You are on page 1of 6

Orai Application to enhanced Language Learning in Speaking Skill

The observation at SMAN 1 Jerowaru Lombok Timur Nusa Tenggara Barat

Muh. Mahrup Zainuddin Sabri.


youfsukeraje@gmail.com

08312980283

UAD
Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
ABSTRACT
This research is aimed aims to find out The Use of Orai Application as Technology- to
enhanced Language Learning in Speaking Skill: The observation at SMAN 1 Jerowaru.
The research was Classroom Action Research; the process of Classroom Action Research
was conducted in two cycles. There were two stages in each cycle. They were planning
stage, implementation stage, observing stage, and reflecting stage. This research involved
25 students of the second grade of SMAN 1 Jerowaru. The data were qualitative in nature
and supported by those of quantitative. The data were obtained by data obtained from by
teaching-learning process in speaking. Meanwhile the quantitative data were obtained by
conducting a speaking test. The research finding showed that use ORAI application was
proved to be significantly positively to improve student score in speaking. ORAI
application is kind of application The earliest known program designed for educational
purposes that were dealing with human language Page's ‘Project Essay Grade' (PEG),
developed as early as 1966 (Borchardt 1994). Preliminary showed before used ORAI was
56%. In preliminary showed student still got a lower score from the criteria minimum.
And after using ORAI application, The researcher got improvement by the speaking test
in the first cycle was 76%. To students, ORAI application could increase students'
speaking skill in made simple describe or reading a sentence, it can conclude ORAI
application was improved for student learning speaking skill in SMAN 1 jerowaru. It can
be concluded that ORAI application can improve students learning skill in SMAN 1
Jerowaru.

Key Words: Orai application, speaking skill


A. Background of the Study language learning as well as the
Speaking is a tool or media effectiveness of their English
by means of communication, course on the basis of how much
there are two kinds of language they feel they have improved in
use to communicate with others their spoken language
such as verbal and nonverbal. proficiency.
Verbal language means
Brown (2003: 151) speaking
conventional way used in
is a productive skill that can be
speaking. By mastering
directly and empirically
speaking, we can convey ideas,
observed, those observations are
arguments, and messages which
invariably colored by the
lie in the structure and meaning
accuracy and effectiveness of a
of all languages. However, both
test-takers listening skill, which
of written and spoken differs
necessarily compromises the
from written language has fewer
reliability and validity of an oral
full of sentences and also less
production test.
formal in the used of
vocabulary. Luoma S. (2004: 1) According to Richard
(2008: 20), the mastery of
Based on the researcher's speaking skill in English are
observation at SMAN 1 priorities for many second-
Jerowaru, the researcher found language or foreign-language
that the students are was worry learners. Consequently, learners
and got difficulty how to often evaluate their success in
pronounce what they want to language learning as well as the
deliver. Beside that student effectiveness of their English
confuse to spell world in course on the basis of how much
English, students only listen to they feel they have improved in
explanations from teachers and their spoken language
do not provide example and proficiency.
opportunities for students to try
their speaking are good or not. 2. ORAI Application

B. REVIEW OF RELATED ORAI application is a kind


LITERATURE of application that can be
1. Speaking downloaded into the
Smartphone, where the
According to Richard application is very useful in
(2008: 20), the mastery of implementing learning in
speaking skill in English is a English. this application helps
priority for many second- students to better understand the
language or foreign-language extent to which students speak
learners. Consequently, learners in English. this application is
often evaluate their success in also able to hear with a clear
voice that is issued in English curriculum development, school
and directly can be in providing development, new strategy, new
value, shortcomings, and methods and the development of
advantages of students in other teaching skills in English.
English. the nature of classroom action
research is reflective by taking
Here are procedures of teaching certain actions in order to
by using ORAI application improve the practice of learning
in the classroom and more
The researcher installs the
professional.
application of ORAI.

Researchers will give some 2. Population and Sample


illustrations about how to use According to Miller
(2005: 53), a population is
the application
defined as a collection of all
The researcher will ask the the possible object, people or
student to come forward and ask scores of a particular type.
them to try the application. Based on the statement, the
population of this researcher
The student will try to speak are 25 students' of the second
English by using application and grade of SMAN 1 Jerowaru
will be guided by the researcher. in academic year 2017/2018.
And the sample consists of 25
C. RESEARCH METHOD students. According to
1. Research Design Kothari (2004: 55), a
In this research, the researcher complete enumeration of all
uses Classroom Action Research items in the population is
(CAR). CAR is a research that known as a census inquiry. In
examines some ideas in practice this research employed
to change something in order to second grade of SMAN 1
get the real research. According Jerowaru with total 25
to Costello (200: 8) the 4 cycles
students as a sample.
in classroom action research
1. Research Instrument
such as planning, action,
In this research, researchers
observation and reflecting.
were already installed
Classroom Action Research
monologue for speaking
(PTK) is an Action Research
instruments in the ORAI
conducted by teachers or
application. the monologue
researchers in the classroom.
instrument in application varies
which is a series of action-
from the basic to the top level.
research in order to solve
and in this research, researchers
problems until solved. Forms of
adjusted the monologue based
reflective research by
on the class, semester, and
researchers themselves, the
curriculum in use.
results can be used as a tool for
Speaking Tests interpreting as follow:

To find out the use of ORAI Strongly Agree 5


Agree 4
applications, researchers
Uncertain 3
provided oral tests contained in Disagree 2
the ORAI application itself Strongly Disagree 1
which is monologues and After tabulating all answers, the
recording as a complementary
researcher calculates the
instrument. Test scores and
notes are very subjective and percentage of the strength of the
researchers divide as five response by using formula as
criteria in speech, which is a
follow (Sudijono, 2008: 43):
score of pronunciation,
grammar, vocabulary, fluency P=
and understanding.
Totalofagreeandstronglyagreeanswer
X 100
2. Technique of Data Totalofidealscores
Analysis Percentage 0%-25%
Method of analyzing used
percentage (per cent) for Percentage 26%-50%
speaking percentage is a
Percentage 51%-75%
technique collecting the data
with given some instrument or Percentage 76%-100% Very Str
material for the student. In this
research, the percentage will be
used to support the main data by
D. Research Finding
using description method which
Research Finding
involves the description and
interpretation of the data. The research finding the
researcher found by using Orai
F application that there is
P=
X 100 significant positively to improve
N
student score in speaking skill. It
Where: can proved Orai application is
P = the percentage kind of application is kind of
application cal help every
F = frequency of the percentage
student to practice their
is being calculated speaking in every situation.
N = Number of cases Student can be more interactive
and active in the class and help
Next, based on the result of the
teacher to be more easily to
percentage of the students’ control the practice and giving
speaking skill, the researcher the direction for student. The
researcher proved before used
also used the criterion of score
Orai was 56%. The student still
got lower score because all the
strategy and method used before To English teacher
is not really influence for The teacher should be more
student learning in speaking. creative to help student in
And after using Orai using media or strategy that
application, The researcher got students do not feel bored in
improvement by the speaking the class.
test in the first cycle was 76%. It
is because the student very To the students
interesting with the application,
student can repeat and use that The students become more
application in their home. confident in their own
Student can correct them self by abilities, and they can
using the application and make motivate themselves to
new innovation in learning resolve the difficult situation
speaking. in learning speaking by using
application.
E. Conclusion
The conclusion of this research To the next researcher
was based on the results of the The researcher hoped that
data analyzed as the answer of other researchers had to find
the research question. The a more effective strategy
researcher finally comes into the application for making
conclusions as follows: student interesting in
In this chapter the researcher learning speaking English.
was explained by using orai
application is not good
presentation in first cycle. But
after using the application the
researcher got the improvement
score from the student.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
It means that meaning that, oari
application has many priorities Brown, H. Douglas. 2001. Teaching by
effect towards students in Principle. Second Edition. San
English speaking skill at SMAN Francisco: San Francisco University.
1. Jerowaru in academic Brown, H. Douglas. 2004. Language
2017/2018. The researcher Assessment Principle and Classroom
would like to offer some Practices. San Francisco state
suggestions to the teachers, University.
students and next
researchers:
Costello, 2003, effective action reserch Luoma. 2004. Assessing Speaking
New York, NY 10038 (Cambridge Language).

Caroline T. 2003. Practical English Miller, Steve. 2005. Experimental


Language Teaching Young Learners. Design and Statistic. Second Edition.
New York: Mc. Graw. Hill. London and New York: Rutledge.

Kothari, C. R. 2004. Research Richards. 2008. Teaching-Listening-


Methodology. Methods and Techniques Speaking Cambridge university press.
2nd Revised Edition. new age
International Publishers.

You might also like