Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Waste Management
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/wasman
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: A down plug-flow anaerobic reactor (DPAR) was designed for the feasibility study on continuous dry fer-
Received 7 May 2014 mentation of swine manure without any additional stirring. Using fresh swine manure as the feedstock
Accepted 23 December 2014 with TS concentration (w/w) of 20%, 25%, 30%, and 35%, stable volumetric biogas production rates of 2.40,
Available online xxxx
1.92, 0.911, and 0.644 L(L d)1 and biogas yields of 0.665, 0.532, 0.252, and 0.178 L g1VS were obtained
respectively, and the TS degradation rates were 46.5%, 45.4%, 53.2%, and 55.6%, respectively. With the
Keywords: increase of feedstock TS concentration, the concentration of ammonia nitrogen grew up to the maximum
Ammonia inhibition
value of 3500 mg L1. Biogas production was obviously inhibited when the concentration of ammonia
Biogas
Down plug-flow anaerobic reactor (DPAR)
nitrogen was above 3000 mg L1. The maximal volumetric biogas production rate of 2.34 L(L d)1 and
Dry fermentation biogas yield of 0.649 L g1VS were obtained with TS concentration of 25% at 25 °C without inhibition.
Swine manure Liquidity experiments showed that TS concentration of digestate could be less than 15.8%, and the flow
rate of digestate more than 0.98 m s1 when the feedstock TS concentration was less than 35%, which
indicated the digestate could be easily discharged from a DPAR. Therefore, it is feasible to conduct a con-
tinuous dry fermentation in a DPAR using fresh swine manure as the feedstock with TS concentration less
than 35%, whereas the feedstock TS concentration should not exceed 30% to achieve the maximal biogas
production rate and biogas yield.
Ó 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction et al., 2011). However, since swine manure is high in nitrogen con-
tent, substantive ammonia nitrogen may accumulate and then
In recent years, intensive animal breeding farms produce a large inhibit the biogas fermentation process (El-Mashad et al., 2004;
quantity of manure in a restricted area, which posed serious pres- Hansen et al., 1999; Strik et al., 2006). Wet fermentation of swine
sure on environment. Therefore, finding effective methods of treat- manure became the focus of previous researches because of less
ment and application is quite urgent. At present, biogas ammonia inhibition, whereas dry fermentation gained less atten-
fermentation is a widely employed process for the treatment of tion. Nevertheless, biogas production from separated pig slurry sol-
swine manure (De Bere, 2000; Fierro et al., 2014; Lu et al., 2007). ids is more profitable than using untreated raw slurry because
Biogas fermentation processes are classified into wet fermenta- there is a higher CH4 potential per unit fresh matter (Hothan
tions (TS concentration less than 10%) (Deng et al., 2014), semi-dry et al., 2013). In the meantime, considered the specificity of the
fermentations (TS concentration ranging from 10% to 20%) dry fermentation feedstock, batch fermentation and two-phase fer-
(Bolzonella et al., 2003; Dong et al., 2010), and dry fermentations mentation processes were mostly adopted for the study on dry bio-
(TS concentration more than 20%) (Abouelenien et al., 2009; gas fermentation (Abouelenien et al., 2009; Borja et al., 2003;
Kusch et al., 2008). Dry fermentation has attracted increasingly Kusch et al., 2008; Massé et al., 2003; Yabu et al., 2011). A batch
extensive attentions in the studies of biogas fermentation with fermentation process is not suitable for industrial-scale production
advantages of water-saving, convenient operation, high yields, due to its complex operation (Ahn et al., 2010; Guendouz et al.,
high fermentation slurry concentration, and better energy- 2010; Lantz, 2012). The two-phase fermentation process can regu-
recovery (Fdez-Güelfo et al., 2010; Kafle and Kim, 2013; Yabu late the content of organic acid during methane-generating phase,
thus enhancing methane production rate and removal rate of vol-
atile fatty acids (VFA). However, in two-phase fermentation pro-
⇑ Corresponding author at: Biogas Institute of Ministry of Agriculture, Section
cess, the separation of acid-producing and methane-generating
4-13, Renmin Road South, Chengdu 610041, PR China. Tel./fax: +86 28 85236376.
E-mail address: dengliangwei@caas.cn (L.-W. Deng). phases is not easy to achieve, and it also requires high cost for
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2014.12.024
0956-053X/Ó 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Please cite this article in press as: Chen, C., et al. Continuous dry fermentation of swine manure for biogas production. Waste Management (2015), http://
dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2014.12.024
2 C. Chen et al. / Waste Management xxx (2015) xxx–xxx
Table 1
The characteristics of swine manure (SM) and inoculation sludge (IS).
Item pH TS (%) VS/TS (%) NH+4–N (mg L1) TKN/TS (%) TC/TS (%) TP/TS (%) Ca/TS (%) Fe/TS (%) C/N
SM 7.32 23.6 81.3 400 2.28 32.9 2.12 1.96 0.21 14.5
IS 7.55 7.65 57.1 395.3 — — — — — —
NH+4–N: Ammonia Nitrogen; TKN: Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen; TC: Total Carbon; TP: Total Phosphorus.
Please cite this article in press as: Chen, C., et al. Continuous dry fermentation of swine manure for biogas production. Waste Management (2015), http://
dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2014.12.024
C. Chen et al. / Waste Management xxx (2015) xxx–xxx 3
Please cite this article in press as: Chen, C., et al. Continuous dry fermentation of swine manure for biogas production. Waste Management (2015), http://
dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2014.12.024
4 C. Chen et al. / Waste Management xxx (2015) xxx–xxx
Table 2
Variations in biogas production under different feedstock TS concentrations*.
Feedstock TS Temperature Biogas production rate CH4 content Volumetric biogas production rate Biogas yield Biogas yield
(%) (°C) (L d-1) (%) L(L d)1 (L g1TS) (L g1VS)
20 25–28 10.8 65.0 2.40 0.540 0.665
20 18–20 5.00 55.0 1.11 0.250 0.307
25 25 ± 2 8.65 65.0 1.92 0.432 0.532
30 25 ± 2 4.10 60.0 0.911 0.205 0.252
35 25 ± 2 2.90 75.0 0.644 0.145 0.178
*
The data in the table are average experimental results after the feedstock TS became stable.
Please cite this article in press as: Chen, C., et al. Continuous dry fermentation of swine manure for biogas production. Waste Management (2015), http://
dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2014.12.024
C. Chen et al. / Waste Management xxx (2015) xxx–xxx 5
tration increased from 2000 mg L1 to 3500 mg L1 and then fell to
3000 mg L1 on day 131, the concentration of free ammonia was
up from 30 mg L1 to 100 mg L1 and then down to 55 mg L1.
When the feedstock TS concentration increased to 35%, the total
ammonia nitrogen concentration changed slightly, increasing from
3000 mg L1 to about 3250 mg L1. However, pH value went up
from 7.32 to 8.0, resulting in a rapid increase in the concentration
of free ammonia from 55 mg L1 to 200 mg L1. Accumulation of
free ammonia was mainly affected by three factors such as the
temperature, the total ammonia nitrogen concentration, and the
pH value. With the increase of the temperature, the total ammonia
nitrogen concentration and pH value, the accumulation of free
ammonia would be prone to occur (Bujoczek et al., 2000; Hansen
et al., 1998). By calculating, under the same conditions of total
ammonia nitrogen concentration and temperature, a variation in
pH of 0.1 would result in a variation in free ammonia concentration
Fig. 4. Variations in concentrations of free ammonia and ammonium nitrogen of of 25%. During the experiment, the concentration of free ammonia
digestate under different feedstock TS concentrations.
that caused inhibition was 55 mg L1 (feedstock TS concentration
of 25%). For the inhibition concentration, researchers obtained
4.44 g(L d)1, the concentration of ammonia nitrogen in the dige- inconsistent conclusions. Weiland (1993) and Koster (1986) found
state increased with the advance of experiment and the increase of that the free ammonia concentration of 50 mg L1 or 80 mg L1
TS concentration in feedstock, as a result of moisture content would have an impact on the biogas fermentation process. Accord-
reduction and ammonia nitrogen accumulation in the DPAR. When ing to McCarty and McKinney (1961), ammonia inhibition would
the feedstock TS concentration was 20%, the highest accumulated not occur until the concentration of free ammonia reached
ammonia nitrogen concentration of 2000 mg L1 could be 150 mg L1. However, Ripley et al. (1985) found that the reaction
achieved. could be carried out well even though the concentration of free
When the feedstock TS concentration was up to 25%, the con- ammonia was more than 345 mg L1. Over a long period of sludge
centration of ammonia nitrogen increased to 3000 mg L1. At this acclimation, Hansen et al. (1998) broadened the inhibition concen-
time, the biogas production rate began to decline because of tration to 1100 mg L1. As shown in Fig. 4, the concentration of free
ammonia inhibition. However, CH4 content in biogas stayed at a ammonia leading to inhibition was lower than those reported by
good level (more than 60%). These can be explained by the follow- other researchers, which could be attributed to the following rea-
ing facts. Although the accumulated ammonia nitrogen exceeded sons. On the one hand, the acclimation time was not so long that
the range of half inhibitory concentration for microorganisms of the microorganism is prone to be inhibited at a low concentration
biogas fermentation (more than 1700 mg L1), it still remained of free ammonia. On the other hand, variations in inoculum, sub-
below the toxicity range (more than 4000 mg L1), which brought strate, experimental conditions, and environment may cause the
about a state of ‘‘inhibited biogas production’’ in the reactor difference of the inhibition concentration.
(Angelidaki et al., 1993; Nakamura et al., 2004). When the feed-
stock TS concentration increased to 30% and 35%, the concentration 3.4. Variations in TS concentrations in digestate and its liquidity
of ammonia nitrogen accumulated to a maximum of 3500 mg L1
on day 131 and decreased to 2900 mg L1 on day 148. 3.4.1. Variations in TS concentrations
Ammonium ion (NH+4) and free ammonia (FA, NH3) are the two As demonstrated in Fig. 5, with the feedstock TS concentration
main forms of inorganic ammonia nitrogen in aqueous solution. of 20%, the digestate TS concentration increased from 7.65% to
Free ammonia has been suggested to be the governing cause of 13.6%. Because there were no measures of temperature control,
inhibition since it is freely membrane-permeable by passive experiment was conducted at ambient room temperature of 18–
expansion. In the experiment, the proportion of free ammonia 28 °C, wide fluctuations occurred on days 32 and 65. Since then,
(NH3) in the total ammonia nitrogen could be calculated by the fol- the temperature was kept at 25 ± 2 °C by circulating hot water in
lowing formula (Hansen et al., 1998):
0 0 11 1
pH
½NH3 B B 10
¼ @1 þ @ C C
A A ð1Þ
½TNH3 0:09018þ2729:92
TðKÞ
10
Please cite this article in press as: Chen, C., et al. Continuous dry fermentation of swine manure for biogas production. Waste Management (2015), http://
dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2014.12.024
6 C. Chen et al. / Waste Management xxx (2015) xxx–xxx
Please cite this article in press as: Chen, C., et al. Continuous dry fermentation of swine manure for biogas production. Waste Management (2015), http://
dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2014.12.024
C. Chen et al. / Waste Management xxx (2015) xxx–xxx 7
Dong, L., Yuan, Z., Sun, Y., 2010. Semi-dry mesophilic anaerobic digestion of water Kusch, S., Oechsner, H., Jungbluth, T., 2008. Biogas production with horse dung in
sorted organic fraction of municipal solid waste (WS-OFMSW). Bioresour. solid-phase digestion systems. Bioresour. Technol. 99, 1280–1292.
Technol. 101, 2722–2728. Lantz, M., 2012. The economic performance of combined heat and power from
El-Mashad, H.M., Zeeman, G., van Loon, W.K.P., Bot, G.P.A., Lettinga, G., 2004. Effect biogas produced from manure in Sweden – a comparison of different CHP
of temperature and temperature fluctuation on thermophilic anaerobic technologies. Appl. Energy 98, 502–511.
digestion of cattle manure. Bioresour. Technol. 95, 191–201. Lissens, G., Vandevivere, P., De Baere, L., Biey, E.M., Verstraete, W., 2001. Solid waste
Fdez-Güelfo, L., Alvarez-Gallego, C., Sales Márquez, D., Romero García, L., 2010. digestors: process performance and practice for municipal solid waste
Start-up of thermophilic–dry anaerobic digestion of OFMSW using adapted digestion. Wat. Sci. Technol. 44, 91–102.
modified SEBAC inoculum. Bioresour. Technol. 101, 9031–9039. Lu, S.G., Imai, T., Ukita, M., Sekine, M., 2007. Start-up performances of dry anaerobic
Fierro, J., Gómez, X., Murphy, J.D., 2014. What is the resource of second generation mesophilic and thermophilic digestions of organic solid wastes. J. Environ. Sci.
gaseous transport biofuels based on pig slurries in Spain? Appl. Energy 114, 19, 416–420.
783–789. Martin, D.J., Potts, L.G.A., Heslop, V.A., 2003. Reaction mechanisms in solid-state
Forster-Carneiro, T., Pérez, M., Romero, L.I., 2008. Influence of total solid and anaerobic digestion: ii. the significance of seeding. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 81,
inoculum contents on performance of anaerobic reactors treating food waste. 180–188.
Bioresour. Technol. 99, 6994–7002. Massé, D.I., Masse, L., Croteau, F., 2003. The effect of temperature fluctuations on
Guendouz, J., Buffière, P., Cacho, J., Carrère, M., Delgenes, J.P., 2010. Dry anaerobic psychrophilic anaerobic sequencing batch reactors treating swine manure.
digestion in batch mode: design and operation of a laboratory-scale, completely Bioresour. Technol. 89, 57–62.
mixed reactor. Waste Manage. 30, 1768–1771. McCarty, P.L., McKinney, R.E., 1961. Salt toxicity in anaerobic digestion. J. Water
Hansen, K.H., Angelidaki, I., Ahring, B.K., 1998. Anaerobia digestion of swine Pollut. Control Fed. 33, 399–415.
manure: inhibition by ammonia. Water Res. 32, 5–12. Nakamura, S., Kishi, I., Sugimura, S., Hamajima, M., Mimura, R., Tsuji, Y., 2004. Effect
Hansen, K.H., Angelidaki, I., Ahring, B.K., 1999. Improving thermophilic anaerobic of ammonia inhibition and loading rate on thermophilic methane fermentation
digestion of swine manure. Water Res. 33, 1805–1810. of garbage. Resour. Process 51, 141–147.
Hilkiah Igoni, A., Ayotamuno, M.J., Eze, C.L., Ogaji, S.O.T., Probert, S.D., 2008. Designs Ripley, L.E., Kmet, N.M., Boyle, W.C., Converse, J.C., 1985. The effects of ammonia
of anaerobic digesters for producing biogas from municipal solid-waste. Appl. nitrogen on the anaerobic digestion of poultry manure. In: Proceedings, 39th
Energy 85, 430–438. Purdue Industrial Waste Conference, Purdue University, Butterworth
Hothan, A., Brauckmann, H.-J., Broll, G., 2013. Influence of storage on methane Publishers, Boston, MA, USA, pp. 73–80.
yields of separated pig slurry solids. Biomass Bioenerg. 52, 166–172. Strik, D.P.B.T.B., Domnanovich, A.M., Holubar, P., 2006. A pH-based control of
Kafle, G.K., Kim, S.H., 2013. Anaerobic treatment of apple waste with swine manure ammonia in biogas during anaerobic digestion of artificial pig manure and
for biogas production: batch and continuous operation. Appl. Energy 103, 61– maize silage. Process Biochem. 41, 1235–1238.
72. Wang, G., Zhao, M., Lang, X., Bao, Z., Zhou, R., 2009. Study on an improved USR for
Koster, I.W., 1986. Characteristics of the pH-influenced adaptation of methanogenic pig manure treatment. Chin. J. Environ. Eng. 3, 919–921 (in Chinese).
sludge to ammonium toxicity. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 36, 445–455. Weiland, P., 1993. One-and two-step anaerobic digestion of solid agroindustrial
Kotsyurbenko, O.R., Nozhevnikova, A.N., Zavarzin, G.A., 1993. Methanogenic residues. Water Sci. Technol. 27, 145–151.
degradation of organic matter by anaerobic bacteria at low temperature. Yabu, H., Sakai, C., Fujiwara, T., Nishio, N., Nakashimada, Y., 2011. Thermophilic
Chemosphere 27, 1745–1761. two-stage dry anaerobic digestion of model garbage with ammonia stripping. J.
Kowalczyk, A., Harnisch, E., Schwede, S., Gerber, M., Span, R., 2013. Different mixing Biosci. Bioeng. 111, 312–319.
modes for biogas plants using energy crops. Appl. Energy 112, 465–472.
Please cite this article in press as: Chen, C., et al. Continuous dry fermentation of swine manure for biogas production. Waste Management (2015), http://
dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2014.12.024