Professional Documents
Culture Documents
com/locate/issn/10434666
Cytokine 33 (2006) 337e345
Received 1 June 2005; received in revised form 10 March 2006; accepted 19 March 2006
Abstract
Chronic inflammation and immunosuppressive therapies increase the risk of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma associated or not with EpsteineBarr
virus (EBV) infection. A possible link between infliximab treatment and increased risk of lymphoma has been suggested. Indeed, infliximab
induces apoptosis of monocytes and activated T lymphocytes, but its effect on B lymphocytes infected or not with EBV is unknown. Secreted
tumor necrosis factor (TNF) a and the expression level of TNF receptor 1 (TNFR1) and TNFR2 were compared in EBV-positive and negative B-
cell lines. The impact of TNFa and infliximab on apoptosis of EBV-positive cells was analyzed regarding the activity of NF-kB. Increased ex-
pression of TNFa in EBV-positive cells suggested that infliximab could affect their survival. However, TNFa or infliximab incubation had no
effect on apoptosis of EBV-positive cells. Loss of NF-kB activity sensitized lymphoblastoid cell lines to TNFa-induced apoptosis, but no direct
effect of infliximab on apoptosis was detected. On the basis of our in vitro data, neither TNFa nor infliximab has a direct effect on apoptosis of B
lymphocytes and EBV-positive cell lines. Thus, if an increased incidence of lymphoma were induced by TNFa blockers, it would not involve
a direct effect on B cells but rather an impaired immune surveillance by T cells.
Ó 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1043-4666/$ - see front matter Ó 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.cyto.2006.03.005
338 F. Baran-Marszak et al. / Cytokine 33 (2006) 337e345
immunodeficient patients [12]. Thus, in RA with lymphoma, GlutaMAX (GibcoBRL, Life Technologies, Cergy-Pontoise,
MTX could be beneficial, resulting from efficient control of France) supplemented with 10% decomplemented fetal calf
the disease, or deleterious, leading to increased risk of EBV- serum (Dutscher, Brumath, France), 100 U/ml penicillin,
associated lymphoproliferations. This latter effect seems mar- 10 mg/ml streptomycin (GibcoBRL), 1 mM sodium pyruvate
ginal, since in two large prospective studies, treatment with (GibcoBRL), MEM vitamins 100 (GibcoBRL) and 5 mg/ml
MTX did not significantly increase the risk of non-Hodgkin’s plasmocin (Cayla InvivoGen, Toulouse, France). Cells were
lymphoma with RA [6,13], although in one of these studies the treated with TNFa (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), 10 ng/
risk of Hodgkin’s lymphoma (usually 10 times less frequent ml for 30 min or 24 h, and infliximab (RemicadeÒ, Scher-
than non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma) was increased in RA patients ing-Plough, Levallois-Perret, France), 5 mg/ml for 24 h.
treated with MTX.
Tumor necrosis factor a (TNFa) blockers are a new class of 2.2. Plasmid and transfection
therapeutic agents that are efficient in the treatment of refrac-
tory RA, spondylarthropathies and CD. TNFa has a dual role The VINL Ik-Ba32/36a episomal vector was derived from
and, depending on the cellular context, can induce cell survival the previously described CKR 516 [21] vector by replacing the
by activating nuclear factor kB (NF-kB) or trigger apoptosis enhanced green fluorescent protein-inducible marker with the
by activating caspases [14]. An increased secretion of TNFa truncated version of the nerve growth factor receptor (NGFR)
is observed in B lymphocytes upon EBV infection but lympho- lacking the cytoplasmic domain. This vector contains the
blastoid cell lines (LCLs) are resistant to TNFa-induced EBNA1 gene to ensure episomal replication, a bidirectional
apoptosis [15] because the viral latent membrane protein 1 tetracycline-inducible promoter driving the expression of two
(LMP1) protects against it. independent cDNAs: Ik-Ba32/36a and NGFR, as a marker
Infliximab is a chimeric monoclonal antibody that binds of induction. The expression of NGFR was determined by
specifically to human TNFa and neutralizes its biologic prop- flow cytometry and used to select cells with magnetic beads.
erties, but some effects of infliximab cannot be explained by The induction of Ik-Ba32/36a was verified by Western
the neutralization of soluble TNFa alone [16]. For instance, blotting.
it induces the rapid suppression of mucosal inflammation in A total of 1 mg vector/106 cells was transfected by double-
CD and the specific increase of apoptosis in T lymphocytes pulse electroporation (first pulse: 750 V, 25 mF and 201 U; sec-
of the lamina propria in vivo and in vitro. Infliximab also in- ond pulse: 125 V, 3000 mF and 99 U). After 3 days of culture,
duces apoptosis in synovial monocytes/macrophages in RA hygromycin-resistant cells (stable transfectants) were selected
[17] and in CD through a caspase-dependent pathway [18]. (three weeks) by the use of 3 ml/ml hygromycin (Hygromycin B,
Results of a few studies suggested an increased incidence Sigma, Saint-Quentin Fallavier, France).
of lymphoma in RA patients treated with TNFa blockers
[19,20]. However, to date it has not been possible to discrim- 2.3. Selection of induced cells
inate between an increased incidence of lymphoma due to the
TNFa blockers themselves and an increased incidence because Stably transfected cells were induced with 0.6 mg/ml doxy-
most severe forms of RA are treated with TNFa blockers. cyline for 24 h (Doxycycline, AP-HP, France) and labeled with
Such increased incidence, which is not established at the pres- anti-low affinity NGFR (LNGFR) coupled with magnetic
ent time, could be due either to a defect of immunosurveil- micro beads for separation by the ‘‘MACSelectÔ LNGFR
lance of EBV-infected B cells by T cells or to a direct effect System’’ procedure (Miltenyi Biotech, Paris, France). The in-
of TNFa blockers on B cells infected or not by EBV. The pos- duced expression of LNGFR was assessed by flow cytometry.
sibility of an increased risk of lymphoma is one of the major CD19 quiescent B lymphocytes were separated from PBMCs
issues concerning the safety of long-term TNFa blocker use. using the same method with anti-CD19.
Only a few data are available concerning the action of
TNFa blockers on B cells infected or not with EBV. The pur- 2.4. Flow cytometry
pose of this work was to determine whether TNFa affects ap-
optosis in EBV-infected B lymphocytes, in Burkitt cell lines Induced cells were washed in phosphate buffered saline
infected or not with EBV and in B cells isolated from periph- (PBS; BioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France), incubated with
eral blood monoclonal cells (PBMCs), and whether infliximab 10 ml PE-labeled NGFR antibody (BD Pharmingen, Morangis,
has a direct effect on apoptosis in these different types of B France) and counted using a Coulter EPICS XL (Beckman
cells in vitro. Coulter, Villepinte, France).
To measure the expression of TNFR1 and TNFR2, cells
2. Materials and methods were washed in PBS, incubated with 5 ml FITC-labeled
TNFR1 (FAB225F) and TNFR2 (FAB226F) antibodies
2.1. Cell culture (R&D Systems Inc., Lille, France) and counted as described.
To measure the apoptosis rate, cells were washed in PBS,
The LCL PRI and the Burkitt lymphoma cell line BL2 and resuspended in Annexin V binding buffer, incubated with
its EBV-infected counterpart BL2.B98.5 were grown at 37 C 5 ml FITC-labeled Annexin V antibody (BD Pharmingen)
in humidified 5% CO2 air in RPMI 1640 medium containing and 5 ml propidium iodide and counted as described.
F. Baran-Marszak et al. / Cytokine 33 (2006) 337e345 339
A
60,0
52
50,0
TNFα secretion pg/ml
40,0
30,0
20,0
10,0
1
0 0
0,0
medium PRI BL2 BL2B95.8
B
128 128
relative cells number
BL2 BL2
PRI B95.8 PRI B95.8
BL2
BL2
0 0
100 101 102 103 104 100 101 102 103 104
log of fluorescence intensity log of fluorescence intensity
for TNFR1 for TNFR2
Fig. 1. Secreted TNFa and expression of TNF receptors are increased in EBV-positive B lymphocytes. (A) Ten million cells of LCL (PRI), EBV-negative Burkitt
lymphoma (BL2) and their EBV-positive counterpart BL2.B95.8, were cultured in a new medium for 24 h at a concentration of 1 million cells/ml. After 24 h,
supernatants were concentrated on 10-kDa filters (Millipore) and the control (medium alone), and secreted TNFa was measured by ELISA. (B) Expression of
TNF receptors TNFR1 and TNFR2 was measured by flow cytometry in BL2, BL2.B95.8 and PRI. Histograms show the relative cells number and the log of fluo-
rescence intensity for TNR1 and TNFR2.
340 F. Baran-Marszak et al. / Cytokine 33 (2006) 337e345
2.7. Quantification of cytokines in cell culture total RNA involved the use of the Archive kit RT from Ap-
supernatants by ELISA plied Biosystems in a final volume of 50 ml. From this, a vol-
ume of 1.25 ml of cDNA was used for gene amplification. All
Ten million cells were washed and grown in 15 ml com- these steps were performed following the recommendations of
plete medium culture for 24 h. Supernatants were concentrated the manufacturer. The relative expression levels of the genes
to 500 ml with a centrifugal filter (cut-off:10 kDa; Amicon Ul- were calculated as previously reported [24], with Abl1
tra-15 Centrifugal Filter Devices, Millipore, Bedford, MA, mRNA expression used for normalization.
USA). Secreted TNFa was measured by ELISA (Quantikine
ELISA kit, R&D Systems). The optical density was deter-
mined by the use of a spectrophotometer (Multiskan EX,
3. Results
Thermo, Cergy-Pontoise, France) set to 450 nm and was ana-
lyzed with use of the Ascent Software (Thermo). Duplicate
3.1. TNFa, TNFR1 (p55) and TNFR2 (p75) are
concentrations were averaged.
differentially expressed in EBV-positive B-cell lines
2.8. Quantitative RTePCR The expressions of TNFa and its receptors were measured
in the LCL PRI and BL cell lines infected (BL2.B95.8) or not
Total RNA was extracted from sorted NGFR-positive and (BL2) with EBV. The secretion of TNFa was measured by
-negative cells by the use of the Qiagen kit following the rec- ELISA in cell culture supernatants, and the expression of
ommendations of the manufacturer. We defined as reference TNFR1 and TNFR2 was determined by flow cytometry.
RNA a pool of RNAs extracted from different tonsils, lymph TNFa secretion was elevated in PRI LCL cells (52 pg/ml)
nodes and spleens with benign reactive follicular hyperplasia. (Fig. 1A). In contrast with BL2 cells, which did not release
RNA levels for the TNFa gene were quantified in parallel in any detectable amount of TNFa, BL2 B95.8 cells secreted
the different RNA extracts and in the RNA pool on an ABI 1 pg/ml of TNFa after 24 h of culture in a new medium. Al-
PRISM 7000 automat by the use of the TaqManR ‘‘Assay on though low, this amount of TNFa was sufficient to induce
demandÔ’’ gene expression reference system (Applied Bio- IkBa degradation in BL2 cells (see Fig. 5A, lane 3). The ex-
system, website: http//www.appliedbiosystem.com) (product pression of the TNF receptors TNFR1 and TNFR2 was high
reference: Hs00174128-m1). The Abl1 gene was used as a ref- in all EBV-positive cells (Fig. 1B), but in our experiments it
erence gene for the control of amplification (product refer- was higher in BL2B95.8 than in PRI cells. PRI cells that se-
ence: Hs00245443-m1). Reverse transcription of 2 mg of creted the highest levels of TNFa were subsequently used to
A
- + - +
I-kBm
I-kBα
FSC
Ponceau red
NGFR
B C
15 2.3
TNFα relative expression
2,5
TNFα secretion pg/ml
15,0
2
7.8 1.3
10,0 1,5
level
1
5,0
0,5
0,0 0
I-kBm - + I-kBm - +
Fig. 2. Specific inhibition of NF-kB reduces TNFa secretion. (A) LCL PRI cells were stably transfected with a tetracycline-inducible vector construct with the
cDNAs coding for I-kBa mutated on serine 32 and 36 (I-kBm) and NGFR as a marker of induction. Expression of NGFR revealed by flow cytometry and
I-kBa by Western blotting was induced after 0.6 mg/ml doxycycline treatment for 24 h. (B) After 24 h of induction, NGFR-positive cells were magnetically selected.
NGFR-positive cells and NGFR-negative cells were cultured for 24 h, supernatants were then concentrated, and secreted TNFa was measured by ELISA. (C)
mRNA expression levels of IkBm selected positive and negative cells were analyzed by quantitative RTePCR. The relative expression level of TNFa mRNA
was calculated with Abl1 mRNA expression used for normalization.
F. Baran-Marszak et al. / Cytokine 33 (2006) 337e345 341
p50/p65
p50/p50
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Fig. 4. TNFa or infliximab have no effect on the DNA binding activity of NF-kB in B lymphocytes. LCL PRI (lanes 1, 2 and 3), BL2 (lanes 4, 5 and 6), BL2.B95.8
(lanes 7, 8 and 9) and Jurkat cells (lanes 10, 11 and 12) were treated with TNFa (tnf) (lanes 2, 5, 8, 11) or infliximab (inf) (lanes 3, 6, 9, 12) for 24 h, and NF-kB
activity (p50/p65) was analyzed by EMSA.
for IkBm-negative cells treated with infliximab, and 75% sensitized to apoptosis by inhibition of NF-kB suggests that
to 73% for IkBm-positive cells treated with infliximab) TNFa had no autocrine action in these cells and that inflixi-
(Fig. 6B). mab had no TNFa-independent effect.
Previous studies have demonstrated that exogenous TNFa
4. Discussion increases DNA synthesis and immunoglobulin production by
mitogen-activated human B cells [25]. In addition, TNFa is
In this study, we demonstrated that neither TNFa nor inflix- an autocrine growth factor in B-cell chronic lymphocytic leu-
imab had an effect on apoptosis in B cells infected or not with kemia [25,26]. Finally, TNFa is one of the earliest genes tran-
EBV. The increased production of TNFa by EBV-positive scribed after antigen stimulation of B cells and is not sufficient
cells, particularly LCLs, suggested a possible effect of inflix- for but augments anti-Ig or anti-CD40þ interleukin-4-induced
imab on these cells. However, our observation that infliximab B-cell proliferation [27]. In EBV-infected B cells, TNFa had
had no effect on apoptosis of LCLs, even when cells were no effect on apoptosis, although it could compete with
A
BL2 BL2
ed s iximab
up
up
b
fl
p
ima
pret 95.8 in
su
ed s
5.8
nflix
reat
reat
up
B9
B
Is
BL2
pret
2
PRI
PR
BL
0 0
1-kBα
Ponceau red
1 2 3 4 5 6
B
0 Infliximab
I-kBα
Ponceau red
Fig. 5. Infliximab neutralizes the secreted TNFa but has no effect on the TNF-induced I-kBa degradation in EBV-infected B cells. (A) Supernatants from EBV-
positive cells (PRI sup or BL2.B95.8 sup) were transferred to EBV-negative BL cells (BL2) for 30 min. The total protein extracts were separated on gel and I-kBa
degradation was analyzed by Western blotting. BL2 incubated with: LCL PRI supernatant (lane 2), BL2.B95.8 supernatant (lane 3), infliximab-pretreated LCL PRI
supernatant (lane 5), infliximab-pretreated BL2.B95.8 supernatant (lane 6). (B) Absence of a direct effect of infliximab. LCL PRI cells were treated with infliximab
for 24 h and expression of I-kBa was analyzed by Western blotting on total protein extracts.
F. Baran-Marszak et al. / Cytokine 33 (2006) 337e345 343
40
20
10
0
0
Infliximab
CD19 PRI BL2 BL2B95.8
B
I-kBm
Without
Infliximab
12 % 73 %
With
Infliximab
11 % 75 %
Annexin V
Fig. 6. Treatment with infliximab has no effect on apoptosis of B lymphocytes infected or not with EBV even after NF-kB inhibition. (A) LCL PRI, BL2,
BL2.B95.8 and CD19-positive selected quiescent B lymphocytes from PBMCs were treated with 5 mg/ml infliximab for 24 h. Apoptosis rate was measured by
flow cytometry with Annexin V. (B) Stably transfected LCL PRI cells were induced with doxycycline for 24 h, and selected, the NGFR-positive ((I-kBmþ) (panels
b and d) and the NGFR-negative (I-kBm) (panels a and c) cells were treated (panels c and d) or not (panels a and b) with infliximab for 24 h. Cell apoptosis was
measured by flow cytometry after Annexin V binding.
lymphotoxin b (TNFb), which was identified as an autocrine the TNFa gene [35]. Our finding of increased expression of
growth factor [28]. The constitutive activation of NF-kB by both TNFR1 and TNFR2 in EBV-infected cell lines confirmed
LMP1 in LCLs [29,30] leads to the induction of target genes the results of previous studies [36,37] but we did not find any
such as Bcl2, Bfl1, Bcl-xl and cIAP1e2 involved in the inhi- correlation between the receptor number, receptor affinity and
bition of apoptosis [31e33], the mechanism by which EBV- the cytotoxic effect of TNFa [38]. Interestingly, although
infected B cells were shown to be resistant to TNFa-induced TNFR1 triggering activates both caspases and NF-kB [39],
apoptosis [15]. TNFa and infliximab had no effect on the activity of NF-kB
It is generally admitted that EBV infection promotes TNFa and the rate of apoptosis in the EBV-positive B cells. There-
production, in BL cells this secretion is variable and may be fore, these cells appear to be insensitive to TNFa. Neverthe-
very low [34]; we found that intracytoplasmic TNFa was less, in agreement with earlier observations, the cells
high in BLs (not shown) contrasting with the low secretion. underwent spontaneous apoptosis following inhibition of
The increased secretion of TNFa in EBV-infected cells is con- NF-kB [31], became sensitive to the apoptosis induced by
sistent with the presence of kB sites in the promoter region of TNFa [15], but remained insensitive to infliximab even after
344 F. Baran-Marszak et al. / Cytokine 33 (2006) 337e345
the inhibition of NF-kB. Thus confirming the absence of a di- [9] Nakatsuka S, Yao M, Hoshida Y, Yamamoto S, Iuchi K, Aozasa K. Pyo-
rect effect of infliximab on LCLs. In addition, we ruled out the thorax-associated lymphoma: a review of 106 cases. J Clin Oncol
2002;20:4255e60.
possibility of increased apoptosis following a direct interaction [10] Kamel OW, van de Rijn M, Weiss LM, Del Zoppo GJ, Hench PK,
of infliximab with transmembrane TNFa as suggested in T Robbins BA, et al. Brief report: reversible lymphomas associated with
lymphocytes [16]. After neutralization of TNFa with inflixi- EpsteineBarr virus occurring during methotrexate therapy for
mab no effect on apoptosis of LCLs was observed confirming rheumatoid arthritis and dermatomyositis. N Engl J Med 1993;328:
that TNFa had no autocrine role in EBV-infected cells. Thus, 1317e21.
[11] Kamel OW, Weiss LM, van de Rijn M, Colby TV, Kingma DW, Jaffe ES.
in comparison with its ability to induce apoptosis in T cells of Hodgkin’s disease and lymphoproliferations resembling Hodgkin’s dis-
the lamina propria in vivo and in vitro in CD, of blood mono- ease in patients receiving long-term low-dose methotrexate therapy.
cytes in CD and RA and of synovial monocytes/macrophages Am J Surg Pathol 1996;20:1279e87.
in RA, infliximab is unable to increase apoptosis in B cells, [12] Starzl TE, Nalesnik MA, Porter KA, Ho M, Iwatsuki S, Griffith BP, et al.
which demonstrates that the action of TNFa blockers may Reversibility of lymphomas and lymphoproliferative lesions developing
under cyclosporin-steroid therapy. Lancet 1984;1:583e7.
vary in different cellular types. [13] Wolfe F, Michaud K. Lymphoma in rheumatoid arthritis: the effect of
The possible increased risk of lymphoma with TNF antag- methotrexate and anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy in 18,572 patients.
onists is one of the major issues concerning the long-term Arthritis Rheum 2004;50:1740e51.
safety of TNFa blockers. Even if a few studies suggest that [14] Natoli G, Costanzo A, Guido F, Moretti F, Levrero M. Apoptotic, non-
the incidence of lymphoma is increased in RA patients treated apoptotic, and anti-apoptotic pathways of tumor necrosis factor signalling.
Biochem Pharmacol 1998;56:915e20.
with TNFa blockers [20,21], it is impossible to determine if [15] Asso-Bonnet M, Feuillard J, Ferreira V, Bissieres P, Tarantino N,
this incidence is linked with anti-TNFa-treated RA being Korner M, et al. Relationship between IkappaBalpha constitutive expres-
more active or corresponds to excessive risk induced by the sion, TNFalpha synthesis, and apoptosis in EBV-infected lymphoblastoid
TNFa blocker itself. If an increased incidence of lymphoma cells. Oncogene 1998;17:1607e15.
was induced by TNF blockers, it would not involve, on the ba- [16] ten Hove T, van Montfrans C, Peppelenbosch MP, van Deventer SJ. In-
fliximab treatment induces apoptosis of lamina propria T lymphocytes
sis of our in vitro data, a direct effect of the treatment of B in Crohn’s disease. Gut 2002;50:206e11.
cells infected or not with EBV but rather an impaired immune [17] Catrina AI, Trollmo C, af Klint E, Engstrom M, Lampa J, Hermansson Y,
surveillance by T cells. et al. Evidence that anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy with both etaner-
cept and infliximab induces apoptosis in macrophages, but not lympho-
cytes, in rheumatoid arthritis joints: extended report. Arthritis Rheum
Acknowledgments 2005;52:61e72.
[18] Lugering A, Schmidt M, Lugering N, Pauels HG, Domschke W,
This work was supported in part by a grant from Schering- Kucharzik T. Infliximab induces apoptosis in monocytes from patients
with chronic active Crohn’s disease by using a caspase-dependent path-
Plough. C.L. was supported by the Fondation pour la re- way. Gastroenterology 2001;121:1145e57.
cherche médicale (FRM). [19] Feltelius N, Fored CM, Blomqvist P, Bertilsson L, Geborek P,
Jacobsson LT, et al. Results from a nationwide postmarketing cohort
study of patients in Sweden treated with etanercept. Ann Rheum Dis
References 2005;64:246e52.
[20] Fleischmann R, Yocum D. Does safety make a difference in selecting the
[1] Bernstein CN, Blanchard JF, Kliewer E, Wajda A. Cancer risk in patients right TNF antagonist? Arthritis Res Ther 2004;6:S12e8.
with inflammatory bowel disease: a population-based study. Cancer [21] Baran-Marszak F, Feuillard J, Najjar I, Le Clorennec C, Bechet JM,
2001;91:854e62. Dusanter-Fourt I, et al. Differential roles of STAT1{alpha} and STAT1
[2] Georgescu L, Quinn GC, Schwartzman S, Paget SA. Lymphoma in pa- {beta} in fludarabine-induced cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in human
tients with rheumatoid arthritis: association with the disease state or B cells. Blood 2004;104:2475e83.
methotrexate treatment. Semin Arthritis Rheum 1997;26:794e804. [22] Feuillard J, Gouy H, Bismuth G, Lee LM, Debre P, Korner M. NF-kappa
[3] Kamel OW, Holly EA, van de Rijn M, Lele C, Sah A. A population B activation by tumor necrosis factor alpha in the Jurkat T cell line is in-
based, case control study of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma in patients with dependent of protein kinase A, protein kinase C, and Ca(2þ)-regulated
rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 1999;26:1676e80. kinases. Cytokine 1991;3:257e65.
[4] Kamel OW, van de Rijn M, Hanasono MM, Warnke RA. Immunosup- [23] Wu F, Garcia J, Mitsuyasu R, Gaynor R. Alterations in binding charac-
pression-associated lymphoproliferative disorders in rheumatic patients. teristics of the human immunodeficiency virus enhancer factor. J Virol
Leuk Lymphoma 1995;16:363e8. 1988;62:218e25.
[5] Kumar S, Fend F, Quintanilla-Martinez L, Kingma DW, Sorbara L, [24] Gabert J, Beillard E, van der Velden VH, Bi W, Grimwade D,
Raffeld M, et al. EpsteineBarr virus-positive primary gastrointestinal Pallisgaard N, et al. Standardization and quality control studies of
Hodgkin’s disease: association with inflammatory bowel disease and ‘real-time’ quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction
immunosuppression. Am J Surg Pathol 2000;24:66e73. of fusion gene transcripts for residual disease detection in leukemia -
[6] Mariette X, Cazals-Hatem D, Warszawki J, Liote F, Balandraud N, a Europe Against Cancer program. Leukemia 2003;17:2318e57.
Sibilia J. Lymphomas in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with meth- [25] Jelinek DF, Lipsky PE. Regulation of human B lymphocyte activation,
otrexate: a 3-year prospective study in France. Blood 2002;99:3909e15. proliferation, and differentiation. Adv Immunol 1987;40:1e59.
[7] Martin T, Weber JC, Levallois H, Labouret N, Soley A, Koenig S, et al. [26] Heslop HE, Bianchi AC, Cordingley FT, Turner M, Chandima W, De
Salivary gland lymphomas in patients with Sjogren’s syndrome may fre- Mel CP, et al. Effects of interferon alpha on autocrine growth factor
quently develop from rheumatoid factor B cells. Arthritis Rheum loops in B lymphoproliferative disorders. J Exp Med 1990;172:
2000;43:908e16. 1729e34.
[8] Baecklund E, Ekbom A, Sparen P, Feltelius N, Klareskog L. Disease ac- [27] Boussiotis VA, Nadler LM, Strominger JL, Goldfeld AE. Tumor necrosis
tivity and risk of lymphoma in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: nested factor alpha is an autocrine growth factor for normal human B cells. Proc
case-control study. BMJ 1998;317:180e1. Natl Acad Sci USA 1994;91:7007e11.
F. Baran-Marszak et al. / Cytokine 33 (2006) 337e345 345
[28] Estrov Z, Kurzrock R, Pocsik E, Pathak S, Kantarjian HM, Zipf TF, et al. [34] Klein SC, Kube D, Abts H, Diehl V, Tesch H. Promotion of IL8, IL10,
Lymphotoxin is an autocrine growth factor for EpsteineBarr virus- TNF alpha and TNF beta production by EBV infection. Leukemia Res
infected B cell lines. J Exp Med 1993;177:763e74. 1996;20:633e6.
[29] Laherty CD, Hu HM, Opipari AW, Wang F, Dixit VM. The Epsteine [35] Goldfeld AE, Strominger JL, Doyle C. Human tumor necrosis factor al-
Barr virus LMP1 gene product induces A20 zinc finger protein expres- pha gene regulation in phorbol ester stimulated T and B cell lines. J Exp
sion by activating nuclear factor kappa B. J Biol Chem 1992;267: Med 1991;174:73e81.
24157e60. [36] Baran-Marszak F, Fagard R, Girard B, Camilleri-Broet S, Zeng F,
[30] Lam N, Sugden B. CD40 and its viral mimic, LMP1: similar means to Lenoir GM, et al. Gene array identification of Epstein Barr virus-regu-
different ends. Cell Signal 2003;15:9e16. lated cellular genes in EBV-converted Burkitt lymphoma cell lines.
[31] Cahir-McFarland ED, Davidson DM, Schauer SL, Duong J, Kieff E. NF- Lab Invest 2002;82:1463e79.
kappa B inhibition causes spontaneous apoptosis in EpsteineBarr virus- [37] Gibbons DL, Rowe M, Cope AP, Feldmann M, Brennan FM. Lympho-
transformed lymphoblastoid cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA toxin acts as an autocrine growth factor for EpsteineBarr virus-trans-
2000;97:6055e60. formed B cells and differentiated Burkitt lymphoma cell lines. Eur J
[32] Chen C, Edelstein LC, Gelinas C. The Rel/NF-kappaB family directly Immunol 1994;24:1879e85.
activates expression of the apoptosis inhibitor Bcl-x(L). Mol Cell Biol [38] Munker R, DiPersio J, Koeffler HP. Tumor necrosis factor: receptors on
2000;20:2687e95. hematopoietic cells. Blood 1987;70:1730e4.
[33] Chen F, Castranova V, Shi X. New insights into the role of nuclear factor- [39] Wajant H, Pfizenmaier K, Scheurich P. Tumor necrosis factor signaling.
kappaB in cell growth regulation. Am J Pathol 2001;159:387e97. Cell Death Differ 2003;10:45e65.