ing the gratuity paid to petitioner under RA No.

610, otherwise known as the

Disability Pemy for payment. However, instead of implet. However, instead of
implementing the full award, the office of said respondent prepared ondeducting the
amounts of P/3,000.00 representing the gratuity paid to petitioner under RA No.
610, otherwise known as the Disability Pemy for payment. Howeving the gratuity
paid to petitioner under RA No. 610, otherwise known as the Disability Pemy for
payment. However, instead of implet. However, instead of implementing the full
award, the office of said respondent prepared ondeducting the amounts of P/3,000.00
representing the gratuity paid to petitioner under RA No. 610, otherwise known as
the Disability Pemy for payment. Howeving the gratuity paid to petitioner under RA
No. 610, otherwise known as the Disability Pemy for payment. However, instead of
implet. However, instead of implementing the full award, the office of said
respondent prepared ondeducting the amounts of P/3,000.00 representing the gratuity
paid to petitioner under RA No. 610, otherwise known as the Disability Pemy for
payment. Howeving the gratuity paid to petitioner under RA No. 610, otherwise
known as the Disability Pemy for payment. However, instead of implet. However,
instead of implementing the full award, the office of said respondent prepared
ondeducting the amounts of P/3,000.00 representing the gratuity paid to petitioner
under RA No. 610, otherwise known as the Disability Pemy for payment. Howeving the
gratuity paid to petitioner under RA No. 610, otherwise known as the Disability
Pemy for payment. However, instead of implet. However, instead of implementing
the full award, the office of said respondent prepared ondeducting the amounts of
P/3,000.00 representing the gratuity paid to petitioner under RA No. 610, otherwise
known as the Disability Pemy for payment. Howeving the gratuity paid to petitioner
under RA No. 610, otherwise known as the Disability Pemy for payment. However,
instead of implet. However, instead of implementing the full award, the office of
said respondent prepared ondeducting the amounts of P/3,000.00 representing the
gratuity paid to petitioner under RA No. 610, otherwise known as the Disability
Pemy for payment. Howeving the gratuity paid to petitioner under RA No. 610,
otherwise known as the Disability Pemy for payment. However, instead of implet.
However, instead of implementing the full award, the office of said respondent
prepared ondeducting the amounts of P/3,000.00 representing the gratuity paid to
petitioner under RA No. 610, otherwise known as the Disability Pemy for payment.
Howeving the gratuity paid to petitioner under RA No. 610, otherwise known as the
Disability Pemy for payment. However, instead of implet. However, instead of
implementing the full award, the office of said respondent prepared ondeducting the
amounts of P/3,000.00 representing the gratuity paid to petitioner under RA No.
610, otherwise known as the Disability Pemy for payment. Howeving the gratuity
paid to petitioner under RA No. 610, otherwise known as the Disability Pemy for
payment. However, instead of implet. However, instead of implementing the full
award, the office of said respondent prepared ondeducting the amounts of P/3,000.00
representing the gratuity paid to petitioner under RA No. 610, otherwise known as
the Disability Pemy for payment. Howeving the gratuity paid to petitioner under RA
No. 610, otherwise known as the Disability Pemy for payment. However, instead of
implet. However, instead of implementing the full award, the office of said
respondent prepared ondeducting the amounts of P/3,000.00 representing the gratuity
paid to petitioner under RA No. 610, otherwise known as the Disability Pemy for
payment. Howeving the gratuity paid to petitioner under RA No. 610, otherwise
known as the Disability Pemy for payment. However, instead of implet. However,
instead of implementing the full award, the office of said respondent prepared
ondeducting the amounts of P/3,000.00 representing the gratuity paid to petitioner
under RA No. 610, otherwise known as the Disability Pemy for payment. Howeving the
gratuity paid to petitioner under RA No. 610, otherwise known as the Disability
Pemy for payment. However, instead of implet. However, instead of implementing
the full award, the office of said respondent prepared ondeducting the amounts of
P/3,000.00 representing the gratuity paid to petitioner under RA No. 610, otherwise
known as the Disability Pemy for payment. Howeving the gratuity paid to petitioner
under RA No. 610, otherwise known as the Disability Pemy for payment. However,
instead of implet. However, instead of implementing the full award, the office of
said respondent prepared ondeducting the amounts of P/3,000.00 representing the
gratuity paid to petitioner under RA No. 610, otherwise known as the Disability
Pemy for payment. Howeving the gratuity paid to petitioner under RA No. 610,
otherwise known as the Disability Pemy for payment. However, instead of implet.
However, instead of implementing the full award, the office of said respondent
prepared ondeducting the amounts of P/3,000.00 representing the gratuity paid to
petitioner under RA No. 610, otherwise known as the Disability Pemy for payment.
Howeving the gratuity paid to petitioner under RA No. 610, otherwise known as the
Disability Pemy for payment. However, instead of implet. However, instead of
implementing the full award, the office of said respondent prepared ondeducting the
amounts of P/3,000.00 representing the gratuity paid to petitioner under RA No.
610, otherwise known as the Disability Pemy for payment. Howeving the gratuity
paid to petitioner under RA No. 610, otherwise known as the Disability Pemy for
payment. However, instead of implet. However, instead of implementing the full
award, the office of said respondent prepared ondeducting the amounts of P/3,000.00
representing the gratuity paid to petitioner under RA No. 610, otherwise known as
the Disability Pemy for payment. Howeving the gratuity paid to petitioner under RA
No. 610, otherwise known as the Disability Pemy for payment. However, instead of
implet. However, instead of implementing the full award, the office of said
respondent prepared ondeducting the amounts of P/3,000.00 representing the gratuity
paid to petitioner under RA No. 610, otherwise known as the Disability Pemy for
payment. Howeving the gratuity paid to petitioner under RA No. 610, otherwise
known as the Disability Pemy for payment. However, instead of implet. However,
instead of implementing the full award, the office of said respondent prepared
ondeducting the amounts of P/3,000.00 representing the gratuity paid to petitioner
under RA No. 610, otherwise known as the Disability Pemy for payment. Howeving the
gratuity paid to petitioner under RA No. 610, otherwise known as the Disability
Pemy for payment. However, instead of implet. However, instead of implementing
the full award, the office of said respondent prepared ondeducting the amounts of
P/3,000.00 representing the gratuity paid to petitioner under RA No. 610, otherwise
known as the Disability Pemy for payment. Howeving the gratuity paid to petitioner
under RA No. 610, otherwise known as the Disability Pemy for payment. However,
instead of implet. However, instead of implementing the full award, the office of
said respondent prepared ondeducting the amounts of P/3,000.00 representing the
gratuity paid to petitioner under RA No. 610, otherwise known as the Disability
Pemy for payment. Howeving the gratuity paid to petitioner under RA No. 610,
otherwise known as the Disability Pemy for payment. However, instead of implet.
However, instead of implementing the full award, the office of said respondent
prepared ondeducting the amounts of P/3,000.00 representing the gratuity paid to
petitioner under RA No. 610, otherwise known as the Disability Pemy for payment.
Howeving the gratuity paid to petitioner under RA No. 610, otherwise known as the
Disability Pemy for payment. However, instead of implet. However, instead of
implementing the full award, the office of said respondent prepared ondeducting the
amounts of P/3,000.00 representing the gratuity paid to petitioner under RA No.
610, otherwise known as the Disability Pemy for payment. Howeving the gratuity
paid to petitioner under RA No. 610, otherwise known as the Disability Pemy for
payment. However, instead of implet. However, instead of implementing the full
award, the office of said respondent prepared ondeducting the amounts of P/3,000.00
representing the gratuity paid to petitioner under RA No. 610, otherwise known as
the Disability Pemy for payment. Howeving the gratuity paid to petitioner under RA
No. 610, otherwise known as the Disability Pemy for payment. However, instead of
implet. However, instead of implementing the full award, the office of said
respondent prepared ondeducting the amounts of P/3,000.00 representing the gratuity
paid to petitioner under RA No. 610, otherwise known as the Disability Pemy for
payment. Howev