Page 1 of 26 AUTHOR SUBMITTED MANUSCRIPT - JPhysA-111032
2:19:42 PM11/17/2018 Joseph R. Cassara Page 1 11/17/2018
1 2 3 4 My initial understanding of the Double Slit experiment was that there 5 existed some internal conscious property to nature; that this entity was 6 somehow aware when it was being watched. However, upon realizing that 7 8 no infinitesimal region in the universe can exist absent of the force of 9 gravity, not even in the vacuum of space - I soon reasoned that, in the words 10 of Gerard T'hooft, "While observing microscopic objects, an observer may 11 12 disturb them, even in a classical theory; moreover, in gravity theories, 13 observers may carry gravitational fields that disturb the system they are 14 looking at,". 15 16 17 This sparked an obsession with the fundamental interactions of nature 18 because I realized that gravity must underpin all of them. This realization 19 20 was what initiated my investigations into a mathematical conjecture, and 21 now after two years - guided by a philosophical viewpoint that nature cannot 22 be random & therefore must have no origin or terminal point - I am finally 23 24 able to go about proofing it. Reality, as I have come to understand it, is a 25 case of sum, ergo sum. Hence, I've done away with a Big Bang and a Finite 26 Universe in my model – favoring a less random cosmological history. 27 28 29 Regarding an idea by William James Sidis, presented in The Animate and 30 The Inanimate, it predicted the existence of black holes after Einstein. His 31 black hole was different than Einstein’s; it was any region of the universe 32 33 that housed a reverse continuum. It even had polar matter jets in his 34 description. I have intuited a deleterious component to extend conventional 35 M theories for a quantum gravity theory underlying not only the 36 37 fundamental interactions, but also solving a broad spectrum of quantum 38 mechanical issues ranging from the trans-planckian problem of black hole 39 physics to the quantum venn diagram paradox. 40 41 42 Imagine a pair of everted and perpendicular branes, the only communication 43 between them being via the quantum eraser. This can be viewed as the sole 44 45 progenitor of all motion in the universe - it is analogue gravity - a 46 deleterious mechanism in the fine structure constant causing a dislocation in 47 the spacetime foam about the asymptotic edge of an event horizon: 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 AUTHOR SUBMITTED MANUSCRIPT - JPhysA-111032 Page 2 of 26
2:19:42 PM11/17/2018 Joseph R. Cassara Page 2 11/17/2018
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 Within the framework of black branes, this is also the mechanism for 40 Hawking radiation as contact with our brane causes an instantaneous 41 42 volumetric reduction in black brane spheres & vice versa proportional to the 43 amount of contacted surface area divided by the quantity of consumption in 44 the system. This is analogous to extreme length contraction about the event 45 46 horizon. 47 48 Black hole evaporation is the result of a tremendous deleterious friction 49 50 between everted space-time continuums. These deleterious braneworlds may 51 form a localized fracture pattern embedded within the interior of the 52 quantum foam. There are no smallest deletions, they could, in essence, occur 53 54 at literally infinite rates of speed relative to our perception. So, considering 55 56 57 58 59 60 Page 3 of 26 AUTHOR SUBMITTED MANUSCRIPT - JPhysA-111032
2:19:42 PM11/17/2018 Joseph R. Cassara Page 3 11/17/2018
1 2 3 4 Laplace’s demon, how do we show that this fracture pattern underlies the 5 fundamental interactions? 6 7 Let us begin by defining the internal dynamics of all elementary particles via 8 9 compressing an unconventionally spherical Model of The Photon: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 AUTHOR SUBMITTED MANUSCRIPT - JPhysA-111032 Page 4 of 26
2:19:42 PM11/17/2018 Joseph R. Cassara Page 4 11/17/2018
2:19:42 PM11/17/2018 Joseph R. Cassara Page 7 11/17/2018
1 2 3 4 I accidentally reproduced E=Mc^2 in my sphere eversions, M(E)=the planck 5 weight x 10^-27 m^3/a1. a1=8.9875518e+16 m/s^2. The planck force is the 6 planck mass of 2.17645e-8 kgs times 8.9875518e+16 m/s^2 (since M=F/a) 7 8 which yields 1,956,095,711.51 newtons. M(E)=1,956,095,711.51 x 10^- 9 27/8.9875518e+16=2.17645e-35 kgs. 10 11 Mass of say a proton is the planck force x 10^-45 m^3/a2. a2=8.9e+14 12 13 m/s^2. M=(1,956,095,711.51 x 1e-45 x 8.9e+16)/(8.9e+14). Therefore, 14 M(proton)c^2=1.9560957e-34 kgs. 15 16 17 This means E=Mc^2 exactly within the syntax of my model. 18 19 We began with a sphere that's 7e-7 meters, with 6.06e+57 inner spheres & 20 21 9^28 lagrange points equal to one planck length at the final iteration of the 22 spherical fractal, describing the micro-gravitation responsible for the photon 23 charge. 24 25 26 Imagine that blue is normal (plot 1), & red is inside out. At first you get a 27 red sphere that's half the size of the original, that's the result of dragging the 28 x,y,z lines through the center (the lagrange point) of the sphere by the length 29 30 of it's radius. 31 32 The change from plot 1 to plot n2 represents an antiphoton because it pulls 33 34 every vector in the e(12) by the radius of that sphere. Plot n2 has no charge 35 & is a sterile neutrino. Plot n3 is a fully sized red sphere, that was the result 36 of dragging the x,y,z lines through the lagrangian center of the sphere by the 37 38 length of it's diameter (this depicts the force of gravity upon the inner 39 structures of the photon and should not be confused with a material sphere 40 eversion). This depicts a positively charged photon because it pushes every 41 42 vector in the e(12) by the radius of that sphere. 43 44 A sterile neutrino may be found at plot #s f(n)=(4/3pi(3^30)^3) through 45 f(n)=(4/3pi(3^60)^3). The peak charge of your photon is where it loops back 46 47 into an antiphoton with even greater charge density. The math is telling us 48 something here, an increased charge density does yield e=mc^2 at every 49 50 positive charge. It seems that the photon charge expands more slowly than 51 the initial antiphoton charge contracts. 52 53 You can fit 8 spheres around the surface of a sphere, if these 9 spheres 54 55 represent a charged particle with 9 times the mass in 1/9th the volume of 56 your original photon than you can repeatedly perform these 9-fold 57 58 59 60 AUTHOR SUBMITTED MANUSCRIPT - JPhysA-111032 Page 8 of 26
2:19:42 PM11/17/2018 Joseph R. Cassara Page 8 11/17/2018
1 2 3 4 compressions 28 more times before you exceed the planck mass. I calculated 5 that the entire 29th sphere would be <lp: 6 7 Since it’s charge must compress the photon by 1 planck length per planck 8 9 time for it to travel at c, the photon mass can be expressed by the quotient of 10 radii between a photon & planck length -> (7e-7/2)/(2(3^60))=4.1282194e- 11 36. Viz a viz, the photon density of elementary majorana fermion (EMF) 1 is 12 13 4.9320464e-36/(4/3pi(7e-7)^3)=3.388006e-17 kg/m^3. Ergo, the particle 14 density of EMF 28 is 4.9320464e-36 x 9^28/(4/3pi(1.6e- 15 16 35)^3)=1.4848022e+96 kg/m^3 this pretty much checks out as the densest 17 possible EMF before you get a black hole planck particle. 18 19 Apropos, all of the elementary particles: 20 21 22 http://animatedphysi...standard-model/ 23 24 & 25 26 27 https://en.wikipedia...ntary_particles 28 29 Could represent some of 28 possible elementary majorana fermions in this 30 31 E(n>/=12) group, creating 84 possible elementary particles which would 32 represent these 28 possible majorana fermions, each consecutively heavier 33 than the previous one - stuck in one particular charge by one another when 34 35 within a composite particle or when interacting in nature - with a 28th & 36 final elementary majorana fermion (which one would find at the cores of 37 strange-quark stars). 38 39 40 Now that we’ve established a fresh perspective on particle physics that 41 encumbers the deleterious braneworld’s mechanism for gravity, how do we 42 43 test to see if it holds up to the standard model? 44 45 Let us start with three dimensions, x,y,z; each with a value of one in a linear 46 47 time continuum going with one linearity, & a negative xyz each with a value 48 of 1 in a negative arrow of time going with an opposite linearity. This lateral 49 space-time continuum forms a dimension all on its own, more on that 50 51 shortly. For now, let each linear continuum pass through one another by a 52 value of .3, canceling out. Now xyz have a value of .7 with a total of 2.1 53 dimensions. In our next reel point .2 of each arrow goes through, leaving a 54 55 value of .8 for xyz, with a total of 2.4 dimensions. From reel one to reel two 56 the dimensions of space time have increased, this is time contraction (fast 57 58 59 60 Page 9 of 26 AUTHOR SUBMITTED MANUSCRIPT - JPhysA-111032
2:19:42 PM11/17/2018 Joseph R. Cassara Page 9 11/17/2018
1 2 3 4 forward) the reverse of time dilation (slow motion). 5 6 If you include a negative 2.1 & 2.4 dimensions in the reverse brane, than 7 8 that's between 4.2 & 4.8 dimensions. Altogether a potential of between 4 & 9 6 dimensions, (4,6) 10 11 12 So there's somewhere between 2 & 3 real physical dimensions at any given 13 point in space and time per brane, so for the di-brane: 14 15 16 6>n>4; n=(4,6) 17 18 f(n)=(λmax)•((4π/3)r^3) 19 20 21 c=x where f(x)=6/n/(4π/3)^(1/3)) where n>6 22 23 24 c=x where f(x)=4/(n/(4π/3)^(1/3)) where 4>n 25 26 x=the speed of gravitational wave propagation 27 28 29 Black hole evaporation will be used to find the higher & lower cosmic 30 scales; the size of an antiproton is 10^-15 m and the Schwarzchild radius of 31 32 its central black hole should equal the rate at which black holes evaporate. 33 34 The Schwarzchild radius is 2.484e-54 meters (just type proton into where it 35 36 says earth). The rate of evaporation is 8.41e-17 seconds (just type proton 37 into where it says earth). 38 39 40 But protons do not have λmax = vacuum density, that’s the problem, so for a 41 proton we must use the original equation f(n)=(λmax)•((4π/3)r^3); where 42 43 f(x)=4/(n/(4π/3)^(1/3)) where 4>n to find the contraction of c with the λmax 44 of a proton ≈ 395 nm. However, in the special case of black holes the 45 equation must be modified. 46 47 48 First of all, it’s 4πr^2 because the quasar within the Schwarzschild radius of 49 the antiproton is a hollow sphere. Secondly, λmax of the proton’s collective 50 51 micro-BH quasars is the proton’s normal λmax but to the negative power of 52 the proton’s length divided by twice the Schwarzschild radius 53 54 55 f(n)=(3.95e-7^-(1e-15/2(2.484e-54)))((4π)(2.484e-54)^2)=7.753772e-107 56 57 58 59 60 AUTHOR SUBMITTED MANUSCRIPT - JPhysA-111032 Page 10 of 26
2:19:42 PM11/17/2018 Joseph R. Cassara Page 10 11/17/2018
1 2 3 4 f(x)=4/(7.753772e-107/(4π))^(1/2) = 1.610306e+54 m/s 5 6 So a black hole with the mass of the sun (1391400000 meters) has a 7 8 Schwarzschild radius of 2953 meters & will evaporate in 6.61e+74 seconds. 9 10 f(n)=(5.04e-7^-1(1.3914e+9/5906)) x ((4π x 2953)^3) = 2.3886249e+25 m/s 11 12 13 f(x)=6/(4π(2.3886249e+25^(1/2))=9.7693891e-14 m/s 14 15 16 1.610306e+54/299,792,458/9.7693891e-14=5.4981971e+58 17 18 5.4981971e+58/8.41e-17=6.5376898e+74 seconds ✓ 19 20 21 The electron most likely has a radius of 10^-12 m, & λmax of about 4e-7 m 22 23 (visible spectrum is where electrons like to hide). 24 25 f(n)=(4e-7)(4π/3(1e-12)^3)=1.6755161e-42 26 27 28 f(x)=4/(1.6755161e-42/(12π^(1/3)))=4.1957466e+43 m/s 29 30 31 The CMB had a radius of 6.9 billion light years, or 6.52809e+28 meters, & 32 λmax of about 1,000 nm. 33 34 35 f(n)=(1e-6)(4π/3(6.52809e+28)^3)=1.1653249e+81 36 37 f(x)=6/(12π(1.1653249e+81)^(1/3))=1.5124155e-28 m/s 38 39 40 4.1957466e+43/1.5124155e-28=2.7742023e+71 seconds 41 42 43 Or 8.7958221e+60 years, the few SMBHs caught in the big crunch will only 44 be less than half-evaporated, so this cannot be right. 45 46 47 Instead we use the lamdamax equation to find a much larger picture of the 48 universe to see how many electrons fit into a super electron, this will give us 49 a complete size for the CMB artifact, so that this process can be redone for a 50 51 more accurate date for the Big Bounce. 52 53 There's 6.52809e+28 meters in the radius of the CMB, using (4π/3(1e- 54 55 12)^3), you can fit 1.165325e+123 electrons into the electrons of the next 56 cosmic scale. Let's see if my math confirms that number using super lp: 57 58 59 60 Page 11 of 26 AUTHOR SUBMITTED MANUSCRIPT - JPhysA-111032
2:19:42 PM11/17/2018 Joseph R. Cassara Page 11 11/17/2018
1 2 3 4 5 2.7742023e+71/299,792,458/6.58e-15=1.4063439e+77 m/s. Planck length 6 over planck time equals 296846011.132 m/s. 7 8 9 1.4063439e+77/296846011.132=4.737621e+68 m/s as your new planck 10 length over planck time. 296846011.132 x 5.39e-44 equals lp, so super lp 11 12 equals 13 14 1.4063439e+77 x 5.39e-44 = 7.5801936e+33 meters. 15 16 7.5801936e+33/4.737621e+68=1.6e-35, which is the planck length (lp). 17 There's 3.125e+22 planck lengths in the length of an electron. 18 19 20 7.5801936e+33 x 3.125e+22 = 2.3688105e+56 meters for the superverse 21 electron. This does not confirm, the CMBR artifact should be 22 2.3688105e+56/2=1.1844052e+56, 23 24 1.1844052e+56/6.52809e+28=1.8143212e+27 times larger than what we can 25 see. 26 27 28 We can't see so much of the CMB artifact for the same reason we can't see 29 forever into the past, it's from a combination of the cosmological redshift 30 either fading it behind the luminosity of the CMBR or the ion interference 31 32 either trapping all of the observable light or compressing it into heavier 33 particles altogether eons before it gets near us. For our next dilation of c 34 equation: 35 36 37 f(n)=(1e-6)(4π/3(1.1844052e+56)^3)=6.959684e+162 cubic meters 38 39 40 f(x)=6/(12π(6.959684e+162)^(1/3))=8.3359856e-56 m/s 41 42 43 4.1957466e+43/8.3359856e-56=5.033294e+98 seconds, which is 44 1.5958446e+88 years; which fits for the evaporation rate for most 45 supermassive black holes (<100 million solar masses). But the few that are 46 47 the largest in the universe, such as this one, they grow each consecutive Big 48 Bounce. 49 50 51 Let the uberelectron be where time t=1. Where total time Tt/2 is the phase 52 space electron neutrino ghost particle, then all other transformations after 53 Tt/2 + 1 is the positron. At 1/(1.8143212e+27 x 45) the volume of a 54 55 Tt/2+Tt(.1) positron charge you get a rindler effect via entropy where dark 56 flow/cosmic bruising=unruh gravitation around the parameter of that sphere- 57 58 59 60 AUTHOR SUBMITTED MANUSCRIPT - JPhysA-111032 Page 12 of 26
2:19:42 PM11/17/2018 Joseph R. Cassara Page 12 11/17/2018
1 2 3 4 volume, a microverse that represents the entropy of the cosmos in it’s 5 current rate of expansion. 6 7 8 You can envision the vacuum radiation of that microcosm in order to 9 redefine what a photon is when referring to the photon sphere of the 10 schwarzschild radius of an anti-proton, which is a sub-planck singularity. 11 12 13 Now what you do here, is you take the CMB data and go from there to the 14 current universe & place the behavior of expansion exactly where it fits in 15 16 that positron knowing that the 13.8 billion light year sphere that was the 17 CMB is 1/1.8143212e+27 of the total volume of the neutrino at T(t)/2, 18 1/(1.8143212e+27 x 45) of the positron at Tt/2+Tt(.1), 1/(1.8143212e+27 x 19 20 2(45)) at Tt/2+Tt(.2), 1/(1.8143212e+27 x 3(45)) at Tt/2+Tt(.3), 21 1/(1.8143212e+27 x 4(45)) at Tt/2+Tt(.4), & 1/(1.8143212e+27 x 5(45)) at 22 Tt/2+Tt(.5). From the behavior of our local region of the electron-neutrino- 23 24 positron we can fill in the rest of the macro black holes beyond our cosmic 25 event horizon like puzzle pieces because we know the behavior of charge 26 with these graphical sphere inversions. 27 28 29 There is actually a way to approach this mathematically. While at first you 30 can only pinpoint where our universe is in this uber neutrino/positron using 31 32 CMB data (i.e dark flow, rotation, cosmic bruising, etc) & matching it with 33 the gravitational torsion that the sphere inversions of elementary majorana 34 fermion #(n) since the photon density of elementary majorana fermion 35 36 (EMF) #1 is 4.9320464e-36/(4/3pi(7e-7)^3)=3.388006e-17 kg/m^3, the 37 electron density of EMF(n) is 4.9320464e-36/(4/3pi(1e- 38 12)^3)=2146347.93531, the black hole planck particle density of EMF 28 is 39 40 (4.9320464e-36 x 9^28)/(4/3pi(1.6e-35)^3)=1.4848022e+96. 41 42 So, 43 44 45 y + 1 = 3.39e-17x 46 47 y + 28 = 1.48e+96x 48 49 50 & 51 52 y + z = 2,146,347.94x 53 54 55 y = 3.39e-17x - 1 -> 3.39e-17x - 1 = 1.48e+96x - 28 -> 3.39x - 1.48e+113x 56 = 10^17 - 2.8e+18 -> -1.48e+113x = -2.7e+18 -> x = 1.82e-95 57 58 59 60 Page 13 of 26 AUTHOR SUBMITTED MANUSCRIPT - JPhysA-111032
2:19:42 PM11/17/2018 Joseph R. Cassara Page 13 11/17/2018
1 2 3 4 y = 3.39e-17(1.8243243e-95) - 1 = ~ -1 5 6 z - ~1 = 3.9063533e-89 7 8 9 z = ~1, but it's really more like 1.0{...89..0’s...}4 etc…& that’s enough to 10 place it as its own elementary particle given that EMF 28 is exponentially 11 denser than EMF 1 by factors of 9. 12 13 14 If we take into account that the universe has expanded for 14 billion years 15 within 1/5th of, let’s say, the first billion plots (or 10,000 plots) in which our 16 17 cosmos resides within an ultra-antielectron...there would still be another 18 million billion years of expansion left before that ultra-antielectron reverses 19 its charge – initiating a Big Crunch that lasts for another million billion years 20 21 before the cosmic vacuum returns back to it’s current state. 22 23 Luckily, it’s not a billion plots, it’s more like 10^66 plots. So this process 24 will take much longer to occur. From here we can reverse a nearly endless 25 26 series of Big Bounces until we’ve decompressed the ultra-antielectron 27 habitat, in which the observable universe resides, into an ultra-antiphoton 28 artifact that exists in a total entropy state of countless antiphoton 29 30 constituents, both equal to plot 1. 31 32 The natural mechanisms which establish the position of view (POV) in 33 34 living entities must be definable by all of the laws and structures of nature. 35 As such this standing quantum wave manifested by the entanglement 36 molecule is describable in normal physics terms some familiar, yet some 37 38 will remain novel for a time. All are necessary for the instantiation of life in 39 this universe. Further, the phenomenon known as entanglement has been 40 known for some time but is poorly understood yet is fundamental to the 41 42 workings of nature writ large. The coherent sharing of state information is 43 the wiring between this space-time and the degrees of freedom (DOF) of the 44 metaverse. Some of these DOF defines metamatter. Metamatter is 45 46 hypothesized to be the metaverse phenomenon which enables the mobility of 47 individuality in this universe. It is how you came to be where you are right 48 now. It is not one's parents or any particular line of ancestry that instantiates 49 50 you in your current ecosystem. All have played what is a rather mundane 51 role in local host proliferation and evolution and contribute to one's fidelity 52 of teleportation and prospects for one's future life. Nonetheless, in nature 53 54 every living host, to one degree or another, does likewise. So how do the 55 56 57 58 59 60 AUTHOR SUBMITTED MANUSCRIPT - JPhysA-111032 Page 14 of 26
2:19:42 PM11/17/2018 Joseph R. Cassara Page 14 11/17/2018
1 2 3 4 most fundamental mechanisms of nature interact to make this amazing 5 phenomenon of nature possible? 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 The LINE hypothesis suggests; In this universe, Planck Holes (PH) are the 21 fundamental multidimensional degrees of freedom (DOF) of the fabric of 22 23 space-time which, under very specific conditions early in the universal 24 instantiation event (big bang), forged amalgams of information from the 25 information entering this universe to become particles of all types including 26 27 dark matter (DM) and its antiparticle (ADM). The effect known as mass is 28 induced in all baryonic matter by its interaction with the Higgs field which 29 produces a minimal PH dilation and thereby minimal gravitation. This 30 31 minimal PH bandwidth produced by normal matter is what causes the 32 information flowing out of this universe into the metaverse to accumulate 33 around affected PH. As water swirls around an open drain; information 34 35 accumulates around minimally dilated PH and thereby imbues mass to 36 particles of baryonic matter. This information trap around the PH is the most 37 fundamental mechanism which defines spontaneous symmetry breaking 38 39 within baryonic matter. 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 Further, and just as significantly, not unlike the most diminutive black hole 55 feeding effect imaginable, this information bottleneck creates a circulating 56 57 58 59 60 Page 15 of 26 AUTHOR SUBMITTED MANUSCRIPT - JPhysA-111032
2:19:42 PM11/17/2018 Joseph R. Cassara Page 15 11/17/2018
1 2 3 4 or spinning information channel around local PH. These spinning 5 information channels define the quantum states of all baryonic particles. 6 While within sufficiently close proximity, these rotating information 7 8 channels in normal matter strongly heterodyne to manifest a particular type 9 of strong entanglement to form the powerful and pivotal binding interaction, 10 the glue (ergo; Gluon) known as the strong nuclear force (SF). This 11 12 spherical, rotational information drain around baryonic particles, imbued by 13 the Higgs field, is effective on the nuclear level but originates on the sub- 14 nuclear PH level. Hence, the SF also acts as a sub-nuclear strong force to 15 16 bind the baryonic triad of quarks which form atomic particles. It is this 17 joining of circulating information channels around PH that manifest the 18 strong force which permit normal matter to congeal into atoms. Furthermore, 19 20 the weak nuclear force emerges from this mass defining feature as a sporadic 21 ejection of amalgams of information to manifest diminutive particles (alpha, 22 beta, neutrinos, etc.) in unstable atoms to produce a form of radioactive mass 23 24 decay. This decay is akin to the jets of information ejected by an overfeeding 25 black hole due to insufficient PH bandwidth. This effect also occurs in 26 overfed PH within particles essentially choking on accumulated information 27 28 within radioactive particles. 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 Additionally, this revolving or spinning PH channel of information, induced 44 by the Higgs fields’ interaction with baryonic particles, not only informs 45 particle mass and the mechanisms for binding and decay but also embodies 46 47 the aptly named fundamental defining degree of freedom known as spin. 48 Spin is the DOF which fundamentally manifests the electromagnetic 49 50 properties of baryonic matter. Consequently, not unlike the earth’s molten 51 circulating mantel, the quantity of information accumulated around the PH 52 (the core) in baryonic matter defines the property known as mass, while the 53 54 circulation of this information defines particle spin and its electromagnetic 55 properties known as charge. These common states of PH interaction by sub- 56 nuclear information channels within baryonic matter constitute the strong- 57 58 59 60 AUTHOR SUBMITTED MANUSCRIPT - JPhysA-111032 Page 16 of 26
2:19:42 PM11/17/2018 Joseph R. Cassara Page 16 11/17/2018
1 2 3 4 electro-weak interactions. In normal matter, some configurations of the 5 circulating information channels around PH positively (inflow) dilates the 6 PH to teleport mass-less amalgams of information into this space-time from 7 8 the metaverse in the form of the particles known as photons. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Emitted photons, once in the Higgs field, neither accumulate information 24 (mass) nor dilate the PH (gravitate) so they travel at the maximum universal 25 rendering speed, ergo; the speed of light. Photons will have a spin that is 26 27 informed by and are entangled with, the spin state of their parent PH regimes 28 from which they emerged. As the spin of a bullet is informed by features 29 indigenous to the rifle barrel from which it emerged, so too are the 30 31 amalgams of information called photons imbued (entangled) with the net 32 spin state of the circulating channel of information around the PH regime 33 from which it emerged. Consequently, photons are the particles that carry 34 35 electromagnetic radiation, light. Light is emitted when information enters 36 this space-time via positively dilated PH and defines the mechanism which 37 creates otherwise mysterious phenomena such as sonoluminescence and the 38 39 Casimir effect. These PH channels of information that flow within particles 40 manifest at or near the Planck scale in three-dimensional space-time. 41 Therefore, PH’s, like all fields, entirely pervade the occupying particles. On 42 43 this scale, the familiar macroscopic processes of burning, fission, fusion, 44 sonic stimulation, etc. which exposes these effects, are themselves universes 45 away. 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 Page 17 of 26 AUTHOR SUBMITTED MANUSCRIPT - JPhysA-111032
2:19:42 PM11/17/2018 Joseph R. Cassara Page 17 11/17/2018
1 2 3 4 5 6 The effect known as gravitation occurs as Higgs effected particles of dark 7 matter negatively (outflow), and more substantially, dilates local PH to a 8 9 greater bandwidth than occurs in normal matter. Hence, dark matter provides 10 a wider channel for information teleportation out of this space-time into the 11 metaverse with little or no information accumulation or circulation. 12 13 Therefore, no spontaneous symmetry breaking occurs when dark matter 14 interacts with the Higgs field; ergo; no mass or spin. This lack of circulating 15 16 information is the key to all of the differences between baryonic matter and 17 dark matter. This smooth flow of information into the PH dilated by dark 18 matter defines the presence of an enhanced gravitational effect as 19 20 information exits this space-time unperturbed. Yet, the absence of these 21 pivotal disruptions in information teleportation mandates that dark matter 22 will not express the other fundamental properties and forces of nature such 23 24 as mass and electromagnetism, or the strong force, or the weak force. Hence, 25 dark matter will be weakly interacting. By this separation of responsibilities, 26 it is hypothesized that baryonic matter is only imbued with significant 27 28 gravitation upon its sequestration of dark matter particles while both are 29 under the influence of the Higgs field. Ergo; matter radiates, and dark matter 30 gravitates. 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 The Higgs field is the attenuation field responsible for PH dilation which 46 47 produces spontaneous symmetry breaking in normal matter. The Higgs field 48 is itself another among many of the mostly anonymous dimensions (DOF) 49 predicted by string theory. The Higgs field exposes its own unique DOF that 50 51 interacts with different particles in different ways to produce the DOF which 52 define this space-time. These interactions manifest in this space-time as 53 mass and as the known fundamental forces and all of the phenomena of this 54 55 universe. Entanglement, Einstein’s spooky action, is one such phenomenon. 56 Quantum entanglement is the coherent sharing of state information which 57 58 59 60 AUTHOR SUBMITTED MANUSCRIPT - JPhysA-111032 Page 18 of 26
2:19:42 PM11/17/2018 Joseph R. Cassara Page 18 11/17/2018
1 2 3 4 occurs at a particular bandwidth of PH dilation. The PH bandwidth 5 appropriate for entanglement (space-time thru-flow), defines a different 6 DOF of the QE spectrum for information teleportation than that of 7 8 gravitation (space-time outflow) or radiation (space-time inflow). 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Entanglement occurs in baryonic matter as these circulating channels of 24 information in particles, while within adequate proximity, become weakly 25 heterodyned to entangle weakly and thereby monogamistically share a 26 27 common degree of freedom of the quantum entanglement spectrum, ergo; 28 the quantum entanglement frequency (QEF). This common QEF, is not 29 necessarily a frequency, and is monogamistically unique to each QE 30 31 connection with metamatter and defines the teleportation channel between 32 each of the entangled participants’. This shared state is nonlocal and persists 33 across any separation in this space-time. This entanglement manifests a 34 35 channel of appropriate bandwidth for two-way teleportation of information 36 as compared to the one-way, PH bandwidths which constitute both the 37 negative gravitational and positive photon radiating, PH states. Entangled 38 39 states may be induced synthetically in the laboratory or naturally, in among 40 other things, in living beings. This mechanism defines the LINE 41 hypothesized mechanism that instantiates the antenna-state known as the 42 43 position of view (POV) in living entities and enables the mobility of 44 individuality in this universe. 45 46 47 The behavior of the initial ultra-antiphoton’s compression will dictate the 48 behavior of change in trajectories for the lagrange points within it’s smaller 49 photon components (i.e., recurring fractal patterns). Ergo, using exascale 50 51 computing, culminated with the memory-processing of a memrister switch 52 and a cloud network large enough to store the entire model in virtuoso, we 53 could in theory follow this compressive behavior to its ultimate conclusion. 54 55 Viz a viz, plot n = current universe to the full capacity of whatever 56 processing power is available. 57 58 59 60 Page 19 of 26 AUTHOR SUBMITTED MANUSCRIPT - JPhysA-111032
2:19:42 PM11/17/2018 Joseph R. Cassara Page 19 11/17/2018
1 2 3 4 With petaFLOPS one may be able to simulate a cubic meter of the 5 observable universe at a time in full detail – or at full scale to mediocre 6 detail. This equation would be a working Theory of Everything that would 7 8 vastly extend the standard model beyond our comprehension. The ultimate 9 implication of such an equation would be yottaFLOPS, offered by the reality 10 of quantum entangled computer processing power: 11 12 13 The electron travels at 2,200 kilometers per second. Since the speed of light 14 for an ultra-antielectron is going to be 136.269299091 times faster than the 15 16 speed of that ultra EMF, all we need is the relative speed of light to combine 17 the velocities. Recall earlier c(f(n)) for an electron was found to be: 18 19 20 The electron most likely has a length of 10^-12 m, & λmax of about 4e-7 m 21 (visible spectrum is where electrons like to hide). 22 23 24 f(n)=(4e-7)(4π/3(1e-12)^3)=1.6755161e-42 25 26 f(x)=(4/(1.6755161e-42/(12π^(1/3))) 27 28 29 x=4.1957466e+43 m/s 30 31 32 4.1957466e+43, but remember we'd have to multiply this velocity by the 33 length of the electron, & divide that product the number of electrons (in a 34 16km copper wire) to account for the dilation of time: 35 36 37 V(sa)=(4.1957466e+43 x 1e-12)/(4396829672.16 x 16000 x 38 299792458)=1989431196 m/s about 2 billion meters per second. 39 40 41 The charge of transient-density is being carried by a blue-shifted (4e-7 m) 42 antiphoton aether in the earth's atmosphere. In space it's a normal 7e-7 m 43 44 redshift photon aether carrying the charge of a denser antiphoton/pseudo- 45 electron. The connection is the equivalence of acceleration with gravitation. 46 Relativity dictates the rate of a particle charge depends upon the density of 47 48 which medium is carrying it. 49 50 This will slightly shift the polarity of both photons despite a separation 51 52 between momenta in what was otherwise a pairing of charges. We've heard 53 of gravity waves, but not charge waves. 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 AUTHOR SUBMITTED MANUSCRIPT - JPhysA-111032 Page 20 of 26
2:19:42 PM11/17/2018 Joseph R. Cassara Page 20 11/17/2018
1 2 3 4 Moving in opposite directions, the velocities of the waves will get a boost 5 from the electrons' collective velocity as they are moving away from one 6 another; 1989431196 + 4400000 = 1993831196 m/s. 7 8 9 V(sa)/c=1993831196/2.998e+8=6.65053767845 times faster than the 10 speed of light. 11 12 13 We could also conclude from Fig. 4, when the Earth center’s relative speed 14 reach 0.9c, 15 16 the speed of spook action would still be 7 times higher than the speed of 17 light. 18 Therefore, we experimentally achieved the lower bound of the ‘spooky 19 20 action’ speed…a 12-hour continuous space-like Bell inequality violation 21 22 These tachyons travel at ~7 planck lengths per planck time in the vacuum. 23 24 25 In summary, relativity dictates the rate of a particle charge depends upon the 26 density of which medium is carrying it – note that the higgs field applies 27 even to natural photons, adhering to the theory of rainbow gravity. So there's 28 29 no need for bosonic mediums, in the conventional sense of the term, for 30 there to exist a force carrier for the length-contracted photon’s charge in this 31 framework of trans-relativity. 32 33 34 Imagine the nucleus as 3 protons composed of 9 quarks, 5 + & 4 -, w/the 35 charge of two protons turning the 3rd into a neutron. These quarks are 36 electrons with several times more mass into several times less volume than a 37 38 normal electron. This nucleus is submerged in the core of a dynamic 39 spherical electron fluid-body. The photon-beam being used to observe this is 40 larger in volume than the atom itself by several orders of magnitude and the 41 42 gravitational field generated by this beam of photons that the atom is 43 submerged in causes the electron fluid-body to gather into several small 44 45 spheres around the nucleus 7 times faster than c propagates at our scale 46 because there are 28 Elementary particles of +, neutral, or - charge each 47 denser than the last by factors of 9.. 48 49 50 “Imagine the nucleus as 3 protons composed of 9 quarks, 5 +” 51 52 Dark energy. 53 54 55 “ & 4 –“ 56 57 58 59 60 Page 21 of 26 AUTHOR SUBMITTED MANUSCRIPT - JPhysA-111032
2:19:42 PM11/17/2018 Joseph R. Cassara Page 21 11/17/2018
1 2 3 4 Dark matter. 5 6 The photon-beam being used to observe this is larger in volume than the 7 atom itself by several orders of magnitude and the gravitational field 8 9 generated by this beam of photons that the atom is submerged in causes the 10 electron fluid-body to gather into several small spheres around the nucleus 7 11 times faster than c propagates at our scale because there are 28 Elementary 12 13 particles of +, neutral, or - charge each denser than the last by factors of 9..” 14 15 Maxwell's Demon. 16 17 18 There does exist a Double-Demon, & a Triple-Demon, etc & it's turtles all 19 the way down. This is Scale Relativity. The photo-electrons permeate the 20 21 quarks, the quarks are constituents of the protons & neutrons about the 22 atomic nuclei of the atoms that compose the planets that inhabit the solar 23 systems which orbit the galactic nuclei of the clusters of galaxies that form 24 25 the super-clusters of galaxies embedded within the expanding cosmic 26 structures that make-up the vacuum radiation or zero-point energy contained 27 within the quantum foam that resides within yet even larger photo-electrons 28 29 that permeate the recurring cosmic fractal that is a quark, or a proton, within 30 atoms of an even greater super-cosmic structure. 31 32 28/9≈π & photon's V(c )=4/1.00000000...etc...544≈electron's 33 34 V(QE)=(28/6.65) x c. 35 36 (6.66666666666 x 4)+(1.0000000000000000000000444444)=27.6666666 37 38 39 π/27.666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666 40 66666666 41 42 43 =0.11355154169 44 45 So we have x=0.11355154169, that is apparently what comes after the 46 1.0000000000000...etc... & also it's the precise velocity of 47 48 QE=6.99755956941c now what is c? Well now you've got the electron 49 density which is 1 point...[89 0's]...11355154169 times greater than the 50 51 photon density which was 2.17645e-8|kgs(planck mass)| divided by 7e-7 m. 52 53 The LINE hypothesis suggests that time dilations are the relative differences 54 between local rendering rates of reality within a gravitational gradient. The 55 56 information teleportation that is gravitation, increases in closer proximity to 57 58 59 60 AUTHOR SUBMITTED MANUSCRIPT - JPhysA-111032 Page 22 of 26
2:19:42 PM11/17/2018 Joseph R. Cassara Page 22 11/17/2018
1 2 3 4 regions of more dilated Planck-Holes (PH) and decrease toward the less 5 dilated PH regions, i.e., of deep space away from sources of gravitation. 6 Why would a higher rate of information drain produced by a higher PH 7 8 dilation and bandwidth decrease the local rendering rate of reality? On local 9 scales, information drain, via the PH, produce a local information deficit 10 which is conserved by consuming local vulnerable information states. This 11 12 will manifest as a bending of a beam of light or the slowing of a ticking 13 clock. This occurs even in the presence of a single gravitating body (M1). 14 M1 hosts gravitation which although increasingly imperceptible at a 15 16 distance, reduces the information load on its hosting universe writ large in an 17 unbounded sphere of influence centered upon the PH dilation distribution 18 around M1’s center of gravitation. 19 20 21 Given the bulkiness of a room sized processor would be implied for a 1nm 22 ICD quantum entanglement processor, one could process practically as 23 24 much information as every human brain on the planet put together. 25 However, single-server AHD variations could only be high-end zettascale. 26 There'd still be exascale Iphones in which one could simulate the human 27 28 brain. A cybernetic brain transplant would be low-end zettascale, offering an 29 IQ to the person undergoing the transplant that would make William Sidis's 30 IQ infantile by comparison. 31 32 33 Citable Evidence 34 35 empty space ought not be really empty. We have two good reasons to think 36 37 so: first, electromagnetic signals behave undoubtedly as waves; since they 38 propagate even through intergalactic space, there must be some thing there 39 (everywhere), in which they do wave. Second, quantum theory predicts that 40 41 vacuum has physical effects, such as the Casimir effect, which is now 42 experimentally confirmed [1]. 43 44 45 46 47 Indeed, there are big problems with the dictum that everything we talk about 48 49 must be observable. While observing microscopic objects, an observer may 50 disturb them, even in a classical theory; moreover, in gravity theories, 51 observers may carry gravitational fields that disturb the system they are 52 53 looking at, so we cannot afford to make an observer infinitely heavy 54 (carrying large bags full of “data”, whose sheer weight gravitationally 55 disturbs the environment), but also not infinitely light (light particles do not 56 57 58 59 60 Page 23 of 26 AUTHOR SUBMITTED MANUSCRIPT - JPhysA-111032
2:19:42 PM11/17/2018 Joseph R. Cassara Page 23 11/17/2018
1 2 3 4 transmit large amounts of data at all), while, if the mass of an observer 5 would be “somewhere in between”, ." 6 7 8 9 The situation is somewhat different when we consider gravity and promote 10 the Lorentz violating tensors to dynamical objects. For example in an aether 11 12 theory, where Lorentz violation is described by a timelike four vector, the 13 four vector can twist in such a way that local superluminal propagation can 14 lead to energy-momentum flowing around closed paths [206]. However, 15 16 even classical general relativity admits solutions with closed time like 17 curves, so it is not clear that the situation is any worse with Lorentz 18 violation. Furthermore, note that in models where Lorentz violation is given 19 20 by coupling matter fields to a non-zero, timelike gradient of a scalar field, 21 the scalar field also acts as a time function on the spacetime. In such a case, 22 the spacetime must be stably causal (c.f. [272]) and there are no closed 23 24 timelike curves. This property also holds in Lorentz violating models with 25 vectors if the vector in a particular solution can be written as a non- 26 vanishing gradient of a scalar. Finally, we mention that in fact many 27 28 approaches to quantum gravity actually predict a failure of causality based 29 on a background metric [121] as in quantum gravity the notion of a 30 spacetime event is not necessarily well-defined [239]. A concrete realization 31 32 of this possibility is provided in Bose-Einstein condensate analogs of black 33 holes [40]. Here the low energy phonon excitations obey Lorentz invariance 34 and microcausality [270]. However, as one approaches a certain length scale 35 36 (the healing length of the condensate) the background metric description 37 breaks down and the low energy notion of microcausality no longer holds. 38 39 40 41 42 In the Bohmian view, nonlocality is even more conspicuous. The trajectory 43 of any one particle depends on what all the other particles described by the 44 same wave function are doing. And, critically, the wave function has no 45 46 geographic limits; it might, in principle, span the entire universe. Which 47 means that the universe is weirdly interdependent, even across vast stretches 48 of space. 49 50 51 52 The hole is quantum-mechanically unstable: It has no bound states. 53 54 Wormhole wave functions must eventually leak to large radii. This suggests 55 56 57 58 59 60 AUTHOR SUBMITTED MANUSCRIPT - JPhysA-111032 Page 24 of 26
2:19:42 PM11/17/2018 Joseph R. Cassara Page 24 11/17/2018
1 2 3 4 that stability considerations along these lines may place strong constraints on 5 the nature and even the existence of spacetime foam. 6 7 8 9 In invariant set theory, the form of the Bell Inequality whose violation would 10 be inconsistent with realism and local causality is undefined, and the form of 11 12 the inequality that it violated experimentally is not even gp-approximately 13 close to the form needed to rule out local realism (54) [21]. A key element in 14 demonstrating this result derives from the fact that experimenters cannot in 15 16 principle shield their apparatuses from the uncontrollable ubiquitous 17 gravitational waves that fill space-time. 18 19 20 21 A finite non-classical framework for physical theory is described which 22 23 challenges the conclusion that the Bell Inequality has been shown to have 24 been violated experimentally, even approximately. This framework 25 postulates the universe as a deterministic locally causal system evolving on a 26 27 measure-zero fractal-like geometry IU in cosmological state space. 28 Consistent with the assumed primacy of IU , and p-adic number theory, a 29 non-Euclidean (and hence non-classical) metric gp is defined on 30 31 cosmological state space, where p is a large but finite Pythagorean prime. 32 Using numbertheoretic properties of spherical triangles, the inequalities 33 violated experimentally are shown to be gp-distant from the CHSH 34 35 inequality, whose violation would rule out local realism. This result fails in 36 the singular limit p = ∞, at which gp is Euclidean. Broader implications are 37 discussed. 38 39 40 41 This optical pumping scenario is implicitly based on the erroneous quantum 42 43 mechanical “myth” that quantum “jumps” are instantaneous. In reality 44 transitions between atomic levels take very, very long times, about 10 45 million times longer than the oscillating period of the electromagnetic 46 47 radiation that drives the excitation. 48 49 50 51 52 Ultimately, these possibilities can be mathematically described and given a 53 geometry. And in this geometry, each photon pathway is a continuous non- 54 55 differentiable trajectory, making the geometry itself fractal, if we recall from 56 the previous article that fractal math is continuous non-differential math. 57 58 59 60 Page 25 of 26 AUTHOR SUBMITTED MANUSCRIPT - JPhysA-111032
2:19:42 PM11/17/2018 Joseph R. Cassara Page 25 11/17/2018
1 2 3 4 These photon trajectories can be described by a fractal dimension that jumps 5 from nonfractal behaviour (whole integer dimensions; regular spacetime) at 6 large everyday scales to fractal behaviour (a dimension that may exist in 7 8 between whole integers) at the quantum scale of physics. 9 10 11 12 13 We show that, when only the time direction is fractal, sea turtles swim at a 14 faster speed than in an ordinary world, while they swim at a slower speed if 15 only the spatial directions are fractal. The latter type of geometry is the one 16 17 most commonly found in quantum gravity. For time-like fractals, relativistic 18 objects can exceed the speed of light, but strongly so only if their size is 19 20 smaller than the range of particle-physics interactions 21 22 23 24 25 Under general assumptions, we discover that the quantum spacetime on 26 27 which the field propagates can be replaced by a classical spacetime, whose 28 metric depends explicitly on the energy of the field: as shown by an analysis 29 of dispersion relations, quanta of different energy propagate on different 30 31 metrics, similar to photons in a refractive material (hence the name 32 “rainbow” used in the literature) 33 34 35 36 Unlike the universe described by General Relativity-which has three 37 dimensions of space and one of time-the braneworld universe contains an 38 extra fourth dimension of space for a total of five dimensions. 39 40 41 42 43 black branes (BHs with plane-symmetric horizon) 44 45 46 47 48 49 black holes in this framework are hotter, have fewer degrees of freedom and 50 decay faster compared to black holes in the Hawking picture 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 AUTHOR SUBMITTED MANUSCRIPT - JPhysA-111032 Page 26 of 26
2:19:42 PM11/17/2018 Joseph R. Cassara Page 26 11/17/2018
1 2 3 4 In the limit that we treat the near-horizon region of a large black hole as 5 Rindler space, we formulate the restriction in terms of an upper bound on the 6 relative boost of any two observers, that are at rest with respect to different 7 8 parts of a time slice 9 10 11 12 13 The kinematics refer for example to photon or particle trajectories and these 14 15 are determined by the system’s space-time metric. Whether the curved 16 spacetime metric is the result of a gravitational field or of a flowing medium 17 becomes irrelevant when the analysis is restricted to the description of wave 18 19 propagation and evolution in this flowing medium: the kinematics are 20 identical and the analogy is robust. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60