Flow,” Proceedings of 8th Power System Computation
Conference, Helsinki, Finland, September 1984.
Fig. 9. The - d P m u / d V , index for Case 4 when
generator reactive power output limits are not 151 F. D. Galiana, “Load Flow Feasibility and the Voltage
imposed (tb in degrees) Collapse Problem,” Proceedings of 23rd Conference on
h i s i o n and Control. Las Vegas. Nevada, December
1984.
Authorized licensed use limited to: UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE JUIZ DE FORA. Downloaded on October 1, 2009 at 16:39 from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
423
Authorized licensed use limited to: UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE JUIZ DE FORA. Downloaded on October 1, 2009 at 16:39 from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.